English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 111316/142225 (78%)
造訪人次 : 48379477      線上人數 : 485
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 傳播學院 > 新聞學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/85663
    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/85663


    題名: 從科學到新聞-由基因新聞看科學與新聞的差距
    作者: 鄭宇君
    Cheng, Yu Chung
    貢獻者: 鍾蔚文
    鄭宇君
    Cheng, Yu Chung
    關鍵詞: 科學新聞
    基因
    隱喻
    論述分析
    社會脈絡
    日期: 1998
    上傳時間: 2016-04-20 14:23:07 (UTC+8)
    摘要:   過去對科學新聞的研究多把焦點放在個人因素上,認為記者或編輯的科學知識不足是造成科學新聞意義偏差的主要原因。但本研究認為知識從科學到新聞的差距不僅是個人因素造成,並與科學新聞產製的社會脈絡有關,而社會脈絡對科學新聞的影響更會藉由語言呈現反映在文本表現上。
    參考文獻: 《大美百科全書》 (1990),第12冊,106-112頁。台北:光復書局。
    《簡明大英百科全書》 (1988),第8冊,67-68,74-77頁。台北:中華書局。
    朱元鴻 (1998):
    〈告別式已結束:我們活在不同的世界嗎?-紀念孔恩〉,《台灣社會學研究》,2:123-172。
    李學勇 譯 (1988):《族群遺傳學與生物演化》。台北:國立編譯館。
    李國偉 (1998.7.12):〈記者創造癌症救星,科學新聞也變八卦〉,《新新聞》,592:82-83。
    林崇熙 (1998a):〈常態科學的政治經濟學〉,《當代》,132:46-61。
    ------ (1998b):〈從革命到被革命-科學家何以不願科學研究來研究科學〉,《當代》,126:18-33。
    周成功 (1996):〈序:一場追獵致病基因的聖戰〉,《基因聖戰》。台北:天下文化。
    ------ (1997):〈導讀:人類基因組解讀計劃〉,《DNA的語言》。台北:天下文化。
    科學月刊 (1990):〈科學與傳播專輯〉,《科學月刊》,21(8):601-624。
    洪漢鼎 (1992):《語言學的轉向》。台北:遠流。
    胡湘玲 (1994):《科技專家與社會溝通-台灣核四爭議13年的科學文化簡史》。清大歷史所科學史組碩士論文。
    迷 走 (1998):〈怪物、女人與生物科技-評「異形4:浴火重生」〉,《醫望》,25:81-88。
    翁秀琪 (1998):〈批判語言學、在地權力觀和新聞文本分析〉,《新聞學研究》,57:97-126。
    孫曼蘋 (1976):《我國報紙科學新聞的正確性研究》。政大新聞所碩士論文。
    陳信行 (1997):〈被人類建構出的真理-窺視「科學戰爭」的熱鬧與門道〉,《破週報》,97/4/17、97/5/1、97/5/16。
    莫名 (1999.4.21):〈請問曹院士:這樣做,對嗎?-對曹安邦院士所謂的「研發抗癌新藥成功的質疑」〉,《新新聞週報》,633:106-107。
    張瓊方 (1997年8月):〈第四代醫學革命-基因治療〉,《光華》,106-114。
    國立編譯館 譯 (1988):《DNA世紀之回顧-遺傳物質構造及機能的研究發展史》。台北:徐氏基金會。
    國家科學委員會 (1998):《行政院國家科學委員會 86年年報》,1-5頁。
    馮建三 (1995):〈科技新聞是意識型態嗎?〉,《新聞學研究》,50:41-59。
    傅大為 (1992):〈「政治性」的科學哲學如何可能?〉,《異時空裡的知識追逐-科學史與科學哲學論文集》,157-211。台北:東大。
    ------ (1998):〈「兩種文化」的迷惑與終結〉,《當代》,132:34-41。
    潘柏滔 (1997):《遺傳工程與人的未來》。台北:雅歌。
    謝瀛春 (1991):《科學新聞的傳播》。台北:黎明。
    韓尚平 (1993):〈美國及英國科技報導及科學傳播對我國的啟示〉,《第二屆中華民國傑出新聞人員研究獎:得獎人研習考察報告》,11-47。台北:中華民國新聞評議會。
    Bazerman, C. (1983). Scientific writing as a social act:A review of the literature of the sociology of science. In P. V. Anderson et al. (Eds.) (1983). New Essays in Technical and Scientific Communication:Research, Theory, Practice, 156-184. New York:Baywood Publishing Company.
    ------ (1998). Emerging perspectives on many dimensions of scientific discourse. In J. R. Martin & Robert Veel (Eds.) (1998). Reading Science:Critical and Functional Perspectives on Discourses of Science, 15-28. London & New York:Routledge.
    Berger, Arthur A. (1997). Narratives in Popular Culture, Media, and Everyday Life. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi:SAGE.
    Berger, P. L. & T. Luckmann (1967). The Social Construction of Reality. 鄒理民 譯(1994):《知識社會學:社會實體的建構》。台北:巨流。
    Bird, S. E. & R.W. Dardenne (1988). Myth chronicle, and story:Exploring the narrative qualities of news. In J. W. Carey (ed.) (1988). Media, Myths, and Narratives:Television and the Press. 47-86. Newbury Park, Beverly Hill, London, New Delhi:SAGE.
    Bishop, J. E. & M. Waldholz. (1990). Genome:The Story of the Most Astonishing Scientific Adventure of Our Time-The Attempt to Map All the Genes in the Human Body. 楊玉齡 譯 (1996):《基因聖戰:擺脫遺傳的宿命》。台北:天下文化。
    Brooks, B. S. et al.. News Reporting and Writing. 李利國 黃淑敏 譯 (1995):《當代新聞採訪與寫作》。台北:周知文化。
    Burkett, W. (1986). News Reporting:Science, Medicine and High Technology. The Iowa State University Press.
    Dornan, C. (1990). Some problems in conceptualizing the issue of "science and media", Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 7(1):48-71.
    Dunwoody, S. (1986). The scientist as source. In S. M. Friedman, S. Dunwoody & C. L. Rogers (Eds.) (1986). Scientists and Journalists:Reporting Science as News, 3-16. New York:Free Press.
    Fairclough, N. (1995). Media Discourse. London, New York, Sydney, Auckland:Edward Arnold.
    Flatow, I. et al. (1986). What makes a good science story?-Panel discussion with Ira Flatow, Deniens S. O`Leary, Joann E. Rodgers, Stephen H. Schneider, and roger J. Trotter. In S. M. Friedman, S. Dunwoody & C. L. Rogers (Eds.) (1986). Scientists and Journalists:Reporting Science as News, 103-115. New York:Free Press.
    Foucault, M. (1972). The Archaeology of Knowledge. New York:Pentheon Books.
    Foss, S. K. (1995). Metaphoric criticism, Rhetorical Criticism:Exploration & Practice, 2nd Edition. Waveland Press.
    Friedman, S. M. (1986). The journalist`s world. In S. M. Friedman, S. Dunwoody & C. L. Rogers (Eds.) (1986). Scientists and Journalists:Reporting Science as News, 17-41. New York:Free Press.
    Friedman, S. M., S. Dunwoody & C. L. Rogers (Eds.) (1986).
    Scientists and Journalists:Reporting Science as News. New York:Free Press.
    Gannon, R. (1991) Introduction, In R. Gannon (Ed.) (1991). Best Science Writing:Readings and Insights. Phoenix:Oryx Press
    Gilbert, G. N. & M. Mulkay (1984). Opening Pandora`s Box:A Sociological Analysis of Scientific Discourse. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
    Goodwell, R. (1986). How to kill a controversy:The case of recombinant DNA. In S. M. Friedman, S. Dunwoody & C. L. Rogers (Eds.) (1986). Scientists and Journalists:Reporting Science as News, 170-181. New York:Free Press
    Halliday, M. A. K. (1989). Functions of language, Language, Context, and Text, 15-28.
    Halliday, M. A. K. & J. R. Martin (1993). Writing Science:Literacy and Discursive Power. Pittsburgh:University of Pittsburgh Press.
    Harre, R. (1994). Some narrative conventions of scientific discourse. In C. Nash (Ed.). (1994). Narrative in Culture:The Uses of Storytelling in the Sciences, Philosophy, and Literature, 2nd Edition, 81-101. London & New York:Routledge.
    Holmes, F. L. (1991). Argument and narrative in scientific writing. In Peter Dear (ed.) (1991). The Literary Structure of Scientific Argument:Historical Studies, 164-181. Philadelphia:University of Pennsylvania Press.
    Jarvie, I. C. (1990). Media representation and philosophical representations of science, Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 7(1):72-79.
    Krieghbaum, H.(1967). Science and Mass Media. 謝瀛春 譯 (1994):《科學與大眾媒介》。台北:遠流。
    Kuhn, T. S.. ([1962],1972)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 程樹德 傅大為 王道還 錢永德 譯 (1994):《科學革命的結構》。台北:遠流。
    ------ (1993). Metaphor in science. In A. Ortony (ed.) (1993). Metaphor and Thought, 2nd Edition, 533-542. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
    Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago & London:University of Chicago Press.
    Latour,B. (1987). Science in Action. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
    Latour,B. & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. Beverly Hills:SAGE.
    Lievrouw, L. A. (1990). Communication and the Social Representation of Scientific Knowledge , Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 7(1):1-10.
    Martin J. R. (1998). Discourse of science:Recontextualisation, genesis, intertextuality and hegemony. In J. R. Martin & Robert Veel (Eds.) (1998). Reading Science:Critical and Functional Perspectives on Discourses of Science, 3-14. London & New York:Routledge.
    Martin, J. R. & Robert Veel (Eds.) (1998). Reading Science:Critical and Functional Perspectives on Discourses of Science, 3-14. London & New York:Routledge.
    Mayer, R. E. (1993). The instructive metaphor:Metaphoric aids to students` understanding of science. In A. Ortony (ed.) (1993). Metaphor and Thought, 2nd Edition, 561-578. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press
    Myers, Greg (1991). Lexical cohesion and specialized knowledge in science and popular science texts, Discourse Processes, 14(1):1-26.
    ------ (1994). Making a discovery:Narratives of split genes. In C. Nash (Ed.). (1994). Narrative in Culture:The Uses of Storytelling in the Sciences, Philosophy, and Literature, 2nd Edition, 102-126. London & New York:Routledge.
    Mulkay, M (1991). Sociology of Science. Milton Keynes, Philadelphia:Open University Press.
    Nelkin, D. (1987). Selling Science:How the Press Covers Science and Technology. New York:W H Freeman & Co.
    Ortony, A. (1993). Metaphor, language, and thought. In A. Ortony (ed.) (1993). Metaphor and Thought, 2nd Edition, 1-16. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
    Petrie, H. G. & R. S. Oshlag (1993). Metaphor and learning. In A. Ortony (ed.) (1993). Metaphor and Thought, 2nd Edition, 579-609. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
    Pollack, R. (1994). Signs of Life:The Language and Meanings of DNA. 楊玉齡 譯 周成功 審訂 (1997):《DNA的語言:給下一輪太平盛世的基因備忘錄》。台北:天下文化。
    Potter, J. (1996). Representing Reality. London, Thousand, New Delhi:SAGE.
    Schudson, M. (1978). Discovering the News:A Social History of American Newspapers. 何穎怡 譯 (1993):《探索新聞》。台北:遠流。
    Schutz, A. ([1962],1990). On multiple realities, Collected Paper Vol.1:The Problems of Social Reality,207-259. M. Natanson ed Dordrecht /Boston/ London:Kluwer Academic Publishers. 盧嵐蘭 譯 (1992):〈多重現實〉,《舒茲論文集(第一冊)》:235-287。台北:桂冠。
    Science (1998). C. elegans:Sequence to Biology,Science 282,11 December 1998,1972-1974,2012-2045。
    Starr, C. & R.Taggart (1992). Biology:the Unity and Diversity of Life. Belmont:Wadsworth.
    White, R. M. (1996). The impossibility of metaphorical senses, The Structure of Metaphor, 169-203. Oxford:Blackwell Publishers.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    新聞學系
    85451018
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002001583
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[新聞學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    index.html0KbHTML2336檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋