Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/99554
|
| Title: | 高階健康檢查事業服務能力成熟度之衡量：模式建立、構念驗證與資訊科技應用
Measuring Service Capability Maturity Level for Advanced Health Checkup Businesses: Model Building, Construct Validation and IT Application |
| Authors: | 張芳凱
Chang, Fang Kai |
| Contributors: | 李有仁
Li, Eldon Y.
張芳凱
Chang, Fang Kai |
| Keywords: | 高階健康檢查服務流程模式
服務流程再造
服務能力等級
服務成熟等級
資訊科技應用
advanced health checkup service process model
service process reengineering
service capability level
service maturity level
IT application. |
| Date: | 2016 |
| Issue Date: | 2016-08-02 17:02:40 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 長久以來，企業核心競爭能力早已被公認是企業獲利以及維繫的驅動者，對於服務業當然也不例外。為了有效生存於現今惡劣的商業環境，服務業必須維護其服務能力之成熟度，以使用者為服務的核心，並以消費者的需求為服務的出發點。唯有以客戶為本，才能使企業永續經營，故台灣服務業若要加入國際市場營運，企業服務能力將扮演一個相當重要的角色。
隨著人類壽命的延長、以及關心個人健康的中產階級崛起，健康檢查已逐漸成為新全民運動。由於市場龐大與需求旺盛，為了服務有健康意識且經濟條件佳的客群，全台醫院和專業診所紛紛設立健康管理中心，提供燈光美、氣氛佳、餐點好、服務親切的健檢環境，其中不少醫院更是砸下重金，重新改造內部裝潢與購買最新式的檢查儀器。因此，高階健檢產業如雨後春筍般的蓬勃成長。
本研究認為，為了實現更高的服務品質，高階健康檢查事業應適當的進行商業流程再造。藉由不斷地改善流程，企業得以回應並滿足顧客的需求，增加企業服務顧客的能力，持續提升服務品質。因此，本研究引用服務企業流程模式的架構，以高階健康檢查事業為研究對象，主要的研究問題分為三大部分：一為適用高階健康檢查事業的服務能力評量模式發展，其二為編輯符合實務用詞的流程領域描述說明，其三為提供高階健康檢查事業品質成長的參考軌跡。
本研究之結果，定義了高階健康檢查事業服務能力等級與成熟等級之表述方式，主動性的給予被評鑑機構一個品質提升的建議與參考的軌跡。本研究設計一套『高階健康檢查事業服務能力成熟度之自我評鑑與改善建議系統』，協助高階健康檢查事業自我評量服務成熟等級，並提供透過資訊科技應用來提升等級的建議。透過階段性的資訊科技應用採納，可妥善配置資訊科技採納進程並編製預算執行順序，來強化醫療照護服務的能力成熟度等級。
Core competitiveness of enterprise has long been recognized as the driver of profits and sustainability of a business. Service industry is certainly in no exception. In order to effectively survive in today`s harsh business environment, services business must maintain its maturity of service capabilities, treat consumer as the core of the services and serve the consumer need as the basic of services. Such consumer-oriented strategy is the key to ensure the long term prosperity of business. It is also essential to Taiwan`s service industry for her successful operations in international market.
With the extended human lifespan, as well as the rise of the middle class with concern about personal health, health checkup service has become a new national sport. In order to serve customers, who have health-conscious mind and favorable financial affordability, hospitals in Taiwan provide specialized clinics and health management centers. They offer soothing lights and good atmosphere as well as healthy meals and friendly services. Such reformation in health checkup business has seen vigorous market growth and received significant investment on both medical equipment and interior remodeling of examination facility.
This study suggests that in order to achieve a higher quality of advanced health checkup service, adequate business process reengineering should be carried out as per need. With constantly improving processes, the service unit would be able to respond and fulfill the customer needs, increase the customer service capacity of the enterprise, and continue to improve service quality. Therefore, this study adapts service business process model as research framework and chooses advanced health checkup business as the research subject. The main research questions are divided into three parts: first is developing a service capability evaluation model for advanced health checkup business; second is editing descriptions of process areas in line with practical terms; third is providing a roadmap of advanced health checkup business to improve their service quality.
Results of this study helps to define the capability level representations and maturity level representations for advanced health checkup business. It could proactively provide suggestions to and also be adopted as a reference roadmap for service quality improvement by the evaluated companies. This study also implements a “self-evaluation and improvement recommendation system for advanced health checkup service capability maturity level”, which assists advanced health checkup business to self-assess the maturity level of service capability, and provide recommendations to enhance the level through IT applications. Through the stage-wise IT application adoption, it could properly arrange IT adoption schedule, prepare budget execution order and strengthen the maturity level of health care services capability. |
| Reference: | 1. 李有仁、洪叔民、曾德宜、陳皆成、陳立偉、蕭丞傑等（2000）。服務創新能力成熟度模式建構成果報告（國科會專題研究計畫成果報告編號：98-EC-17-A-29-S2-0005）。台北：中華民國行政院國家科學委員會。
2. 財團法人全國認證基金會（2016）。本會新增『健康檢查品質與流程管理要求』、『健康檢查認證服務手冊』文件，公開徵詢意見。線上檢索日期：2016年6月20日，網址：http://www.taftw.org.tw/wSite/ct?xItem=1291&ctNode=30&mp=1
3. 程瑞婷（2012)。醫策會健康檢查品質認證制度介紹。醫療品質雜誌，6（2)，9-12。
4. 滕淑芬（2015)。《健康遠見》2015健檢指南特刊。遠見雜誌，2015年5月號。
5. Barney, J. （1991）. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management, 17（1）, 99-120.
6. Caldas, C. H., & Soibelman, L. （2003）. Automating hierarchical document classification for construction management information systems. Automation in Construction, 12（4）, 395-406.
7. Central Intelligence Agency. The World Factbook. （2013）. Retrieved from https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html
8. CMMI Product Team, （2010）. CMMI for Acquisition, Version 1.3 （CMU/SEI-2010-TR-032）.
9. CMMI Product Team. （2002）. Capability Maturity Model® Integration （CMMI SM）, Version 1.1. Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University/SEI-2002-TR-012. Pittsburg, PA.
10. Crosby, P. B. （1979）. Quality is free: The art of making quality certain （Vol. 94）. New York: McGraw-Hill.
11. Davenport, T. H., & Short, J. E. （1990）. The New Industrial Engineering: Information Technology and Business Process Redesign. Sloan Management Review, 31（4）, 11-27.
12. del Aguila Obra, A. R., Cámara, S. B., & Meléndez, A. P. （2002）. Internet usage and competitive advantage: the impact of the Internet on an old economy industry in Spain. Internet Research, 12（5）, 391-401
13. Deming, W. Edwards. （1986）, Out of the Crisis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. Donabedian, A. （1978). The quality of medical care. Science, 856-864.
15. Dyer, J. H. & Singh, H. （1998）. The relational view: cooperative strategy and source of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Journal, 23 （4）, 660-679.
16. Eisenhardt, K. M. （1989）. Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 48-511
17. Eisenhardt, K.M. & Martin, J.A. （2000）. Dynamic capabilities: what are they?. Strategic Management Journal, 21 （10-11）, 1105–1121.
18. Forrester, E. （2008). Applying CMMI for Services to Health Care. Software Engineering Institute Digital Library. Retrieved June 5, 1999 from the World Wide Web: http://resources.sei.cmu.edu/asset_files/Presentation/2008_017_001_22358.pdf
19. Gibson, C.F. & Nolan, R.L. （1974）. Managing the four stages of EDP growth. Harvard Business Review, 52 （2）, 76-88.
20. Gibson, D. L., Goldenson, D. R., & Kost, K. （2006）. Performance results of CMMI-based process improvement （No. CMU/SEI-2006-TR-004）. Carnegie-Mellon Univ Pittsburgh Pa Software Engineering Inst.
21. Goldenson, D. R., & Gibson, D. L. （2003）. Demonstrating the Impact and Benefits of CMMI （Trademark）: An Update and Preliminary Results （No. CMU/SEI-2003-SR-009）. Carnegie-Mellon Univ Pittsburgh Pa Software Engineering Inst.
22. Grant, R. M. （1996）. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic management journal, 17, 109-122.
23. Grover, V., Jeong, S. R., Kettinger, W. J., & Teng, J. T. （1995）. The implementation of business process reengineering. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12（1）, 109-144.
24. Hammer, M. （1990）. Reengineering work: Don`t automate, obliterate. Harvard Business Review, 68 （4）, 104-112.
25. Hammer, M., & Champy, J. （1993）. Reengineering the corporation: A manifesto for business revolution. New York: Harper Business.
26. Humphrey, Watts S. （1989）. Managing the Software Process. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley
27. Jiang, J. J., Klein, G., Hwang, H. G., Huang, J., & Hung, S. Y. （2004）. An exploration of the relationship between software development process maturity and project performance. Information & Management, 41（3）, 279-288.
28. Juran, Joseph M. （1988）. Juran on Planning for Quality. New York: Macmillan
29. Kang, L. S., & Paulson, B. C. （1998）. Information management to integrate cost and schedule for civil engineering projects. Journal of construction engineering and management, 124（5）, 381-389.
30. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. （1996）. Linking the balanced scorecard to strategy. California management review, 39（1） ,53-79.
31. Kerzner, H. R. （2013）. Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. Wiley.
32. Kogut, B., & Zander, U. （1992）. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization science, 3（3）, 383-397.
33. Kuznets, S. （1965）. Economic Growth and Structure: Selected Essays. New York: W.W. Norton & Co., Inc
34. Li, E. Y., Chen, J. S., & Huang, Y. H. （2006）. A framework for investigating the impact of IT capability and organisational capability on firm performance in the late industrialising context. International Journal of Technology Management, 36（1）, 209-229.
35. Li, E.Y., Chen, L.W., & Shen, C.L. （2010）. A framework for service innovation capability maturity model. Proceedings of the 14th International conference on Operations and Supply Chain Management, Hong Kong, China, July 25-31, 529-534.
36. Lusch, R. F., Vargo, S. L., & O’Brien, M. （2007）. Competing through service: Insights from service-dominant logic. Journal of retailing, 83（1）, 5-18.
37. Nolan, R. L. （1979）. Managing the crisis in data processing. Harvard Business Review, 57 （2）, 115-126.
38. Nolan,R.L.（1973）.Managing the computer resource: a stage hypothesis. Communications of the ACM, 16（7）, 399-405.
39. Paulk., M.C., Curtis., B., Chrissis., M.B. & Weber., C.V. （1993）.Capability Maturity Model, Version 1.1. IEEE Software, 10 （4）,18-27.
40. Penrose, E. T. （1995）. The theory of the growth of the firm. New York: John Wiley.
41. Phan, D. D., Vogel, D. R. & Jr, J. F. N. （1995）. Empirical Studies in Software Development Projects: Fields Survey and OS/400 Study. Information & Management, 28, 271-280.
42. Project Management Institute. （2008）. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge: PMBOK® Guide. （4th ed.） Project Management Institute.
43. Project Management Institute, （1996）. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge （PMBOK Guide）, Project Management Institute..
44. Rappaport, A. （1986）. Will the corporate plan create value for shareholders?.Directors and Boards, 11（1）, 24-26.
45. Ravichandran, T. （1999）. Redefining organizational innovation: towards theoretical advancements. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 10（2）, 243-274.
46. Rindova, V. P., & Kotha, S. （2001）. Continuous "morphing": Competing through dynamic capabilities, form, and function. Academy of Management Journal, 44 （6）, 1263-1280
47. Rojas, E. M. & Songer, A. D. （1999）. Web-centric systems: a new paradigm for collaborative engineering. Journal of Management in Engineering, 15 （1）, 39-45.
48. Sambamurthy, V., Bharadwaj, A. & Grover, V. （2003）. Shaping agility through digital options: reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms. MIS Quarterly, 27（2）, 237–263.
49. Shewhart, Walter A. （1931）. Economic control of quality of manufactured product. New York: Van Nostrand.
50. Stake, R. E. （1995）. The art of case study research.
51. Talwar, R. （1993）. Business re-engineering—A strategy-driven approach. Long Range Planning, 26（6）, 22-40.
52. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G. & Shuen, A. （1997）. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic management journal, 18 （7）, 509–533.
53. Teng, J. T. C., Grover, V. & Fiedler, K. D. （1994）. Business process reengineering: charting a strategic path for the information age. California Management Review, 37 （7）, 9–31.
54. Tippins, M. J., & Sohi, R. S. （2003）. IT competency and firm performance: is organizational learning a missing link?. Strategic Management Journal, 24（8）, 745-761.
55. Vargo, S. L. （2007）. An Overview of Service-Dominant Logic. College of Business Administration, University of Hawaii, USA.
56. Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. （2004）. Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68, 1-17.
57. Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. （2006）. What it is, what it is not, what it might be . The service-dominant logic of marketing: Dialog, debate, and directions. ME Sharpe.
58. Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. （2008）. Service-dominant logic: Continuing the evolution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36, 1-10.
59. Venkatramen, N. （1994）. IT-enabled business transformation: From automation to business scope redefinition. Sloan Management Review, 35（2）, 73-87.
60. Web of Knowledge. Thomson Reuters. （2013）. Retrieved from http://apps.webofknowledge.com
61. Wernerfelt, B. （1984）. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5（2）, 171-180.
62. Whitten, J. L., & Bentley, L. D. （1998）. Systems analysis and design methods （4th ed.）. St. Louis, MO: Times Mirror/Mosby College Publishing.
63. Wohlwend, H., & Rosenbaum, R. （1993）. Software improvement in an international company. Proceedings from 15th International Conference on Software Engineering, Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society Press, 212-220.
64. Yin, R. K. （2009）.Case study research: Design and methods （Vol. 5）. Sage. |
| Description: | 博士
國立政治大學
資訊管理學系
98356507 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0983565072 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [資訊管理學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| index.html | 0Kb | HTML2 | 329 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
