English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 96245/126860 (76%)
Visitors : 32262371      Online Users : 377
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/99670


    Title: 臺灣民眾國家認同的發展:1895年到2000年
    The Development of People’s National Identity from 1895 to 2000
    Authors: 羙雪倫
    Medina, Sharon Paulette
    Contributors: 游清鑫
    Yu, Ching Hsin
    羙雪倫
    Medina, Sharon Paulette
    Keywords: 國家認同
    歷史經驗
    集體認同
    認同變遷
    社會認同
    政治認同
    文化認同
    臺灣
    國民黨統治
    1895年至2000年
    日本殖民統治
    228事件
    National Identity
    Historical Experience
    Collective Identitiy
    Identity Change
    Social Identity
    Political Identity
    Cultural Identity
    Taiwan
    Kuomintang Rule
    1895-2000
    Japanese Colonial Rule
    228 Incident
    Date: 2016
    Issue Date: 2016-08-03 11:37:55 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 國家認同指涉的是涵蓋傳統、語言與政治的整體國家文化,經過學者在各學術領域的討論,此一概念已經變得普遍。既有的研究主要則是對國家認同概念持續建構,以及瞭解個人、團體以及「國家」之間的複雜互動關係。本論文以臺灣為例,嘗試點出歷史與國家認同關係的重要性,並從1895年日本在臺灣開始殖民政策開始,到國民黨在臺灣威權統治期間,再到2000年臺灣的民主轉型之間,瞭解究竟是哪些因素,以及這些因素如何,與何時,對臺灣國家認同的發展產生影響等問題,提供重要的支持點點。其間重要的研究問題也包含究竟國家認同所指為何?以及歷史經驗,諸如日本的殖民統治時期、228事件、白色恐怖、國民當的威權統治,以及2000年之前的民主轉型等,會如影響國家認同的變化?本論文在一開始對認同發展的研究進行一總體式的回顧,接著討論社會、政治與文化認同彼此之間如何互動,以及這些認同如何與前述歷史經驗影響國家認同的發展。在此同時,本文也將評述其他學者對於1895年到2000年之間臺灣民眾國家認同發展的相關研究與論點。
    National Identity, the depiction of a country as a whole, encompassing its culture based on traditions, language and politics. This concept has grown to be common, lectured by scholars from various disciplines. Existing studies have fabricated piece by piece the definition of national identity, to comprehend the complex interaction within individuals, groups and a “Nation”. This paper seeks to provide the importance of the relationship of history on national identity, using the case of Taiwan, also known as the R.O.C (Republic of China). The importance of this research is critical to support how, when, and what variables during the time period of 1895 (Japanese Colonial Period) to 2000 (KMT Authoritarian Rule and Democratic Transition Period) were the main causes for Taiwan’s national identity to evolve. What exactly does national identity refer to? And how do historical experiences such as, the Japanese colonial era, the 2-28 and White Terror period, and KMT’s authoritarian rule and democratic transition before 2000, can systematically cause change? Prior to analyzing Taiwan, we first conduct a general review on the development of identity; the interconnection between the social, political, and cultural identities and how those identities along with historical experiences impact national identity evolution. At that juncture, we will question other scholarly works on the development of people’s national identity from 1895 to 2000 and its impact in Taiwan.
    Reference: 1.Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined Communities. London: Verso.
    2.Bellocchi, N. (2010, June 24). Lee Teng hui's Democratic Legacy. Retrieved 2016, from Taipei Times: http://taipeitimes.com/news/editorials/archives/2010/06/24/2003476228>
    3.Brewer, M. B. (2001). The Many Faces os Soicial Identity: Implications for Political, Psychology. JSTOR, Political Psychology(22.1), 115-125. Retrieved 2016, from http://www.jstor.org
    4.Brown, M. J. (2004). Is Taiwan Chinese? The Impact of Culture, Power, and Migration on Changing Identities. University of California, 9.
    5.Cerulo, K. A. (1997). Identity Construction: New Issues, New Directions. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 385-409. Retrieved 2016, from http://www.jstor.org
    6.Chang, B.-y. (2004). From Taiwanization to De-sinification: Culture Construction in Taiwan Since 1990's. China Perspectives, 56, 34-44.
    7.Chang, C. J. (2003). China. San Diego, California: Greenhaven Press.
    8.Chang, H.-C., & Holt, R. (2009). Taiwan and ROC: A Critical Analysis of President Che Shui-bien's Construction of Taiwan's Identity in National Speeches. Chicago, USA: Routledge: Taylor and Francis Group. Retrieved 2016, from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.455.9090&rep=rep1&type=pdf
    9.Chang, L.-C. (2015). Island of Histories: Memory, Identity, and Heritage in Contemporary Taiwanese Historiography. Academia Sinica.
    10.Chen, C.-C. (1991). Impact of Japanese Colonial Rule on Taiwanese Elites. Journal of Asian History, 22(1). Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org
    11.Chen, D.-S. (2001). Taiwan's Social Changes in the Patterns of Social Solidarity in the 20th Century. In R. L. Edmonds, & S. M. Goldstein (Eds.), Taiwan in the Twentieth Century: A Retrospective View (pp. 61-82). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    12.Ching, L. T. (2001). Becoming Japanese. Berkeley, California: University of California.
    13.Chu, Y.-h., & Lin, J.-w. (2001). Political Development in 20th Century Taiwan: State-Building, Regime Transformation and the Construction of National Identity. In D. Fell (Ed.), The Politics of Modern Taiwan (Vol. 165, pp. 102-129). Routledge Press.
    14.Copper, J. F. (2009). Taiwan: Nation-State or Province? Boulder: Westview Press.
    15.Corcuff, S. (2002). Memories of the Future: National Identity Issues and the Search for a New Taiwan. New York: Armonk Press.
    16.Davis, T. C. (1999). Revisiting Group Attachment: Ethnic and National Identity (Vol. 20). Political Psychology.
    17.Day, G., & Thompson, A. (2004). Theorizing Nationalism. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan Press.
    18.Dekker, H., Malova, D., & Hoogendoorn, S. (2003). Nationalism and Its Explanations. Political Psychology, 24(2), 345-376. Retrieved 2016, from http://www.jstor.org
    19.Dittmer, L. (2004). Taiwan and The Issue of National Identity. Asian Survey, 44(4), 475-483. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/as.2004.44.4.475?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
    20.Dittmer, L. (2005). Taiwan's Aim-inhibited Quest for Identity and the China Factor. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 71-90.
    21.Doenecke, J. D. (2003). Chiang Kai-shek and The Struggle Between the Nationalist and Communist. In The History of National China (Vol. 2, pp. 102-221). Farmington Hills Press.
    22.Gold, T. B. (1993). Taiwan's Quest for Identity in the Shadow of China. In S. Tsang, In the Shadow of China: Political Development in Taiwan Since 1949 (p. 169=192). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
    23.Grosby, S. (2005). Nationalism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford, New York: Oxford Press.
    24.Hsiau, A.-C. (2000). Contemporary Taiwanese Cultural Nationalism.
    25.Hsiau, A.-C. (2014). The Emergence of De-exiled Cultural Politics and the Post War Generation in Taiwan. 52, 173-214.
    26.Hsieh, J. F. (2004). National Identity and Taiwan's Mainland China Policy. Journal of Contemporary China, 13(40), 479-490. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org
    27.Hsieh, J. F. (2005). Ethnicity, National Identity, and Domestic Politics in Taiwan. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 40(1-2).
    28.Huang, C. (2005). Dimensions of Taiwanese/ Chinese Identity and National Identity in Taiwan: A Latent Class Analysis. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 40(1-2), 51-70.
    29.Huang, F.-s. (2007, March 17). Colonization and Modernization Under Japanese Rule (1895-1945). Government Information Office, p. Chapter 6.
    30.Hughes, C. (1997). Taiwan and Chinese Nationalism: National Identity and Status in International Society. New York: Routledge: Taylor and Francis Corporation .
    31.Hutchinson, J., & Smith, A. (1994). Nationalism. New York: Oxford UP.
    32.Klintworth, G. (1994). Taiwan's United Nations Membership Bid. The Pacific Review, 7(3), 283-295.
    33.Lee, S.-f. (2004, February 28). 2-18 Incident. Taipei Times. Retrieved from http:://www.taipeitimes.com/news/editorials/archives/2004/02/28/2003100472
    34.Lee, W.-C. (2000). Taiwan's Cultural Reconstruction Movement Identity Politics and Collective Action Since 2000. Issues and Studies, 41(1), 1-50.
    35.Liao, P.-h., & Wang, D. (2006). Taiwan and the Japanese Colonial Rule, 1895-1945: History, Culture, Memory. Retrieved 2016, from Columbia: http://www.cup.columbia.edu/book/978-0-231-13798-0/taiwan-under-japanese-colonial-rule-18951945
    36.Lynch, D. (2004). Taiwan's Democratization and the Rise of Taiwanese Nationalism as Socialization to Global Culture. Pacific Affairs, 75(4), 557-574.
    37.Martin, R. (1975). The Socialization of Children in China and on Taiwan: An Analysis of Elementary School. The China Quarterly(62), 242-262. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/652858
    38.Matsuda, H. (2012). Japanese “New Imperial History” in Comparative Perspective: The Cases of Okinawan and Taiwanese Migrations. Journal of History for the Public.
    39.Mulvenon, J. C. (2003). A Poverty of Riches: New Challenges and Opportunities in PLA Research. Rand Corporation, 172.
    40.Ruciano, F. L. (2003). The Construction of National Identity. Political Research Quaterly, 56(3), 361-366. Retrieved 2016, from http://www.jstor.org
    41.Shih, C.-f., & Chen, M. (2010). Taiwanese Identity and The Memories of 2-28: A Case for Political Reconciliation. Asian Perspective, 34(4), 85-113.
    42.Shozo, F. (2006). The Formation of Taiwanese Identity and the Cultural Policy of Various Outside Regimes. In L. Ping-Hui, & D. Wang, Taiwan Under Japanese Colonial Rule 1895-1945: History, Culture, Memory (pp. 62-77). Columbia: Columbia University Press. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7312/liao13798.9
    43.Smith, A. D. (1991). National Identity. New York: University of Nevada Press.
    44.Sneath, D. (2010). Political Mobilization and the Construction of Collective Identity in Mongolia. Central Asian Survey, 29(3), 251-267.
    45.Sokefeld, M. (2001). Reconsidering Identity. 96H, 527-544. Retrieved 2016, from http://www.jstor.org
    46.Tillman, D. (2006, Apirl 24). Fomosa Killings are put at 10,000. New York Times.
    Retrieved from http://www.taiwandc.org/hst-1947.htm
    47.Tsai, C.-h., & Cheng, S.-f. (2004). Change and Continuity of Social Cleavage in Taiwan. American Political Science Association.
    48.Tsai, C.-Y. (2007). National Idenity, Etnic Identity, and Party Identity in Taiwan. Maryland Series in Contemporary Asian Studies, 2-28. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1187&context=mscas
    49.Tsurumi, P. E. (1979). Education and Assimilation in Taiwan under Japanese Rule 1895-1945. Modern Asian Studies, 13(4), 617-641. Retrieved 2016, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/312185
    50.Wachman, A. M. (1994). Competiting Identities in Taiwan. In M. Rubinstein, The Other Taiwan:1945 to the Present (pp. 17-80). New York: Routledge Press.
    51.Wang, F.-c. (2013). A Prolonged Exile: National Imagination of the KMT Regime in Post-war Taiwan. Orien Extremus, 52, 137-172.
    52.Wenfang, T. (2007). Nationalism and Electoral Outcome in Taiwan: The Impact of Identity Fence-sitting on Voting Behaviour. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 1(4), 481-496.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    亞太研究英語碩士學位學程(IMAS)
    102926042
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0102926042
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[亞太研究英語博/碩士學位學程(IDAS/IMAS) ] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    604201.pdf1712KbAdobe PDF383View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback