English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 118295/149332 (79%)
Visitors : 78137174      Online Users : 193
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/159536


    Title: 得利型財產犯罪的基本問題--以強盜得利罪、詐欺得利罪與恐嚇得利罪為中心
    On Problems of Property Crime concerning Infringement of Property Interests: Focusing on Offenses of Acquiring Illegal Benefit by Robbery, Fraudulence, and Extortion
    Authors: 黃士軒
    Huang, Shih-Hsuan
    Contributors: 政大法學評論
    Keywords: 財產上利益;移轉;財物;勞務;確實性;免除債務;侵害擔保權;事實上利益
    Property benefit;Transfer;Property object;Service;Certainty;Debt relief;Infringement of security rights;Factual benefit
    Date: 2024-12
    Issue Date: 2025-09-17
    Abstract: 我國刑法財產犯罪中的重要類型,例如強盜罪、詐欺罪與恐嚇罪,均具有將取財罪規定為第1項,將得利罪規定為第2項的構造。這些犯罪的性質應如何理解,對於我國得利型財產犯罪而言,是重要的基礎。本文在內容上分為以下幾個部分:第1部分中,掌握我國關於得利型財產犯罪的學說現況(貳);第2部分中,則是掌握我國關於得利型財產犯罪的實務現況(參);第3部分,則是基於上述兩部分的考察結果,應進一步分析檢討的問題(肆);第4部分,則是就我國學說對於日本現行刑法理解不充分之處,重新考察近代日本現行刑法的立法過程,指出日本立法者的真正意思應在於透過得利型財產犯罪規定補充可能的處罰漏洞,並非如我國學界的一般理解,亦即並非單純地引進德國刑法的規定而已。並且,以此為基礎,本文也嘗試重新以侵害個人財產的觀點,對於得利型犯罪的各個重要的基本問題展開解釋論(伍)。
    The main types of property crimes in the Taiwanese Criminal Code, such as robbery, fraud, and extortion, share a common structure. These crimes are typically divided into two sections: the first addressing the crime of taking tangible property, and the second focusing on the crime of taking property benefits. Understanding the nature of these crimes is essential for analyzing profit-based property crimes under the Taiwanese Criminal Code.
    This article is organized into the following parts:
    Part 1 examines the current theoretical status of profit-based property crimes in Taiwan (II).
    Part 2 explores the judicial practices related to profit-based property crimes in Taiwan (III).
    Part 3 builds on the findings of the previous sections to further analyze and critique key issues that warrant further discussion (IV).
    Part 4 addresses the limited understanding of Japan’s current Criminal Code in Taiwanese criminal law research. By revisiting the legislative process of Japan’s 1907 criminal law, this article highlights that the real intention of Japanese lawmakers may have been to address potential gaps in punishment through the inclusion of provisions on profit-based property crimes rather than simply adopting elements of German criminal law.
    Furthermore, this article reinterprets fundamental issues related to profit-based crimes through the lens of personal property infringement (V).
    Relation: 政大法學評論, 179, 189-269
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.53106/102398202024120179003
    DOI: 10.53106/102398202024120179003
    Appears in Collections:[政大法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文
    [法學院] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML16View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback