English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 117581/148612 (79%)
Visitors : 69523199      Online Users : 272
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/158739


    Title: 分析美國盟邦之民意對中國態度之變化,2012~2022
    An analysis of trends in public attitudes toward China among U.S. allies, 2012–2022
    Authors: 谷丞皓
    Ku, Chen-Hao
    Contributors: 薛健吾
    Hsueh, Chien-Wu
    谷丞皓
    Ku, Chen-Hao
    Keywords: 習近平
    美國盟邦
    威脅平衡理論
    憲政自由主義
    反感度
    Xi Jinping
    U.S. allies
    Balance of threat theory
    Constitutional liberalism
    Unfavorable sentiment
    Date: 2025
    Issue Date: 2025-08-04 15:25:43 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 自從2012年習近平上台後,中國開始改變了過去的發展路線。在內政方面,中共開始強化對中國社會的控制;在對外關係上,也改變過去「韜光養晦」的路線,轉而以積極、強勢的作為維護國家利益,也改變了中國與其他國家的關係,特別是與傳統美國盟邦的關係,導致這些國家的人民對中國的反感度在這段時間都有上升的趨勢。然而,本文發現,位在不同地區的美國盟邦的人民對中國的反感程度和變化趨勢都不盡相同。雖然美國的亞太盟邦的反感程度總體而言是高於美國的歐洲盟邦,但美國的歐洲盟邦在2019~2020年反感度上升的幅度卻遠高於亞太盟邦。究竟是哪些原因造成兩個地區的美國盟邦對中國反感度變化的差異呢?本文認為,雖然「中國的各種軍事增強或強勢作為」和「中國在人權議題上的各種爭議性作為」無疑是影響美國盟邦民意的重要因素,但這兩項因素卻是透過兩個重要中介變數的調節影響,因而使美國位在不同地區的盟邦的民意對中國的態度出現差異:根據守勢現實主義中的「威脅平衡理論」與政治文化中的「憲政自由主義」兩項理論的建議,本文認為,由於亞太盟邦距離中國較近,感受到中國較大的安全威脅,因此「中國的各種軍事增強或強勢作為」對於他們民意變化的影響就比對歐洲盟邦還要明顯;而歐洲盟邦由於距離中國較遠,而感受到中國的安全威脅的程度較低,但是由於他們與中國在憲政自由主義中的價值觀相悖,進而導致「中國在人權議題上的各種爭議性作為」對這些國家在2020年之後對中國的反感程度有著相較於亞太盟邦更為顯著的上升。本文的發現,增進了我們對於「美國的盟邦如何看待中國所帶來的威脅感」這個問題的理解。
    Since Xi Jinping came to power in 2012, China has begun to shift away from its previous development trajectory. Domestically, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has strengthened its control over Chinese society. In foreign affairs, it has abandoned the previous policy of “keeping a low profile” in favor of a more proactive and assertive approach to safeguarding national interests. This shift has altered China's relationships with other countries, particularly with traditional U.S. allies, leading to a rising trend in public antipathy toward China within those nations during this period. However, this study finds that the degree and trajectory of anti-China sentiment among the publics of U.S. allies vary across regions. While anti-China sentiment is generally higher among America’s allies in the Asia-Pacific than among those in Europe, the increase in negative perceptions between 2019 and 2020 was much more pronounced in the European allies. What, then, accounts for the differences in changing attitudes toward China among U.S. allies in these two regions? This paper argues that while China’s military buildup and assertive behavior, as well as its controversial actions on human rights issues, are undeniably key drivers of public opinion in U.S. allied countries, their effects are mediated by two crucial variables: perceived security threats and political-cultural values. Drawing on the theory of “balance of threat” from defensive realism and the concept of “constitutional liberalism” from political culture, this study proposes that Asia-Pacific allies—being geographically closer to China and therefore perceiving a greater security threat—are more strongly influenced by China’s military actions and assertive foreign policy. In contrast, European allies, who are geographically more distant and perceive a lower level of direct security threat, are more affected by China’s human rights controversies. Their strong commitment to constitutional liberal values causes these issues to resonate more deeply, especially after 2020, resulting in a sharper increase in anti-China sentiment than that observed in the Asia-Pacific. This study contributes to our understanding of how U.S. allies perceive the threat posed by China and the regional variation in public attitudes toward its rise.
    Reference: 一、中文部分
    BBC news 中文,2017,〈「限韓令」下的韓流產業能否重回中國市場?〉,《BBC 中文》, https://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/trad/chinese-news-42319225(查閱日期:2022/11/15)
    BBC news 中文,2018,〈中國總理李克強訪問日本:中日關係期待破冰〉,《BBC 中文》,https://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/trad/world-44036906(查閱日期:2024/4/2)
    BBC news 中文,2018,〈中日關係暖化:台日關係持續審慎「冷卻」〉,《BBC news 中文》,https://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/trad/chinese-news-46001215(查閱日期:2024/04/02)
    BBC news 中文,2018,〈安倍訪華:中日關係升溫只是邁出了第一步〉,《BBC news 中文》,https://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/trad/chinese-news-45997580(查閱日期:2024/4/2)
    BBC news 中文,2019,〈G20峰會:貿易戰陰雲下,習近平與安倍認同促進「自由公平貿易」〉,《BBC news 中文》,https://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/trad/world-48799035(查閱日期:2024/4/2)BBC news 中文,2019,〈新冠疫情、戰狼外交與中國國際形象:民調顯示世界多國對華惡感飆升〉,《BBC news 中文》,https://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/trad/world-54442667(查閱日期:2022/11/15)BBC news 中文,2019,〈逃犯條例:「反送中」等五個還需搞明白的問題〉,《BBC news 中文》,取自:https://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/trad/chinese-news-48612503(查閱日期:2022/12/12)
    BBC news 中文,2020,〈習近平與菅義偉首次通話 但「未談國事訪問計劃」〉,《BBC news 中文》,https://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/trad/chinese-news-54291307(查閱日期:2024/4/2)
    BBC news 中文,2021,〈中國海警法上路 執法權擴容下釣魚島火藥味漸濃〉,《BBC news 中文》,https://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/trad/chinese-news-56249465(查閱日期:2024/4/2)
    BBC news 中文,2021,〈中美日關係三岔口:美日52年後再度提及台灣聯合聲明的同與異〉,《BBC news 中文》,https://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/trad/world-56785182(查閱日期:2024/4/2)
    BBC news 中文,2021,〈日本首相三強角逐 對華強硬成為共識〉,《BBC news 中文》,https://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/trad/world-58513780(查閱日期:2024/4/2)
    BBC news 中文,2020,〈中英關係:英國和中國的經濟聯繫有多深〉,《BBC news 中文》,https://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/trad/world-53497124(查閱日期:2024/5/7)
    人民網,2022,〈經濟實力科技實力綜合國力躍上新台階〉。《人民網》,http://politics.people.com.cn/BIG5/n1/2022/0823/c1001-32508685.html(查閱日期:2023/12/25)
    人民畫報,2020,〈最新中日關係民調結果出爐!特殊時期有何特別之處?〉,《人民畫報》,http://www.rmhb.com.cn/gd/202011/t20201117_800227212.html(查閱日期:2024/3/17)
    人權觀察,2021,〈中國2021年度事件〉,《人權觀察》,https://www.hrw.org/zh-hant/world-report/2022/country-chapters/china(查閱日期:2024/6/16)
    Yahoo 財經,2021,〈民調:澳大利亞人對中國的信任度創歷史新低〉,《Yahoo 財經》,https://hk.finance.yahoo.com/news/%E6%B0%91%E8%AA%BF- %E6%BE%B3%E5%A4%A7%E5%88%A9%E4%BA%9E%E4%BA%BA%E5%B0%8D%E4%B8%AD%E5%9C%8B%E7%9A%84%E4%BF%A1%E4%BB%BB%E5%BA%A6%E5%89%B5%E6%AD%B7%E5%8F%B2%E6%96%B0%E4%BD%8E-164038394.html(查閱日期:2022/11/2)
    Yahoo新聞,2023,〈為啥有些韓國人那麼討厭中國人?網曝關鍵原因 調查結果曝光證實〉,《Yahoo 新聞》,https://tw.news.yahoo.com/%E7%82%BA%E5%95%A5%E6%9C%89%E4%BA%9B%E9%9F%93%E5%9C%8B%E4%BA%BA%E9%82%A3%E9%BA%BC%E8%A8%8E%E5%8E%AD%E4%B8%AD%E5%9C%8B%E4%BA%BA-%E7%B6%B2%E6%9B%9D%E9%97%9C%E9%8D%B5%E5%8E%9F%E5%9B%A0-%E8%AA%BF%E6%9F%A5%E7%B5%90%E6%9E%9C%E6%9B%9D%E5%85%89%E8%AD%89%E5%AF%A6-120510704.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS50dy8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAKARoBb6l-A-KtnfhAFMkjk3cQu9FYKW1d7X3h3uNqZhGlzl-FVdXCi6_SKptPbuED6jJ3TPmHbORsGhGobLfvd7Dtpkz-a4moHh8ksYX0KE2T9y5F6yfXvGN3M95xfrGJ3DnQXM7C2_TG1tvq6SX_58oorr9duJQ8UcONtyvfmJ(查閱日期:2024/5/19)
    Yahoo新聞,2025,〈日本人討厭中國人4大原因,最有好感的地方是這個!大家應該不意外〉,《Yahoo 財經》,https://hk.news.yahoo.com/%E6%97%A5%E6%9C%AC%E4%BA%BA%E8%A8%8E%E5%8E%AD%E4%B8%AD%E5%9C%8B%E4%BA%BA-%E5%A4%A7%E5%8E%9F%E5%9B%A0-%E6%9C%80%E6%9C%89%E5%A5%BD%E6%84%9F%E7%9A%84%E5%9C%B0%E6%96%B9%E6%98%AF%E9%80%99%E5%80%8B-%E5%A4%A7%E5%AE%B6%E6%87%89%E8%A9%B2%E4%B8%8D%E6%84%8F%E5%A4%96-145539485.html(查閱日期:2025/3/12)
    ABC新聞,2020,〈全球33國對美中態度如何?日本人最反感中國〉。《ABC新聞》,https://www.abc.net.au/chinese/2020-01-17/pew-survey-on-global-attitudes-on-us-and-china/11878098(查閱日期:2024/1/8)
    RCI,2023,〈你信任習近平還是拜登?24國民眾對中國和美國的看法:皮尤民調〉,《RCI》,https://ici.radio-canada.ca/rci/zh-hant/%E6%96%B0%E9%97%BB/2024566/%E4%B8%AD%E7%BE%8E%E5%8D%B0%E8%B1%A1-%E7%9A%AE%E5%B0%A4%E6%B0%91%E8%B0%83(查閱日期:2024/1/7)
    SBS中文,2022,〈調查:七成澳人對中國第一印象是「政府」「威脅」「人權」〉,《SBS中文》,https://www.sbs.com.au/language/chinese/zh-hant/article/survey-shows-how-australians-think-about-china-in-their-own-words/a8qfgj8vd(查閱日期:2025/6/23)
    大紀元,2012,〈日本自民黨總裁安倍晉三參拜靖國神社〉,《大紀元》,https://web.archive.org/web/20140222045823/http://www.epochtimes.com/b5/12/10/17/n3708354.htm(查閱日期:2024/4/2)
    大紀元,2016,〈中日關係回暖 李克強會見日外相岸田文雄〉,《大紀元》,https://www.epochtimes.com/b5/16/5/1/n7789990.htm,(查閱日期:2024/4/2)
     中央社,2021,〈限韓令解除? 韓國電影相隔6年後在中國上映〉,《中央社》,https://www.cna.com.tw/news/amov/202112080369.aspx(查閱日期:2022/11/9)
    中央社,2023,〈中國批尹錫悅談台海 南韓:外交失禮令人質疑國格〉,《中央社》,https://www.cna.com.tw/news/aopl/202304200329.aspx(查閱日期:2025/5/5)
    中央社,2019,〈共諜投奔澳洲 調查專家投書澳媒分析叛逃者自白〉,《中央社》,https://www.cna.com.tw/news/firstnews/201911260004.aspx(查閱日期:2025/5/5)
    中央通訊社,2018,〈中日關係回暖 川普是主要動因〉,《中央通訊社》,https://www.rti.org.tw/news/view/id/409309(查閱日期:2024/4/2)
    中時新聞網,2022,〈使絆子、幹拐子 揭開中韓冬運短道速滑20年恩怨史〉,《中時新聞網》,https://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20220209003862-260409?chdtv(查閱日期:2025/5/7)
    中央日報,2022,〈韓國人「反日情緒」降低8個百分點「反華情緒」增加14個百分點〉,《中央日報》,https://chinese.joins.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=103041(查閱日期:2025/5/28)
    王怡,2004,〈憲政主義的一個詮釋〉,《教師之友》 ,2:1-16
    王崑義,2007,〈中國的「和諧外交」與對南太平洋的擴展〉,台灣國際研究期刊,3(3):63-109
    公民報橘,2018,〈除了獨裁鴨霸,還有什麼原因導致大家討厭中國?〉,《公民報橘》,https://buzzorange.com/citiorange/2018/05/24/why-people-hate-china/(查閱日期:2025/2/12)
    日經中文網,2017,〈2017中日關係展望:烏雲中有一縷陽光〉,《日經中文網》,https://zh.cn.nikkei.com/columnviewpoint/column/23040-2017-01-03-04-59-29.html(查閱日期:2024/4/2)
    日經中文網,2017,〈低調的中日邦交正常化45年紀念〉,《日經中文網》,https://zh.cn.nikkei.com/politicsaeconomy/politicsasociety/26940-2017-09-11-10-01-40.html(查閱日期:2024/4/2)
    日經中文網,2017,〈中日探索新時代兩國關係〉,《日經中文網》,https://zh.cn.nikkei.com/china/cpolicssociety/27870-2017-11-13-02-07-49.html(查閱日期:2024/4/2)
    日經中文網,2018,〈習近平與安倍:笑容背後是不信任〉,《日經中文網》,https://zh.cn.nikkei.com/columnviewpoint/column/28932-2018-02-08-05-00-00.html(查閱日期:2024/4/2)
    自由時報,2020,〈泰國示威者高舉台灣旗!路透:奶茶聯盟掀東亞捍衛民主旋風〉,《自由時報》,https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/world/breakingnews/3265509
    (查閱日期:2024/3/9)
    自由時報,2022,〈25國民調:多數民眾對中國好感度驟降 願伸援台灣抗中〉,《自由時報》,https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/world/breakingnews/4099874(查閱日期:2023/12/18)
    宋成有,2014,〈中韓關係史〉,北京:社會科學出版社
    宋永等,1993,〈韓中關係論〉,首爾:韓國建國大學
    台灣讀報教育指南,2013,〈日本修憲 和平與戰爭拉鋸〉,《台灣讀報教育指南》,https://web.archive.org/web/20131213054016/http://www.mdnkids.com/nie/nie_indicate/Unit7/W-960523N15/W-960523N15.htm(查閱日期:2024/4/2)
    台灣調查網,2023,〈【全球民調/歐洲】歐洲年輕人對中美都怎麼看?民調:多數持批評態度〉,《台灣調查網》,https://polls.com.tw/20426/(查閱日期:2024/6/16)
    法廣,2017,〈日本認為習安會以國旗為背景是中國示好訊號〉,《法廣》,https://www.rfi.fr/tw/%E4%B8%AD%E5%9C%8B/20170710-%E6%97%A5%E6%9C%AC%E8%AA%8D%E7%82%BA%E7%BF%92%E5%AE%89%E6%9C%83%E4%BB%A5%E5%9C%8B%E6%97%97%E7%82%BA%E8%83%8C%E6%99%AF%E6%98%AF%E4%B8%AD%E5%9C%8B%E7%A4%BA%E5%A5%BD%E8%A8%8A%E8%99%9F(查閱日期:2024/4/2)
    法廣,2020,〈澳大利亞內務部長堅持要求獨立調查中國新冠病毒來源〉,《法廣》,https://www.rfi.fr/tw/%E5%9C%8B%E9%9A%9B/20200426- %E6%BE%B3%E5%A4%A7%E5%88%A9%E4%BA%9E%E5%85%A7%E5%8B%99%E9%83%A8%E9%95%B7%E5%A0%85%E6%8C%81%E8%A6%81%E6%B1%82%E7%8D%A8%E7%AB%8B%E8%AA%BF%E6%9F%A5%E4%B8%AD%E5%9C%8B%E6%96%B0%E5%86%A0%E8%82%BA%E7%82%8E%E7%96%AB%E6%83%85(查閱日期:2022/11/20)
    法廣,2021,〈加兩個邁克爾與家人團聚康明凱前妻:對那些幫助獲釋的人無比感激〉,《法廣》,https://www.rfi.fr/cn/%E6%94%BF%E6%B2%BB/20210925-%E5%8A%A0%E4%B8%A4%E4%B8%AA%E8%BF%88%E5%85%8B%E5%B0%94%E4%B8%8E%E5%AE%B6%E4%BA%BA%E5%9B%A2%E8%81%9A-%E5%BA%B7%E6%98%8E%E5%87%AF%E5%89%8D%E5%A6%BB-%E5%AF%B9%E9%82%A3%E4%BA%9B%E5%B8%AE%E5%8A%A9%E8%8E%B7%E9%87%8A%E7%9A%84%E4%BA%BA%E6%97%A0%E6%AF%94%E6%84%9F%E6%BF%80(查閱日期:2025/5/7)
    法廣,2022,〈2022年的日中關係:正在消失的“戰略互惠”〉,《法廣》,https://www.rfi.fr/tw/%E5%B0%88%E6%AC%84%E6%AA%A2%E7%B4%A2/%E6%9D%B1%E4%BA%AC%E5%B0%88%E6%AC%84/20221228-2022%E5%B9%B4%E7%9A%84%E6%97%A5%E4%B8%AD%E9%97%9C%E4%BF%82-%E6%AD%A3%E5%9C%A8%E6%B6%88%E5%A4%B1%E7%9A%84-%E6%88%B0%E7%95%A5%E4%BA%92%E6%83%A0(查閱日期:2024/4/2)
    法廣,2024,〈法中關係60年:歷史 、現狀、矛盾〉,《法廣》,https://www.rfi.fr/tw/%E6%B3%95%E5%9C%8B/20240127%E6%B3%95%E4%B8%AD%E9%97%9C%E4%BF%8260%E5%B9%B4%E7%9A%84%E7%9F%9B%E7%9B%BE(查閱日期:2024/6/1)
    法廣,2024,〈法專家談中法建交60年: 未來難測,但須對話〉,《法廣》,https://www.rfi.fr/tw/%E5%B0%88%E6%AC%84%E6%AA%A2%E7%B4%A2/%E5%9C%8B%E9%9A%9B%E7%B8%B1%E6%A9%AB/20240128-%E6%B3%95%E5%B0%88%E5%AE%B6%E8%AB%87%E4%B8%AD%E6%B3%95%E5%BB%BA%E4%BA%A460%E5%B9%B4-%E6%9C%AA%E4%BE%86%E9%9B%A3%E6%B8%AC%EF%BC%8C%E4%BD%86%E9%A0%88%E5%B0%8D%E8%A9%B1(查閱日期:2024/6/1)
    沃草,2023,〈五個層面分析:俄羅斯入侵烏克蘭後,歐洲如何看待中國威脅〉,《沃草》,https://watchout.tw/forum/aj9CHsxJ6a15iuK9d31P(查閱日期:2023/12/28)
    沃草,2022,〈中國在太平洋群島的野心與硬實力—從軍事策略與經濟策略切入〉,《沃草》,https://watchout.tw/forum/CEaPysmapahTa9SMUihe(查閱日期:2024/10/20)
    何思慎,2012,〈日本「國有化」釣魚臺對日「中」關係的影響〉, 《展望與探索》,10(10):14-18
    信傳媒,2019,〈影響力擴大負評也暴增 這六個國家對中國惡感超過六成.. 〉,《信傳媒》,https://www.cmmedia.com.tw/home/articles/17885(查閱日期:2024/1/8)
    美國之音,2020,〈澳洲總理呼籲調查新冠病毒起源 中澳關係裂痕加深〉,《美國之音》,https://www.voacantonese.com/a/australian-pm-no-evidence-coronavirus-originated-china-laboratory-urges-inquiry-20200501/5400747.html(查閱日期:2024/5/30)
    美國之音,2024,〈德外長指控中國軍援俄羅斯 北京為何收起“戰狼式”反應?〉,《美國之音》,https://www.voacantonese.com/a/germany-china-ukraine-war-russia-ev-20241203/7885649.html(查閱日期::2024/12/28)
    邱延正,2016,〈憲政民主的精義〉。《復興崗學報》,109:139-158
    金融時報,2019,〈香港修訂《逃犯條例》爲何引發激烈反對?〉,《金融時報》,http://big5.ftchinese.com/story/001082905?archive(查閱日期:2022/12/15)
    林泰和,2018,〈澳洲的中國威脅論的再形成〉,《戰略安全研析》,149:44-55
    林賢參,2010,〈韓國海軍巡邏艦「天安號」沉沒事件〉,《清流月刊》,民國99年五月號,https://www.mjib.gov.tw/FileUploads/eBooks/4de327ac3dc14d809bf564000720db92/Section_file/5cfc56be72b144bfa1d3b2cbac2a14a5.pdf(查閱日期:2025/4/20)
    邵軒磊,2012,〈中國威脅論之解析-以日本相關研究文獻為例〉,《中國大陸研究》,55(3):85-105
    周冠威,2021,《時代革命》,臺北:影樂國際
    青年日報,2021,〈澳洲再添2太平洋島國外館 加速反制中共〉,《青年日報》,https://www.ydn.com.tw/news/newsInsidePage?chapterID=1365005(查閱日期:2025/5/21)
    香港電台網,2010,〈南北韓開炮交火2死20 傷,首爾開緊急會議〉,《香港電台網》, https://thup.site.nthu.edu.tw/p/412-1210-9517.php?Lang=zh-tw(查閱日期:2025/03/01)
    紐時中文網,2014,〈「習安會」:誰讓步了?〉,《紐時中文網》,https://cn.nytimes.com/asia-pacific/20141120/cc20kato/zh-hant/(查閱日期:2024/4/2)
    紐時中文網,2018,〈中國遊客瑞典旅社事件考驗兩國關係〉,《紐時中文網》,https://cn.nytimes.com/world/20180918/chinese-tourists-sweden-vacation/(查閱日期:2025/5/7)
    紐時中文網,2021,〈韓國人對中國負面看法加深,年輕人尤甚〉,《紐時中文網》,https://cn.nytimes.com/asia-pacific/20210820/korea-china-election-young-voters/zh-hant/(查閱日期:2024/6/12)
    黑快明,2020,〈中國銳實力對澳洲的滲透與澳洲政府的回應政策〉,《遠景基金會季刊》,21(3):41-110
    梁文韜,2004,〈再思現代憲政主義之源起-在殖民地主義場境下的洛克自由憲政思想〉,政治與社會哲學評論,11:129-172
    章榮明,2023,〈中國勢力擴張在斐濟受挫〉,《國防安全研究院》,https://indsr.org.tw/respublicationcon?uid=12&resid=1944&pid=3847(查閱日期:2024/12/20)
    章榮明,2024,〈中國在南太平洋重掀波瀾〉,《國防安全研究院》,https://indsr.org.tw/uploads/indsr/files/202501/5914cc0f-5d32-4ba6-b57f-27e0f8faa048.pdf(查閱日期:2024/12/20)
    菱傳媒,2022,〈美「中國軍力報告」出爐!2035年前擁1500枚核彈列對台4大可能行動〉,《菱傳媒》,https://rwnews.tw/article.php?news=5976(查閱日期:2023/12/25)
    張文賢,2008,〈中印關係中的地緣政治因素研究〉,臺北:國立政治大學碩士論文
    康德(Immanuel Kant),1990,《道德底形上學之基礎(李明輝譯)》,聯經出版社,(原著出版於1785年)
    華爾街日報,2019,〈香港引渡條例修訂議案反對者計劃舉行新的抗議活動〉,《華爾街日報》,https://cn.wsj.com/articles/%E9%A6%99%E6%B8%AF%E5%BC%95%E6%B8%A1%E6%A2%9D%E4%BE%8B%E4%BF%AE%E8%A8%82%E8%AD%B0%E6%A1%88%E5%8F%8D%E5%B0%8D%E8%80%85%E8%A8%88%E5%8A%83%E8%88%89%E8%A1%8C%E6%96%B0%E7%9A%84%E6%8A%97%E8%AD%B0%E6%B4%BB%E5%8B%95-121560231313(查閱日期:2022/12/11)
    新華網,2013,〈日本首相安倍晉三要參拜靖國神社〉,《新華網》,https://web.archive.org/web/20140107202625/http://news.xinhuanet.com/world/2013-12/26/c_118717838.htm(查閱日期:2024/4/2)
    新華網,2015,〈《關於東北亞和平與合作的聯合宣言》(全文)〉,《新華網》,https://web.archive.org/web/20191229021840/http://www.xinhuanet.com/world/2015-11/01/c_1117004595.htm(查閱日期:2024/4/2)
    新華網,2016,〈「薩德」到了家門口,中國該如何應對?〉,《新華網》,http://news.sina.com.cn/w/zg/2016-07-08/doc-ifxtwiht3394255.shtml(查閱日期:2022/11/12)
    新華社,2015,〈習近平成功訪英:開啟中英關係的“黃金時代”〉,《新華社》,http://www.xinhuanet.com/politics/2015-10/25/c_128355367.htm(查閱日期:2024/5/7)
    陳麒安,2008,〈聯盟理論之研究:現實主義的觀點〉,《國際關係學報》,26:133-167
    陳嘉銘,2016,〈霍布斯的《利維坦》I〉,《台大開放式課程》,
    http://ocw.aca.ntu.edu.tw/ocw_files/105S101_CT08L03.pdf (查詢日期:2023/12/20)
    陳宥樺,2017,〈權力與影響:中國對於澳洲的政治與學術滲透?〉,《兩岸國際》,http://www.taiwansig.tw/index.php/%E6%94%BF%E7%AD%96%E5%A0%B1%E5%91%8A/%E5%85%A9%E5%B2%B8%E5%9C%8B%E9%9A%9B/8090-%E6%AC%8A%E5%8A%9B%E8%88%87%E5%BD%B1%E9%9F%BF%EF%BC%9A%E4%B8%AD%E5%9C%8B%E5%B0%8D%E6%96%BC%E6%BE%B3%E6%B4%B2%E7%9A%84%E6%94%BF%E6%B2%BB%E8%88%87%E5%AD%B8%E8%A1%93%E6%BB%B2%E9%80%8F?tmpl=component&format=pdf(查詢日期:2025/6/22)
    陳欣之,2005,《抗衡、扈從、交往或卸責─東協國家應對中國崛起的研究》台北:行政院國科會研究計畫
    陳欣之,1996,〈東協諸國對「中國威脅論」的看法與回應〉,《問題與研究》,35(11):15-33
    進出口服務網,2023,〈2022年各國對我國外貿依存度〉,《進出口服務網》,http://www.ciedata.com/News/202304/3dbdcef7-3337-452a-a382-bdd80f804619.html(查閱日期:2024/4/15)
    搜狐,2023,〈2022年世界國家和地區GDP總量和人均GDP排名出爐! 〉《搜狐》,https://www.sohu.com/a/668888365_121119270#google_vignette(查閱日期:2024/4/15)
    傅子耕,2020,〈人生而自由──盧梭《民約論》導讀〉,《元智大學通識教育部》,file:///C:/Users/owner/Downloads/%E5%82%85%E5%AD%90%E8%80%95%E8%80%81%E5%B8%AB-%E6%B0%91%E7%B4%84%E8%AB%96%E5%B0%8E%E8%AE%80-%E5%A3%93%E7%B8%AE%20(1).pdf(查閱日期:2023/12/11)
    劉德海,2022,〈當前澳洲對太平洋地區島國的援助政策〉,《國際開發援助現場季刊》,8,8-14
    蔡政修,2011,〈中國威脅論的省思〉,《東海大學「中國發展對台灣的影響」座談會》,http://www2.thu.edu.tw/~trc/2-thuup/3-program/second/1-class/3-chi/3-02-07.pdf(查閱日期:2023/9/15)
    德國之聲,2020,〈民調:德國人看中國 疑慮多多〉,《德國之聲》,https://www.dw.com/zh-hant/%E6%B0%91%E8%AA%BF%E5%BE%B7%E5%9C%8B%E4%BA%BA%E7%9C%8B%E4%B8%AD%E5%9C%8B-%E7%96%91%E6%85%AE%E5%A4%9A%E5%A4%9A/a-55649991(查閱日期:2024/6/16)
    德國之聲,2025,〈歐盟:暫不重啟中歐投資協定、維持對華制裁〉,《德國之聲》,https://www.dw.com/zh-hant/%E6%AD%90%E7%9B%9F%E6%9A%AB%E4%B8%8D%E9%87%8D%E5%95%9F%E4%B8%AD%E6%AD%90%E6%8A%95%E8%B3%87%E5%8D%94%E5%AE%9A%E7%B6%AD%E6%8C%81%E5%B0%8D%E8%8F%AF%E5%88%B6%E8%A3%81/a-72562950 (查閱日期:2025/3/18)
    薛健吾,2016,〈抗衡或扈從:14個歐亞國家對俄國外交政策選擇的再檢視〉,《東吳政治學報》,34(3):121-178
    轉角國際,2020,〈中日的防疫謀算:日本「推遲」習近平4月國是訪問,東奧後秋季再說〉,《轉角國際》,https://global.udn.com/global_vision/story/8662/4391686(查閱日期:2024/4/2)
    轉角國際,2016,〈崔順實風暴,南韓第四權洗牌(上):從美牛抗爭到秘線實權〉,《轉角國際》,https://global.udn.com/global_vision/story/8663/2112478,(查閱日期:2025/3/22)
    關鍵評論網,2022,〈中韓文化之爭:繼泡菜之爭後,兩方網友再次為了麻辣燙起源交鋒〉,《關鍵評論網》,https://www.thenewslens.com/article/170549(查閱日期:2025/3/22)
    關鍵評論網,2022,〈皮尤中心「對中國觀感」民調:德日義反感逾15年,英荷近3年由喜轉厭,只有星馬以3國不討厭中國〉,《關鍵評論網》,https://www.thenewslens.com/article/174087(查閱日期:2023/12/11)
    二、英文部分
    Australian Bureau of Statistics. 2024. “Population clock and pyramid.” https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/people/population/population-clock-pyramid
    Australian Government. 2012. “ Australia-China: Not just 40 years.” https://treasury.gov.au/publication/economic-roundup-issue-4-2012/australia-china-not-just-40-years
    BBC. 2020. “ How strong are Britain and China's economic ties?” https://www.bbc.com/news/business-53468925
    CEIAS. 2022. “British public opinion on China in the age of COVID-19.” https://sinofon.cz/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/UK-poll-report.pdf
    CEIAS. 2022. “French public opinion on China in the age of COVID-19.” https://www.ifri.org/sites/default/files/atoms/files/fr_poll_report.pdf
    CEIAS. 2022. “German public opinion on China in the age of COVID-19.” https://sinofon.cz/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/DE-poll-report_noISBN.pdf
    Carnegie Europe. 2023.“ Europe’s Dangerous Dependence on China.” https://carnegieendowment.org/europe/strategic-europe/2023/04/europes-dangerous-dependence-on-china?lang=en
    CSIS. 2023. “Balancing Act: Managing European Dependencies on China for Climate Technologies.”
    https://www.csis.org/analysis/balancing-act-managing-european-dependencies-china-climate-technologies
    Council on Foreign Relations. 2023. “The China-North Korea Relationship.” https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/china-north-korea-relationship
    China Trade Monitor. 2021. “Guest Post: 30 Years of Diplomatic Relations Between Korea and China: Changes in Trade Structure and Its Implication.” https://www.chinatrademonitor.com/guest-post-30-years-of-diplomatic-relations-between-korea-and-china-changes-in-trade-structure-and-its-implication/
    CGTN. 2019. “China-France economic cooperation advances”. https://news.cgtn.com/news/2019-11-04/China-France-economic-cooperation-advances-Llds8gtpNC/index.html
    China-EU – international trade in goods statistics. 2024. “Statistics Explained.” https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics explained/SEPDF/cache/55157.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com
    Foreign Policy. 2023. “China Can’t Catch a Break in Asian Public Opinion.” https://foreignpolicy.com/2023/06/28/china-soft-power-asia-culture-influence-korea-singapore/
    Global Security. Org. 2022. “L-SAM Long-range Surface-to-Air Missile.” https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/rok/l-sam.htm
    JETRO Statistics. 2019. “Japanese Trade with China and FDI Stock in China.” https://www.vifindia.org/article/2020/june/25/the-future-of-china-japan-relations
    Jiajia Li and Abbas Ali Chandio. 2020. “Trade Impacts on Embodied Carbon Emissions—Evidence from the Bilateral Trade between China and Germany.” https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/14/5076
    Kenneth N. Waltz. 1979. “Theory of International Politics”, pp. 115-128. MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing. Company.
    Lowy Institute. 2022. “Attitudes to China.” https://poll.lowyinstitute.org/charts/attitudes-to-china/
    Lowy Institute. 2022.“ feelings-towards-other-nations.” https://poll.lowyinstitute.org/charts/feelings-towards-other-nations/
    MDPI. (2020). “Trade Impacts on Embodied Carbon Emissions—Evidence from the Bilateral Trade between China and Germany.” https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/14/5076
    Office for national statistics. 2021. “ Estimates of the population for the UK, England, Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland.” https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigration/populationestimates/datasets/populationestimatesforukenglandandwalesscotlandandnorthernireland
    Pew Research Center. 2011. “Chapter 4. Views of China.” https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2011/07/13/chapter-4-views-of-china/
    Pew Research Center. 2022. “How Global Public Opinion of China Has Shifted in the Xi Era.” https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2022/09/28/how-global-public-opinion-of-china-has-shifted-in-the-xi-era/
    Pew Research Center. 2023. “Taiwan seen more favorably than not across 24 countries.” https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/08/11/taiwan-seen-more-favorably-than-not-across-24-countries/
    Perspective. 2018. “Australia’s Second China Challenge.” https://web.archive.org/web/20191203005059/https://www.iseas.edu.sg/images/pdf/ISEAS_Perspective_2018_20@50.pdf/(May 10, 2024 )
    Randall L. Schweller. 1999. “Managing the Rise of Great Power: History and Theory. ” In Alastair Iain Johnston and Robert S. Ross, eds., Engaging China: The Management of an Emerging Power, pp.1-31. London and New York: Routledge.
    Rand Corporation. 2023. “North Korea and China Aren't the Allies You Think They Are.” https://www.rand.org/pubs/commentary/2023/09/north-korea-and-china-arent-the-allies-you-think-they.html
    Reuters. 2023. “Economic reliance on China that EU wants to 'rebalance'. ” https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/economic-reliance-china-that-eu-wants-rebalance-2023-04-04/
    The Washington Post. 2017. “South Korea and China move to normalize relations
    after THAAD dispute.” https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/south-korea-and-china-move-to-normalize-relations-after-thaad-conflict/2017/10/31/60f2bad8-bde0-11e7-af84-d3e2ee4b2af1_story.html
    Tim Summers · Hiu Man Chan · Peter Gries · Richard Turcsany. 2021. “Worsening British views of China in 2020: evidence from public opinion, parliament, and the media.” pp. 173-194. Asia Europe Journal (2022)
    The Sydney Morning Herald. 2013. “Gillard urges closer Asian ties to ease tensions.” https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/gillard-urges-closer-asian-ties-to-ease-tensions-20130407-2helh.html
    The Interpreter. 2013. “What the new defence white paper will say about China.” https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/post/2013/09/23/What-new-Defence-White-Paper-will-say-about-China.aspx
    The Australian. 2012. “Julia Gillard's US-China balancing act.” https://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/obama-in-australia/our-indispensable-alliance-barack-obama/story-fnb0o39u-1226197460882
    UK in a changing Europe. 2022. “Global public opinion is divided on Russia and China.” https://ukandeu.ac.uk/global-public-opinion-is-divided-on-russia-and-china/
    U.S. Department of State. 2017. “China’s Disregard for Human Rights.” https://2017-2021.state.gov/chinas-disregard-for-human-rights/
    Walt, Stephen, M. 1987. “The Origins of Alliance.” pp. 18-24. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
    Whitehouse. 2021. “Quad Leaders’ Joint Statement: The Spirit of the Quad.” https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/03/12/quad-leaders-joint-statement-the-spirit-of-the-quad/
    Wilfred M. Chow, Enze Han, Xiaojun Li. 2019. “Brexit identities and British public opinion on China. ” International Affairs, Volume 95, Issue 6, November 2019, Pages 1369–1387.
    Xavier Romero-Vidal. 2022. “The world has divided into liberal and illiberal spheres.” https://www.cam.ac.uk/stories/worlddivided
    三、日文部分
    言論NPO. 2021. “第16回日中共同世論調査結果. ” https://www.genron-npo.net/world/archives/9354-2.html
    総務省統計局. 2024. “人口推計(令和5年(2023年)10月確定値、令和6年(2024年)3月概算値). ” https://www.stat.go.jp/data/jinsui/new.html
    四、韓文部分
    아산정책연구원. 2017. “한반도 사드(THAAD) 배치와 급변하는 한국인의 주변국 인식. ” https://www.asaninst.org/contents/%ED%95%9C%EB%B0%98%EB%8F%84-%EC%82%AC%EB%93%9Cthaad-%EB%B0%B0%EC%B9%98%EC%99%80-%EA%B8%89%EB%B3%80%ED%95%98%EB%8A%94-%ED%95%9C%EA%B5%AD%EC%9D%B8%EC%9D%98-%EC%A3%BC%EB%B3%80%EA%B5%AD-%EC%9D%B8/
    동아시아연구원. 2023. “한중의 상호 인식 변화와 한일관계의 함의. ” https://www.eai.or.kr/new/ko/etc/search_view.asp?intSeq=21822&board=kor_workingpaper
    세계일보. 2023. “中 매체 한국은 왜 중국 싫어할까? 달라진 위상 적응 못해 [미드나잇 이슈] ” https://www.segye.com/newsView/20230427511436
    五、法文部分
    Institut national de la statistique et des études économiques. 2024. “Population et structure de la population. ” https://www.insee.fr/en/statistiques/series/103088458
    六、德文部分
    Statistisches Bundesamt. 2022. “Bevölkerungsstand: Amtliche Einwohnerzahl Deutschlands 2022. ”
    https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Gesellschaft-Umwelt/Bevoelkerung/Bevoelkerungsstand/_inhalt.html
    Welt. 2016. “Deutsche fürchten die Chinesen – doch sie lieben uns. ”https://www.welt.de/wirtschaft/article155280339/Deutsche-fuerchten-die-Chinesen-doch-sie-lieben-uns.html
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    東亞研究所
    111260016
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0111260016
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[東亞研究所] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    001601.pdf3584KbAdobe PDF0View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback