English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109927/140876 (78%)
Visitors : 45974845      Online Users : 998
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 財務管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/96314
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/96314


    Title: 囚犯兩難賽局之合作行為分析
    Authors: 謝慧美
    Contributors: 周德宇
    謝慧美
    Date: 1997
    Issue Date: 2016-05-10 18:56:59 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 吾人日常生活中常遭遇類似囚犯兩難的問題,如返還遺失物、幫助陌生人、遵守規則,以及慈善捐贈等。傳統囚犯兩難賽局下的Nash均衡是雙方皆不合作,然而日常生活中實不乏合作的例子存在,因此有必要對PD賽局加以研究。
    本文利用演化方法,加入C類型與D類型於Guttman(1996)的模型中分析,試圖探討囚犯兩難賽局之合作行為變化。本文除了使Guttman的模型更為一般化之外,將使傳統文獻發展更為完整。
    本模型在單方不確定下存在兩種人,甲(R)是理性人,乙(MR)試可能理性人。甲懷疑乙可能是理性人、機械式TFT、C或D類型。研究結果發現:在混合策略的PBE中,對任何參賽的階段小於preempt前一階段而言,R不會採行非合作策略;對任何參賽的階段小於preempt前兩階段而言,MR不會採行非合作策略。當雙方交手次數增加時,非合作階段數維持不變,亦即,合作階段數隨交手機會增加而提高。最後透過比較靜態分析得知,當甲認為乙是C類型的可能性增加時,他可能提前或延後preempt策略以探索乙的類型。若甲認定乙是TFT類型的機率較小,使得preempt的策略報償大於和乙同時由C轉變為D的策略報償時,他會提前preempt以剝削乙。而當甲認定乙是TFT類型的主觀機率增加時,他會延後preempt以避免遭受乙的懲罰,故此時合作的機會增加。
    單方不確定性的結果可以一般化至雙方不確定的情況。
    Reference: 1. Andreoni, J. (1988), "Privately Provided Public Goods in a Large
    Economy: The Limits of Altruism," Journal of Public Economics, Vol.
    35, pp. 57-73.
    2. _____ ( 1989), "Giving with Impure Altruism: Application to
    Charity and Ricardian Equivalence," Journal of Political Economy, Vo1.
    97, pp. 1447-58.
    3. (1990), "Impure Altruism and Donations to Public
    Goods:A Theory of Warm-Glow Giving," Economy Journal, Vol. 100,
    pp.464-77.
    4. Axelrod, R. (1980), "More Effective Choice in the Prisoner` Dilemma,"
    Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 24, pp. 379-403.
    5. ____ (1981), "The Emergence of Cooperation among Egoists,"
    American Political Science Review, Vol. 62, pp. 306-18.
    6. ____ (1984), The Evolution of Cooperation. New York Basic
    Books.
    7. Becker, G. S. (1974), "A Theory of Social Interactions," Journal of
    Political Economy, Vol. 82, pp. 1063-93.
    8. Bergstrom, T. , L. Blume and H. Varian (1986), "On the Private
    Provision of Public Goods," Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 29, pp.
    25-49.
    9. Coase, R. H. (1960), "The Problem of Social Cost," Journal of Law and
    Economics, Vol. 3, pp. 386-405.
    10. Conlisk, J. (1980), "Costly Optimizers Versus Cheap Imitators,"
    Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Vol. 1, pp. 275-
    93.
    11. Guttman, 1. M. (1996), "Rational Actor, Tit-for-tat Types, and the
    Evolution of Cooperation," Journal of Economy Behavior and
    Organization, Vol. 29, pp. 27-56.
    12. Gibbons, R. (1992), Game Theory for Applied Economists. Princeton
    University Press. Princeton, New Jersey.
    13. Hirshleifer, J. and 1. C. , Martinez Coll (1988), "What Strategies Can
    Support the Evolutionary Emergence of Cooperation?" Journal of
    Conflict Resolution, Vol. 32, pp. 367-98.
    14. Hobbes,T. (1651), Leviathan. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge,
    New York.
    15. Konrad, K. A. (1994),"The Strategic Advantage of Being Poor: Private
    and Pub1ic Provision of Public Goods," Economica, Vol. 61, pp. 79-62.
    16. Krep, D. M. , P. Mi1grom, J. Robert, and R. Wilson, (1982), "Rational
    Cooperation in the Finitely Repeated Prisoners` Dilemma," Journal of
    Economic Theory, Vol. 27, pp. 245-52.
    17. Mailath, O. J. (1992), "Introduction: Symposiwn on Evolutionary
    Game Theory," Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 57, pp. 259-77.
    18. Mueller, D. C. (1986), "Rational Egoism Versus Adaptive Egoism as
    Fundational Postulate for a Descriptive Theory of Human Behavior,"
    Public Choice, Vol. 51, pp. 3-23.
    19. (1989), Public Choice II. Cambridge University Press.
    Cambridge.
    20. Myerson, R. B. (1991), Game Theory---Analysis of Conflict.
    Harvard University Press. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London,
    England.
    21. Nachbar, 1. H. (1992), "Evolution in the Finite1y Repeated Prisoners`
    Dilemma, Journal of Economic Behavior anti Organization, Vol. 19,
    pp. 307-91.
    22. Olson, M. (1965), The Logic of Collective Action. Harvard University
    Press. Harvard.
    23. Posnett, 1. and T. Sandler, (1991), "The Private Provision of Public
    Goods: A perspective on Neutrality," Public Finance Quarterly, Vol.
    19, pp. 22-42.
    24. Scafri, A. ]. (1992), "Rational Conjectures Equilibriain the Private
    Provision of Public Goods," Public Finance Quarterly, Vol. 20, No.2,
    pp.139-51.
    25. Stark, O. (1993), "Nonmarket Transfers and Altruism," European
    Economic Review, Vo1. 37, pp. 1413-24.
    26. Suden, R.(1985), "Consistent Conjectures and Voluntary Contributions
    to Public Goods: Why the Conventional Theory Doesn`t Work,"
    Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 27, pp. 117-24.
    27. Warr, P. G. (1982), "Pareto Optimal Redistribution and Private
    Charity," Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 19, pp. 131-38.
    28. _____ (1983), "The Private Provision of a Public Good Is
    lndependent of the Distribution of Income," Economics Letters, Vol.
    13, pp. 207-11.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    財政學系
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G91NCCU7082012
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[財務管理學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2158View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback