English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 118405/149442 (79%)
造訪人次 : 78377500      線上人數 : 155
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/159540


    題名: 應報作為刑罰的正當性基礎
    Retribution as the Legitimacy of Punishment
    作者: 廖宜寧
    Liao, I-Ning
    貢獻者: 政大法學評論
    關鍵詞: 應報;預防;刑罰;自由;罪責原則
    Retribution;Prevention;Punishment;Freedom;Principle of guilt
    日期: 2025-03
    上傳時間: 2025-09-17
    摘要: 本文旨在建構應報理論的正當性基礎，以一元化的論證模式，同時證立刑罰目的與刑罰正當性，兼及我國不同應報理論學說的關懷與思維並予以整合。
    應報觀點的核心在於，國家有必要用刑罰回應一個與其價值程度相對應、出自主體意志決定的犯罪行為。應報理論之證立，因而必須先肯定個人的主體性，論證國家與主體負擔的義務關聯性，並說明現實上刑罰與犯罪的對應合理性。本文主張，個人作為公民，理念上與國家相互承認，並由此獲致主體地位；個別主體的自由須在國家內實現，現實上的自由依存於體制化了的，與其他主體共同維繫的行為秩序框架，公民因而對此一自由秩序的持續實踐負有義務。犯罪行為即是對此義務的違反，行為人透過行為，體現出對現行規範秩序的重大否定立場，而代表著整體法秩序的國家，則應在現實上以一個同等嚴厲的客觀措施回應。透過這個「對否定的否定」，原初規範的普遍性與有效性得以在現實上真正獲得確證。
    This article aims to propose a foundational framework for the theory of retribution by employing a unified argumentation model, thus simultaneously justifying both the purpose and legitimacy of punishment, addressing the core concerns of various retribution theories within my country, and integrating these different approaches into a cohesive whole.
    At the heart of this retribution perspective is the principle that the state must impose punishment in response to criminal acts in a manner that corresponds to their value and is determined by the will of the subject. Theoretically, this necessitates an affirmation of the subjectivity of the individual, a demonstration of the relationship between the state’s obligations and the individual, and an explanation of the rationality behind the correspondence between punishment and crime.
    This article argues that, as citizens, individuals conceptually recognize themselves in relation to the state and thereby acquire subject status. The freedom of individual subjects can only be realized within the framework of the state; actual freedom depends on an institutionalized behavioral order jointly maintained with other subjects. Therefore, individuals have an obligation to uphold and continue practicing in this free order. When a citizen violates this obligation and, through their behavior, adopts a fundamentally negative stance toward the existing order, it becomes necessary for the state—as the embodiment of the overall legal order—to respond with an equally severe objective measure. Through this“negation of negation,”the universality and validity of the original norm can be reaffirmed.
    關聯: 政大法學評論, 180, 121-210
    資料類型: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.53106/102398202025030180003
    DOI: 10.53106/102398202025030180003
    顯示於類別:[政大法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文
    [法學院] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    index.html0KbHTML19檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋