Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/158385
|
Title: | ESG融入不動產投資決策之效益與挑戰:以台灣商辦為例 The Benefits and Challenges of Integrating ESG into Real Estate Investment Decisions: A Case Study of Taiwan's Commercial Office Market |
Authors: | 楊曜聰 Yang, Yao-Tsung |
Contributors: | 陳明進 Chen, Ming-Chin 楊曜聰 Yang, Yao-Tsung |
Keywords: | ESG 商辦不動產 綠建築 情境模擬 投資決策 ESG Office Real Estate Green Building Scenario Simulation Investment Decision |
Date: | 2025 |
Issue Date: | 2025-08-04 13:29:31 (UTC+8) |
Abstract: | 近年來,環境、社會與公司治理(Environmental, Social and Governance, ESG)已成為全球資本市場重視的重要準則,亦逐漸滲透至不動產投資領域。隨著永續金融發展趨勢日益明確,機構投資人與開發商開始將ESG因素納入不動產投資評估與策略規劃。然而,在台灣商辦市場中,ESG導入實務仍面臨資訊不透明、評估標準未統一及初期投入成本高等挑戰。 本研究以台灣三個具代表性ESG導向之商辦個案(台北101、南山廣場與宏匯i-Tower)為研究對象,透過文獻探討、個案研究與情境模擬三種質性研究方法,分析ESG措施在環境、社會、治理三構面之施作內容與實務成效,並模擬不同導入深度情境對資產租金、空置率與投資吸引力之潛在影響。 研究結果顯示,導入高標準ESG措施之商辦資產,普遍具有租金溢價、空置率降低與吸引高信用租戶之成效,並可因應法規與氣候風險壓力。惟ESG導入效果亦受限於區位條件、市場成熟度及租戶認知落差。本研究建議不動產投資人與開發商應視資產定位與目標租戶輪廓設計差異化永續策略,政府則應強化ESG評估與揭露制度、提供政策誘因,以促進台灣不動產市場永續轉型。 In recent years, Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) factors have become key criteria in global capital markets and are increasingly integrated into real estate investment strategies. As sustainable finance gains momentum, institutional investors and developers are gradually incorporating ESG considerations into property evaluation and asset allocation. However, the implementation of ESG in Taiwan’s office market remains nascent, facing challenges such as limited data transparency, inconsistent evaluation standards, and high upfront investment costs. This study focuses on three representative ESG-oriented office buildings in Taiwan—Taipei 101, Nan Shan Plaza, and Hongwell i-Tower—applying a mixed qualitative methodology consisting of literature review, case study, and scenario simulation. The research examines ESG practices across environmental, social, and governance dimensions and simulates the potential impacts of different ESG adoption levels on rental performance, vacancy rates, and investor attractiveness. The findings indicate that office buildings with advanced ESG implementation generally achieve rental premiums, lower vacancy rates, and stronger appeal to institutional tenants, while also enhancing resilience to regulatory and climate-related risks. However, these outcomes are influenced by location-specific factors, market maturity, and tenant awareness. This study suggests that investors and developers should tailor ESG strategies based on asset positioning and tenant profiles, while policymakers should improve ESG disclosure systems and provide policy incentives to support the sustainable transition of Taiwan’s commercial real estate market. |
Reference: | 中文部分 期刊論文 1.尤晴韻(2024a)。IFRS永續揭露準則導入與政策進展,財經政策評論,29(2),48–64。 2.尤晴韻(2024b)。從政策到金融實踐:亞洲永續金融標準發展趨勢。綠色經濟評論,12(2),34-49。 3.台灣綠建築協會(2024)。台灣永續辦公空間政策建議報告。台北市:台灣綠建築協會。 4.林建宏、吳美玲(2023)。台灣不動產市場ESG標準化的挑戰。台灣經濟評論,41(2),215–230。 5.林志明(2023)。ESG投資在台灣的不動產市場影響。投資與財務,21(4),112–130。 6.林秀美(2024)。金融監理與永續轉型的對話。台灣永續金融論壇專刊,3,22–33。 7.林育安(2024)。IFRS永續準則與企業揭露實務接軌分析。永續財務季刊,8(1),56–72。 8.彭子軒(2024)。ESG整合與台灣不動產投資策略轉型分析。不動產與永續發展研究,第15期,75–92。 9.張文智(2023)。台灣商辦市場ESG發展趨勢與影響。不動產市場評論,12(1),45–62。 10.許庭維、陳美慧(2022)。公私協力推動台灣ESG的實踐。台灣商業與永續發展期刊,5(1),78–95。 11.高明偉(2023a)。智慧辦公與ESG在台灣的發展趨勢。商業研究,32(1),15–30。 12.高明偉(2023b)。綠建築認證對商辦資產價值的實證探討,建築與環境研究,17(1),66–82。 13.陳美伶(2022)。ESG與商辦市場的關聯性探討。不動產學刊,25(3),45–60。 14.陳雅芬(2022a)。綠建築對商辦市場影響之研究。建築與環境,19(2),78–90。 15.陳雅芬(2022b)。智慧建築技術與ESG效益評估,永續建築科技季刊,14(4),39–55。 16.謝宗翰(2022)。ESG評估機構的發展與挑戰。經濟學報,48(2),33–50。 博碩士學位論文 1.林信仁。2023。「ESG觀點之房地產業永續發展關鍵成功因素研究–多元決策分析法之應用」。國防大學財務管理學系碩士論文。 網際網路 1.台北金融大樓公司(2022)。台北101ESG永續報告書。取自 https://www.taipei-101.com.tw 2.宏匯開發股份有限公司(2023)。宏匯 i-Tower 專案簡介與媒體發布。取自 https://www.hongwell.com.tw 3.南山人壽(2022)。企業社會責任報告書。取自 https://www.nanshanlife.com.tw 4.財團法人中華經濟研究院(2021)。企業社會責任報告書指導原則。取自 https://www.cier.edu.tw 5.國家實驗研究院(2022)。台灣綠建築評估系統 EEWH 指南。台灣建築中心。取自 https://www.tbec.org.tw 6.臺灣土地研究,上網日期2025年2月27日,檢自:https://www.ipress.tw/J0229?pWebID=1409&pType=&mSeq=0 7.CBRE(2022)。台灣辦公室市場概況。取自 https://www.cbre.com.tw 8.Deloitte(2023)。工作的未來:對辦公市場變化的洞察。取自 https://www2.deloitte.com 9.Gartner(2022)。智慧辦公設計趨勢。取自 https://www.gartner.com 10.Jones Lang LaSalle(2023)。台灣不動產市場報告。取自 https://www.jll.com.tw 11.Real Capital Analytics(2022)。台灣商業不動產交易報告。取自 https://www.rcanalytics.com 12.Savills(2022)。台灣ESG與不動產投資。取自 https://www.savills.com.tw 13.內政部建築研究所(2022)。零碳建築推動計畫。取自:https://www.abri.gov.tw/ 14.經濟部能源局(2023)。再生能源發展條例。取自:https://www.moeaboe.gov.tw/ 15.環境部(2024)。碳費徵收管理辦法公告。取自:https://www.epa.gov.tw/ 16.金融監督管理委員會(2023)。綠色金融行動方案3.0。取自:https://www.fsc.gov.tw/ 17.台灣銀行(2022)。綠色貸款及永續連結貸款簡介。取自:https://www.bot.com.tw/ 會議簡報 1.尤晴韻(2024)。國內外永續準則發展趨勢。ESG永續發展趨勢與推動製造業精進永續管理工作坊。 2.池祥麟(2024)。我國永續金融發展趨勢及現況。ESG永續發展趨勢與推動製造業精進永續管理工作坊-台中場。 3.林秀美(2024)。金管會永續發展政策。金融監督管理委員會。 4.林育安(2024)。我國永續金融發展趨勢及現況:接軌IFRS永續揭露準則。金融監督管理會證券期貨局。 5.黃瓊瑤(2024)。國內外ESG推動案例分享。永續發展趨勢與推動製造業精進永續管理工作坊 (桃園場)。 6.陳峙霖(2024)。國內外ESG推動案例分享。ESG永續發展趨勢與推動製造業精進永續管理工作坊-高雄場。 7.鍾元珧(2024)。ESG永續發展趨勢與推動製造業精進永續管理工作坊:企業誠信課程。ESG永續發展趨勢與推動製造業精進永續管理工作坊。 英文部分 書籍 1.Shiller, R. J. (2000). Irrational Exuberance. Princeton University Press. 專書論文 1.Financial Supervisory Commission. (2021). Taiwan's Corporate Governance 3.0: Sustainable Development Roadmap. Taiwan Financial Supervisory Commission Report. 2.Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI). (2006). The Six Principles for Responsible Investment. United Nations PRI Report. 3.United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. 4.United Nations Global Compact. (2004). Who Cares Wins: Connecting Financial Markets to a Changing World. UN Global Compact Report. 5.World Economic Forum. (2020). The Future of ESG Investing. WEF White Paper. 期刊 1.Bauer, R., Eichholtz, P., & Kok, N. (2010). Corporate governance and performance: The REIT effect. Real Estate Economics, 38(1), 1-29. 2.Cheng, A., & Zhang, Y. (2022). Financing sustainability: Green bonds andESGlending in Asia-Pacific markets. Finance & Sustainability Review, 10(3), 105–123. 3.Chen, C. & Hsieh, M. (2022). ESGinvesting and sustainable real estate development in Taiwan. Journal of Sustainable Real Estate, 14(2), 67-89. 4.Clark, G. L., Feiner, A., & Viehs, M. (2015). From the stockholder to the stakeholder: How sustainability can drive financial outperformance. Oxford University Working Paper. 5.Derwall, J., Guenster, N., Bauer, R., & Koedijk, K. (2005). The eco-efficiency premium puzzle. Financial Analysts Journal, 61(2), 51-63. 6.Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835-2857. 7.Eichholtz, P., Kok, N., & Quigley, J. M. (2010). Doing well by doing good? Green office buildings. American Economic Review, 100(5), 2492-2509. 8.Eichholtz, P., Kok, N., & Yonder, E. (2018). Portfolio greenness and the financial performance of REITs. Journal of International Money and Finance, 86, 256–269. 9.Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015).ESGand financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210-233. 10.Gabe, J., & Thornton, J. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 on commercial real estate and workplace sustainability. Journal of Real Estate Research, 43(3), 115-134. 11.Geltner, D., & Miller, N. G. (2021). Commercial Real Estate: Analysis and Investments (4th ed.). Cengage Learning. 12.Geltner, D., Miller, N., Clayton, J., & Eichholtz, P. (2014). Commercial Real Estate: Analysis and Investments (3rd ed.). OnCourse Learning. 13.Gompers, P., Ishii, J., & Metrick, A. (2003). Corporate governance and equity prices. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(1), 107-156. 14.Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-291. 15.Kok, N., Eichholtz, P., & Quigley, J. M. (2011). The economics of green building. Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(1), 50-63. 16.Ling, D. C., & Naranjo, A. (1997). Economic risk factors and commercial real estate returns. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 15(3), 283-307. 17.Lintner, J. (1965). The valuation of risk assets and the selection of risky investments in stock portfolios and capital budgets. Review of Economics and Statistics, 47(1), 13–37. 18.Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio selection. Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77-91. 19.Mossin, J. (1966). Equilibrium in a capital asset market. Econometrica, 34(4), 768–783. 20.Müller, C., Schneider, T., & Wagner, K. (2021). Green leases: How sustainability clauses contribute to ESG-compliant real estate. Sustainable Cities and Society, 74, 103210. 21.Schaltegger, S., Burritt, R., & Petersen, H. (2022).ESGinvestments and long-term returns: Empirical evidence from green real estate portfolios. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 12(1), 45–64. 22.Seiler, M. J., Webb, J. R., & Myer, F. C. (1999). Diversification issues in real estate investment. Journal of Real Estate Literature, 7(2), 163-179. 23.Sharpe, W. F. (1964). Capital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. Journal of Finance, 19(3), 425-442. 網際網路 1.CBRE. (2023). Taiwan commercial real estate market report: Q4 2023. Retrieved from https://www.cbre.com.tw 2.European Commission. (2022). Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR). Retrieved from https://finance.ec.europa.eu 3.Financial Supervisory Commission. (2021). Taiwan's Corporate Governance 3.0: Sustainable Development Roadmap. Retrieved from https://www.fsc.gov.tw 4.Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). (n.d.). GRI Standards. Retrieved from https://www.globalreporting.org/ 5.GRESB. (2023). Real estate assessment methodology. Retrieved from https://www.gresb.com 6.GRESB. (2023). Real Estate Assessment Results. Retrieved from https://www.gresb.com 7.GRESB(Global Real Estate Sustainability Benchmark), Retrieved Febuary 27 2025, from: https://www.gresb.com/nl-en/ 8.IFRS Foundation. (2023). IFRS Sustainability Disclosure Standards: IFRS S1 and IFRS S2. Retrieved from https://www.ifrs.org/ 9.International WELL Building Institute. (2021). WELL building standard v2. Retrieved from https://www.wellcertified.com 10.JLL. (2023). Taipei & New Taipei Grade A office market overview. Retrieved from https://www.jll.com.tw 11.JLL. (2023). Taipei and New Taipei office market outlook. Retrieved from https://www.jll.com.tw 12.Journal of Sustainable Real Estate, Retrieved Febuary 27 2025, from: https://www.tandfonline.com/journals/rsre20 13.MSCIESGResearch LLC. (2023). MSCIESGratings methodology. Retrieved from https://www.msci.com/our-solutions/esg-investing 14.Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI). (2006). The Six Principles for Responsible Investment. Retrieved from https://www.unpri.org 15.Real Estate Economics, Retrieved Febuary 27 2025, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/15406229 16.Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD). (2017). Final Report: Recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures. Retrieved from https://www.fsb-tcfd.org/ 17.Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures (TNFD). (n.d.). TNFD Framework. Retrieved from https://tnfd.global/ 18.UN Global Compact & UBS. (2004). Who Cares Wins: Connecting Financial Markets to a Changing World. Retrieved from https://d306pr3pise04h.cloudfront.net/docs/issues_doc/Financial_markets/who_cares_who_wins.pdf 19.UN PRI. (2006). Principles for Responsible Investment. Retrieved from https://www.unpri.org/ 20.United Nations Global Compact. (2004). Who Cares Wins: Connecting Financial Markets to a Changing World. Retrieved from https://www.unglobalcompact.org 21.USGBC. (2023). LEED v4.1 building design and construction guide. U.S. Green Building Council. Retrieved from https://www.usgbc.org 22.World Economic Forum. (2020). The Future ofESGInvesting. Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org 23.World Economic Forum. (2020). The Global Risks Report 2020. Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-global-risks-report-2020/ |
Description: | 碩士 國立政治大學 國際金融碩士學位學程 112ZB1068 |
Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0112ZB1068 |
Data Type: | thesis |
Appears in Collections: | [國際金融碩士學位學程] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
106801.pdf | | 1054Kb | Adobe PDF | 0 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|