政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/96693
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 109948/140897 (78%)
造访人次 : 46086904      在线人数 : 1201
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/96693


    题名: 從國際私法選法規則對兩岸收養案件之分析
    其它题名: An Analysis of “Cross-strait Adoptions” in View of International Private Law
    作者: 王重陽
    Wang, Chung-Young
    关键词: 兩岸收養;涉外收養;收養之成立;收養之終止;收養之解除;收養之方式;收養準據法;反致;兒童保護及跨國收養合作公約;人民關係條例
    cross-strait adoption;inter-country adoption;adoption relation;termination of adoption;rescission of adoption;form of adoption;Renvoi;the Convention on Protection of Children and cooperation in Respect of Intercountry Adoption;Act Governing Relations between the People of Taiwan and the Mainland
    日期: 2006-12
    上传时间: 2016-05-16 17:12:24 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 我國法規定大陸人民經由收養來台依親必須得到我國法院的認可，因此法院在審理涉陸收養事件時，為避免有無效或有得撤銷之原因，必須審查涉陸收養之成立要件與方式，惟兩岸收養制度明顯不同，大陸更於一九九九年修改收養法，法院在處理涉陸收養案件時，依台灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例規定若指示適用大陸法時，究竟是適用大陸之內國收養規定或外國收養規定，直接適用實體法規定或其國際私法之規定，大陸收養法如何正確解讀、法律漏洞如何補充等，進而在我內國法的適用上，台灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例中反致規定如何適用、涉陸收養與涉外收養發生競合時如何處理，涉陸收養關係終止效力之準據法是否為立法上的疏漏，及實務對於上開疑義的處理是否妥當等，為本文所欲討論的重點。
    In accordance with our law adoption of a child from the Mainland shall be applied to the courts for admission. During a trial case relating to adoption between the people of Taiwan and the Mainland, the courts should check the legal requirements and form of the adoption to prevent the adoption on the ground that it is null and void or it may be annulled. The rules of adoption between Taiwan and Mainland China are, however, apparently different. Moreover, Mainland China amended its Adoption Code in 1999. When the courts are dealing with those cases relating to people from Mainland China, if the Act Governing Relations between People of Taiwan and the Mainland stipulates application of the Mainland rules, shall the courts apply the domestic adoption rules or the inter-country adoption rules? Shall the courts apply the substantive laws or the international privacy laws? How is one to interpret Mainland China’s adoption rules? How does one address legal gaps? Furthermore, in terms of application of domestic rules, how does one apply the renvoi? How does one address the problem when Mainland adoption and foreign adoption happen concurrently? Is the absence of rules for the termination of adoption between the people of Taiwan and the people of Mainland China people a legislative gap? Have the courts made proper decisions in regard to the above questions above? These are the key points of this essay.
    關聯: 法學評論, 94, 335-376
    数据类型: article
    显示于类别:[政大法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 大小格式浏览次数
    94(335-376).pdf629KbAdobe PDF21138检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈