English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 118786/149850 (79%)
造訪人次 : 82535325      線上人數 : 699
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/157670
    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/157670


    題名: 企業參與國際倡議與公司績效之關聯性
    Relationship Between Corporate Participation in International Initiatives and Firm Performance
    作者: 宋承軒
    Song, Cherng-Shiuan
    貢獻者: 林宛瑩
    Lin, Wan-Ying
    宋承軒
    Song, Cherng-Shiuan
    關鍵詞: 參與國際倡議
    參與國際倡議數量
    公司績效
    Corporate Participation in International Initiatives
    Number of International Initiatives
    Firm Performance
    日期: 2025
    上傳時間: 2025-07-01 14:16:27 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 隨著全球永續發展趨勢與環境、社會及公司治理議題的重要性提升,全球企業亦將這些議題納入公司績效及投資決策的重要考量。本研究以2017至2023年台灣上市公司(非金融業)為樣本。探討企業參與ESG和碳排相關的國際倡議與公司績效之關聯性,並進一步分析企業參與國際倡議的數量是否對公司績效產生不同影響。本研究之實證結果顯示,企業是否參與國際倡議與 Tobin’s Q 及股價報酬率皆呈正向關聯,其中僅股價報酬率達到顯著水準,說明支持企業參與永續倡議有助於短期股價表現。進一步以企業參與倡議的數量衡量之研究結果則顯示,Tobin’s Q僅部分達到單尾顯著水準,而股價報酬率則達到顯著水準。
    In response to the growing global emphasis on sustainable development and the increasing importance of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) issues, corporations worldwide have increasingly incorporated these factors into corporate
    performance evaluations and investment decisions. This study uses a sample of Taiwanese listed non-financial firms from 2017 to 2023 to examine the relationship between corporate
    participation in ESG- and carbon-related international initiatives and firm performance. Furthermore, it investigates whether the number of international initiatives a firm participates in yields differential effects on performance. The empirical results indicate that corporate participations in international initiatives is positively associated with both Tobin’s Q and stock returns, with only the stock returns reaching statistical significance. This finding suggests that corporate engagement in sustainability initiatives may enhance short-term stock performance. Regarding the number of initiatives, the results show that the association with Tobin’s Q is marginally significant
    under a one-tailed test, while stock returns demonstrate statistically significant associations.
    參考文獻: 包沂靄、張淑清、吳冠勳、鄭淩淇、張慧珊(2024)。碳排放量、企業社會責任與公司治理對公司價值之影響。Journal of Data Analysis,19(1),15-49。
    吳幸蓁與廖蕙儀,2017,自願性揭露企業社會責任資訊之決定因素與其資訊後果, 中山管理評論,第25卷,第1期:13-62。
    林宛瑩、汪瑞芝與游順合 (2012)。研發支出、內部董事與經營績效。會計審計論叢,2(1),61-90。
    張育琳,2019,節能減碳,企業綠色環境管理策略與公司績效之關連性,中山管 理評論,第27卷,第2期:279-326。
    張雅淇、王雅琦(2023)。董事會特質、企業風險管理與券商分析師盈餘預測準確度之關聯性。中山管理評論,31(3),481-543。
    許永明(2021)。從學術文獻探討CSR作為企業策略性運用工具:過去、現在與未來。管理學報,38(4),477-495。
    彭郁潔、朱文儀、黃子軒(2024)。董事會獨立性、董事忙碌程度與公司績效之關係。中山管理評論,(印製中),i+1-31。
    蔡裕明、張璟升、張芷瑜、林承宏、洪婉瑜(2024)。探究高污染行業中企業社會責任實踐之經濟影響:從ESG績效到公司價值。管理資訊計算,13(2),141-155。
    蔡裕明、黃觀松、周文琪(2024)。綠色會計對臺灣上市公司碳排放與財務績效影響之研究。管理資訊計算,13(),30-43。
    謝安軒、林宛瑩、鄭桂蕙 (2023)。環境社會治理績效與銀行借款條件。
    Alareeni, B. A., & Hamdan, A. (2020). ESG impact on performance of US S&P 500-listed firms. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 20(7), 1409-1428.
    Aragón-Correa, J. A. (1998). Strategic proactivity and firm approach to the natural environment. Academy of management Journal, 41(5), 556-567.
    Benlemlih, M., & Bitar, M. (2018). Corporate social responsibility and investment efficiency. Journal of business ethics, 148, 647-671.
    Bolton, P., & Kacperczyk, M. (2021). Do investors care about carbon risk? Journal of financial economics, 142(2), 517-549.
    Capozza, D. R., & Seguin, P. J. (2003). Inside ownership, risk sharing and Tobin's q‐ratios: Evidence from REITs. Real Estate Economics, 31(3), 367-404.
    Chung, K. H., & Pruitt, S. W. (1994). A simple approximation of Tobin's q. Financial management, 70-74.
    Clark, G. L., & Viehs, M. (2014). The implications of corporate social responsibility for investors: An overview and evaluation of the existing CSR literature. Available at SSRN 2481877.
    Clark, G. L., Feiner, A., & Viehs, M. (2015). From the stockholder to the stakeholder: How sustainability can drive financial outperformance.
    Coad, A. (2009). The Growth of firms: A survey of theories and empirical evidence. Edward Elgar.
    Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Ellstrand, A. E., & Johnson, J. L. (1998). Meta-Analytic Reviews of Board Composition, Leadership Structure, and Financial Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 19(3), 269–290.
    Davidsson, P., Steffens, P., & Fitzsimmons, J. (2009). Growing profitable or growing from profits: putting the horse in front of the cart? Journal of business venturing, 24(4), 388-406.
    Delmar, F., Davidsson, P., & Gartner, W. B. (2003). Arriving at the high-Growth firm. Journal of business venturing, 18(2), 189-216.
    Dhaliwal, D. S., Radhakrishnan, S., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2012). Nonfinancial disclosure and analyst forecast accuracy: International evidence on corporate social responsibility disclosure. The accounting review, 87(3), 723-759.
    Dittmar, A., & Mahrt-Smith, J. (2007). Corporate governance and the value of cash holdings. Journal of financial economics, 83(3), 599-634.
    Duchin, R., Matsusaka, J. G., & Ozbas, O. (2010). When are outside directors effective? Journal of financial economics, 96(2), 195-214.
    Duque-Grisales, E., and J. Aguilera-Caracuel. 2021. Environmental, social and governance (ESG) scores and financial performance of multilatinas: Moderating effects of geographic international diversification and financial slack. Journal of Business Ethics 168 (2):315-334.
    Eccles, R. G., & Serafeim, G. (2017). Corporate and integrated reporting: A functional perspective. In Corporate stewardship (pp. 156-171). Routledge.
    Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835-2857.
    Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1992). The cross‐section of expected stock returns. the Journal of Finance, 47(2), 427-465.
    Fatemi, A. M., Fooladi, L. J. & Tehranian, H. (2015). Valuation effects of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Banking and Finance, 59, 182-192.
    Fatemi, A., Glaum, M., & Kaiser, S. (2018). ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure. Global finance journal, 38, 45-64.
    Faulkender, M., & Wang, R. (2006). Corporate financial policy and the value of cash. The journal of finance, 61(4), 1957-1990.
    Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of sustainable finance & investment, 5(4), 210-233.
    Garvey, G. T., Iyer, M., and Nash, J. (2018). Carbon footprint and productivity: does the “E” in ESG capture efficiency as well as environment. Journal of Investment Management, 16(1): 59-69.
    Ghani, R. A., Samah, A. R. A., Baharuddin, N. S., & Ahmad, Z. (2023). Determinants of firm value as measured by the Tobin’s Q: a case of Malaysian plantation sector. Int J Acad Res Account Finance Manag Sci, 13(2), 420-432.
    Ghoul, S. E., Guedhami, O., & Kim, Y. (2017). Country-level institutions, firm value, and the role of corporate social responsibility initiatives. Journal of International Business Studies, 48, 360-385.
    Giese, G., Lee, L. E., Melas, D., Nagy, Z., & Nishikawa, L. (2019). Foundations of ESG investing: How ESG affects equity valuation, risk, and performance. Journal of portfolio management, 45(5), 69-83.
    Greening, D. W., & Turban, D. B. (2000). Corporate social performance as a competitive advantage in attracting a quality workforce. Business & society, 39(3), 254-280.
    Griffin, J. J., & Mahon, J. F. (1997). The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate: Twenty-Five Years of Incomparable Research. Business & Society, 36(1), 5-31.
    Griffin, P. A., Lont, D. H., & Sun, E. Y. (2017). The relevance to investors of greenhouse gas emission disclosures. Contemporary Accounting Research, 34(2), 1265-1297.
    Hardiyansah, M., Agustini, A. T., & Purnamawati, I. (2021). The effect of carbon emission disclosure on firm value: environmental performance and industrial type. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(1), 123-133.
    Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of management review, 20(4), 986-1014.
    Hayashi, F. (1982). Tobin's marginal q and average q: A neoclassical interpretation. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 213-224.
    Hermundsdottir, F., & Aspelund, A. (2021). Sustainability innovations and firm competitiveness: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 280, 124715.
    Javed, M., Rashid, M. A., Hussain, G., & Ali, H. Y. (2020). The effects of corporate social responsibility on corporate reputation and firm financial performance: Moderating role of responsible leadership. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(3), 1395-1409.
    Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. The American economic review, 76(2), 323-329.
    Jo, H., and M. A. Harjoto. 2011. Corporate Governance and Firm Value: The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 103 (3):351-383.
    Junius, D., Adisurjo, A., Rijanto, Y. A., & Adelina, Y. E. (2020). The impact of ESG performance to firm performance and market value. Jurnal Aplikasi Akuntansi, 5(1), 21-41.
    Kao, E. H., Yeh, C. C., Wang, L. H., & Fung, H. G. (2018). The relationship between CSR and performance: Evidence in China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 51, 155-170.
    Kotsantonis, S., C. Pinney, and G. Serafeim. 2016. ESG Integration in Investment Management: Myths and Realities. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 28 (2):10-16.
    Lang, L. H., Stulz, R., & Walkling, R. A. (1991). A test of the free cash flow hypothesis: The case of bidder returns. Journal of financial economics, 29(2), 315-335.
    Lindenberg, E. B., & Ross, S. A. (1981). Tobin's q Ratio and Industrial Organization. The Journal of Business, 54(1), 1-32.
    Loderer, C. F., & Waelchli, U. (2010). Firm Age and performance. Available at SSRN 1342248.
    Loew, T., Ankele, K., Braun, S., & Clausen, J. (2004). Significance of the CSR debate for sustainability and the requirements for companies. Institut for Ecological Economy Research GmbH (IÖW), 1-16.
    Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value. Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 1-18.
    Majumdar, S. K. (1997). The impact of Size and Age on firm-Level performance: some evidence from India. Review of Industrial organization, 12, 231-241.
    Mak, Y. T., & Kusnadi, Y. (2005). Size really matters: Further evidence on the negative relationship between board size and firm value. Pacific-Basin finance journal, 13(3), 301-318.
    Margolis, J. D., Elfenbein, H. A., & Walsh, J. P. (2009). Does it pay to be good...and does it matter? A meta-analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance.
    Matsumura, E. M., Prakash, R., & Vera-Muñoz, S. C. (2014). Firm-value effects of carbon emissions and carbon disclosures. The accounting review, 89(2), 695-724.
    Miah, M. D., Hasan, R., & Usman, M. (2021). Carbon emissions and firm performance: evidence from financial and non-financial firms from selected emerging economies. Sustainability, 13(23), 13281.
    Opler, T. C., & Titman, S. (1994). Financial distress and corporate performance. The Journal of finance, 49(3), 1015-1040.
    Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization studies, 24(3), 403-441.
    Perfect, S. B., & Wiles, K. W. (1994). Alternative constructions of Tobin's q: An empirical comparison. Journal of Empirical Finance, 1(3-4), 313-341.
    Saka, C., & Oshika, T. (2014). Disclosure effects, carbon emissions and corporate value. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 5(1), 22-45.
    Shaikh, I. (2022). Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practice and firm performance: an international evidence. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 23(1), 218–237.
    Verheyden, T., Eccles, R. G., & Feiner, A. (2016). ESG for all? The impact of ESG screening on return, risk, and diversification. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 28(2), 47-55.
    Wang, B., and M. Yang. 2022. A study on the mechanism of ESG performance on corporate value—Empirical evidence from A-share listed companies in China. Soft Sci 36 (6):78-84.
    Xie, J., Nozawa, W., Yagi, M., Fujii, H., & Managi, S. (2019). Do environmental, social, and governance activities improve corporate financial performance? Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(2), 286-300.
    Yoon, B., Lee, J. H., & Byun, R. (2018). Does ESG performance enhance firm value? Evidence from Korea. Sustainability, 10(10), 3635.
    Yu, X., & Xiao, K. (2022). Does ESG Performance Affect Firm Value? Evidence from a New ESG-Scoring Approach for Chinese Enterprises. Sustainability, 14(24), 16940.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計學系
    111353048
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0111353048
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[會計學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    304801.pdf2376KbAdobe PDF0檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋