Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/158747
|
| Title: | 我國科技大學智慧製造領域產學研發合作之模式與績效影響因素探究
Exploring the models and performance-influencing factors of industry-university R&D collaboration in smart manufacturing at Taiwan’s universities of science and technology |
| Authors: | 洪嘉音
Hong, Jia-Yin |
| Contributors: | 陳榮政
Chen, Jung-Cheng
洪嘉音
Hong, Jia-Yin |
| Keywords: | 科技大學
智慧製造
產學合作研發模式
績效影響因素
University of science and technology
Smart manufacturing
Industry-university R&D collaboration models
Performance-influencing factors |
| Date: | 2025 |
| Issue Date: | 2025-08-04 15:28:42 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 隨著全球數位轉型與智慧製造浪潮興起，我國科技大學在國家創新體系與產業升級中扮演關鍵角色。本研究旨在探討科技大學於智慧製造領域的產學合作模式，分析影響研發合作績效的關鍵因素，並比較學界與業界對影響因素的認知差異。研究採混合方法，第一階段進行學界與業界半結構式訪談，探討產學合作模式；第二階段以問卷調查搭配與IPA分析，分析實務觀點中的績效影響因素。
本研究在質性分析中歸納出三種主要的產學合作模式：需求驅動型、平臺導向型與網絡生態型，各具不同信任基礎與運作特性。需求驅動型強調教師個人聲譽與技術能力，靈活但穩定性較低；平臺導向型由制度統籌資源，提升穩定性但彈性不足；網絡生態型依賴多元行動者互動，促進創新生態，但難以規模化。量化分析顯示產學雙方重視短期資源與成果，忽視前提條件與治理，學界偏重學術指標，企業則著重技術落地與人才接軌，反映雙方合作文化差異。
本研究基於上述研究發現，進一步歸納出以下結論：
一、合作模式無優劣之分，應依情境靈活調整與互補
二、產學角色關係正由分立走向螺旋交織
三、產學合作須由專案管理邏輯轉向生態建構願景
綜上所述，本研究強調產學合作發展不宜僅以單一模式或標準化指標評斷成效，而應依合作階段、目標與情境靈活調整，並鼓勵三種模式在實務中交錯互補、動態共存。同時，合作關係亦應從傳統分立主體的角色定位，逐步邁向螺旋交織與共同調適，形塑多層次、長期互信的夥伴關係。未來產學合作發展更應超越專案管理的短期績效思維，朝向建構開放、彈性且具韌性的創新生態系統，以因應智慧製造技術快速變革與國際競爭挑戰，並實現產業升級與社會永續發展的共同願景。
With the rise of global digital transformation and smart manufacturing, universities of science and technology in Taiwan play a critical role in the national innovation system and industrial upgrading. This study aims to explore the models of industry-university collaboration in the field of smart manufacturing, analyze key factors influencing R&D performance, and compare the differing perceptions of these factors between academia and industry. A mixed-methods approach was adopted: the first stage involved semi-structured interviews with academic and industry representatives to identify collaboration models; the second stage utilized a questionnaire survey combined with Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) to examine performance-influencing factors from practical perspectives.
The qualitative analysis identified three major models of industry-university collaboration: demand-driven, platform-oriented, and network-ecosystem types, each with distinct trust foundations and operational characteristics. The demand-driven model emphasizes individual faculty reputation and technical expertise, offering flexibility but lacking stability. The platform-oriented model relies on institutional resource integration to enhance stability but is less flexible. The network-ecosystem model depends on interactions among diverse actors, fostering innovation ecosystems but is challenging to scale. The quantitative analysis showed that both academia and industry focus on short-term resources and outcomes, while often neglecting contextual conditions and governance. Academia tends to prioritize academic indicators, whereas industry focuses on practical outcomes, technology implementation, and talent integration, reflecting fundamental cultural differences in collaboration.
Based on these findings, the study concludes that:
A.Collaboration models have no inherent superiority and should be flexibly adjusted according to context and needs.
B.The roles of academia and industry are shifting from separate entities to intertwined partnerships.
C.Industry-university collaboration should evolve from project management logic to an ecosystem-oriented vision.
In summary, the study emphasizes that the development of industry-university collaboration should not be judged solely by standardized indicators or a single model, but should flexibly adapt to different stages, goals, and contexts. The three models should coexist dynamically and complement each other in practice. Furthermore, partnerships should move beyond traditional role divisions toward multi-level, long-term trust-based collaborations. Future development should transcend short-term project-oriented thinking and aim to build an open, resilient innovation ecosystem that can address rapid technological change in smart manufacturing and contribute to sustainable industrial and societal development. |
| Reference: | 一、中文部分
吳明振、林雅幸、陳培基（2014）。技職教育再造的挑戰與展望。中等教育，65（2），6-20。https://doi.org/10.6249/SE.2014.65.2.01
吳清山、簡惠閔(2008)。臺灣高等技職教育改革分析：1996-2007年。教育研究月刊，167，47-67。
李昆晃（2016）。我國大學技術移轉之法制與成效—以美國、日本為比較對象〔碩士論文，國立臺灣大學〕。臺灣碩博士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/q62kv7
周祝瑛、楊硯婷、梁瀞文（2019）。大學產學合作之探討。臺灣教育評論月刊，8（1），35-42。
周燦德（2013）。台灣推動產學合作的策略模式－產學研發與人才培育。朝陽學報，18，85-109。
林尚平、陳宥杉、雷漢聲、陳達仁、黃銘傑、蔡渭水、黃家齊、張克群（2009）。行政院國科會產學合作機制之發展現況與未來建議。商管科技季刊，10（1），1-28。https://www.cabmt.org.tw/uploads/upload/4ef6afd3782e287998089297ab7ce528.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com
國立屏東科技大學永續發展中心（2020年4月22日）。與誠新國際產學攜手共創農漁產業新里程碑。取自 https://sustainability.npust.edu.tw/news/%E8%88%87%E8%AA%A0%E6%96%B0%E5%9C%8B%E9%9A%9B%E7%94%A2%E5%AD%B8%E6%94%9C%E6%89%8B%E5%85%B1%E5%89%B5%E8%BE%B2%E6%BC%81%E7%94%A2%E6%A5%AD%E6%96%B0%E9%87%8C%E7%A8%8B%E7%A2%91/
國家科學及技術委員會（無年份）。創新產學合作計畫。取自https://www.nstc.gov.tw/folksonomy/list/d1c0f0cb-636f-4640-8994-8d9cb7435214?l=ch
國家發展委員會（2016）。5+2產業創新計畫。https://www.ndc.gov.tw/Content_List.aspx?n=9D024A4424DC36B9
國家發展委員會（2020）。六大核心戰略產業推動方案。https://www.ndc.gov.tw/Content_List.aspx?n=9614A7C859796FFA
張彥輝、耿筠（2010）。我國高等教育機構研發成果運用之比較－採成本與收益觀點。商管科技季刊，11（2），189-208。https://doi.org/10.30083/CMQ.201006.0001
教育部（2022）。高等教育深耕計畫第二期計畫書（行政院核定版）。取自 https://ws.moe.edu.tw/Download.ashx?u=C099358C81D4876CE71664C148AB43844E638E8CF689EC603CACE6FFB697971CECFF30EA85A9247B6A0AC28AD5EA1F35EBC8EA1CE5339EAAA53A71939A4D1922D7A5829B9B6E5BBEF1A101EB29B68599&n=F7CA995CE89B0799A79C2F1CAC435597D8AF5F912A33DF3456EBA2D0D3226C2CB0781281C1E266704704D3F8B40127662903218B4619E56BD4BE868DA69AD94759F142791ABDB0C9E42DFD7139E13653&icon=..pdf
教育部產學合作資訊網（無年份）。教育部產學合作資訊網。取自 https://iac.twaea.org.tw/index.html
教育部資訊及科技教育司（2024）。110-113智慧製造跨域整合人才培育計畫。https://proj.moe.edu.tw/tcim/cl.aspx?n=6504
黃炳欽、張國保（2007）。教育部推動產學合作現況與發展方向。人文社會科學研究，1（1），1-19。https://doi.org/10.6284/NPUSTHSSR.2007.1(1)1
楊振昇、蔡進雄（2013）。國內外人才培育相關政策之比較分析研究（國家教育研究院委託研究報告）。國家教育研究院。
經濟部產業技術司（2023）。2023年我國產業創新研發政策推動。https://www.itis.org.tw/PubReport_Detail.aspx?rpno=42165588
經濟部產業技術司（2024）。2024/2025產業技術白皮書。https://www2.itis.org.tw/PubReport_Detail.aspx?rpno=6947812&industry=5&ctgy=37&free=&type=pubreport
經濟部產業技術司（無年份）。組織與職掌。取自 https://www.moea.gov.tw/MNS/doit/content/Content.aspx?menu_id=13389
劉素娟、鍾任琴、林英杰、齊雁茹（2016）。大學產學合作模式探討。朝陽學報，21，57-71。
魏佳卉（2020）。從國家預算看高教未來。評鑑雙月刊，87，44-47。
二、英文部分
Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Di Costa, F. (2011). University-industry research collaboration: a model to assess university capability. Higher Education, 62, 163-181.
Adner, R. (2006). Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem. Harvard Business Review, 84(4), 98–107.
Afzal, M. N. I., Sulong, R. S., Dutta, S., & Mansur, D. K. B. H. (2018). An investigation on triple helix model and national innovation systems: The case of Malaysia. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 21(2), 1–15. https://journal.uii.ac.id/ajie/article/view/10305
Ankrah, S., & AL-Tabbaa, O. (2015). Universities-industry collaboration: A systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 31, 387-408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2015.02.003
Autio, E., Nambisan, S., Thomas, L. D. W., & Wright, M. (2018). Digital affordances, spatial affordances and the genesis of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(1), 72–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1266
Barnes, T., Pashby, I., & Gibbons, A. (2002). Effective university–industry interaction: A multi-case evaluation of collaborative R&D projects. European Management Journal, 20(3), 272–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-2373(02)00044-0
Bekkers, R., & Bodas Freitas, I. M. (2008). Analysing knowledge transfer channels between universities and industry: To what degree do sectors also matter? Research Policy, 37(10), 1837-1853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.007
Borgatti, S. P., & Foster, P. C. (2003). The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. Journal of Management, 29(6), 991–1013. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(03)00087-4
Borgatti, S. P., Mehra, A., Brass, D. J., & Labianca, G. (2009). Network analysis in the social sciences. Science, 323(5916), 892-895. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1165821
Bozeman, B. (2000). Technology transfer and public policy: A review of research and theory. Research Policy, 29, 627- 655. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00093-1
Brockhoff, K., Gupta, A. K., & Rotering, C. (1991). Inter-firm R&D co-operations in GermanyLa coopération dans la recherche-dévelopement entre compagnies en AllemagneKooperation bei R&D Firmen in DeutschlandEjemplos de la cooperación entre empresas de investigación y desarollo en Alemania. Technovation, 11(4), 219–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-4972(91)90035-3
Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Harvard University Press.
Caniëls, M. C. J., & Van den Bosch, H. (2011). The role of higher education institutions in building regional innovation systems. Papers in Regional Science, 90(2), 271-286. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2010.00344.x
Cohen, M., Fernandes, G., & Godinho, P. (2025). Measuring the impacts of university–industry R&D collaborations: A systematic literature review. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 50(1), 345–374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-024-10114-5
Coleman, G. (1987). Logical framework approach to the monitoring and evaluation of agricultural and rural development projects. Project Appraisal, 2(4), 251-259. https://doi.org/10.1080/02688867.1987.9726638
Cooke, P. (2001). Regional innovation systems, clusters, and the knowledge economy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 945–974. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/10.4.945
Das, T. K., & Teng, B. S. (2000). A resource-based theory of strategic alliances. Journal of Management, 26(1), 31-61. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600105
Davey, T., Galán Muros, V., Meerman, A., Allinson, R., & Baaken, T. (2011). The State of European University Business Cooperation. Science-to-Business Marketing Research Centre, Münster University of Applied Sciences. https://www.ub-cooperation.eu/pdf/englishexec.pdf
Davis, J., Edgar, T., Porter, J., Bernaden, J., & Sarli, M. (2015). Smart manufacturing, manufacturing intelligence and demand-dynamic performance. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 47, 145-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2012.06.037
Eryanto, H., Swaramarinda, D. R., & Nurmalasari, D. (2019). Effectiveness of entrepreneurship practice program: Using CIPP program evaluation. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 22(1), 1-10.
Etzkowitz, H. (2000). The triple helix: University–industry–government innovation in action. Routledge.
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1995). The triple helix: University–industry–government relations: A laboratory for knowledge-based economic development. EASST Review, 14(1), 14-19. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2480085
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
Fernandes, G., Barbosa, J., Pinto, E. B., & Araújo, M. T. (2019). Applying a method for measuring the performance of university‑industry R&D collaborations: Case study analysis. Procedia Computer Science, 164, 424-432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.12.202
Fernandes, G., Santos, J. M. R. C. A., Ribeiro, P., Ferreira, L. M. D. F., O’Sullivan, D., Barroso, D., & Pinto, E. B. (2023). Critical success factors of university‑industry R&D collaborations. Procedia Computer Science, 219, 1650-1659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.458
Freeman, C. (1987). Technology policy and economic performance: Lessons from Japan. Pinter.
Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7
Gasper, D. (2000). Evaluating the ‘logical framework approach’ towards learning-oriented development evaluation. Public Administration and Development, 20(1), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-162X(200002)20:1<17::AID-PAD89>3.0.CO;2-5
Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380. https://doi.org/10.1086/225469
Hagedoorn, J. (1993). Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: Interorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences. Strategic Management Journal, 14(5), 371–385. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2486823
Hassouna, M. M., & Zaazou, Z. A. (2024). The Impact of Undergraduate Internships on Employability-An Empirical Study. The Academic Journal of Contemporary Commercial Research, 4(3), 24-47.
Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2003). The dynamic resource‐based view: Capability lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 997–1010. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.332
Hilkenmeier, F., Fechtelpeter, C., & Decius, J. (2022). How to foster innovation in SMEs: Evidence of the effectiveness of a project-based technology transfer approach. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 47, 719–747. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-021-09913-x
Hsu, D. W., Shen, Y. C., Yuan, B. J., & Chou, C. J. (2015). Toward successful commercialization of university technology: Performance drivers of university technology transfer in Taiwan. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 92, 25-39.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125617745086
Hui, J. (2017). The path to deepening school-enterprise cooperation in higher vocational education. Chinese Education & Society, 50(5-6), 451-457.
Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2018). Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, 39(8), 2255-2276. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2904
Jacobson, N., Butterill, D., & Goering, P. (2005). Consulting as a strategy for knowledge transfer. The Milbank Quarterly, 83(2), 299-321.
Jantunen, A. (2005). Knowledge‐processing capabilities and innovative performance: an empirical study. European Journal of Innovation Management, 8(3), 336-349.
Kaplan, R. S. (2009). Conceptual foundations of the balanced scorecard. Handbooks of Management Accounting Research, 3, 1253-1269. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1751-3243(07)03003-9
Kaymaz, K., & Eryıgıt, K. Y. (2016). Determining factors hindering university-industry collaboration: An analysis from the perspective of academicians in the context of entrepreneurial science paradigm. International Journal of Social Inquiry, 4(1), 185-213.
Kiss, É., & Páger, B. (2024). A feldolgozóipar és az Ipar 4.0 technológiák területi összefüggései Magyarországon a negyedik ipari forradalom elején. Tér és Társadalom, 38(1), 129-154. https://doi.org/10.17649/TET.38.1.3527
Koria, M., Osorno, R. H., Telalbasic, I., Ramírez Vázquez, D. del C., & Chirchir, E. (2020). An innovation intermediary for Nairobi, Kenya: Designing student-centric services for university-industry collaboration. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 13(6), 671–683. https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2020.1796012
Kusiak, A. (2017). Smart manufacturing. International Journal of Production Research, 56(1-2), 508-517. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1351644
Lai, W.-H. (2011). Willingness-to-engage in technology transfer in industry–university collaborations. Journal of Business Research, 64(11), 1218–1223.
Lee, C. H., Bagchi-Sen, S., & Poon, J. (2015). University—industry collaboration in a triple helix setting on a US medical campus. Industry and Higher Education, 29(1), 37-49. https://doi.org/10.5367/ihe.2015.0240
Li, B. (2018). China’s manufacturing locus in 2025: With a comparison of “Made-in-China 2025” and “Industry 4.0”. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 135, 66–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.028
Li, Y., Li, Z., & Liu, T. (2024). Does university–industry collaboration improve firm productivity? Evidence from China. PLOS ONE, 19(7), e0305695. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0305695
Lundvall, B.A. (1992). National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. Pinter.
Marullo, C., Piccaluga, A., & Cesaroni, F. (2021). From knowledge to impact. An investigation of the commercial outcomes of academic engagement with industry. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 34(9), 1065-1080. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2021.1947488
Mgonja, C. (2017). Enhancing the university-industry collaboration in developing countries through best practices. International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology, 50(4), 216-225. https://doi.org/10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V50P235
Mittal, S., Khan, M. A., Romero, D., & Wuest, T. (2019). Smart manufacturing: Characteristics, technologies and enabling factors. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 233(5), 1342–1361. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954405417736547
Montgomery, D. C., & Woodall, W. H. (2008). An overview of six sigma. International Statistical Review, 76(3), 329-346. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-5823.2008.00061.x
Moore, J. F. (1993). Predators and prey: A new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review, 71(3), 75–86.
Mowery, D. C., Nelson, R. R., Sampat, B. N., & Ziedonis, A. A. (2001). The growth of patenting and licensing by US universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh–Dole act of 1980. Research policy, 30(1), 99-119.
Nelson, R. R., & Rosenberg, N. (1993). Technical innovation and national systems. In: Nelson, R. R. (Ed.), National innovation systems: A comparative analysis (pp. 3–21). Oxford University Press.
Opassuwan, T., & Wannamakok, W. (2024). Deciphering the determinants of firm’s engagement with universities: An insight into the Thai industrial landscape. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10(1), 100248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100248
Perkmann, M., & Walsh, K. (2007). University–industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(4), 259-280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00225.x
Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’Este, P., Fini, R., Geuna, A., Grimaldi, R., Hughes, A., Krabel, S., Kitson, M., Llerena, P., Lissoni, F., Salter, A., & Sobrero, M. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations, Research Policy, 42(2), 423-442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.007
Pinto, J. K., & Pinto, M. B. (2021). Critical success factors in collaborative R&D projects. In: Fernandes, G., Dooley, L., O’Sullivan, D., & Rolstadås, A. (Eds), Managing Collaborative R&D Projects. Contributions to Management Science (PP. 253-270). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61605-2_14
Porter, M. E. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 76(6), 77–90.
Poyago-Theotoky, J. (2009). University-industry technology transfer options: Licensing or research joint venture? Economics Bulletin, 29(4), 2582-2591.
Ranga, M., & Etzkowitz, H. (2013). Triple helix systems: An analytical framework for innovation policy and practice in the knowledge society. Industry and Higher Education, 27(4), 237-262. https://doi.org/10.5367/ihe.2013.0165
Ratnay, G., Indriaswuri, R., Widayanthi, D. G. C., Atmaja, I. M. P. D., & Dalem, A. A. (2022). CIPP Evaluation Model for Vocational Education: A Critical Review. Education Quarterly Reviews, 5(3), 1-8.
Roessner, J. D. (2000). Technology transfer. In: Hill. C. (Ed.), Science and technology policy in the US: A time of change. Longman.
Ross, P., & Maynard, K. (2021). Towards a 4th industrial revolution. Intelligent Buildings International, 13(3), 159–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508975.2021.1873625
Scott, J. (2017). Social network analysis (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529716597
Spöttl, G., & Windelband, L. (2020). The 4th industrial revolution – its impact on vocational skills. Journal of Education and Work, 34(1), 29–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2020.1858230
Stufflebeam, D. L. (1971). The relevance of the CIPP evaluation model for educational accountability. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 5(1), 19–25.
Thoben, K. D., Wiesner, S., & Wuest, T. (2017). “Industrie 4.0” and smart manufacturing – A review of research issues and application examples. International Journal of Automation Technology, 11(1), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.20965/ijat.2017.p0004
Tian, M., Su, Y., & Yang, Z. (2022). University–industry collaboration and firm innovation: An empirical study of the biopharmaceutical industry. Journal of Technology Transfer, 47(5), 1488–1505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-021-09877-y
Toosi, M., Modarres, M., Amini, M., & Geranmayeh, M. (2021). Context, input, process, and product evaluation model in medical education: A systematic review. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 10(1), 199. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1115_20
Tsai, H. H., & Liou, C. L. (2012). An approach for enhancing industry–university collaboration by funding of university owned enterprises for technological universities in Taiwan. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 14(3), 239-244.
Vardhan, J., & Mahato, M. (2022). Business incubation centres in universities and their role in developing entrepreneurial ecosystem. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, 8(1), 143-157.
Vuori, V., & Helander, N. (2016). Knowledge barriers in university industry knowledge networks. Proceedings of the 17th European Conference on Knowledge Management, pp. 952-959.
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815478
Zhuang, T., & Shi, J. (2022). Engagement, determinants and challenges: A multinational systematic review of education-focused university-industry collaborations. Educational Review, 76(5), 1363-1391. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2022.2149701
Zhuang, T., Zhao, S., Zheng, M., & Chu, J. (2021). Triple helix relationship research on China's regional university–industry–government collaborative innovation: Based on provincial patent data. Growth and Change, 52(3), 1361-1386. https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.12490 |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
教育學系
110152003 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110152003 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [教育學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 200301.pdf | | 3694Kb | Adobe PDF | 0 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
