English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 110944/141864 (78%)
Visitors : 47825911      Online Users : 423
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/98548
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/98548


    Title: 文創產業重要智慧資本之個案研究-企業與銀行之觀點
    Case study of cultural and creative industry`s important intellectual capital - views of banks and company
    Authors: 黃榆芬
    Contributors: 王文英
    黃榆芬
    Keywords: 個案研究法
    智慧資本
    文創產業
    銀行
    Case Study Method
    Intellectual Capital
    Cultural and Creative Industry
    bank
    Date: 2016
    Issue Date: 2016-07-01 14:56:09 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 以知識經濟為主軸的時代,會計報表之淨資產已不足以代表企業之價值,透過智慧資本之管理可協助企業保有競爭優勢。但除了企業需要評估本身所擁有智慧資本外,銀行評估放款決策時也需透過智慧資本了解企業真正價值。本研究採個案研究法,以文創產業的個案公司作為研究對象,探討其重視之智慧資本及管理制度。此外,透過訪談兩家銀行以瞭解其進行放款決策時所重視之公司智慧資本,並比較公司重視之智慧資本與銀行評估放款時所重視之公司智慧資本的差異,進而分析差異之可能原因。本研究提出以下三點結論:

    一、文創公司重視之智慧資本項目共計39項,且個案公司對於大部分重要智慧資本皆設有管理制度。
    二、影響銀行放款決策之智慧資本項目有38項。
    三、文創公司與銀行有相同重視之智慧資本項目23項,以及不同項目有29項,造成差異主要原因為兩者對於公司經營穩定性重視程度不同與彼此資訊不對稱所導致。

    針對研究結果,並進而對個案公司、產業界及後續研究提出建議。
    In the knowledge-based economy, financial statements can only reflect enterprises’ partial value. Enterprise can maintain it’s competitive advantages by intellectual capital management. Not only insiders, but outsiders such as banks need to make the comprehensive accessments from existing quantitive information to undiscovered qualitive intellectual capital for capturing the enterprises’ real value. This research adopts case study method, where the research subject is an enterprise in cultural and creative industry. The research identifies the important intellectual captial and it’s related management. In addition, by interviewing with two banks, I will understand the intellectual capital which the banks emphasize on when they make loan decisions, and making the comparison for important intellectual capital of enterprise between banks and managers and further analyze the reasons of differences. According to the result of case analyses, the conclusions are as follow:
    1. In firms’ perspective, there are 39 important indicators, most of which have set measurements for management.
    2. In banks’ perspective, there are 38 inportant indicators
    3. Both of banks and managers consider 23 indicators as the important intellectual capital indicators. However, they do not hold the consistent opinions on 29 indicators. The main differences between them are operating stability and information asymmetry.

    According to the research result, I make some recommendations for the case company, industry and future research.
    Reference: 中文文獻
    王文英與張清福,2004,智慧資本影響績效模式之探討:我國半導體業之實證研究,會計評論,第39期,89-117。
    文化建設委員會,2010,文化創意產業發展法。
    文化部,2014,2014臺灣文化創意產業發展年報。
    古宜靈,2014,文化產業的創新與知識資本之研究,建築與規劃學報,第15卷,第2/3期,129-153。
    台灣智慧資本研究中心與資策會,2006,智慧資本管理,台北:華泰文化。
    行政院,2003,挑戰2008:國家發展重點計畫(2002-2007)。
    吳思華,2004a,文化創意的產業化思維(上),典藏今藝術,第136期,134-137。
    吳思華,2004b,文化創意的產業化思維(下),典藏今藝術,第137期,114-117。
    吳思華、賴鈺晶與顏如妙,2000,網際網路智慧資本衡量與發展措施研究,經濟部工業局軟體五年發展計畫。
    林文燦、白森全、余文欽與洪文義,2008民俗文化創意商品行銷策略-以大甲媽祖國際觀光文化節為例,第六屆管理學術研討會,433 – 439。
    林詠能,2014,我國文化創意產業發展困境,國民教育,第54卷,第5期,1-3。
    邱誌勇、劉柏君與廖淑雯,2004,自滿的狂享與虛幻及其之後—論台灣文化產業。當代,第200期,116-123。
    洪鉛財、賴杉桂與劉孟嫻,2011,智慧資本之流程資本對股價淨值比影響之探討-以財務資本及公司成長性為干擾變數。朝陽商管評論,第10卷,第1期,101-126。
    唐祖貽,2013,政策加持文創類股提升軟實力,今周刊,第886期,214-215。
    夏學理、秦嘉嫄、洪琬喻、陳國政、施沛琳、謝知達與陳怡君,2008,文化創意產業概論,臺北市:五南。
    郭孚宏,2015,台灣文創產業發展歷程與人才培育概況,商業職業教育,第137期,41-45。
    陳世哲與許淑君,1999,競爭策略、人力資源管理系統與組織績效之研究,亞太管理評論,第4卷,第4期,413-429。
    陳佳宏,2014,文創產業「創作端」的關鍵成功要素-以霹靂布袋戲、悲慘世界、漫威漫畫為例,臺灣經濟研究月刊,第37卷,第4期,19-26。
    陳萬淇,1995,個案研究方法,台北:華泰文化事業公司。
    黃美賢,2015,博物館發展文化創意產業之關鍵成功因素,藝術教育研究,第29期,77-110。
    廖淑容,2012,布袋戲產業特性與網絡現象之研究,社會與區域發展學報,第4卷,第1期,21-56。
    劉大和,2003,文化創意產業界定及其意義,台灣經濟研究月刊,第26期,115-122。
    劉正田,2002,無形資產、成長機會與股票報酬關係之研究,會計評論,第35期,1-29。
    劉正田,2003,企業研發投資與淨值市價比現象。風險管理學報,第5卷,第2期,261-285。
    劉維公,2003,什麼是文化創意產業?文化創意產業的時代意義,典藏今藝術,第128期,42-45。
    滕人傑,2004,國內文化創意產業生態初探-以新興之音樂與表演藝術、視覺藝術及工藝產業為例,台灣經濟研究月刊,第27期,90-100。
    藺德與邱上嘉,2005,台灣文化創意產業的回顧與展望,設計研究,第5期,141-147。



    英文文獻
    A1-Ali, N. 2003. Comprehensive Intellectual Capital Management. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
    Bontis, N. 1996. There’s a prices on your head: Managing intellectual capital strategically. Ivy Business Quarterly 60(4): 40-47.
    Bontis, N. 1998. Intellectual capital: An exploratory study that develops measures and models. Management Decision 36(2): 63-72.
    Brooking, A. 1996. Intellectual Capital: Core Asset for the Millennium Enterprise. London: International Thomson Business Press.
    Caves, R. 2003. Creative Industries:Contracts between Art and Commerce. Harvard University Press.
    Chen, J., Z. Zhu, and H. Y. Xie. 2004. Measuring intellectual capital: A new model and empirical study. Journal of Intellectual Capital 5(1): 195-212.
    Drucker, P. F. 1985. Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Practice and Principles. London: Heinemann.
    Dzinkowski, R. 2000. The measurement and management of intellectual capital: An introduction. Management Accounting 78(2): 32-36
    Edvinsson, L., and M. S. Malone. 1997. Intellectual Capital: Realizing Your Company’s True Value by Finding its Hidden Roots. New York: HarperCollins Publishers, Inc.
    Edvinsson, L., and P. Sullivan. 1996. Developing a model for managing intellectual capital. European Management Journal 14(4): 356-364.
    Edvinsson, L., R. Dvir, N. Roth, and E. Pasher. 2004. Innovations: The new unit of analysis in the knowledge era. Journal of Intellectual Capital 5 (1): 40-58.
    Garnham, N. 2005. From cultural to creative industries. International Journal of Cultural Policy 11(1): 19-20
    Hesmondhalgh, D. 2006. The cultural industries. London: Sage.
    Jonas, G. J., and S. J. Young, 1998. Bridging the gap: Who can bring a user focus to business reporting? Accounting Horizons 12(June): 154-159.
    Klein, D. A., and L. Prusak. 1994. Charactering intellectual capital. Multiclient program working paper, Boston: Ernst & Young Center for Business Innovation.
    Lev, B., and T. Sougiannis. 1996. The capitalization, amortization, and value- relevance of R&D. Journal of Accounting & Economics 21: 107-138.
    Lynn, B. E. 1998. Intellectual capital: Key to value-added success in the next millennium. CMA Magazine 72(1): 10-15.
    Ordóñez de Pablos, P. 2003. Intellectual capital reporting in Spain: A comparative view. Journal of Intellectual Capital 4(1): 61-81.
    Pennings, J. M., K. Lee, and van Witteloostuijn, A. 1998. Human capital, social capital, and firm dissolution. Academy of Management Journal. 41(4): 425-440.
    Roos, J., G. Roos, L. Edvinsson, and N. C. Dragonetti. 1998. Intellectual Capital: Navigating in the New Business Landscape. New York: New York University Press.
    Stewart, T. A. 1997. Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of Organization. New York: Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group, Inc.
    Sullivan, P. H. 2000.Value-Driven Intellectual Capital: How to Convert Intangible Corporate Assets into Market Value. N.Y.: John Wiley and Sons.
    Ulrich, D. 1998. Intellectual capital = competence x commitment. Sloan Management Review 39(2): 15-26.
    Yin, R. K. 1994. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 2nd ed. Califormia: Sage Publications.
    Zhou, A. Z., and D. Fink. 2003. The intellectual capital web: A systematic linking of intellectual capital and knowledge management. Journal of Intellectual Capital 4(1): 34-48.

    參考網站
    財政部財政資料中心http://www.fia.gov.tw/dp.asp?mp=1
    個案公司網站
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計學系
    103353041
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0103353041
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[會計學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    There are no files associated with this item.



    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback