English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 110944/141864 (78%)
Visitors : 48034922      Online Users : 958
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/95923
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/95923


    Title: 品質成本影響因素之研究
    Authors: 張寶光
    Contributors: 吳安妮
    林祖嘉

    張寶光
    Date: 1999
    Issue Date: 2016-05-10 15:56:00 (UTC+8)
    Abstract:   本文探討品質成本之影響因素,因為釐清影響不同品質成本之關鍵因素,不但可改善生產作業流程,且能有效地進行品質成本的管理與控制。在理論上,本文採雙邊獨占之情境,將品質成本及品質成本影響因素之概念納入模式中,以探討最適品質水準下,品質成本與其影響因素間之各種理論關係。並配合對屬印刷業之個案公司深度訪談所得之資訊,以形成待檢定之研究假說。
      實證上,經採實地實證法,以民國86年1月至87年7月之內外部失敗成本與其影響因素之資料加以分析,研究結果顯示,內部失敗成本之主要影響因素為複雜度、困難度、原物料品質水準、顧客類型、製程問題、與管理階層更換效果等均受到資料之支持,然檢驗水準及退件處理成本則未受支持。外部失敗成本之主要影響因素則為複雜度、困難度、退件處理成本、顧客類型、與管理階層更換效果,組織功能因素則未受資料支持。
      This study examines the factors that affect quality costs of products and services.Clarifying critical factors of different quality costs can not only improve the product operational processes, but also enhance the management and control of quality costs.Theoretically, this study analysis the quality costs and the affecting factors there of assuming in bilateral monopoly situations. Furthermore, by a field interview with aprinting company, we develop testable hypotheses thereon.
      Empirically, this study employs a field empirical approach to investigate theinternal and external failure costs and their causal factors using the data from 1997 January to 1998 July. The results show that the factors affecting internal failure costsare complexity, difficulty, quality of materials, customer types, problems in manufacturing process, and the side effect of management changes. On the other hand,the other two factors, the level of inspection and costs of product return, are insignificant causing factors of internal failure costs. The key affecting factors ofexternal failure costs are complexity, difficulty of manufacturing process, costs of product return, customer types, and the side effect of management changes, whereasthe functional effect of the new-organized committee is not supported by empirical data.
    Reference: 1. Alien, F., and G.R. Faulhaber, 1991. Service quality: Multidisciplinary andmultinational perspectives:289-301.
    2. Atkinson, A., R. Balakrishnsn, P. Booth, J. Cote, T. Groot, T. Malmi, H. Roerts, E.Uliana, and A. Wu. 1997. New directions in management accounting research. Journal of Management Accounting Research 9: 79-108.
    3. Banker, R.D., and H.H. Johnson. 1993. An empirical study of cost drivers in theU.S. airline industry. Accounting Review(]uly): 576-601.
    4. Beaver, W., C. Eger, S. Ryan and M. Wolfson. 1989. Financial reporting, supplemental disclosures, and bank share prices. Journal of Accounting Research27(Autumn): 157-178.
    5. Bimberg, J., M. Shields, and M. Young. 1990. The case for multiple methods in empirical management accounting research. Journal of Management Accounting Research 2(Fall): 33-66.
    6. Chase, R.B., and N.J. Aquilano. 1994. Production and operation management: Manufacturing and services, 7th edition. The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
    7. Collins, P. 1995. Implementing a cost of quality strategy: Beware of demotivating your employees! Management Services 39: 14-16.
    8. Datar, S., T. Mukhopadhyay, and K. Srmivasan. 1993. Simultaneous estimation of cost drivers. The Accounting Review 68(July): 602-614.
    9. Diallo, A., Z.U. Khan, and C.F. Vail. 1995. Cost of quality in the new manufacturing environment. Management Accounting 77(August): 20-25.:
    10. Fine, C. 1986. Quality improvement and learning in productive systems. Management Science 32(10): 1301-1315.
    11. Fine, C. 1988. A quality control model with learning effects. Operations Research 36(3): 437-444.
    12. Foster, G., and L. Sjoblom. 1996. Quality improvement drivers in the electronics industry. Journal of Management Accounting Research 8: 55-86.
    13. Fredericks, J.O., and J.M. Salter. 1995. Beyond customer satisfaction. Management Review 84 (May): 29-32.
    14. Garrison, R.H., and E.W. Noreen. 1997. Managerial Accounting. The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
    15. Gray, J. 1995. Quality costs: A report card on business. Quality Progress 28(April): 51-54.
    16. Hegji, C.E. 1995. On the economics of developing input supplier relationships. Mid-Atlantic Journal of Business 31 (December): 247-257.
    17. lttner, C.D. 1996. Exploratory evidence on the behavior of quality costs. Operation Research 44(Jan/Feb): 114-130.
    18. lttner, C.D., D.F. Larcker, and M.V. Rajan. 1997. The choice of performance measures in annual bonus contracts. The Accounting Review 72(April): 231-255.
    19. lttner, C.D. and D.F. Larcker. 1995. Total quality management and the choice of information and reward systems. Journal of Accounting Research 33 (Supplement): 1-34.
    20. Johnson, R.D., and B.H. Kleiner. 1993. Does higher quality mean higher cost? International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 10: 64-80.
    21. K-aplan, R., and D. Norton. 1996. The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
    22. Karmarkar, U.S., and R.C. Pitbladdo. 1997. Quality, class, and competition. Management Science 43(January): 27-39.
    23. Kim, M.W., and W.M. Liao. 1994. Estimating hidden quality costs with quality loss functions. Accounting Horizons 8: 8-18.
    24. Maher, W., and D. Stickney and C. Weil. 1997. Managerial Accounting. West Publishing Company.
    25. Margavio, G.W., R.L. Fink, and T.M. Margavio. 1994. Quality improvement using capital budgeting and Taguchi`s function. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 11: 10-20.
    26. McConachy, B.R. 1996. Concurrent management of total cost and total quality. Transactions of AACE International : QMA21-QMA26.
    27. Morse, W.J. 1993. A handle on quality costs. CMA Magazine 67(February): 21-24.
    28. Newey, W., and K. West. 1987. A simple positive semi-definite, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix. Econometrica 55:703-708.
    29. Richardson, J., and J Roumasset. 1995. Sole sourcing, competitive sourcing, parallel sourcing: Mechanisms for performance. Managerial and Decision Economics 16:71-84.
    30. Stevenson, T., 1990. Production and operation management: Manufacturing and services, 7th edition. The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
    31. Tapiero, C.S. 1987. Production learning and quality control. HE transaction 19:362-370.
    32. Tayles, M., M. Woods, and D. Seary. 1996. The costing of process quality: Opportunities for new accounting practices. Management Accounting-London 74(November): 28-30.
    33. Tumey,P.B. 1992. Activity-Based Management. Management Accounting(Jw.uary): 20-25.
    34. Underhill, B.N. 1995. Decision tree helps categorize quality costs. Quality Progress 28(August): 168.
    35. Webster, S.E., C. Buldrini, and J. Malyeff. 1998. Improving quality through operator certification systems. HE Solution 30(April): 18-22.
    36. White, H. 1980. A Heteroskedasticity-coefficient covariance matrix and a direct test for heteroskedastity. Econometrica 48: 817-838.
    37. Wilson, L. 1993. The quality measure is customer opinion. Journal for Quality & Participation 16(Oct/Nov): 12-14.
    38. Wruck, K.H., and M.C. Jensen. 1994. Science, specific knowledge, and total quality management. Journal of Accounting & Economics(Novembe!) 18: 247-287.
    39. Youde, R.K. 1992. Cost-of-quality reporting: How we see it. Management Accounting 73(January): 34-38.
    40. Young, S., and F. Selto. 1991. New manufacturing practices and cost management: A review of the literature and directions for research. Journal of Accounting Literature 10:265-298.
    41. Young, S., and F. Selto. 1993. Explaining cross-sectional workgroup performance differences in a JIT facility: A critical appraisal of a field-based study. Journal of Management Accounting Research 5(Fall): 300-326.
    Description: 博士
    國立政治大學
    會計學系
    83353502
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#A2010000565
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[會計學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    There are no files associated with this item.



    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback