English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 118209/149242 (79%)
Visitors : 74464775      Online Users : 564
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/159322


    Title: 外人持股比例對商品課稅原則選擇之影響
    The Impact of Foreign Ownership Proportion on the Choice of Commodity Taxation Principle
    Authors: 詹毓馨
    Chan, Yu-Hsin
    Contributors: 翁堃嵐
    Ueng, K. L. Glen
    詹毓馨
    Chan, Yu-Hsin
    Keywords: 外人持股
    商品課稅原則
    生產地課稅原則
    消費地課稅原則
    最適稅率
    福利比較
    運輸成本
    Foreign ownership
    Commodity taxation principles
    Origin-based taxation principle
    Destination-based taxation principle
    Optimal tax rate
    Welfare comparison
    Transportation costs
    Date: 2025
    Issue Date: 2025-09-01 16:31:35 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文探討外人持股比例對商品課稅原則(生產地課稅與消費地課稅)選擇之影響。傳統文獻多假設企業完全由本國人持有,忽略全球化下外人持股的普遍現象。本文延伸Haufler et al. (2005)模型,納入兩國相互持股,分析不同課稅原則下之最適稅率與社會福利。主要發現如下:在無相互持股時,不論運輸成本高低,生產地課稅原則均優於消費地課稅原則。然而,若兩國相互持股比例達一定門檻,消費地課稅原則之社會福利可能反超生產地課稅原則,且此結果於高持股比例下不受運輸成本影響。
    本研究的主要貢獻在於揭示全球化背景下,外人持股結構對稅制設計的重要影響。隨著外人持股比例的提升,政府在設定最適稅率時,會改變對廠商利潤的重視程度,並相應調整課稅原則。具體而言,當兩國相互持股比例達三分之一以上時,消費地課稅原則無論運輸成本高低,均能帶來較高的社會福利。這一結果顛覆了傳統文獻中主張生產地課稅原則優於消費地課稅原則的研究結論,並為全球資本流動下的租稅政策設計提供新見解。
    This paper explores how foreign ownership influences the choice between origin-based and destination-based commodity taxation. While traditional studies typically assume that firms are entirely domestically owned, this assumption no longer reflects the realities of globalization, where foreign shareholding has become increasingly common. To address this gap, the paper builds on the model developed by Haufler et al. (2005), introducing mutual shareholding between two countries to examine how different taxation principles affect optimal tax rates and social welfare. The analysis reveals that origin-based taxation consistently outperforms destination-based taxation, regardless of transportation costs, when there is no mutual shareholding. However, once the level of mutual shareholding crosses a certain threshold, destination-based taxation can generate higher social welfare. This result holds regardless of the level of transportation costs, as long as the foreign ownership ratio remains high.
    This study makes a significant contribution by highlighting the impact of foreign ownership structure on tax system design in the context of globalization. As foreign ownership increases, governments will change the emphasis on manufacturers' profits when setting the optimal tax rate, ultimately modifying their taxation principles. Specifically, when the ratio of mutual shareholding between the two countries exceeds one-third, the consumption-based taxation principle results in higher social welfare, regardless of transportation costs. The findings challenge traditional literature, which generally favors production-based taxation over consumption-based taxation, and provide fresh insights for designing tax policies in the era of global capital mobility.
    Reference: 期刊
    許淑媖、黃鴻、林燕淑(2007)。差別化關稅與政治獻金。經濟論文叢刊,35(2),155-182。https://doi.org/10.6277/ter.2007.352.2
    郭虹瑩(2010)。一般化的最適差別關稅原則。社會科學論叢,4(2),35-51。https://doi.org/10.30401/RSS.201010_4(2).0002
    郭虹瑩(2022)。最適差別關稅-考慮外國廠商友善國內消費者的情況。農業與經濟,(65),63-79。https://doi.org/10.6181/AGEC.202206_(65).0003
    郭虹瑩、翁堃嵐(2007)。低成本高補貼嗎?考慮公司稅制的情況。經濟論文叢刊,35(3),321-335。https://doi.org/10.6277/ter.2007.353.3
    Bandyopadhyay, S. (1997). Demand elasticities, asymmetry and strategic trade policy. Journal of International Economics, 42(1-2), 167-177.
    Behrens, K., Hamilton, J. H., Ottaviano, G. I., & Thisse, J. F. (2007). Commodity tax harmonization and the location of industry. Journal of International Economics, 72 (2), 271-291.
    Brander, J., & Krugman, P. (1983). A ‘reciprocal dumping’ model of international trade. Journal of International Economics, 15 (3-4), 313-321.
    Collie, D., & De Meza, D. (2003). Comparative advantage and the pursuit of strategic trade policy. Economics Letters, 81(2), 279-283.
    De Meza, D. (1986). Export subsidies and high productivity: Cause or effect?. Canadian Journal of Economics, 347-350.
    Gatsios, K. (1990). Preferential tariffs and the ‘most favoured nation’principle: A note. Journal of International Economics, 28(3-4), 365-373.
    Haufler, A., & Pflüger, M. (2004). International commodity taxation under monopolistic competition. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 6 (3), 445-470.
    Haufler, A., & Pflüger, M. (2007). International oligopoly and the taxation of commerce with revenue‐constrained governments. Economica, 74 (295), 451-473.
    Haufler, A., Schjelderup, G., & Stähler, F. (2005). Barriers to trade and imperfect competition: The choice of commodity tax base. International Tax and Public Finance, 12, 281-300.
    Haufler, A., & Schulte, C. (2011). Merger policy and tax competition: The role of foreign firm ownership. International Tax and Public Finance, 18, 121-145.
    Huizinga, H., & Nicodème, G. (2006). Foreign ownership and corporate income taxation: An empirical evaluation. European Economic Review, 50 (5), 1223-1244.
    Hwang, H., & Mai, C. C. (1991). Optimum discriminatory tariffs under oligopolistic competition. Canadian Journal of Economics, 693-702.
    Kawasaki, A., Ohkawa, T., & Okamura, M. (2020). Endogenous timing game in a mixed duopoly with partial foreign ownership and asymmetric increasing marginal costs. Australian Economic Papers, 59 (2), 71-87.
    Mai, C. C., & Hwang, H. (1988). Optimal export subsidies and marginal cost differentials. Economics Letters, 27(3), 279-282.
    McCracken, S. (2015). The choice of commodity tax base in the presence of horizontal foreign direct investment. International Tax and Public Finance, 22, 811-833.
    McCracken, S., & Stähler, F. (2010). Economic integration and the choice of commodity tax base with endogenous market structures. International Tax and Public Finance, 17, 91-113.
    Neary, J. P. (1994). Cost asymmetries in international subsidy games: Should governments help winners or losers?. Journal of International Economics, 37(3-4), 197-218.
    Ohori, S. (2011). Environmental policy instruments and foreign ownership. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 13, 65-78.
    Opp, M. M. (2010). Tariff wars in the Ricardian Model with a continuum of goods. Journal of International Economics, 80(2), 212-225.
    Raimondos-Møller, P., & Schmitt, N. (2010). Commodity taxation and parallel imports. Journal of Public Economics, 94 (1-2), 153-162.
    Wu, T. C. (2019). Trade costs and the choice of international commodity tax base revisited: The role of transboundary pollution. International Journal of Economic Theory, 15 (4), 361-383.
    Wu, T. C., Chang, C. J., & Yen, C. T. (2023). The choice of commodity taxation principle in a vertically related industry. Academia Economic Papers, 51 (2), 195-237.
    Wu, T. C., Liang, C. Y., & Lee, Y. C. (2020). Trade costs and the choice of international commodity tax principle-the role of vertical product differentiation. Academia Economic Papers, 48 (2), 217-260.
    Wu, T. C., Yen, C. T., & Chang, H. W. (2023). Network externalities, trade costs, and the choice of commodity taxation principle. International Tax and Public Finance, 30 (5), 1203-1224.

    網路資料
    駐沙烏地阿拉伯王國台北經濟文化代表處(2024)。沙烏地阿拉伯主權基金投資居全球之冠,https://www.taiwanembassy.org/sa/post/5588.html
    AccorHotels. (2018). AccorHotels sells 57.8% of the capital of AccorInvest. https://press.accor.com/download?n=8f44adbd3e640cd1f7925655ad9a90c4.pdf&picid=3954
    Public Investment Fund. (2018). PIF partners with global investor groups to acquire 55% stake in AccorInvest. https://www.pif.gov.sa/en/news-and-insights/press-releases/2018/pif-partners-with-global-investor/
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    財政學系
    111255028
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0111255028
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[財政學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    502801.pdf1090KbAdobe PDF0View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback