政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/50735
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 118628/149684 (79%)
造访人次 : 79712650      在线人数 : 316
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 企業管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/50735


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/50735


    题名: DISC人格、人際角色與團隊績效的探討-以AMBA團隊經營課程為例
    The discuss between DISC personality,interpersonal roles,and team performance
    作者: 王銘弘
    贡献者: 黃秉德
    王銘弘
    关键词: 人格特質
    人際角色
    DISC
    日期: 2010
    上传时间: 2011-09-29 16:31:36 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 在現代社會，不管是在產業、政府或是教育機構，皆仰賴團隊其組織運作的效率，沒有效率的團隊浪費組織資源、無法達到預期績效、工作必頇重新設計及延長對市場的反應時間(Ross,nbsp,2008)，大部分的人認為以團隊的方式增加生產力是簡單的方式，而且大部分的管理者相信，團隊對於部門及公司的成功是重要的(Dyer & Dyer,1987)。團隊組成中最常被拿來探討的尌是人格特質，因此，本研究將以政治大學專業管理學院(AMBA)參與團隊經營課程的同學為對象，從個人、團隊的角度，探討高績效團隊的組成與團隊互動過程對績效的影響，以及 DISC中的人際角色對於團隊績效的影響。
    參考文獻: 中文部分
    王建忠. (2001). 團隊領導與團隊效能：團隊內互動的中介效果. 碩士, 國立臺灣大學, 台北市. Retrieved from
    王美玲. (2002). 醫療產業團隊管理之實證研究. 碩士, 靜宜大學, 台中縣. Retrieved from
    危芷芬. (2005). 心裡測驗: 台北: 雙葉書廊有限公司.
    吳秉恩. (1986). 組織行為學: 華泰書局.
    邱淑妙. (2006). 團隊人格特質、轉換型領導與團隊效能之關係探討 --團隊凝聚力之中介角色. 碩士, 國立中山大學, 高雄市. Retrieved from
    張淑玲. (2002). 團隊領導、團隊價值觀對團隊效能之影響. 碩士, 國立中山大學, 高雄市. Retrieved from
    張翊祥. (2004). 團隊成員人格特質組合對團隊效能影響之研究 ─ 以團隊互動過程為中介變項. 碩士, 中原大學, 桃園縣. Retrieved from
    陳錫堯. (2001). 人格特質分析系統(超級DISC)應用在企業界之效果研究. 碩士, 大葉大學, 彰化縣. Retrieved from
    蔡靜婷. (2000). 工作團隊多元化、衝突與任務績效之相關性研究. 碩士, 國立中正大學, 嘉義縣. Retrieved from
    英文部份
    Ainger, A., Kaura, R., & Ennals, R. (1995). Executive guide to business success through human-centred systems: Springer-Verlag.
    Bales, R. F., Cohen, S. P., & Williamson, S. A. (1979). SYMLOG: A system for the multiple level observation of groups (Vol. 67): Free Press New York.
    Barrick, M. R., Stewart, G. L., Neubert, M. J., & Mount, M. K. (1998). Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(3), 377.
    Bidjerano, T., & Dai, D. Y. (2007). The relationship between the big-five model of personality and self-regulated learning strategies. Learning and Individual Differences, 17(1), 69-81.
    Campion, M. A., Medsker, G. J., & Higgs, A. C. (1993). Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel psychology, 46(4), 823-847.
    Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of management, 23(3), 239.
    David, D. V., & Silverman, S. B. (1989). Personality and job performance: Evidence of incremental validity. Personnel psychology, 42(1), 25-36.
    Diggles-Buckles, V., & Vercruyssen, M. (1990). Age-related slowing, SR compatibility, and stages of information processing.
    Digman, J. M. (1989). Five robust trait dimensions: Development, stability, and utility. Journal of Personality, 57(2), 195-214.
    Dyer, W. G., & Dyer, J. H. (1987). Team building: Jossey-Bass.
    Forgus, R. H. (1966). Perception: The basic process in cognitive development: McGraw-Hill.
    Friedman, M., & Rosenman, R. H. (1974). Type A behavior and your heart: Knopf New York.
    Gladstein, D. L. (1984). Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. Administrative science quarterly, 29(4), 499-517.
    Glass, D. C. (1977). Behavior patterns, stress, and coronary disease.
    Guilford, T. (1959). Personality, New York: Megraw-Hill. Guion. RM. & Gottier. RF (1965). Validity of personality measures in personnel selection. Personnel Psychotogy, 18, 135-164.
    Hackman, J. R. (1983). A normative model of work team effectiveness: DTIC Document.
    Harris, T. A. (1969). I`m ok you`re ok: A practical guide to transactional analysis.
    Hilgard, E. R. (1953). Introduction to psychology.
    Hoffman, L. R., & Maier, N. R. F. (1961). Quality and acceptance of problem solutions by members of homogeneous and heterogeneous groups. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62(2), 401.
    Hyatt, D. E., & Ruddy, T. M. (1997). An examination of the relationship between work group characteristics and performance: Once more into the breech. Personnel psychology, 50(3), 553-585.
    Jackson, S. E., Stone, V. K., & Alvarez, E. B. (1993). Socialization amidst diversity: The impact of demographics on work team oldtimers and newcomers. Research in organizational behavior, 15, 45-45.
    Jehn, K. A. (1993). Enhancing effectiveness: An investigation of advantages and disadvantages of value-based intragroup conflict. International Journal of Conflict Management, 5(3), 223-238.
    Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative science quarterly, 44(4), 741-763.
    Jessup, H. R. (1992). The road to results for teams. Training and Development, 46(9), 65-68.
    Jewell, L. N., & Reitz, H. J. (1981). Group effectiveness in organizations: Scott, Foresman, Glenview, Ill.
    John, S. (1995). Weighing up the evidence on managing diversity. People management, 61.
    Jung, C. G. (1971). Psychological types, volume 6 of The collected works of CG Jung. Princeton University Press, 18, 169-170.
    Kappe, R., & van der Flier, H. (2010). Using multiple and specific criteria to assess the predictive validity of the Big Five personality factors on academic performance. Journal of Research in Personality, 44(1), 142-145. doi: DOI: 10.1016/j.jrp.2009.11.002
    Katz, R. (1982). The effects of group longevity on project communication and performance. Administrative science quarterly, 27(1), 81-104.
    Katzenbach, J. R., & Smith, D. K. (1993). The wisdom of teams: Creating the high-performance organization: Harvard Business Press.
    McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1989). The structure of interpersonal traits: Wiggins`s circumplex and the five-factor model. Journal of personality and social psychology, 56(4), 586.
    McCrae, R. R., & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the five factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60(2), 175-215.
    McGrath, J. E. (1964). Social psychology: A brief introduction: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
    McGregor, D. (1960). The human side of enterprise. Nonaka, Ikijuro e Hirotaka.
    Messick, D. M., & Mackie, D. M. (1989). Intergroup relations. Annual review of psychology, 40(1), 45-81.
    Miller, E. (1994). Diversity and its management: Training managers for cultural competence within the organization. Journal article by EK Miller; Management Quarterly, 35.
    Morrison, K. A. (1997). Personality correlates of the Five-Factor Model for a sample of business owners/managers: Associations with scores on self-monitoring, Type A behavior, locus of control, and subjective well-being. Psychological Reports.
    Moulton-Marston, W. (1928). Emotions of normal people: New York. Harcourt, Brace.
    Myrtek, M. (1995). Type A behavior pattern, personality factors, disease, and physiological reactivity: A meta-analytic update. Personality and individual differences, 18(4), 491-502.
    Nieva, V., Fleishman, E., & Reick, A. (1978). Team dimensions: Their identity, their measurement, and their relationships (contract number DAH 19-78-c-0001): Wahsington, DC: Advanced Research Resources Organization.
    O`Neill, T. A., & Allen, N. J. (2011). Personality and the prediction of team performance. [Article]. European Journal of Personality, 25(1), 31-42. doi: 10.1002/per.769
    O`Reilly, C. A., & Flatt, S. (1989). Executive team demography, organizational innovation, and firm performance. University of California, Berkeley, Working Paper.
    Ouchi, W. G. (1980). Markets, bureaucracies, and clans. Administrative science quarterly, 25(1), 129-141.
    Peeters, M. A. G., Van Tuijl, H. F. J. M., Rutte, C. G., & Reymen, I. M. M. J. (2006). Personality and team performance: a meta-analysis. [Article]. European Journal of Personality, 20(5), 377-396. doi: 10.1002/per.588
    Quick, T. L. (1992). Successful team building: Amacom Books.
    Riggle, E. D. B., & Johnson, M. M. S. (1996). Age difference in political decision making: Strategies for evaluating political candidates. Political Behavior, 18(1), 99-118.
    Riordan, C. M., & Weatherly, E. W. (1999). Defining and measuring employees¡¦ identification with their work groups. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59(2), 310.
    Riso, D. R., & Hudson, R. (1987). Personality types: using the enneagram for self-discovery: Mariner Books.
    Ross, nbsp, & T. (2008). Can team success be predicted? The development of a new method of team member selection to increase the probability of team success. Ph.D. 3336555, The University of Nebraska - Lincoln, United States -- Nebraska. Retrieved from
    Salas, E., Dickinson, T. L., Converse, S. A., & Tannenbaum, S. I. (1992). Toward an understanding of team performance and training.
    Schwarz, R. M., & Schwarz, R. (1994). The skilled facilitator: Practical wisdom for developing effective groups: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
    Shonk, J. H. (1982). Working in teams: A practical manual for improving work groups: Amacom.
    Triandis, H. C., Kurowski, L. L., & Gelfand, M. J. (1994). Workplace diversity.
    Watson, W. E., Minzenmayer, T., & Bowler, M. (2006). Type A Personality Characteristics and the Effect on Individual and Team Academic Performance. [Article]. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(5), 1110-1128. doi: 10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00033.x
    Yang, B. R. (2007). The Study of the Research Department of Institutional Investors¡¦ Scale, Composition, Communication and Work Performance.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    企業管理研究所
    98355006
    99
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0098355006
    数据类型: thesis
    显示于类别:[企業管理學系] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    没有与此文件相关的档案.



    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈