Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/95914
|
| Title: | 網際網路公司核心智慧資本管理制度之探討─以入口網站為例 |
| Authors: | 高婉容 |
| Contributors: | 王文英
高婉容 |
| Keywords: | 核心智慧資本管理制度
網際網路
入口網站
人力資本
流程資本
創新資本
關係資本
management system of the core intellectual capital
Internet
portal site
human capital
process capital
innovation capital
relation capital |
| Date: | 2002 |
| Issue Date: | 2016-05-10 15:55:37 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 無時間及距離限制之網際網路的出現，大舉改變了人類的生活，除了深入家庭外，亦同時深入企業，大幅改變企業經營模式。新的經濟型態是由新技術、全球化趨勢和當前財務報表所看不到的無形資產所組成，全球產業的競爭要素正由實體資產的競爭轉為虛擬的、無形的資產競爭，許多學者稱這些無形資產為智慧資本。網際網路被認為是一個知識密集和人力資源密集的高附加價值產業，智慧資本在此類產業中相形重要，因此智慧資本的管理制度便成為其主要課題。
近來，網際網路產業呈泡沫化現象，此時存活下來而仍佔有一席之地的網際網路公司，必有其優勢所在。本研究即欲探討為其創造高價值及延續其競爭力之核心智慧資本管理制度為何。
本研究採個案研究法，輔以問卷調查，以能吸引最多顧客、與一般大眾親近度最高的入口網站為研究對象。首先，初步訪談個案公司主管有關該公司之核心智慧資本管理制度，再根據文獻及訪談所得資訊，設計問卷進行調查，以瞭解個案公司主管對其公司各項智慧資本細項之重視程度，再就各公司核心智慧資本之管理與衡量方式進一步深入訪談，經整理分析及比較探討後，做出以下結論：
一、入口網站公司共同重視之智慧資本次分類為人力資本中的「經營團隊」、「專業技能」、「向心力」、「創造力」，流程資本中的「組織彈性」，創新資本中的「智慧財產」，關係資本中的「顧客規模」、「顧客忠誠」、「顧客資訊」、「策略夥伴」及「聲譽」，共計十一項。
二、策略會影響核心智慧資本的組成內容。
三、考量公司策略及經營背景以制訂適切之管理制度，幫助核心智慧資本之創造、累積及維持。
Timeless and accessible Internet changes our life style. Besides families, it goes deep into the enterprises and drastically changes business models. New economy is composed of new technology, trend of globalization and intangible assets that aren`t presented in financial statements. Competitive factors of globe industries have shifted from physical assets to intangible assets, which are called “Intellectual Capital”. Internet industry, which is knowledge and human-intensive, is considered as high value-added industry. Intellectual capital in this industry is more important than others; therefore, the management system of intellectual capital is the primary topic.
The Internet companies, which could survive at the Internet bubble and play a decisive role, must have extraordinary advantages. The purpose of this study is to explore how to manage the core intellectual capital, which can create high values and raise competitiveness in the Internet companies.
Case study and questionnaires are used in this study. The objects of this study are the portal sites that are the most attractive and close to the public. Firstly, by interviewing the executives, we could have the preliminary understanding about the management system of the core intellectual capital. Secondly, according to the result of literature review and our work in stage one, we designed and collected our questionnaires. Through the questionnaires, we could understand how the executives stress the attributes about the items of intellectual capital. Finally, we had detailed interviews with the executive of our objects by above results. After analyzing and comparing the results, the conclusions of this study are:
1. Portal sites stress the partial same sub classification of intellectual capital, which are ‘management team’, ‘professional skill’, ‘employee commitments’ ,and‘creativity’ in human capital ,‘flexibility of organization’ in process capital ,‘intellectual property’ in innovation capital , ‘customer scale’ , ‘customer loyalty’, ‘customer information’ ,‘strategic partners’ , and‘reputation’ in relation capital.
2. The composition of the core intellectual capital is effected by strategy.
3. To create, accumulate and maintain the core intellectual capital is by establishing the appropriate management system with considering the strategy and background of the enterprise. |
| Reference: | 一、中文部分
吳思華、賴鈺晶、顏如妙等，2000，網際網路智慧資本衡量與發展措施研究，經濟部工業局軟體五年發展計畫。
李以仁譯，2001，破解獲利密碼，台北市：藍鯨出版，巨思文化發行。（Boulton, R. E. S., B. D. Libert, and S. M. Samek. 2000. Cracking the value code: How successful businesses are creating wealth in the new economy. New York: Harper Business.）
李永年、丁惠民譯，2000，Net profit：網路金字塔的獲利模式與企業定位，台北市：遠擎管理顧問。(Cohan, P. S. 1999. Net profit: How to invest and compete in the real world of internet business. Allston Press.)
宋偉航譯，1998，智慧資本：資訊時代的企業利基，台北市：智庫。（Stewart, T. A. 1997. Intellectual capital: the new wealth of organizations. Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group, Inc.）
林大容譯，1999，智慧資本：如何衡量資訊時代無形資產的價值，台北市：麥田出版，城邦文化發行。（Edvinsson, L., and M. S. Malone. 1997. Intellectual capital- realizing your company``s true value by finding its hidden brainpower. New York: Harper Business.）
黃翔祺，2000，網際網路智慧資本研究，國立政治大學科技管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
陳正平譯，2001，斷層線上：傾聽投資者的聲音．重建企業核心優勢，台北市：臉譜文化出版，城邦文化發行。（Moore, G. A. 2000. Living on the fault line: Managing for shareholder value in the age of the Internet. New York: HarperBusiness.）
――――，1999，數位達爾文主義：網路時代的生存競爭策略，台北市：臉譜文化出版，城邦文化發行。（Schwartz, E. I. 1999. Digital Darwinism: 7 breakthrough business strategies for surviving in the cutthroat web economy. Big Apple Tuttle-Mori Agency, Inc.）
張志偉，2000，YAHOO─雅虎稱霸網際網路精彩傳奇，台北市：商業周刊出版，城邦文化發行。
張秋蓉，2000，網路許我一個未來─WWW世界的淘金夢，台北市：商訊文化。
張肇顯，2000，以智慧資本為基礎之策略性人力資源管理實務研究─以台灣地區入口網站為例，私立輔仁大學管理學研究所未出版碩士論文。
葉至誠、葉立誠，1999，研究方法與論文寫作，臺北市：商鼎文化。
鄭惠之，2000，「ValueReporting─數位經濟下企業價值之創造、衡量及報表系統之發展」研討會報導，會計研究月刊，第177期（8月）：14-25。
賴彥豪，2001，智慧資本之評價與知識管理活動─兩個個案分析，國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
譚大純、汪昭芬，2001，評估知識績效的八大類指標，會計研究月刊，第185期（4月）：68-73。
二、英文部分
Buren, M. E. V. 1999. A yardstick for knowledge management. Training & development alexandria, Vol. 53, Iss. 5 (May): 71-78.
Edvinsson, L., and P. Sullivan. 1996. Developing a model for managing intellectual capital. European management journal. London, Vol. 14, Iss. 4 (Aug.): 356-364.
Hauschild, S., T. Licht, and W. Stein. 2001. Creating a knowledge culture. The MaKinsey quarterly (Spring): 74-81.
Horibe, F. 1999. Managing knowledge workers: new skill and attitudes to unlock the intellectual capital in your organization. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Kaplan, R. S., and D. P. Norton. 2001. The strategy-focused organization: How balanced scorecard companies thrive in the new business environment. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Martinez, P. 2000. Models made ‘e’: What business are you in? Center for IBM e-business Innovation.（http://ibm.com/service/innovation）
Roos, J., G. Roos, N. C. Dragonetti, and L. Edvinsson. 1997. Intellectual capital: Navigating the new business landscape. Macmillan Press Ltd, U. K.
Roos, G., Bainbridge, A., and K. Jacobsen. 2001. Intellectual capital analysis as a strategic tool. Strategy & leadership. Chicago, Vol. 29, Iss. 4 (Jul./Aug.): 21-26.
Ulrich, D. 1998. Intellectual capital = competence × commitment. Sloan management review (Winter): 15-26.
Yin, R. K. 1989. Case study research- design and methods. 2nd edition Newbury Parks, California: Sage.
三、網路資源
http://tw.yahoo.com
http://www.pchome.com.tw
http://www.ithome.com.tw/index.html |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
會計學系 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#A2010000465 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [會計學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
