English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 111200/142120 (78%)
Visitors : 48101255      Online Users : 588
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/8824


    Title: 共有土地分割登記轉載問題之探討
    Other Titles: A Study on Subdivision Registration of Title for Co-ownership Land
    Authors: 楊松齡
    Yang , Song-ling
    Keywords: 分割登記;共有;抵押權
    Subdivision registration;Co-ownership;Mortgage
    Date: 2006-03
    Issue Date: 2008-11-18 09:53:44 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: In order to improve the utilization of common property, the Civil Code, Article 823 provides that “each co-owner of a common property may request for a subdivision of property rights”. But before subdivided the said land with multiple ownership, each co-owner is free to create a mortgage on their entitled share of land ownership. If some of the co-owners create a mortgage on their entitled shard of land ownership when the land is undergoing a subdivision, shall the mortgage be transferred to each subdivided land according to the original entitled share or only be transferred to the land to which the original creator is entitled after the subdivision? We found that mortgagee and other co-owners shall be equally concerned with this issue, which implied that the subdivision registration (Article 107 of The Land Registration Regulations) shall be revised.
    共有土地除因其使用目的不能分割或契約訂有不能分割之期限外，爲促進共有物之利用，使共有之關係消滅，於公私皆有裨益，故民法第八百二十三條乃明定，各共有人得隨時請求分割共有物。惟原共有人以其應有部份設定抵押之抵押權，究應存在分割後該共有人分得之部份？抑或仍存留於原共有物分割形成之全體單獨所有之上？依現行民法第八百六十八條規定意旨抵押權具有不可分性，故抵押之不動產如經分割，其抵押權不因此受影響。惟此規範是否及於應有部份設定抵押權，恐有爭議。就抵押權人立場而言，爲獲得充足之擔保，當主張土地分割後其抵押權仍存於分割後之每一宗土地。就共有人而言，爲確保其產權之圓滿，當主張土地分割後抵押權應存在於抵押人取得之土地。現行土地登記規則與民法物權編修正草案，亦呈不同之規範。這些規定與見解各有所本，本文擬由法律經濟觀點，進行研析，期能提供不同思考途徑，以供參酌。
    Relation: 臺灣土地研究, 8(1), 23-39
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[地政學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    23-39楊松齡＿共有土地分割登記轉載問題之探討.pdf4089KbAdobe PDF21248View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback