English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 116849/147881 (79%)
Visitors : 64169410      Online Users : 477
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 金融學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/157834
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/157834


    Title: 探討投資人情緒對股票型ETF流動性之影響─以台灣市場為例
    The Impact of Investor Sentiment on the Liquidity of Equity ETFs: Evidence from the Taiwan Market
    Authors: 羅稑涵
    Contributors: 林靖庭
    羅稑涵
    Keywords: ETF
    投資人情緒
    買賣價差
    相對買賣價差
    Amihud指標
    Date: 2025
    Issue Date: 2025-07-01 15:17:11 (UTC+8)
    Abstract:   本研究探討投資人情緒對國內股票型ETF流動性之影響。研究樣本期間為2018年10月1日至2024年9月30日,共包含24檔國內股票型ETF,並將ETF按照市值型、主題型及高股息型進行分類,以利進一步分析。
      本研究採用兩種方法來測量投資人情緒指標,第一種為主成分分析法(Principal Component Analysis, PCA)所建立的樂觀指標,是利用相對強弱指標(RSI)、資金流量指標(MFI)、加權指數週轉率與券資比等四種情緒特徵因子建構而成,第二種採用台灣選擇權波動指數作為恐慌指標。本文使用下列三種流動性代理變數:買賣價差(quoted spread)、相對買賣價差(proportional quoted spread)和Amihud指標(Amihud, 2002),並透過應用縱橫資料回歸模型(panel data regression model)進行實證分析。
      研究最終結果顯示,投資人情緒不論對所有類型ETF,抑或是各類型ETF的流動性均存在正向影響,也就是當投資人情緒較樂觀時,ETF的流動性代理變數則會下降,代表著ETF流動性提升;相對地,當投資人情緒較悲觀時,ETF的流動性代理變數則會上升,代表ETF流動性的下降。本研究為投信業者、ETF造市商及監管機構提供市場情緒對所有類型與不同類型ETF流動性變化的實證結果,以期提升未來ETF市場的交易效率。
      This study explores the impact of short-term investor sentiment on the liquidity of domestic equity ETFs in Taiwan. The sample period spans from October 1, 2018, to September 30, 2024, covering a total of 24 domestic equity ETFs. These ETFs are categorized into capitalization-based, theme-based, and high-dividend-based types for further analysis.
      This study employs two methods to measure the short-term investor sentiment index. The first one is optimistic indicator, which is constructed using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) based on four sentiment features—RSI, MFI, turnover of Taiwan Stock Exchange Capitalization Weighted Stock Index, and short sale to margin purchase ratio—while the other one directly adopts the Taiwan VIX. Liquidity is represented using three proxy variables: quoted spread, proportional quoted spread, and Amihud illiquidity measure (Amihud, 2002). Lastly, a panel data regression model is applied for empirical analysis.
      The research results show that short-term investor sentiment has a positive impact on the liquidity of all types of ETFs, as well as the liquidity of each type of ETF. Specifically, when investor sentiment is more optimistic, the liquidity proxy variables for ETFs decline, indicating an increase in ETF liquidity. Conversely, when investor sentiment is more pessimistic, the liquidity proxy variables for ETFs rise, indicating a decrease in ETF liquidity. This study provides empirical evidence to investment trust firms, ETF market makers, and regulatory agencies on how market sentiment influences the liquidity of all type and different types of ETF, aiming to enhance ETF market efficiency in the future.
    Reference: 周賓凰, 張宇志, & 林美珍. (2019). 投資人情緒與股票報酬互動關係. 證券市場發展季刊: 行為財務學特別專刊, 153.
    Agrrawal, P., & Clark, J. M. (2009). Determinants of ETF liquidity in the secondary market: A five-factor ranking algorithm. ETFs and Indexing, 2009(1), 59-66.
    Ahn, H. J., Cao, C. Q., & Choe, H. (1996). Tick size, spread, and volume. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 5(1), 2-22.
    Amihud, Y. (2002). Illiquidity and stock returns: cross-section and time-series effects. Journal of financial markets, 5(1), 31-56.
    Amihud, Y., & Mendelson, H. (1986). Asset pricing and the bid-ask spread. Journal of financial Economics, 17(2), 223-249.
    Antoniou, C., Doukas, J. A., & Subrahmanyam, A. (2013). Cognitive dissonance, sentiment, and momentum. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 48(1), 245-275.
    Baker, M., & Stein, J. C. (2004). Market liquidity as a sentiment indicator. Journal of financial Markets, 7(3), 271-299.
    Baker, M., & Wurgler, J. (2006). Investor sentiment and the cross‐section of stock returns. The journal of Finance, 61(4), 1645-1680.
    Barinov, A. (2014). Turnover: liquidity or uncertainty?. Management Science, 60(10), 2478-2495.
    Brown, G. W., & Cliff, M. T. (2004). Investor sentiment and the near-term stock market. Journal of empirical finance, 11(1), 1-27.
    Chang, C. L., Hsieh, T. L., & McAleer, M. (2016). How are VIX and Stock Index ETF related? (No. 16-010/III). Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper.
    Chang, E. C., Luo, Y., & Ren, J. (2014). Short-selling, margin-trading, and price
    efficiency: Evidence from the Chinese market. Journal of Banking & Finance, 48, 411-424.
    Chen, H., Chong, T. T. L., & Duan, X. (2010). A principal-component approach to measuring investor sentiment. Quantitative Finance, 10(4), 339-347.
    Chiu, J., Chung, H., Ho, K. Y., & Wang, G. H. (2012). Funding liquidity and equity liquidity in the subprime crisis period: Evidence from the ETF market. Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(9), 2660-2671.
    Chordia, T., Roll, R., & Subrahmanyam, A. (2000). Commonality in liquidity. Journal of financial economics, 56(1), 3-28.
    Chung, K. H., & Zhang, H. (2014). A simple approximation of intraday spreads using daily data. Journal of Financial Markets, 17, 94-120.
    Chung, K. H., & Chuwonganant, C. (2014). Uncertainty, market structure, and liquidity. Journal of Financial Economics, 113(3), 476-499.
    Clifford, C. P., Fulkerson, J. A., & Jordan, B. D. (2014). What drives ETF flows?. Financial Review, 49(3), 619-642.
    Copeland, M., & Copeland, T. (2016). VIX versus Size. Journal of Portfolio Management, 42(3), 76.
    Debata, B., Dash, S. R., & Mahakud, J. (2018). Investor sentiment and emerging stock market liquidity. Finance Research Letters, 26, 15-31.
    Demsetz, H. (1968). The cost of transacting. The quarterly journal of economics, 82(1), 33-53.
    Eleswarapu, V. R., & Reinganum, M. R. (1993). The seasonal behavior of the liquidity premium in asset pricing. Journal of Financial Economics, 34(3), 373-386.
    Fong, K. Y., Holden, C. W., & Trzcinka, C. A. (2017). What are the best liquidity proxies for global research?. Review of Finance, 21(4), 1355-1401.
    Goyenko, R. Y., Holden, C. W., & Trzcinka, C. A. (2009). Do liquidity measures measure liquidity?. Journal of financial Economics, 92(2), 153-181.
    Hameed, A., Kang, W., & Viswanathan, S. (2010). Stock market declines and liquidity. The Journal of finance, 65(1), 257-293.
    Hendershott, T., & Riordan, R. (2013). Algorithmic trading and the market for liquidity. Journal of financial and quantitative analysis, 48(4), 1001-1024.
    Hong, H., & Stein, J. C. (2007). Disagreement and the stock market. Journal of Economic perspectives, 21(2), 109-128.
    Hong, H., & Sraer, D. A. (2016). Speculative betas. The Journal of Finance, 71(5), 2095-2144.
    Hu, S., Zhong, M., & Cai, Y. (2019). Impact of investor behavior and stock market liquidity: Evidence from China. Entropy, 21(11), 1111.
    Hudson, Y., & Green, C. J. (2015). Is investor sentiment contagious? International sentiment and UK equity returns. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 5, 46-59.
    Hung, P. H. (2016). Investor sentiment, order submission, and investment performance on the Taiwan Stock Exchange. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 39, 124-140.
    Karpoff, J. M. (1987). The relation between price changes and trading volume: A survey. Journal of Financial and quantitative Analysis, 22(1), 109-126.
    Le, H., & Gregoriou, A. (2020). How do you capture liquidity? A review of the literature on low‐frequency stock liquidity. Journal of Economic Surveys, 34(5), 1170-1186.
    Liu, S. (2015). Investor sentiment and stock market liquidity. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 16(1), 51-67.
    Marshall, B. R., Nguyen, N. H., & Visaltanachoti, N. (2018). Do liquidity proxies measure liquidity accurately in ETFs?. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 55, 94-111.
    Peltomäki, J. (2017). Beta as a determinant of investor activity in sector exchange-traded funds. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 65, 137-145.
    Qadan, M., Kliger, D., & Chen, N. (2019). Idiosyncratic volatility, the VIX and stock returns. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 47, 431-441.
    Ryu, D., Kim, H., & Yang, H. (2017). Investor sentiment, trading behavior and stock returns. Applied Economics Letters, 24(12), 826-830.
    Schmeling, M. (2009). Investor sentiment and stock returns: Some international evidence. Journal of empirical finance, 16(3), 394-408.
    Stoll, H. R. (1989). Inferring the components of the bid‐ask spread: Theory and empirical tests. the Journal of Finance, 44(1), 115-134.
    Tseng, Y. C., & Lee, W. C. (2016). Investor sentiment and ETF liquidity-evidence from Asia markets. Advances in Management and Applied Economics, 6(1), 89.
    Wang, W., Su, C., & Duxbury, D. (2021). Investor sentiment and stock returns: Global evidence. Journal of Empirical Finance, 63, 365-391.
    Whaley, R. E. (2000). The investor fear gauge. Journal of portfolio management, 26(3), 12.
    Yang, C., & Zhou, L. (2015). Investor trading behavior, investor sentiment and asset prices. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 34, 42-62.
    Yin, H., Wu, X., & Kong, S. X. (2022). Daily investor sentiment, order flow imbalance and stock liquidity: evidence from the Chinese stock market. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 27(4), 4816-4836.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    金融學系
    112352019
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0112352019
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[金融學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    201901.pdf3129KbAdobe PDF0View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback