English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 117578/148609 (79%)
Visitors : 70748762      Online Users : 398
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 財務管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/158503
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/158503


    Title: 現金增資週期公司股價探討 - 台灣上市櫃公司
    The Impacts of Long and Short-term Abnormal Return on Seasoned Equity Offerings (SEO) periods
    Authors: 薛浩瑞
    Hsueh, Hao-Jui
    Contributors: 李志宏
    Lee, Jie Haun
    薛浩瑞
    Hsueh, Hao-Jui
    Keywords: 現金增資
    事件研究法
    超額報酬
    股本膨脹
    撥券日
    除權日
    Seasoned Equity Offerings
    Event Study
    Abnormal Returns
    Capital increase
    Allotment Date
    Ex-rights Date
    Date: 2025
    Issue Date: 2025-08-04 14:06:51 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究以 2000 年至 2024 年間台灣上市櫃公司辦理現金增資為研究對象,採 事件研究法探討現金增資對公司股價之影響。以現金增資宣告日、補充日、除權日 及撥券日作為觀察基準,並從多個角度及因子分析市場反應的時點與強度。樣本涵 蓋超過 1400 筆現增事件,並以累積平均超額報酬作為衡量指標。
    實證結果顯示:市場對現金增資各階段反應具有顯著異質性。宣告日反應偏中 性至正面,平均異常報酬為正;補充認購價格公告日則無顯著反應,但潛在套利空 間大於 4%、股本膨脹率偏高時,市場回應較為積極。除權日為顯著負向事件,跳 空跌幅與股本膨脹與套利空間成正比;撥券日為市場對稀釋效應反應最強烈時點, 平均超額報酬為 -1.69%,高膨脹個案甚至達 -4.07%。此外,從除權日至撥券日間 進行放空策略可獲得顯著正報酬(平均 4.94%),顯示其具高度策略價值。然撥券 後股價雖略有反彈,但長期持有的異常報酬仍為負,持有越久機會成本越高,顯示 現增事件後長期投資策略效果不佳。
    本研究有助於投資人於面對現增事件時採取更審慎的操作策略,亦提供企業 於規劃融資結構與增資時之參考依據,並對相關政策單位在資訊揭露與資本市場 監理層面提供實證支持。
    This study examines the impact of seasoned equity offerings (SEOs) on stock prices of Taiwanese listed companies from 2000 to 2024 using the event study methodology. The analysis centers on key event dates, including the announcement date, pricing date, ex-rights date, and allotment date, assessing the market’s timing and magnitude of reactions through various lenses and factors. Covering over 1,400 SEO cases, the study utilizes cumulative average abnormal returns (CAAR) as the primary metric.
    Empirical results reveal significant heterogeneity in market reactions across different SEO stages. The announcement date tends to elicit neutral to slightly positive responses, with average abnormal returns being positive. The pricing announcement date shows no significant immediate reaction. The ex-rights date emerges as a significantly negative event, with price gaps correlating positively with the capital increase ratio and arbitrage spreads. The allotment date registers the strongest market reaction to dilution effects, with an average abnormal return of -1.69%, and as high as -4.07% for cases with high capital increases. Furthermore, implementing short-selling strategies between the ex-rights and allotment dates yields significant positive returns, averaging 4.94%, indicating high strategic value. Although slight price rebounds occur post-allotment, long-term abnormal returns remain negative, and prolonged holding periods entail higher opportunity costs, indicating that long-term investment strategies post-SEO are ineffective.
    This study provides investors with a basis for adopting more prudent trading strategies when facing SEO events, offers reference insights for firms planning capital structures and fundraising, and supplies empirical evidence for regulators regarding information disclosure and capital market supervision.
    Reference: 李存修(1994)。股票股利除權交易日之稅後超額報酬與比價心理假說之實證 《台大管理論叢》,5(1),41–60。
    林世銘、陳明進、李存修(2001)。兩稅合一前後上市公司除權及除息日股價行 為之探討。《管理學報》,18(3),477–501。
    林宜平(2019)。台灣上市公司現金增資前後股價之異常報酬分析。國立台北大 學企業管理學系碩士論文。
    范積藝(1995)。台灣上市櫃公司辦理現金增資目的與市場訊息效果之實證研 究。國立政治大學財務管理研究所碩士論文。
    吳岱儒(2004)。企業融資行為之實證研究—以融資順位理論觀點分析。國立政治 大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    曾建文(2008)。台灣上市公司現金增資訊息之市場反應:短期異常報酬的實證 研究。淡江大學財務金融學系碩士論文。
    郭峰邑(2001)。我國上市公司現金增資訊息宣告與異常報酬之關係。《管理評 論》,20(3),47–68。
    陳慧陵(2020)。台灣上市櫃公司現金增資公告對股價影響之研究。國立雲林科 技大學財務金融系碩士論文。
    劉峯志(2017)。現金增資對公司財務績效與股價之影響-以台灣上市櫃公司為 例。國立中正大學財務金融系碩士論文。
    Asquith, P., & Mullins, D. W. (1986). Equity issues and offering dilution. Journal of Financial Economics, 15(1-2), 61–89.
    Bali, R., & Hite, G. (1998). Ex dividend day stock price behavior: Discreteness or tax induced clienteles? Journal of Financial Economics, 47, 127–159.
    Bhardwaj, R., & Brooks, L. D. (1999). Further evidence on dividend yields and the ex-dividend day stock price effect. Journal of Financial Research, 22(4), 503–514.
    Boyd, J., & Jagannathan, R. (1994). Ex-dividend price behavior of common stocks. Review of Financial Studies, 7, 711–741.
    Chen, H.-L., Chow, E. H., & Shiu, C.-Y. (2013). Ex-dividend prices and investor trades: Evidence from Taiwan. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 24, 39–65.
    Durand, D., & May, A. M. (1960). The ex-dividend behaviour of American Telephone and Telegraph stock. Journal of Finance, 15(1), 19–31. Elton, E. J., & Gruber, M. J. (1970). Marginal stockholder tax rates and the clientele effect. Review of Economics and Statistics, 52, 68–74.
    Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. The Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383–417.
    Frank, M., & Jagannathan, R. (1998). Why do stock prices drop by less than the value of the dividend? Evidence from a country without taxes. Journal of Financial Economics, 47(2), 161–188.
    Graham, J. R., Michaely, R., & Roberts, M. R. (2003). Do price discreteness and transactions costs affect stock returns? Comparing ex‐dividend pricing before and after decimalization. The Journal of Finance, 58(6), 2611–2636.
    Hu, S.-Y., & Tseng, Y.-I. (2006). Who wants to trade around ex‐dividend days? Financial Management, 35(4), 95–119.
    Jegadeesh, N. (2000). Long-term performance of seasoned equity offerings: Benchmark errors and biases in expectations. Financial Management, 29(3), 5–30.
    Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. American Economic Review, 76(2), 323–329.
    Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.
    Kalay, A. (1982). The ex‐dividend day behavior of stock prices: A reexamination of the clientele effect. The Journal of Finance, 37(4), 1059–1070.
    Leland, H. E., & Pyle, D. H. (1977). Informational asymmetries, financial structure, and financial intermediation. Journal of Finance, 32(2), 371 387.
    Liljeblom, E., Löflund, A., & Hedvall, K. (2001). Foreign and domestic investors and tax induced ex-dividend day trading. Journal of Banking & Finance, 25(9), 1687–1716.
    Loughran, T., & Ritter, J. R. (1995). The new issues puzzle. The Journal of Finance, 50(1), 23–51.
    McConnell, J. J., & Muscarella, C. J. (1985). Corporate capital expenditure decisions and the market value of the firm. Journal of Financial Economics, 14(3), 399 422.
    Michaely, R., & Vila, J.-L. (1995). Investors' heterogeneity, prices, and volume around the ex-dividend day. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 30(2), 171–198.
    Miller, M. H., & Modigliani, F. (1961). Dividend policy, growth, and the valuation of shares. Journal of Business, 34, 411–433.
    Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1963). Corporate income taxes and the cost of capital: A correction. American Economic Review, 53(3), 433–443.
    Myers, S. C. (1984). The capital structure puzzle. The Journal of Finance, 39(3), 575–592.
    Myers, S. C., & Majluf, N. S. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, 13(2), 187–221.
    Naranjo, A., Nimalendran, M., & Ryngaert, M. (2000). Time variation of ex-dividend day stock returns and corporate dividend capture: A reexamination. The Journal of Finance, 55, 2357–2372.
    Rantapuska, E. (2008). Ex-dividend day trading: Who, how, and why? Evidence from the Finnish market. Journal of Financial Economics, 88(2), 355–374.
    Ross, S. A. (1977). The determination of financial structure: The incentive signalling approach. Bell Journal of Economics, 8(1), 23–40.
    Scholes, M. S. (1972). The market for securities: Substitution versus price pressure and the effects of information on share prices. Journal of Business, 45(2), 179–211.
    Spiess, D. K., & Affleck-Graves, J. (1995). Underperformance in long-run stock returns following seasoned equity offerings. Journal of Financial Economics, 38(3), 243–267.
    Tseng, Y.-L., & Hu, S.-Y. (2013). Tax reform and the identity of marginal traders around ex-dividend days. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 25,181–199.
    Tyler, R. H., & Koski, J. L. (2016). Ex‐dividend profitability and institutional trading skill. The Journal of Finance, 72, 461–494.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    財務管理學系
    112357015
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0112357015
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[財務管理學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    701501.pdf1161KbAdobe PDF0View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback