English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 118524/149574 (79%)
Visitors : 78851264      Online Users : 264
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 金融學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/158590
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/158590


    Title: ETF集中度與公司績效
    ETF Concentration and Firm Performance
    Authors: 蔡有容
    Tsai, Yu-Jung
    Contributors: 金帛春
    Kim, Baek-Chun
    蔡有容
    Tsai, Yu-Jung
    Keywords: 指數股票型基金
    投資組合集中度
    公司績效
    公司治理
    被動投資者
    資訊效率
    Exchange Traded Funds
    Portfolio Concentration
    Firm Performance
    Corporate Governance
    Passive Investors
    Information Efficiency
    Date: 2025
    Issue Date: 2025-08-04 14:32:33 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究探討指數股票型基金(ETF)是否以及如何影響台灣企業的績效。我們使用2009年至2024年的台灣上市公司季度面板資料,建構出一個公司層級的加權平均ETF持股集中度指標,該指標同時反映ETF的持股比例與其投資組合的集中程度。研究結果顯示,ETF集中度與企業績效(以資產報酬率ROA與股東權益報酬率ROE衡量)之間存在顯著的正向關係。
    為處理內生性問題,我們採用兩階段最小平方法(2SLS)並使用工具變數,以建立ETF集中度對企業績效的因果關係。我們進一步探討三種潛在的影響機制:(1)公司治理、(2)退出機制、以及(3)股價資訊性。研究發現,公司治理機制最具說服力,ETF集中度較高的公司,其TESG治理品質得分顯著較高;而退出機制則未顯示出顯著效果。至於股價資訊性方面,ETF集中度與報酬非同步性及Amihud流動性指標呈正向關聯,但其經濟影響相對有限,顯示該機制可能為輔助性但具補充性的傳導途徑。
    整體而言,本研究指出,在新興市場中,當被動型機構投資人的持股達到一定集中程度時,確實會對企業經營成果產生實質影響。
    This study examines whether and how Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) influence firm performance in Taiwan. Using quarterly panel data from 2009 to 2024 on Taiwanese listed firms, we construct a firm-level measure of weighted-average ETF concentration that captures both the ownership stake and the portfolio focus of ETFs. Our results show a significant positive relationship between ETF concentration and firm performance, measured by return on assets (ROA) and return on equity (ROE). We address the endogeneity concerns by using 2SLS with instrumental variables to link ETF concentration causally to firm performance . We explore three mechanisms: (1) corporate governance, (2) exit behavior, and (3) price informativeness. We find strong support for the governance channel, as firms with higher ETF concentration exhibit better governance quality, measured by TESG scores. There is no significant evidence supporting the exit mechanism. As for price informativeness, ETF concentration is positively associated with nonsynchronicity and Amihud illiquidity, though the economic effect is modest. This suggests a secondary but complementary transmission channel.
    Overall, this study highlights that passive institutional investors exert real influence on firm outcomes in emerging markets when their ownership is sufficiently concentrated.
    Reference: Antoniou, C., Li, F. W., Liu, X., Subrahmanyam, A., & Sun, C. (2023). Exchange-traded funds and real investment. Review of Financial Studies, 36, 1043–1093.
    Appel, I. R., Gormley, T. A., & Keim, D. B. (2016). Passive investors, not passive owners. Journal of Financial Economics, 121, 111–141.
    Ben-David, I., Franzoni, F., & Moussawi, R. (2018). Do ETFs increase volatility? The Journal of Finance, 73, 2471–2535.
    Borochin, P., & Yang, J. (2017). The effects of institutional investor objectives on firm valuation and governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 126, 171–199.
    Chen, H.C. (2024). Combining TESG scores with financial data: Observing the performance of Taiwan listed companies [Master’s thesis, National Taiwan University]. National Taiwan University Repository. https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU202400248
    Chen, Q., Goldstein, I., & Jiang, W. (2007). Price informativeness and investment sensitivity to stock price. Review of Financial Studies, 20, 619–650.
    Chen, T.K., Tsai, T.S., & Huang, M.L. (2023). ETF Ownership Level, ETF Ownership Volatility, and Corporate Credit Risk. Journal of Accounting Review, 76, 95–143.
    Choi, N., Fedenia, M., Skiba, H., & Sokolyk, T. (2017). Portfolio concentration and performance of institutional investors worldwide. Journal of Economics, 123, 189–208.
    Easley, D., Michayluk, D., O'Hara, M., & Putniņš, T. J. (2021). The active world of passive investing. Review of Finance, 25(5), 1433–1471.
    Edmans, A. (2009). Blockholder trading, market efficiency, and managerial myopia. The Journal of Finance, 64, 2481–2513.
    Edmans, A., Fang, V. W., & Zur, E. (2013). The effect of liquidity on governance. Review of Financial Studies, 26, 1443–1482.
    Ferreira, D., Ferreira, M. A., & Raposo, C. C. (2011). Board structure and price informativeness. Journal of Financial Economics, 99(3), 523–545.
    Glosten, L., Nallareddy, S., & Zou, Y. (2021). ETF activity and informational efficiency of underlying securities. Management Science, 67, 22–47.
    Goldman, E., Sun, Z., & Zhou, X. (2016). The effect of management design on the portfolio concentration and performance of mutual funds. Financial Analysts Journal, 72, 49–61.
    Israeli, D., Lee, C. M. C., & Sridharan, S. A. (2017). Is there a dark side to exchange-traded funds? An information perspective. Review of Accounting Studies, 22, 1048–1083.
    Ivković, Z., Sialm, C., & Weisbenner, S. (2008). Portfolio concentration and the performance of individual investors. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 43, 613–655.
    El Kalak, I., & Tosun, O. K. (2022). ETF ownership and corporate cash holdings. European Financial Management, 28, 1308–1346.
    El Kalak, I., Hudson, R., & Tosun, O. K. (2023). Engaged ETFs and firm performance. European Financial Management, 30, 1708–1756.
    Kandel, E., Massa, M., & Simonov, A. (2011). Do small shareholders count? Journal of Financial Economics, 101, 641–665.
    Liu, C. J. (2019). The impact of ETF ownership on Taiwanese corporate investment [Master’s thesis, National Chengchi University]. National Chengchi University Repository. https://doi.org/10.6814/NCCU201900474
    Sai, M., & Yamada, K. (2025). Does passive ownership affect corporate governance? Evidence from the Bank of Japan’s ETF purchasing program. Research in International Business and Finance, 77(2025), 102924
    Schmidt, C., & Fahlenbrach, R. (2017). Do exogenous changes in passive institutional ownership affect corporate governance and firm value? Journal of Financial Economics, 124, 285–306.
    Sedgwick, J. (2024, May 27). Taiwan ETF issuers to pull in $420mn in fees this year. Ignites Asia. https://www.ft.com/content/e4975157-ec6d-4c1f-9181-11de2422ddbd
    Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1986). Large shareholders and corporate control. Journal of Political Economy, 94, 461–488.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    金融學系
    112352025
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0112352025
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[金融學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    202501.pdf2127KbAdobe PDF0View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback