English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 110939/141863 (78%)
Visitors : 47656203      Online Users : 1122
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/94818


    Title: 高承諾人力資源措施與知識分享的關係探討:採跨層次分析
    A Study of the Relationship between High Commitment Human Resource Practices and Knowledge Sharing: A cross-level analysis using hierarchical linear modeling
    Authors: 楊敦程
    Yang, Tun Cheng
    Contributors: 韓志翔
    Han, Tzu Shian
    楊敦程
    Yang, Tun Cheng
    Keywords: 階層線性模式
    高承諾人力資源措施
    知覺組織支持
    信任
    知識分享
    High Commitment Human Resource Practices
    Perspective Organization Support
    Trust
    knowledge sharing
    Hierarchical Linear Modeling
    Date: 2008
    Issue Date: 2016-05-09 11:55:54 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 知識不同於一般的商品,其具有無形、內隱與價值不易判斷等特質,組織很難以權威、命令、或單以金錢的方式來要求員工主動分享其專屬的知識,以提高組織內知識運用與創造的循環。人力資源制度涵蓋整體企業,各項措施與內部員工息息相關,而員工個人主觀的支持知覺和對上司的信任態度,對其知識分享(Knowledge sharing)的行為存在可能的影響。本研究以社會交換理論為基礎,透過階層線性模式(Hierarchical Linear Modeling)的統計方法,以Snell & Dean(1992)提出的五種高承諾人力資源措施構面為組織層次變項,同時參考Eisenberger(1986)與Robinson(1994)所提出的知覺組織支持(POS)與信任(Trust)為個體層次的預測變項和中介變項,驗證跨層次與單一層次的變項對組織員工知識分享行為的影響。

    本研究將問卷分為主管問卷與基層問卷,透過書面郵寄與電子郵件的方式進行發放,對象為台灣國內27家金融機構的管理人員與一般員工,參與本研究的公司涵蓋銀行、證券、保險、投信、郵局與期貨公司。我們經由實證分析,得到了以下的研究發現:

    一、 員工的知覺組織支持的認知程度愈高,其採取知識分享的意願與行為也會愈高。
    二、 員工的知覺組織支持的認知程度愈高,其對直屬上司的信任也會跟著增加。
    三、 員工對直屬上司的信任程度增加,其採取知識分享的意願與行為也會愈高。
    四、 對直屬上司的信任在員工的知覺組織支持與知識分享之間存在中介效果。
    五、 高承諾人力資源措施對知覺組織支持之間的跨層次影響有顯著,個別措施中嚴格甄選、績效評估、外部競爭與內部公平薪酬制度對員工的知覺組織支持之間存在正向關係。
    六、 高承諾人力資源措施對信任之間的跨層次影響不顯著,個別措施的關係皆不顯著。
    七、 高承諾人力資源措施對知識分享之間的跨層次影響不顯著,個別措施中僅嚴格甄選對員工的知識分享之間存在正向關係。

    依據本研究結論,提供具體建議予相關單位及後續研究者參考。
    Knowledge has the characteristics of being intangible, tacit and difficult to evaluate. So an organization can’t force its employees to actively share their own knowledge to others by using the ways of authority, command or high payment only. High Commitment Human Resource Management (HCHRM) system includes many practices which closely influence the whole company and individuals in the organization context. And in individual level, the knowledge-sharing behavior of employees may be changed by the factors of perception organization support (POS) for company and the Trust for supervisors. In this study, we use Hierarchical Linear Modeling (HLM) to investigate the relationship among HCHRM practices, POS, Trust and Knowledge Sharing (KS) in both single level and cross level. The research hypotheses all base on the theory of Social Exchange.

    We collected 956 valid questionnaires from the employers and employees in 27 financial companies in Taiwan. According to the results of our analysis, we found that POS and Trust in individual level were significantly and positively associated with the employees’ behavior of knowledge sharing. And Trust also had intervening effect between POS and KS. In cross-level analysis, HCHRM practices can only affect the variable of POS. Finally, we conclude with a brief discussion of the interpretations and implications of the results in the context of single-level and cross-level. We also provide some practical and reasonable suggestions for company supervisors and further research.
    目 錄 1
    表 圖 次 3
    第一章 緒論 5
    第一節 研究背景 5
    第二節 研究動機 6
    第三節 研究目的 9
    第四節 研究流程 9
    第五節 論文架構 10
    第二章 文獻探討 12
    第一節 知識分享 12
    第二節 高承諾人力資源措施 14
    第三節 社會交換理論 17
    第四節 知覺組織支持、信任與知識分享 18
    一、 知覺組織支持與知識分享的關係 18
    二、 知覺組織支持與信任的關係 19
    三、 信任與知識分享的關係 20
    四、 信任在知覺組織支持與知識分享的中介角色 21
    第五節 高承諾人力資源措施、知覺組織支持、信任與知識分享 22
    一、 高承諾人力資源措施與知覺組織支持的關係 22
    二、 高承諾人力資源措施與信任關係 24
    三、 高承諾人力資源措施與知識分享的關係 25
    第三章 研究方法 27
    第一節 研究架構 27
    第二節 資料蒐集與抽樣方法 28
    一、 研究對象與樣本來源 28
    二、 問卷發放與回收情形 29
    第三節 問卷設計 31
    第四節 資料分析方法 38
    第四章 統計分析與實證結果 43
    第一節 研究變項的聚合要件 43
    第二節 樣本結構與相關分析 46
    一、 個體層次的樣本敘述統計 46
    二、 組織層次的樣本敘述統計 48
    三、 研究變項的相關性分析 50
    第三節 個體層次分析 53
    一、 知覺組織支持、信任與知識分享之間的影響關係 53
    二、 信任的中介效果分析 63
    第四節 跨層級分析 65
    一、 高承諾人力資源措施對知覺組織支持的影響 66
    二、 高承諾人力資源措施對信任的影響 69
    三、 高承諾人力資源措施對知識分享的關係 72
    第五節 研究結果 75
    第五章 結論與建議 78
    第一節 研究結論 78
    第二節 研究建議 80
    第三節 研究貢獻 81
    第四節 研究限制與未來研究方向 82
    參考文獻 84
    中文文獻 84
    英文文獻 86
    附錄一:主管問卷 90
    附錄二:基層問卷 93
    Reference: 中文文獻
    1. 王文彥 (2002),「知識分享內外在動機與知識分享行為之研究---以A公司為例」,國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
    2. 王宜敏 (2001),「影響資訊人員知識分享行為之因素―以社會交換理論為基礎來探討」,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
    3. 李誠主編 (2002),「人力資源管理的十二堂課」,第二版,北市:天下遠見。
    4. 李漢雄 (2000),「人力資源策略管理」,初版,北市:揚智文化。
    5. 汪金城 (2001),「研發機構知識分享機制之研究-以工研院光電所研發團隊為例」,國立政治大學公共行政學系碩士論文。
    6. 吳秉恩 (2002),「分享式人力資源管理」,修訂二版,台北翰蘆圖書出版。
    7. 吳秉恩審校 (2007),「人力資源管理:理論與實務」,初版,華泰文化。
    8. 吳偉立 (2002),「促動因子與知識分享要素關係之研究—以人格特質及工作特性為干擾變項」,靜宜大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    9. 房美玉 (2000),「企業人力資源管理策略和政府相關策略規劃之契合度分析」,行政院經建會委託中央大學人資所之研究專案。
    10. 卓正欽 (2007),「人力資源效能知覺對組織承諾之影響」,國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所博士論文。
    11. 林宜瑄等譯 (2003),「知識優勢:杜拉克、梭羅等大師共譜未來市場新貌」,中文初版,北市:遠流。
    12. 林育理 (2005),「組織知識活動氣候對員工知識活動行為影響之研究:一個跨層次模式的驗證」,元智大學管理研究所博士論文。
    13. 林佳怡 (2001),「知覺組織支持對員工工作態度影響之探討」,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
    14. 林佳潓 (2004),「知覺組織支持與組織公民行為:角色定義幅度之中介效果」,中原大學心理學研究所碩士論文。
    15. 林淑惠 (2002),「夥伴關係、知識分享、制度化與人力資源管理對教育訓練委外績效之探討」,國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
    16. 林鉦琴 (2005),「組織公民行為之跨層次分析層級線性模式應用」,管理學報,第22卷第4期,頁503-524。
    17. 林鉦棽、彭台光 (2006),「多層次管理研究:分析層次的概念、理論和方法」,管理學報,第23卷第6期,頁649-675。
    18. 林億明 (2002),「團隊導向的人力資源管理實務對團隊知識分享與創新之影響-社會資本的中介效果」,東吳大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    19. 林震岩 (2007),「多變量分析:SPSS的操作與應用」,再版二刷,智勝文化。
    20. 祝道松、林淑美、倪豐裕 (2003),「預算目標困難度對預算參與、預算目標接受度,與管理績效間關係影響之探討:以台灣地區製造業為例」,管理學報,第20卷第5期:頁1023-1043。
    21. 徐其力 (2002),「組織文化對知識分享之影響研究」,國立彰化師範大學工業教育學系碩士論文。
    22. 陳世明 (2001),「知識分享與創新績效之研究-以交易成本理論觀點探討」,長榮管理學院經營管理研究所碩士論文。
    23. 許道然 (2001),「公部門組織信任與組織公民行為關係之研究」,國立政治大學公共行政學系博士論文。
    24. 張美倫 (2003),「台灣中等學校教職員之組織支持知覺對其組織承諾與變革認知影響之探討」,朝陽科技大學企業管理所碩士論文。
    25. 陳柏村 (2005),「知識管理:正確槪念與企業實務」,初版,北市:五南。
    26. 陳俊儒 (2006),「個人特性、人力資源管理活動與創新績效關係之多層級探討」,國立成功大學國際企業研究所碩士論文。
    27. 黃靖文 (2002),「知識管理、人力資源管理與經營策略間關係之研究 ---以高科技公司為例」,國立成功大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
    28. 葉勇誼 (2002),「政治行為與知識分享:電子產業之實證研究」,義守大學管理研究所碩士論文。
    29. 楊政學,2006,「知識管理學理與實證」,台北:揚智文化。
    30. 楊朝旭、蔡柳卿(2006),「人力資源管理系統、創新與企業經濟附加價值關連性之研究」,管理評論,第23卷第3期,頁44~68。
    31. 溫福星 (2007),「階層線性模式:原理、方法與應用」,初版,雙葉書廊。
    32. 廖佩涵 (2005),「國際人力資源管理活動與外派人員學習動機、知識分享關係之探討-以知覺組織支持、信任為中介變數」,國立成功大學國際企業研究所博士論文。
    33. 黎士群 (1999),「組織公平、信任與知識分享行為之關係性研究—以Unix系統管理人員為例」,銘傳大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。
    34. 蔡櫻枝 (2003),「人力資源策略、知識導向文化、知識分享阻力對組織成員知識分享意願影響之研究」,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
    35. 賴麗秋 (2001),「促進知識管理的人力資源管理及策略」,國立臺灣大學商學研究所碩士論文。
    36. 韓志翔 (2004),「高能力-高承諾人力資源管理與個人層次知識管理關連性研究」,行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫。
    37. 韓志翔、莊如松、葉柏秀 (2006),「高績效人力資源管理與知識分享之關係:以組織承諾與組織公民行為為中介變項」,2006 IACMR conference 中文論壇,6月16日,中國南京。
    38. 謝哲豪 (2006),「組織政治知覺、信任與知識分享關係之研究」,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。


    英文文獻
    1. Alavi, M. (1997), “KPMG Peat Marwick U.S.: One Giant Brain,” Harvard Business
    2. School (Case), July 11
    3. Allen, M.W. (1992), “Communication and organizational commitment: perceived organizational support as a mediating factor,” Communication Quarterly, 40, 357–367.
    4. Arthur, J.B. (1994), “Effects of human resource systems on manufacturing performance and turnover,” Academy of Management Journal, 37, 670–687.
    5. Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. (1986), “The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.
    6. Blau, P. M. (1964), Exchange and power in social life, New York: Wiley.
    7. Darroch, J., & McNaughton, R. (2002), “Examinging the link between knowledge management practices and types of innovation,” Jouranl of Intellectural Capital, 3(3): 210-222.
    8. Chowdhury, S. (2005), “The role of affect- and Cognition-based trust in complex knowledge sharing,” Journal of Managerial Issues, 17(3):310-326.
    9. Clegg, S.R. (1989), “Radical revisions- power, discipline, and organizations,” Organization Studies, 10(1):97-115.
    10. Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998), “Working Knowledge:How Organizations Manage What They Know,” Harvard Business School Press.
    11. Delaney, J. T., & Huselid, M. A. (1996), “The impact of human resource management practices on perceptions of organizational performance,” Academy of Management Journal, 39, 949–969.
    12. Delery, J. E. (1998), “Issues of fit in strategic human resource management: implications for research,” Human Resource Management Review, 8, 289–309.
    13. Drucker, P. F. (1993), “Post-capitalist society,” Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann.
    14. Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P., & Davis–LaMastro, V. (1990), “Perceived organizational support and employee diligence, commitment, and innovation,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 51–59.
    15. Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986), “Perceived organizational support,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 500–507.
    16. Ellen M. Whitener (2001), “Do high commitment human resource practices affect employee commitment? a cross-level analysis using hierarchical linear modeling,” Journal of Management, 27, 515–535.
    17. Gold, A. H., Malhotra A.and Segars, A. H. (2001), “Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspectives,” Journal of management Information Systems, 18(1):185-214
    18. Hendriks, P. (1999), “Why share knowledge? The influence of ICT on motivation for knowledge sharing,” Knowledge and Process Management, 6(2): 91-100.
    19. Hofmann, D. A. (1997), “An overview of the logic and rationale of hierarchical linear models,” Journal of Management, 23, 723–744.
    20. Hofmann, D. A., & Gavin, M. B. (1998), “Centering decisions in hierarchical linear models: implications for research in organizations,” Journal of Management, 24, 623–641.
    21. Hofmann, D. A. (2002), “Issues in multilevel research: theory development, measurement, and analysis,” In: Rogelberg S G. (Ed.) Handbook of Research Methods in Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Blackwell Publishers, p258
    22. Homans, G. C. (1961), “Social behavior” New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World.
    23. Huselid, M. A. (1995), “The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance,” Academy of Management Journal, 38, 635–672.
    24. Hutchison, S., & Garstka, M. L. (1996), “Sources of perceived organizational support: goal setting and feedback,” Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 1351–1366.
    25. Ichniowski, C., Shaw, K., & Prennushi, G. (1997), “The effects of human resource management practices on productivity,” American Economic Review, 87, 291–313.
    26. James, L. R. (1982), “Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 219-229.
    27. Inger, V.E. & Gary, W.D. (2000), “Knowledge Sharing in High Technology Companies,” Journal of Marketing, 48.
    28. James, L. R., Demaree, R. G.., & Wolf, G. (1984), “Estinating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85-98.
    29. Kidwell, R.E., Jr., Mossholder, K.W., & Bennett, N. (1997), “Cohesive and organizational citizenship behavior: A multilevel analysis using work group and individuals. Journal of Management,” 23(6):775-793.
    30. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. A. (1993), “Procedural justice, attitudes, and subsidiary top management compliance with multinational corporate strategic decisions,” Academy of Management Journal, 36, 502–526.
    31. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (1998), „Procedural justice, strategic decision making, and the knowledge economy,” Strategic Management Journal, 19 (4):323-338.
    32. Levinson, H. (1965), “Reciprocation: the relationship between man and organization,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 9, 370–390.
    33. Mayer, R. C., & Davis, J. H. (1999), “The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for management: a field quasi-experiment,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 123–136.
    34. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995), “The Knowledge-Creating Compa,”. New York: Oxford University Press.
    35. Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., & Konno, N. (2000), SECI, “Ba and Leadership: A unified model of dynamic knowledge creation,” Long Range Planning, 33(1): 5-34.
    36. Ostroff, C., & Bowen, D. E. (2000), “Moving HR to a higher level: HR practices and organizational effectiveness,” In: “K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: foundations, extensions, and new directions” (pp. 211–266). San Francisco: Jossey–Bass.
    37. Petrash, G. (1996), “Dow’s Journal to a Knowledge Value Management Culture,” European Management Journal, 14(4):365-373.
    38. Pfeffer, J. (1995), “Producing sustainable competitive advantage through the effective management of people,” Academy of mangement executive, 9(1):55-72.
    39. Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., & Bommer, W.H. (1996), “Transformational leader behaviors and substitutes for leadership as determinants of employee satisfaction, commitment, trust, and organizational citizenship behaviors,” Journal of Management, 22, 259–298.
    40. Podsakoff, P.M. & Organ,D.W. (1986), “Self-reports in organizational research: problems and prospects”, Journal of management,12:531-544.
    41. Quinn, J.B., Anderson, P., and Finkelstein, S. (1996),”Managing Professional Intellect: Making the Most of the Best,” Harvard Business Review, March-April
    42. Scarbrough, H., & Swan, J. (1999), “Case-studies in knowledge management,” London: IPD.
    43. Quinn, J. B., Anderson, P., & Finkelstein, S. (1996), „Managing professional intellect: Making the most of the best,” Harvard Business Review, 74(2):71.
    44. Robinson, S. L., & Rousseau, D. M. (1994), “Violating the psychological contract: not the exception but the norm,” Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 245–259.
    45. Rousseau, D. M. (1985), “Issues of level in organizational research: multi-level and cross-level perspectives,” In: L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 1–37). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
    46. Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998), “Not so different after all: a cross-discipline view of trust,” Academy of Management Review, 23, 393–404.
    47. Raudenbush, S. W. & Bryk, A. S. (2002), “Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd edition),” Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
    48. Schwab, D. P. (2005), “Research methods for organizational studies(2nd ED.),” Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
    49. Settoon, R. P., Bennett, N., & Liden, R. C. (1996), “Social exchange in organizations: perceived organizational support, leader-member exchange, and employee reciprocity,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 219–227.
    50. Snell, S., & Dean, J. (1992), “Integrated manufacturing and human resource management: a human capital perspective,” Academy of Management Journal, 35, 467–504.
    51. Teece, D. J. (1998), “Capturing value from knowledge assets: The new economy, markets for know-how, and intangible assets,” California management review, 40(3):55-79
    52. Tsui, A. S., Pearce, J. L., Porter, L. W., & Tripoli, A. M. (1997), “Alternative approaches to the employeeorganization relationship: does investment in employees pay off?” Academy of Management Journal, 40, 1089–1121.
    53. Walton, R. E. (1985), “From control to commitment in the workplace,” Harvard Business Review, 63 (2), 77–84.
    54. Wood, S., & de Menezes, L. (1998), “High commitment management in the U.K.: evidence from the Workplace Industrial Relations Survey and Employers’ Manpower and Skills Practices Survey,” Human Relations, 51, 485–515.
    55. Wright, P.M., Dunford,B.B., & Snell, S.A. (2001), “Human Resources and the resource based view of the firm,” Academy of management review, 18:293-321
    56. Youndt, M., Snell, S., Dean, J., & Lepak, D. (1996), “Human resource management, manufacturing strategy, and firm performance,” Academy of Management Journal, 39, 836–866.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    管理碩士學程(AMBA)
    95362024
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095362024
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[管理碩士學程/商管專業學院碩士學位學程 AMBA] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2500View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback