Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/158403
|
Title: | 動態能力觀點分析台達電轉型 A Case Study on the Transformation of Delta Electronics from the Perspective of Dynamic Capabilities |
Authors: | 葉思辰 Yeh, Ssu-Chen |
Contributors: | 邱奕嘉 葉思辰 Yeh, Ssu-Chen |
Keywords: | 動態能力 轉型 代工 解決方案 Dynamic capabilities theory Transformation ODM Solutions |
Date: | 2025 |
Issue Date: | 2025-08-04 13:33:37 (UTC+8) |
Abstract: | ODM製造企業近年面臨營運挑戰,需要回應來自應用導向場域與系統整合能力的市場期待與需求。本研究聚焦於企業如何在延續既有技術基礎的前提下,發展整合方案輸出能力與組織支援體系。面對技術複雜度升高與市場需求碎片化的趨勢,企業若欲提升價值貢獻與差異化能力,需重新配置原有資源,並建構支援場域應用導入的制度與組織機制。然而現有文獻對於代工企業如何從延續性的基礎上重構能力與組織以因應此一轉變,仍缺乏具體分析。 本研究選擇台達電作為研究個案,分析其從模組製造導向轉向整合解決方案的轉型歷程。觀察企業如何調整原有模組技術的應用邏輯,並透過組織重組與制度化機制,建構跨部門協作與專案導向的營運模式,進而支援區域應用場域的整體方案交付。研究結論如下: 1. 台達電以原有模組技術為基礎,透過標準化與整合設計,延伸技術應用至多樣場域,逐步發展出系統解決能力,呈現具延續性的轉型模式。 2. 透過建立中介組織與跨部門制度,如策略管理委員會與解決方案辦公室,企業促進內部協作與知識整合,支撐資源重組與專案運作。 3. 結合全球研發與區域支援網絡,企業建立在地交付與即時應變能力,使模組業務與方案導向業務得以併行,形成具彈性的營運架構。 本研究指出,製造企業若能掌握原有產品之間的應用潛力,並同步發展跨部門協作與區域支援制度,便能在維持製造強項的同時,逐步建立解決方案導向的能力體系。台達電的轉型歷程為理解延續性轉型與動態能力演化提供實務觀察與理論補充,對同類型技術型企業具有參考價值。 ODM manufacturers have recently faced operational challenges due to growing market expectations for system integration and application-oriented capabilities. This study examines how firms build solution delivery capacity and internal support mechanisms by extending existing technical foundations. Faced with growing technical complexity and fragmented demand, firms aiming to enhance value contribution must reconfigure existing resources and establish organizational mechanisms to support localized solution delivery. However, current research offers limited insight into how manufacturing firms restructure capabilities based on continuity rather than disruption. This study adopts Delta Electronics as a case study to examine its transformation from a module-focused manufacturer to an integrated solution provider. It explores how the firm extended the application of existing technologies through standardization and module recombination, while also establishing cross-functional coordination mechanisms and a project-oriented operating model to support regional delivery. Findings are as follows: 1. Delta’s transformation was built on its modular foundation, gradually developing system-level capabilities through standardized integration, rather than breaking away from its existing base. 2. The firm established intermediary organizations such as the Strategy Management Committee and Solution Management Office, promoting cross-functional collaboration and internal knowledge flow to enable capability reconfiguration. 3. Through a global R&D network and regional support teams, Delta developed localized delivery and agile response capacity, allowing the company to maintain both module-based and solution-oriented operations. This research shows that manufacturing firms can evolve solution capabilities by building on existing strengths, rather than abandoning them. Delta’s case provides a reference for understanding path-dependent transformation and dynamic capability development in technology-intensive industries. |
Reference: | 中文文獻 1. 陳明璋 (1996)。企業轉型的策略與成功關鍵。貿易週刊,1690期,18~21頁。 2. 陳奕伶 (2024年)。台灣資料中心市場發展趨勢分析。財團法人資訊工業策進會產業情報研究所。 3. 王正勤 (1998年2月1日)。品質打下四百億江山 — 台達電。天下雜誌。上網日期 2025年5月24日,檢自 https://www.cw.com.tw/article/5106418 4. 吳琬瑜、孫珮瑜、廖瑞真 (2007年5月9日)。常勝軍最急切的挑戰 — 台達電子副董事暨執行長vs.台大EMBA前執行長黃崇興。天下雜誌。上網日期 2025年5月24日,檢自https://www.cw.com.tw/index.php/article/5110268 5. 鉅亨網新聞中心 (2013年12月24日)。台達電自救記:零件供應商轉型系統方案解決。鉅亨網。上網日期 2025年5月14日,檢自https://news.cnyes.com/news/id/2065984 6. 陳良榕 (2014年10月14日)。台達電 百試一中,堅持價値。天下雜誌。上網日期 2025年5月16日,檢自https://www.cw.com.tw/article/5061839 7. 林宏達 (2015年6月10日)。他讓公司市值翻倍 媲美大立光 強勢改造3年大砍2萬員工 高階主管大換血 王子的野心 鄭平揭祕。今周刊。上網日期 2025年5月16日,檢自https://www.businesstoday.com.tw/article/category/183008/post/201506100001/ 8. 康育萍 (2017年6月1日)。台達電轉型就磨一招:幫別部門賺錢。商業週刊。上網日期 2025年5月17日,檢自https://www.businessweekly.com.tw/business/blog/19835 9. 黃亦筠 (2018年3月23日)。台達電轉型 鄭平:我不會變成天花板,不用都聽我的!。天下雜誌。上網日期 2025年5月20日,檢自https://www.cw.com.tw/article/5088862 10. 張彥文 (2019年1月)。台達讓人資成為變革伙伴。哈佛商業評論數位版。上網日期 2025年5月16日,檢自https://www.hbrtaiwan.com/article/18481/human-resources-become-a-revolutionary-partner 11. 蔡靚萱 (2021年1月28日)。台達電十年磨亮電動車、5G 它是下一座護國神山?。商業週刊。上網日期 2025年5月16日,檢自 https://www.businessweekly.com.tw/Archive/Article?StrId=7003151&rf=google 12. 台灣產業創生平台 (2021年4月28日)。台達電鄭平:創新轉型是持續成長唯一的路。台灣產業創生平台經營實務專區。上網日期 2025年5月14日,檢自https://www.tw-ren.com/renaissance/589 13. 周頌宜 (2021年12月14日)。舊產品能賺錢,為何還要養虧錢的新事業?台達電執行長揭露市值翻 3 倍的祕辛。經理人。上網日期 2025年5月17日,檢自https://www.managertoday.com.tw/ 14. 吳筱雯 (2022年5月27日)。台達電轉型 拓展商業品牌。工商時報。上網日期 2025年5月17日,檢自https://www.ctee.com.tw/news/20220527700185-430502 15. 台灣產業創生平台 (2024年1月4日)。從零組件到解決方案!台達電靠雙腳並用推進新事業。台灣產業創生平台經營實務專區。上網日期 2025年5月14日,檢自https://www.tw-ren.com/renaissance/915 16. 楊孟軒 (2024年5月9日)。一塊黃仁勳簽名產品,揭露台達野心 當起AI伺服器「水電師」。天下雜誌。上網日期 2025年5月24日,檢自https://www.cw.com.tw/article/5130283 英文文獻 1. Adams, J. D. (1984). Transforming Work. Miles Review Press. 2. Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1978). Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Reading, MA: Addision-Wesley. 3. Barbara, B., & Philippe, H. (1994). Toward a Definition of Corporate Transformation. Sloan Management Review, 35(3), 101-106. 4. Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. 5. Bibeault, D. B. (1982). Corporate turnaround: How managers turn losers into winners. McGraw- Hill. 6. Cohen. W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152. 7. Daft, R.L. (1998). Organization theory and design(6th ed.). South-Western College Publishing 8. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10-11), 1105-1121. 9. Grant, R. M. (1991). The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation. California Management Review, 33(3), 114-135. 10. Grant, R. M. (1995). Contemporary Strategy Analysis: Concepts, Techniques, Applications(2nd ed.). Cambridge: Blackwell Ltd. 11. Helfat, C. E. (1997). Know-how and asset complementarity and dynamic capability accumulation: The case of R&D. Strategic Management Journal, 18(5), 339–360. 12. Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2003). The dynamic resource‐based view: Capability lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 997-1010. 13. Hodge, B. J., Anthony, W. P., & Gales, L. M. (1996). Organization theory: A strategic approach (5th ed.). Prentice Hall International. 14. Kilmann, R. H., & Covin, T. J. E. (1988). Corporate Transformation: Revitalizing Organizations for a Competitive World. Jossey-Bass. 15. Levy A. & Merry U. (1988). Organizational Transformation: Revitalizing Organization for a Competitive World. Jessey-Bass Inc. 16. McKinsey & Company. (2019). The numbers behind successful transformations. Retrieved May 22, 2025, from https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/transformation/our-insights/the-numbers-behind-successful-transformations 17. Nonaka, I., & Toyama, R. (2007). Strategic management as distributed practical wisdom (phronesis). Industrial and corporate change, 16(3), 371-394. 18. Penrose, E. (1959). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. John Wiley Press. 19. Rindova, V. P., & Kotha, S. (2001). Continuous “Morphing”: Competing through Dynamic Capabilities, Form, and Function. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1263-1280. 20. Schulze, A., & Brusoni, S. (2022). How dynamic capabilities change ordinary capabilities: Reconnecting attention control and problem-solving. Strategic Management Journal, 43(12), 2447–2477. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3413 21. Teece, D.J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997) Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 509-533. 22. Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and micro foundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 1319-1350. 23. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource‐based view of the firm. Strategic management journal, 5(2), 171-180. 24. Zollo, M. , & Winter, S. (2002). Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science, 13(3), 339-351. 25. Zott, C. (2003). Dynamic Capabilities and the Emergence of Intra-Industry Differential Firm Performance: Insights from a Simulation Study. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 97-125. |
Description: | 碩士 國立政治大學 科技管理與智慧財產研究所 112364126 |
Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0112364126 |
Data Type: | thesis |
Appears in Collections: | [科技管理與智慧財產研究所] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
412601.pdf | | 1101Kb | Adobe PDF | 0 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|