| Reference: | 一﹒中文部分
王榮春。 (民83)。 人際親疏與目標設定對團體中個人工作及團體工作努力分配的影響。 國立政治大學心理研究所碩士論文。
朱令娟。 (民.77)。 酬賞型態、角色重要性及工作變異性對社會閒散之影響。 國立政治大學心理研究所碩士論文。
吳秀美。 (民84)。 社會開散或社會補償:勞力辯正的作用。 私立中原大學心理學研究所碩士論文。
吳靜吉、高泉豐、王敬仁、丁興祥。(民70)。 拓弄思語文創造思考測驗(乙式)指導及研究手冊。 台北市，遠流出版社。
李美枝(1993 )。從有關公平判斷的研究結果看中國人之人己關係的界限。 本土心理學研究， 1, 267-300 。
林幸台、王木榮。 (民76)。 威廉斯創造力測驗指導手冊。 台北市，心理出版社。
用佩芬。 (民83)。 人際親疏度及工作次數對團體中個人工作表現的影響。 國立政治大學心理研究所碩士論文。
張國義、陳皎眉。 (民84) 。不同的激勵策略對社會閒散之影響。中華心理學刊， 37(1) , 71-81 。
許正聖。(民83)。 中國人的內團體偏私行為?從「關係」角度探討社會認同理論。 國立政治大學心理研究所
碩士論文。
陳品華。 (民.82)。 人際親疏度，情境後果對差序性反應的影響?以公正知覺為例。 國立政治大學心理研究所
碩士論文。
程懷琳。(民77) 。工作類型、工作能力及酬賞分配方式對團體中個人玉作表現的影響。 國立政治大學心理研
究所碩士論文。
費孝通。 (1974) 。差序格局。 見費孝通著:鄉土中國，頁22-30 。上海:觀察社。
黃光國(1985)。 人情與面子:中國人的權力遊戲。 見楊國書主編:中國人的心理，頁289-318 。台北:桂冠圖書公司。
黃光國。 (民80) 。中國人的權力遊戲。 台北市:巨流圖書公司。
黃靜怡。 (民83)。 團體成員間的關係及個人動機對社會因境中合作行為的影響。 國立政治大學心理研究所碩士論文。
楊國樞(1993)。 中國人的社會取向:社會互動的觀點。見楊國樞、余安邦主編:中國人的心理與社會心理
念及方法篇(一九九二) ，頁87-142 。台北:桂冠圖書公司。
鄭美芳。(民77) 。社會助長與社會閒散之比較研究。 國立政治大學心理研究所碩士論文。
二、英文部分
Allport, F.R. (1920). The influence of the group upon association and thought. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 3, 159 - 182 .
Baron, R.S. (1986). Distraction-conflict theory: Progress
and problems. Advances in Experiemntal Social Psychology,
12, 1-40.
Bartis, S., Harkins, S.G., & Szymanski, K. (1988).
Evaluation and performance: A two-edged knife. Personality
and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14(2),242-251.
Brickner, M.A., Harkins, S.G., & Ostrom, T.M. (1986).
Effects of Personal involvement: Thought-provoking
implications for social loafing. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 51, 763-769.
Burwitz, L., & Newell, K.M. (1972). The effects of the
mere presence of co actors on learning a motor skill.
Journal of Motor Behavior, 4, 99-102.
Cannent, D. W. (1970). Rate of simple moter responding
as a function of coaction, competition, and sex the participants. PsychollOlnic Science, 12, 340-341.
Clark, M.S. (1981). Noncompariability of benefits gjven
and received: A cue to the existence of friendship. Social
Psychology Quarterly, 44, 375-381.
Clark, M. S. (1984). Reocrd keeping in two types fo relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
47, 549-557.
Clark, M. S., & Mills, J. (1979). Interpersonal attraction
· In exchange and communal relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 12-24.
Clark, M.S., Powell, M.C., & Mills, J. (1986). Keeping
track of needs in communal exchange relationships.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, g,333-338.
Clark, M.S., Quellette, R., Powell, M.C., & Milberg, S.
(1987). Recipient`s mood, relationship type, and helping.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53,94-103.
Cottrell, N.B. (1972). Social facilitation. In C.G.
McClintock (Ed.), Experimental Social Psychology.
New York: Holt.
Dashiell, J.F. (1930). An experiemntal analysis of some
group effects. Joural of Abnormal and Social Psychology,
25, 190-199.
Deaux, K., & Major, B. (1987). Putting gender into context:
An interactive model of gender-related behavior.
Psycholo gical Review, 94-3, 369-389.
Ellemers, N., Van Knippenberg, A., & Wilke, H. (1990).
· The influence of permeability of group boundaries and
stability of group status on strategies of individual mobility and social change. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 233-246.
Ellemers, N., Van Knippenberg, A., de Vries, N.K., &
Wilke, H. (1988). Social identification and permeability
of group boundaries. European Journal of Social
Psychology,18, 497-513.
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison process.
Human Relations, 7, 117 -140.
Goethals, G., & Darley, J. (1987). Social companson
theory: Self-evaluation and group life. In B. Mullen &
G.R. Geothals(Eds.), Theories of group behavior (pp.
21-47). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Harcum, E.R., & Badura, L.L. (1990). Social Loafing as a
response to an appraisal of appropriate effort. Journal
of Psychology, 124,629-637.
Harkins, S.G., & - Jackson, J.M. (1985). The role of
evaluation in eliminating social loafing. Personality
and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 575-584.
Harkins, S.G., & Petty, R. E. (1982). Effects of task difficult and task uniqueness on social loafing. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology:, 43, 1214-1229.
Harkins, S.G., & Szymanski, K. (1988). Scialloafing and
self-evaluation with an objective standard. Journal of
Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 354-365.
Harkins, S.G., & Szymanski, K. (1989) . Social loafing
group evaluation . Journal of Personality: and Social
Psychology, 56, 934-941.
Harkins, S.G., Latane`, B., & Williams, K. (1980). Social
loafing: allocating effort or taking it easy? Journal of
Experimental Social Psychology:, lQ(5), 457 -465.
Heckhausen, H. (1977). Achievement motivation and its `
constructs: A cognitive model. Motivation and Emotion,
1, 283-329.
Holmes, J.G., & Rempel, J.K. (1989) .. Trust in close relationships. In C.Hendrick (Ed .), Close relationships
(pp. 187-220). Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
Hui, C.H., & Triandis, H.C. (1991). Cultural differences
in reward allocation: Is collectivism the explanation?
· British Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 145-157.
Inglham, A.G., Levinger, G., Graves, J., & Peckham, V.
(1974). Theringelmann effect:_ Studies of group size
and group performance. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 10, 371-384.
Jackson, J.M., & Williams, K.D. (1985). Social loafing
on difficult tasks: Working collectively can improve
performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
49, 937-942.
Kerr, N.L., & Bruun, S. (1981) . ringelmann revisited: Alternative explanations for the social loafing effect.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,
7, 224-231.
Kerr, N.L., & Bruun, S.E. (1983). Dispensability ofmember
effort and group motivation losses: free-rider effects.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1),78-94.
Kravitz, D. A., & Martin, B. (1986). Ringelmann rediscovered: The original article. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 50, 936-941.
Latane`, B., Williams, K., & Harkins, S. (1979). Many
hands make light the work: The causes and consequences
of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 822-832.
Li, M.e. (1992). The effect of group identuty on reaction
to injustice as a ffunction of individualism and collectivism. Unpulished doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania
State University.
Markus, H. (1978) .. The effect of mere presence on social
facilitation: An unobtrusive test. Journal of Experimental
Social Psychology,14, 389-397.
Marten, R., & Landers, D.M. (1972). Evaluation potential
as a determinant of coaction effects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 8, 347-359.
Meumann, E. (1904). Haus-und schularbeit: experimente
an kindern der volkschule. Die Deutsche Schule, 8,
278-303.
Pessin, J. (1933). The compatative effects of social and
mechanical stimulation on memorizing. American Journal of Psychology, 45, 263-270.
Petty, R., Harkins, S., Williams, K., & Latane` B. (1977).
The effects of group size on cognitive effort and evaluation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,
3, 579-582.
Sanna, L.I. (1992). Self-efficacy theory: Implications for
social facilitation and social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(5), 774-786.
Shepperd, I.A. & Wright, R.A. (1989). Individual contributions to a collective effort: An incentive analysis.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, D.,141-149.
Sholar, W.A., & Clark, M.S. (1982). Deciding in communal
and exchange relationships: By consensus or
should majority rile? Paper presented in a symposium
on "Communal and Exchange Relationship", Clark, M.S. (Chair), Meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Baltinl0re, MD.
Snyder, M., & Ickes, W. (1985). Personality and social
behavior. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook
of social psychology (Vol 2, 3rd ed., pp.883· -947) . New
York: Random House.
Szymanski, K. , & Harkins, S.G. (1987). Social loafing
and self-evaluation woth a social standard. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 891-897.
Tajfel, H. & Turner, J.C. (1978). An integrative theory
of intergroup conflict. In W.G. Austin & Worchel
(Eds), The social psychology of intergroup relations
(pp.33-47) . Montercy, CA:Brooks/Cole.
Tajfel, H. & Turner, J.C. (1985). The social identity theory
of intergroup behavior. IN S. Worchel & W.G.
Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (2nd
ed.,). Chicago: Neison-Hall.
Tajfel, H. (1975). The exit of social mobility and the
voice of social change. Social Science Information,
14, 101-118 .
Tajfel, H. (1978a). Interindividual behavior and intergroup
behavior. In H. Tajfel (Ed.). Differentiation between
social groups. New York: Academic Press.
Tajfel, H. (1978b). Social categorization, social identity,
and social companson. In H. Tajfel (Ed.).
Differentiation between social groups . New York:
Academic Press.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J.C. (1986). The social identity theory
of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W.G.
Austin (Eds.), Psychology of Intergroup relations (2nd
ed., pp.7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
Travis, L.E. (1925). The effect of small audience upon
hand-eye coordination. Journal of Abnormal and Social
Psychology, 20, 142-146.
Travis, L.E. (1928). The influence of the group upon the
stuterer`s speed in free association. Journal of Abnormal
Psychology, 23, 45-51.
Triandis, H. (1989). The self and social behavior in different
culture contexts. Psychological Review, 96,506-520.
Triandis, H.C., Bontempo, R., & Villareal, M.l (1988).
Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives
in self-ingroup relationship. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology,54，323-338.
Triplett, N. (1897). The dynamogenic factors In
pacemaking and competition. American Journal of
Psychology, 9, 507-533.
Vroom, V.H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York:
Wiley.
Waddell, B.A., & Clark, M.S. (1982). Feelings of exp;oitation
in communal and exchange relationship. Paper
presented in a symposiulll on "Communal and Exchange
Relationships", Clark, M.S. (Chair), Meeting
of the Eastern Psychological Association, Baltimore,
MD.
Weston, S.B., & English, H.B. (1926). The influence of
the group on psychological test scores. American
Journal of Psychology, 37, 600-601.
Williams, K.D., & Karau, S.J. (1991). Social loafing and
social compensation: The effects of expectations of coworker
performance . Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 21, 571-581.
Williamson, G.M., & Clark, M.S. (1989). Providing help
and desired relationship type as determinants of
changes in moods and self-evaluations. Journal of
· Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 722-734.
Williams, K., Harkins, S., & Latane`, B. (1981). Identifiability
as a deterrent to social loafing: Two cheering
experiments. Journal of personality and Social Psychology,
40, 303-311.
Williams, K.D. (1981, May). The effects of group cohensiveness
on social loafing. Paper presented at the Annual
Convention of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Detroit, MI.
Williamson, G.M., & Clark, M.S. (1992). Impact of desired
relationship type on affective reactions to choosing
abd being required to help. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 10-18.
Yamagishi, T. (1988). Exit from the group as an individualistic solution to the free rider problem in the United States and Japan. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 530-542.
Zajonc, R.B. (1965). Social facilitation. Science, 149,269-274. |
