Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/159705
|
| Title: | 中國 ESG 發展的特色：從生態國家理論為分析
The Characteristics of ESG Development in China: An Analytical Perspective from Ecological State Theory |
| Authors: | 陳子俊
Chen, Tzu-Chun |
| Contributors: | 林義鈞
陳子俊
Chen, Tzu-Chun |
| Keywords: | ESG
永續發展
生態國家
永續政策
中國
ESG
Sustainable Development
Eco-state
Sustainability Policy
China |
| Date: | 2025 |
| Issue Date: | 2025-10-02 11:13:06 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 隨著全球政經局勢的變遷與極端氣候對生活的影響，世人對於永續發展的關注與投入日益上升，既有文獻對於環境、社會與治理（Environmental、Social、Governance, ESG）的發展與公司績效進行了諸多的討論，惟目前有關於 ESG 的文獻多聚焦於已開發國家中，鮮少針對開發中國家進行討論。而中國做為全球二大經濟體與開發中國家之代表，不論是其日益漸大的溫室氣體排量，抑或其對於全球供應鏈中所扮演的重要角色，對於全球永續發展的進程有著不可忽視的地位。
因此本文主要聚焦於中國 ESG 的發展，希望透過工業化與結構性壓力（Industrialisation and structural problem pressures）、國際影響 (International influences)、利益團體 (Interest groups)、機構 (Institutions)、理念（Ideals）構成的 5I ，做為變項來分析中國 ESG 發展的研究架構，補充既有文獻對於中國ESG 的了解。總體而言，本文發現中國的 ESG 發展高度來自於國家監管，這樣由上而下的框架，與歐美國家由下而上的發展模式有所不同，中國企業發展ESG 的動力來源於政府強制性的法律規範。並且，在共同富裕的治理目標之下，使得中國 ESG 的發展相當關注社會層面的議題，例如：扶貧與鄉村振興等項目，並且這樣的特色出現於中國的 ESG 揭露、評級與投融資制度之中。
本文之研究成果結合 ESG 領域與中國研究，揭露中國的 ESG 架構與發展，更系統化的了解中國 ESG 相關特色與制度脈絡。並分別提出對於研究與政策的建議以深化對於中國 ESG 的了解。從研究層面而言，未來的研究可以從中共意識形態與 ESG 的交疊之處，加深兩者之間的連結與關係；從政策層面而言，隨著國際、區域與國家間對於 ESG 制度與實務運作的越發重視，本文亦可做為未來企業進行中國 ESG 相關法令與策略規劃時的參考依據。
With the shifting global political and economic landscape and the impact of extreme climate events on people’s lives, public attention to and engagement in sustainable development has been increasing. Existing literature has extensively discussed the development of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) practices and their relationship with corporate performance; however, most ESG studies have focused on developed countries, with relatively little attention paid to developing economies. As the world’s second-largest economy and a representative of developing countries, China occupies a critical position in the global sustainable development agenda, whether due to its rapidly growing greenhouse gas emissions and its pivotal role in global supply chains.
Accordingly, this study focuses on the development of ESG in China. It proposes a research framework based on the “5I” model—Industrialisation and structural problem pressures, International influences, Interest groups, Institutions, and Ideals—to analyze the drivers and characteristics of China’s ESG development, thereby complementing existing scholarship on this topic. Overall, the study finds that China’s ESG development is largely driven by state regulation. This top-down framework contrasts with the bottom-up approaches more common in Europe and the United States, where corporate ESG engagement is often voluntary. In China, corporate ESG initiatives primarily stem from mandatory governmental laws and regulations. Furthermore, under the governance goal of “common prosperity,” Chinese ESG practices place significant emphasis on social dimensions, such as poverty alleviation and rural revitalization. These features are embedded in China’s ESG disclosure practices, rating systems, and investment and financing mechanisms.
The findings of this study integrate the field of ESG with China studies, revealing the structure and development of ESG in China and providing a more systematic understanding of its distinctive characteristics and institutional context. The study further offers recommendations for both academic research and policy to deepen insights into China’s ESG. From the research perspective, future studies could explore the intersections between the Chinese Communist Party’s ideology and ESG, thereby strengthening the linkage and relationship between the two. From the policy perspective, as international, regional, and national attention to ESG systems and practical operations continues to grow, this study may serve as a reference for enterprises in formulating compliance strategies and policies related to ESG in China. |
| Reference: | 中央國債登記結算有限責任公司中債研發中心、興業經濟研究諮詢股份有限公司與氣候債券倡議組織，2022，中國可持續債券市場報告 2022，取自https://cn.climatebonds.net/files/reports/cbi-china-sotm-22-cn.pdf。查閱時間 2025/7/4。
中華人民共和國財政部會計司 ，2024 ，《企業可持續披露準則——基本準則（徵求意見稿）》起草說明，取自https://upload.news.esnai.com/2024/0527/1716799385429.pdf。查閱時間 2025/7/4。
中共中央辦公廳，2021，《關於中央企業在完善公司治理中加強黨的領導的意見》，取自 https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2021-05/30/content_5614000.htm。查閱時間2025/7/4。
中國人民銀行，2025，我國綠色貸款保持高速增長本外幣綠色貸款餘額超36萬億元，中國政府網，取自，https://www.gov.cn/lianbo/bumen/202502/content_7004354.htm。查閱時間2025/7/4。
中國證券投資基金業協，2024，中國特色ESG指標及國企ESG表現研究，中國證券投資基金業協會，取自https://www.amac.org.cn/hyyj/sy/202405/P020240520608316664981.pdf。查閱時間2025/7/4。
中證指數有限公司，2020，CSI ESG 評價方法論，取自 https://oss-ch.csindex.com.cn/home_research/ESG_DATA/中證指數有限公司ESG評價方法.pdf。查閱時間 2025/7/4。
王元芳、馬連福，2014，國有企業黨組織能降低代理成本嗎?——基於“內部人控制”的視角，管理評論，26（10），138-151。
北京ESG研究院，2024，財政部《企業可持續披露準則——基本準則 (徵求意見稿)》與三大交易所《可持續發展披露指引》、ISSB準則的對比分析，取自 https://bjesg.com/upload/1/cms/content/editor/1716886320268.pdf。查閱時間2025/7/4。
朱孟楠、梁裕所、吳增明，2020，互聯網資訊交互網路與股價崩盤風險：輿論監督還是非理性傳染，中國工業經濟，10，81-99。
外交部新聞司，2025，習近平在氣候和公正轉型領導人峰會上的致辭（全文），取自 https://www.mfa.gov.cn/zyxw/202504/t20250423_11602641.shtml。查閱時間 2025/7/4。
余漢、黃爽、宋增基，2024，國有股參股能否提升企業 ESG 表現？，上海財經大學學報，26（1），64-78。
李增福、馮柳華，2022，企業ESG表現與商業信用獲取，財經研究，48（12），151-165。
林秀雲譯，2013，社會科學研究方法 （原作者: Earl Babbie），台北市：雙葉書廊。
郁建興、任傑，2021，共同富裕的理論內涵與政策議程，政治學研究，（3），13-25。
胡鞍鋼、周紹傑，2022，2035 中國：邁向共同富裕，北京工業大學學報 （社會科學版），22（10），1-22。
馬連福、王元芳、沈小秀，2012，中國國有企業黨組織治理效應研究——基於“內部人控制”的視角，中國工業經濟，（8），84-97。
財新智庫，2024，中國ESG發展白皮書2024，取自https://cn.climatebonds.net/files/reports/cbi-china-sotm-22-cn.pdf。查閱時間2025/7/4。
莊永丞，2023，論我國 ESG 之揭露法制-從永續報告書揭開 ESG 面紗，東吳法律學報，35（2），1-65。
國家發展改革委員會. 2021. 中國落實〈2030年可持續發展議程〉進展報告（2021年），取自https://www.ndrc.gov.cn/wsdwhfz/202111/t20211111_1303691_ext.html。查閱時間2025/7/4。
第一財經研究，2022，中國A股公司ESG評級分析報告，取自 https://img.cbnri.org/files/2022/11/638047136077460000.pdf。查閱時間2025/7/4。
武鵬、楊科、蔣峻松、王海林，2023，企業ESG表現會影響盈餘價值相關性嗎，財經研究，49（6），137-152。
游美惠，2000，內容分析、文本分析與論述分析在社會研究的運用，調查研究，5-42。
詹芳芳，2024，中國ESG信息披露的國際借鑒、現狀與監管思路探討，財務管理研究，8，5-42。
柳學信、孔曉旭、王凱，2020，國有企業黨組織治理與董事會異議——基於上市公司董事會決議投票的證據，管理世界，36（5），116-133。
商道融綠 ESG 評級方法論 2023，商道融綠，取自 https://www.syntaogf.com/pages/methodology。查閱時間 2025/7/4。
陳紅、胡耀丹、納超，2018，黨組織參與公司治理、管理者權力與薪酬差距，山西財經大學學報，40（2），84-97。
陳爽英、蓋慶恩，2010，民營企業的政治參與、治理結構與慈善捐贈，管理世界，（7），109-118。
陳超凡、李文博、關成華，2024，可持續評價與企業綠色創新——來自中國A股上市公司ESG表現的實證證據，北京師範大學學報（社會科學版），（5），104-115。
陳仕華、姜廣省、李維安，2014，國有企業紀委的治理參與能否抑制高管私有收益？，經濟研究，（10），139-151。
雷海民、梁巧轉、李家軍，2012，公司政治治理影響企業的運營效率嗎——基於中國上市公司的非參數檢驗，中國工業經濟，（9），109-121。
高勇強、陳亞靜、張雲均，2012，紅領巾還是綠領巾：民營企業慈善捐贈動機研究，管理世界，（8），106-114。
孫俊秀、譚偉杰、郭峰，2024，中國主流ESG評級的再評估，財經研究，50（5），4-18。
氣候債券倡議組織2022，中國綠色債券市場年度報告 2022，取自 https://cn.climatebonds.net/files/reports/cbi-china-sotm-22-cn.pdf。查閱時間2025/7/4。
萬得信息技術股份有限公司， 2023，Wind ESG 評級方法論，萬得。取自 https://www.wind.com.cn/WindESGRating/index.html?lan=cn#/ESGSummary/home。查閱時間 2025/7/4。
國際資本市場協會（ICMA），2023，中國ESG實踐白皮書——基於發債企業和上市公司的觀察，取自 https://www.icmagroup.org/assets/Whitepaper-on-ESG-practices-Chinese-version-January-2023.pdf。查閱時間2025/7/4。
聯合國，2024，世界投資報告，取自 https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/wir2024_overview_ch.pdf。查閱時間2025/7/4。
Achtenhagen, L., & Welter, F. 2007. Media Discourse in Entrepreneurship Research, in Neergaard, H. and Ulhoi, J. P. (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative.Methods in Entrepreneurship Research, Cheltenham UK: 193-215. Edward Elgar.
American Chamber of Commerce in the People’s Republic of China. 2023. American Business in China White Paper 2023. Retrieved from https://www.amchamchina.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/AmCham-China-2023-White-Paper.pdf. Access on 2025/7/4.
Aizawa, M., & Yang, C. 2010. Green credit, green stimulus, green revolution? China’s mobilization of banks for environmental cleanup. The Journal of Environment & Development, 19(2), 119-144.
Apple Inc. 2022. Apple calls on global supply chain to decarbonize by 2030. Retrieved from https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2022/10/apple-calls-on-global-supply-chain-to-decarbonize-by-2030/ .Access on 2025/7/4.
Apple Inc. 2025. Environmental Progress Report 2025. Retrieved from https://www.apple.com/environment/pdf/Apple_Environmental_Progress_Report_2025.pdf. Access on 2025/7/4.
Avramov, D., Chordia, T., Jostova, G., & Philipov, A. 2009. Dispersion in analysts’ earnings forecasts and credit rating. Journal of Financial Economics, 91(1), 83-101.
Batta, G., & Muslu, V. 2017. Credit rating agency and equity analysts’ adjustments to GAAP earnings. Contemporary Accounting Research, 34(2), 783-817.
Betsill, M. M. , 2002. Environmental NGOs meet the sovereign state: The Kyoto Protocol negotiations on global climate change. Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law and Policy, 13(3), 49–64.
Betsill, M. M. 2006. Transnational actors in international environmental politics. In M. M. Betsill, K. Hochstetler, & D. Stevis (Eds.), International Environmental Politics, New York, NY: 172–202 Palgrave Macmillan.
Berg, F., Kölbel, J. F., & Rigobon, R. 2022. Aggregate confusion: The divergence of ESG ratings. Review of Finance, 26(6), 1315-1344.
Castree, N. 2008. Neoliberalising nature: The logics of deregulation and reregulation. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 40(1), 131–152.
Chang, E. C., & Wong, S. M. 2004. Political control and performance in China's listed firms. Journal of Comparative Economics, 32(4), 617-636.
Chen, Z., Marin, G., Popp, D., & Vona, F. 2020. Green stimulus in a post-pandemic recovery: the role of skills for a resilient recovery. Environmental and Resource Economics, 76, 901-911.
Chen, S., Han, X., Zhang, Z., & Zhao, X. 2023. ESG investment in China: Doing well by doing good. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 77, Article 101907.
Cheng, M., & Subramanyam, K. R. 2008. Analyst following and credit ratings. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(4), 1007-1043.
Craig, M. 2020a. Greening the state for a sustainable political economy. New Political Economy, 25(1), 1–4.
Craig, M. 2020b. ‘Treasury Control’ and the British environmental state: The political economy of green development strategy in UK central government. New Political Economy, 25(1), 30–45.
Dale, A., & Newman, L. 2010. Social capital: a necessary and sufficient condition for sustainable community development?. Community Development Journal, 45(1), 5-21.
Di T, & Thornton, J. 2020. Do ESG scores affect bank risk-taking and value? Evidence from European banks. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(5), 2286–2298.
Duit, A., Feindt, P., & Meadowcroft, J. 2016. Greening Leviathan: The rise of the environmental state? Environmental Politics, 25(1), 1–23.
Dsouza, S. 2023. Differences in ESG investing in the EU and the United States (Master's thesis). The University of Texas at Austin.
European Union Chamber of Commerce in China. 2024. European Business in China Position Paper 2024/2025. Retrieved from https://europeanchamber.oss-cn-beijing.aliyuncs.com/upload/documents/documents/European_Business_in_China_Position_Paper_2024_2025.[1269].pdf. Access on 2025/7/4.
European Commission. 2021. EU–China Comprehensive Agreement on Investment: Draft agreement text (non-official publication). Retrieved from https://policy.trade.ec.europa.eu/eu-trade-relationships-country-and-region/countries-and-regions/china/eu-china-comprehensive-agreement-investment_en. Accessed on 2025/7/4.
Fletcher, R. 2010. Neoliberal environmentality: Towards a poststructuralist political ecology of the conservation debate. Conservation and Society, 8(3), 171–181.
Fong, K., Hong, H., Kacperczyk, M., & Kubik, J. D. 2022. Do security analysts discipline credit rating agencies? The Review of Corporate Finance Studies, 11(4), 815-848.
Freeman, R. E. 1984. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston, MA: Pitman.
Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. 2015. ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210-233.
Gillan, S. L., Koch, A., & Starks, L. T. 2021. Firms and social responsibility: A review of ESG and CSR research in corporate finance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 66, Article 101889.
Global Reporting Initiative. 2024. Global Reporting Initiative Standards. Retrieved from https://www.globalreporting.org/standards. Access on 2025/7/4.
Gough, I. 2016. Welfare states and environmental states: A comparative analysis. Environmental Politics, 25(1), 24–47.
Gu, J. 2024. Investor attention and ESG performance: Lessons from China's manufacturing industry. Journal of Environmental Management, 355, Article 120483.
He, R., Chen, X., Chen, C., Zhai, J., & Cui, L. 2021. Environmental, social, and governance incidents and bank loan contracts. Sustainability, 13(4), Article 1885.
IFRS Foundation . 2023a. Statement of intent to work together towards comprehensive corporate reporting. Retrieved from https://integratedreporting.ifrs.org/resource/statement-of-intent-to-work-together-towards-comprehensive-corporate-reporting/. Access on 2025/7/4.
IFRS Foundation . 2023b. IFRS Foundation opens ISSB office in Beijing. Retrieved from https://www.ifrs.org/news-and-events/news/2023/06/ifrs-foundation-opens-issb-office-in-beijing/. Access on 2025/7/4.
International Energy Agency (IEA). 2020. CO2 emissions from fuel combustion highlights. Retrieved from https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/data-products. Access on 2025/7/4.
International Energy Agency (IEA). 2023. CO2 emissions in 2022. Retrieved from https://www.iea.org/reports/co2-emissions-in-2022. Access on 2025/7/4.
International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, United Nations Environment Programme, and World Wildlife Fund. 1980. World Conservation Strategy: Living Resource Conservation for Sustainable Development. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.
ISSB. 2023a. IFRS S1 General requirements for disclosure of sustainability-related financial information. Retrieved from https://www.ifrs.org/content/dam/ifrs/publications/pdf-standards-issb/english/2023/issued/part-a/issb-2023-a-ifrs-s1-general-requirements-for-disclosure-of-sustainability-related-financial-information.pdf. Access on 2025/7/4.
ISSB. 2023b. IFRS S2 Climate-related disclosures. Retrieved from https://www.ifrs.org/issued-standards/ifrs-sustainability-standards-navigator/ifrs-s2-climate-related-disclosures/#standard. Access on 2025/7/4.
Jang, G., K, H., Lee, J., & Bae, K. 2020. ESG scores and the credit market. Sustainability, 12(8), Article 3456.
Jung, B., Sivaramakrishnan, K., & Soderstrom, N. 2016. When do stock analysts find bond rating changes informative? Accounting and Business Research, 46(1), 3-30.
Katsamakas, E., Miliaresis, K., & Pavlov, O. V. 2022. Digital platforms for the common good: Social innovation for active citizenship and ESG. Sustainability, 14(2), Article 639.
Krueger, R., & Agyeman, J. 2005. Sustainability schizophrenia or ‘actually existing sustainabilities?’ Toward a broader understanding of the politics and promise of local sustainability in the US. Geoforum, 36(4), 410–417.
Kostka, G. 2016. Command without control: The case of China’s environmental target system. Regulation & Governance, 10(1), 58–74.
La Torre, M., Leo, S., & Panetta, I. C. 2021. Banks and environmental, social and governance drivers: Follow the market or the authorities? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(6), 1620-1634.
Lee, C. M. C., & So, E. C. 2017. Uncovering expected returns: Information in analyst coverage proxies. Journal of Financial Economics, 124(2), 331-348.
Lee, L.-E. 2024. 17 years of MSCI ESG ratings and long-term corporate performance. MSCI Institute. Retrieved from https://www.msci-institute.com/themes/risk-return/long-term-corporate-performance/. Access on 2025/7/4.
Li, P., Zhou, R., & Xiong, Y. 2020. Can ESG performance affect bond default rate? Evidence from China. Sustainability, 12(7), Article 2954.
Li, T. T., Wang, K., Sueyoshi, T., & Wang, D. D. 2021. ESG: Research progress and future prospects. Sustainability, 13(21), Article 11663.
Lin, S. Y. 2021. Bringing resource management back into the environmental governance agenda: eco-state restructuring in China. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(8), 12272-12301.
MacLeod, M., & Park, J. 2011. Financial activism and global climate change: The rise of investor-driven governance networks. Global Environmental Politics, 11(2), 54-74.
Mordor Intelligence. 2024. ESG investment analyst market. Retrieved from https://www.mordorintelligence.com/. Access on 2025/7/4.
Morgan Stanley. 2024. Sustainable funds modestly outperform as flows show in first half of 2024. Retrieved from https://www.morganstanley.com/ideas/sustainable-funds-performance-first-half-2024. Access on 2025/7/4.
Patton, M. Q. 2002. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods (3rd edition). Sage Publications, Inc.
Porra, J., Hirschheim, R., & Parks, M. S.. 2014. The Historical Research Method and Information Systems Research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems,15(9), 536-576.
Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI). 2018. PRI reporting framework - Main definitions. Retrieved from https://www.unpri.org/Uploads/i/m/n/maindefinitionstoprireportingframework_127272_949397.pdf. Access on 2025/4/27.
Principles for Responsible Investment(PRI). 2024. PRI response to FRC call for evidence on ISSB standards . Retrieved from https://dwtyzx6upklss.cloudfront.net/Uploads/f/m/o/pri_response_to_frc_call_for_evidence_on_issb_standards_117922.pdf. Access on 2025/7/4.
Qiu, M. Y., & Yin, H. 2019. An analysis of enterprises’ financing cost with ESG performance under the background of ecological civilization construction. The Journal of Quantitative and Technical Economics, 36(3), 108-123.
Raworth, K., & Drique, M. 2017. A safe and just space for humanity. Revue Projet, 356(1), 10-14.
Sachs, J. D. 2015. The Age of Sustainable Development. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Salvia, M., Reckien, D., Pietrapertosa, F., Eckersley, P., Spyridaki, N. A., Krook-Riekkola, A., Olazabal, M., De Gregorio Hurtado, S., Simoes, S. G., Geneletti, D., Viguié, V., Fokaides, P. A., Ioannou, B. I., Flamos, A., Szalmane Csete, M., Buzasi, A., Orru, H., de Boer, C., Foley, A.,...& Heidrich, O. 2021. Will climate mitigation ambitions lead to carbon neutrality? An analysis of the local-level plans of 327 cities in the EU. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 135, Article 11253.
Shen, H., Lin, H., Han, W., and Wu, H. 2023. ESG in China: A review of practice and research, and future research avenues. China Journal of Accounting Research, 16(4), Article 100325.
Stavins, R. N. 2003. Experience with market-based environmental policy instruments. Handbook of Environmental Economics, 1, 355-435.
Strange, T., and Bayley, A. 2008. Sustainable Development: Linking Economy, Society, Environment. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Tamazian, A., Chousa, J. P., & Vadlamannati, K. C. 2009. Does higher economic and financial development lead to environmental degradation: evidence from BRIC countries. Energy Policy, 37(1), 246-253.
United Nations. 2004. Who Cares Wins. Retrieved from https://www.unepfi.org/fileadmin/events/2004/stocks/who_cares_wins_global_compact_2004.pdf. Access on 2025/7/4.
Yu, E. P., Luu, B. V., & Chen, C. H. 2020. Greenwashing in environmental, social and governance disclosures. Research in International Business and Finance, 52, Article 102445.
Van Rooij, B., Stern, R. E., & Fürst, K. 2016. The authoritarian logic of regulatory pluralism: Understanding China’s new environmental actors. Regulation & Governance, 10(1), 3-13.
Walton, S., & Boon, B. 2014. Engaging with a Laclau & Mouffe informed
discourse analysis: a proposed framework. Qualitative Research inOrganizations and Management: An International Journal, 9(4), 351-370.
Wan, D., Xue, R., Linnenluecke, M., Tian, J., & Shan, Y. 2021. The impact of investor attention during COVID-19 on investment in clean energy versus fossil fuel firms. Finance Research Letters, 43, Article 101955.
Wang, J., Chang, H., & Long, J. (2022). Reducing rural income inequality and its spatial convergence in China during the past two decades. Habitat International, 130. Article 102694.
While, A., Jonas, A. E. G., & Gibbs, D. 2010. From sustainable development to carbon control: Eco-state restructuring and the politics of urban and regional development. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 35(1), 76–93.
Wood, D. M. 1990. Soil Behaviour and Critical State Soil Mechanics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
World Commission on Environment and Development. 1987. Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zhou, J., Wu, K., & Li, Y. 2025. Does firm internationalization improve ESG performance? Evidence from China. International Review of Economics & Finance, Article 104168. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
政治學系
111252006 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0111252006 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [政治學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 200601.pdf | 1482Kb | Adobe PDF | 0 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
