English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 110944/141864 (78%)
Visitors : 47883447      Online Users : 636
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 文學院 > 中國文學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/80683


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/80683


    Title: 荀子對孔子思想的繼承與發揚──儒家道統的反思及其重建
    Other Titles: The Thought of Xunzi Succeed to Confucius: The Reflection and Reconstruction of Confucian Orthodoxy
    Authors: 曾暐傑
    TSENG, Wei-Chieh
    Contributors: 中文系
    Keywords: 孔子;荀子;孟子;儒家道统;性恶;天人之分;天道
    Confucius;Xunzi;Mencius;Confucian orthodoxy, the human nature is sinful;the division of heaven and men;way of heaven
    Date: 2015-08
    Issue Date: 2016-01-21 14:47:46 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 唐宋以来视荀子为歧出，认为孔孟一系才是正宗。然跳脱如此框架，破除“以孟解孔”“以孟批荀”的
    框架，重新检视孔子不言之“性”与“天道”，可以发现荀子的“性恶论”与“天人之分”其实与孔子的观点一脉相承。
    而《荀子》一书之所以集中论述“性恶”与“天人之分”的思维，正是为批驳孟子悖离传统———擅改“性”之内涵并过
    度强调“天人合一”的内在思维，欲捍卫儒家之正统而不得不做出的批判。这不仅不是儒学之歧途，反倒反映荀子
    作为儒学正宗的合理性。只要能够正确理解“性恶”是在“礼义”脉络下的“自然人性论”；而“天人之分”是“合中有
    分”的天人关系表述，孔荀学说便无磗格。由此便可以重构儒学道统，建立“孔荀”范式。
    Scholar usually think Xunzi is diversification in Confucian from Tang and Song dynasty, but Mencius is the
    orthodox Confucian who succeeds to Confucius. If we don’t interpret Confucius via Mencius and criticize Xunzi on a basis of
    Mencius thinking, we will find the thought of Xunzi is really succeed to Confucius but not the apostate thinker in Confucian. The
    thought of human nature is sinful in Xunzi is from the aspect of human nature in Confucius. The thought of the division of heaven
    and men in Xunzi is also from Confucius’ thinking about heaven. The thought of human nature is sinful and the division of
    heaven and men what look like not similar to the thought of Confucius, just because he wants to point out and criticizes the
    thought of Mencius is diversification in Confucain. In the conclusion, we can say the thought of Xunzi is really succession to
    Confucius and he is the orthodox scholar in Confucian.
    Relation: 臨沂大學學報, Vol.37, No.4, pp.25-30
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[中國文學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    408933.pdf293KbAdobe PDF21200View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback