English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 117581/148612 (79%)
Visitors : 69525867      Online Users : 81
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/158650
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/158650


    Title: 企業多角化程度與氣候風險之關聯
    The Relationship Between Corporate Diversification and Climate Risk
    Authors: 沈柏宇
    Sheng, Bor-Yeu
    Contributors: 翁嘉祥
    Weng, Chia-Hsiang
    沈柏宇
    Sheng, Bor-Yeu
    Keywords: 氣候風險
    產業多角化
    地域多角化
    產業屬性
    風險分散策略
    Climate risk
    business diversification
    geographic diversification
    industry characteristics
    risk mitigation strategy
    Date: 2025
    Issue Date: 2025-08-04 14:49:56 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究基於氣候相關財務揭露工作小組(TCFD)報告書建議、投資組合理論、資源基礎理論等觀點,構建多角化與氣候風險關係之實證模型,探討企業多角化策略是否有助降低氣候風險,並進一步檢驗高碳產業是否具調節效果。研究以2019至2023年美國S&P 500成分公司為樣本,運用固定效果迴歸模型,分別以環境風險評分(Environment Risk Score)與環境管理缺口分數(Environmental Management Gap)為應變數,衡量產業與地域多角化程度對氣候風險的影響。本研究主要探討:(1)不同類型之多角化策略對氣候風險之效果是否一致?(2)高碳排放產業是否加劇或削弱該關係?
    實證結果顯示,地域多角化穩定呈現風險緩解效果,支持其分散區域性氣候衝擊之功能;相對而言,產業多角化與氣候風險則呈正相關。高碳產業多角化之風險調節效果並未獲得支持。本文進一步納入替代變數(1-HHI)、交互項設計與分組檢定,並控制企業固定效果與年度干擾,提升模型識別力,降低樣本異質性與內生性干擾。整體結果具穩健性與理論一致性,顯示企業多角化對氣候風險之效果高度依賴其策略類型與氣候治理能力。
    This study examines the relationship between corporate diversification and climate risk, drawing on TCFD guidelines, portfolio theory, and the resource-based view. Using panel data from S&P 500 firms (2019–2023), it explores whether industry and geographic diversification reduce climate risk and whether this relationship is moderated by high-carbon industry status. Fixed-effects regressions are employed with Environment Risk Score and Environmental Management Gap as key dependent variables.
    Results indicate that geographic diversification consistently mitigates climate risk,while industry diversification is positively associated with it. No significant moderating effects are found for high-carbon industries. Robustness is confirmed through alternative measures, interaction terms, and subgroup analyses. The findings highlight that the effectiveness of diversification depends on its type, implementation sequence, and the firm’s climate governance capacity, offering practical implications for sustainability strategy and risk management.
    Reference: Amihud, Y., & Lev, B. (1981). Risk reduction as a managerial motive for conglomerate mergers. The Bell Journal of Economics, 12(2), 605–617.
    Ansoff, H. I. (1957). Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 113–124.
    Aramonte, S., & Carl, M. (2021). Firm-level R&D after periods of intense technological innovation: The role of investor sentiment (BIS Working Papers No. 916). Bank for International Settlements.
    BP p.l.c. (2023). Annual Report and Form 20‑F 2022. BP p.l.c.
    Bansal, P. & DesJardine, M. R. (2014). Business sustainability: It is about time. Strategic Organization, 12(1), 70–78.
    Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.
    Berger, P. G., & Ofek, E. (1995). Diversification's effect on firm value. Journal of Financial Economics, 37(1), 39-65.
    Bodnar, G. M., Tang, C., & Weintrop, J. (1997). Both sides of corporate diversification: The value impacts of geographic and industrial diversification (NBER Working Paper No. 6224). National Bureau of Economic Research.
    Bolton, P., & Kacperczyk, M. (2021). Do investors care about carbon risk? Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), 517–549.
    Bolton, P., Kacperczyk, M., & Samama, F. (2022). Net‑zero carbon portfolio alignment. Financial Analysts Journal, 78(2), 19–33.
    Chatterjee, S., & Wernerfelt, B. (1991). The link between resources and type of diversification: Theory and evidence. Strategic Management Journal, 12(1), 33–48.
    Contractor, F. J., Kundu, S. K., & Hsu, C. C. (2003). A three-stage theory of international expansion: The link between multinationality and performance in the service sector. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(1), 5–18.
    Delios, A., & Beamish, P. W. (1999). Geographic scope, product diversification, and the corporate performance of Japanese firms. Strategic Management Journal, 20(8), 711–727.
    Denis, D. J., Denis, D. K., & Yost, K. (2002). Global diversification, industrial diversification, and firm value. Journal of Finance, 57(5), 1951–1979.
    Dietz, S., Bowen, A., Dixon, C., & Gradwell, P. (2016). Climate value at risk of global financial assets. Nature Climate Change, 6(7), 676–679.
    Dixit, A. K., & Pindyck, R. S. (1994). Investment under uncertainty. Princeton University Press.
    Eccles, R. G., & Klimenko, S. (2019). The investor revolution. Harvard Business Review, 97(3), 106–116.
    Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10-11), 1105-1121.
    Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1997). Industry costs of equity. Journal of Financial Economics, 43(2), 153–193.
    Glenmede. (2024). ESG integration in high-carbon industries: Transition risks and capital flow trends. Glenmede Investment Management.
    Gort, M. (1962). Diversification and integration in American industry. Princeton University Press.
    Hart, S. L., & Dowell, G. (2011). A natural-resource-based view of the firm: Fifteen years after. Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 146-163.
    Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E., & Ireland, R. D. (1994). A mid-range theory of the interactive effects of international and product diversification on innovation and performance. Journal of Management, 20(2), 297–326.
    Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E., & Kim, H. (1997). International diversification: Effects on innovation and firm performance in product-diversified firms. Academy of Management Journal, 40(4), 767–798.
    Hoang, K., Nguyen, C., Huynh, T. L. D., Zhang, H., & Vu, V. T. T. (2025). How does carbon transition risk drive corporate diversification? Evidence from heavy emitter firms in China. Economic Analysis and Policy, 85, 1971–1994.
    IEA. (2021). Oil and gas industry in energy transitions. International Energy Agency.
    IPCC. (2021). Climate change 2021: The physical science basis.
    Ilhan, E., Sautner, Z., & Vilkov, G. (2021). Carbon tail risk. Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), 621-647.
    Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2022). Climate change 2022: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (H.-O. Pörtner, D. C. Roberts, M. Tignor, et al., Eds.). Cambridge University Press.
    Islam, E., & Singh, M. (2022). Geographic diversification, climate risk, and bank lending: Evidence from farm loans. SSRN.
    Jacquemin, A. P., & Berry, C. H. (1979). Entropy measure of diversification and corporate growth. Journal of Industrial Economics, 27(4), 359–369.
    Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. American Economic Review, 76(2), 323–329.
    Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. (2000). Is group affiliation profitable in emerging markets? An analysis of diversified Indian business groups. Journal of Finance, 55(2), 867–891.
    Krueger, P., Sautner, Z., & Starks, L. T. (2020). The importance of climate risks for institutional investors. Review of Financial Studies, 33(3), 1067–1111.
    La Porta, R., López-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1998). Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106(6), 1113–1155.
    Lang, L. H. P., & Stulz, R. M. (1994). Tobin’s Q, corporate diversification, and firm performance. Journal of Political Economy, 102(6), 1248–1280.
    Lewellen, W. G. (1971). A pure financial rationale for the conglomerate merger. The Journal of Finance, 26(2), 521–537.
    Li, X. (2024). Physical climate change exposure and firms' adaptation strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 46(3), 750–789.
    MSCI. (2023). ESG ratings methodology. MSCI ESG Research LLC.
    Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio selection. The Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77–91.
    McGrath, R. G., & Nerkar, A. (2004). Real options reasoning and a new look at the R&D investment strategies of pharmaceutical firms. Strategic Management Journal, 25(1), 1-21.
    Montgomery, C. A. (1994). Corporate diversification. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(3), 163–178.
    New Climate Institute. (2023). Corporate climate responsibility monitor 2023: Transparency and integrity in emissions reduction.
    OECD. (2022). Climate change and corporate governance.
    Onali, E., & Mascia, D. V. (2022). Corporate diversification and stock risk: Evidence from a global shock. Journal of Corporate Finance, 72, 102150.
    Palepu, K. (1985). Diversification strategy, profit performance and the entropy measure. Strategic Management Journal, 6(3), 239–255.
    Qian, G., & Li, L. (2002). Multinationality, global market diversification and risk performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(2), 355–372.
    Qian, G., Li, L., Li, J., & Qian, Z. (2010). Regional diversification and firm performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(8), 1274–1292.
    Rumelt, R. P. (1974). Strategy, structure, and economic performance. Harvard Business School Press.
    S&P Global Ratings. (2025). Ripple Effect: How value chains compound sector exposures to physical climate risks.
    S&P Global Sustainable1. (2025, March). Climate physical risk report: Financial impacts of water stress, drought, and extreme heat.
    Scharfstein, D. S., & Stein, J. C. (2000). The Dark Side of Internal Capital Markets: Divisional Rent-Seeking and Inefficient Investment. Journal of Finance.
    Song, W., Qu, W., & Xu, W. (2024). Does green finance reform promote heavily polluting enterprises’ diversification? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. SSRN.
    Stein, J. C. (1997). Internal Capital Markets and the Competition for Corporate Resources. Journal of Finance.
    Stern, N. (2007). The economics of climate change: The Stern review. Cambridge University Press.
    Stiglitz, J. E., & Stern, N. (2017). Report of the High-Level Commission on Carbon Prices. World Bank.
    Sustainalytics. (2023). ESG risk ratings methodology overview.
    Sustainalytics. (2024). The ESG Risk Ratings Methodology: Version 3.1
    Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures. (2017). Final report: Recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures.
    Teece, D. J. (1982). Towards an economic theory of the multiproduct firm. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 3(1), 39–63.
    Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350.
    Villalonga, B. (2004). Diversification discount or premium? New evidence from the business information tracking series. Journal of Finance, 59(2), 479–506.
    Weitzman, M. L. (2009). On modeling and interpreting the economics of catastrophic climate change. Review of Economics and Statistics, 91(1), 1-19.
    Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism: Firms, markets, relational contracting. Free Press.
    World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. Oxford University Press.
    Young, M. N., et al. (2008). Corporate Governance in Emerging Economies: A Review of the Principal–Principal Perspective. Journal of Management Studies.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計學系
    112353003
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0112353003
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[會計學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    300301.pdf1585KbAdobe PDF0View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback