政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/100405
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 110180/141115 (78%)
Visitors : 46598193      Online Users : 481
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/100405


    Title: 污染清理費用優先權之研究
    Other Titles: A Study of the Environmental Cleanup Lien
    Authors: 黃健彰
    Huang, Chien-Chang
    Keywords: 土壤及地下水污染整治法;水污染防治法;全面性環境應變補償及責任法;污染清理費用優先權;風落果實優先權;費用性優先權;廢棄物清理法;優先權;聯邦優先權
    Soil and Groundwater Pollution Remediation Act;Water Pollution Control Act;Comprehensive Environmental Response;Environmental cleanup lien;Windfall lien;Expense lien;Waste Disposal;Lien;Federal lien
    Date: 2013-05
    Issue Date: 2016-08-18 11:56:45 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 廢棄物清理法第七一條第一項規定：「不依規定清除、處理之廢棄物，直轄\\r市、縣（市）主管機關或執行機關得命事業、受託清除處理廢棄物者、仲介非法清除處理廢棄物者、容許或因重大過失致廢棄物遭非法棄置於其土地之土地所有人、管理人或使用人，限期清除處理。屆期不為清除處理時，直轄市、縣（市）主管機關或執行機關得代為清除、處理，並向其求償清理、改善及衍生之必要費用。屆期未清償者，移送強制執行；直轄市、縣（市）主管機關或執行機關得免提供擔保向行政法院聲請假扣押、假處分。」第三項規定：「第一項必要費用之求償權，優於一切債權及抵押權。」土壤及地下水污染整治法第四九條規定：「依第四十三條、第四十四條規定應繳納之費用，優先於一切債權及抵押權。」水污染防治法第七一條第一項規定：「地面水體發生污染事件，主管機關得命污染行為人限期清除處\\r理，屆期不為清除處理時，主管機關得代為清除處理，並向其求償清理、改善及衍生之必要費用。屆期未清償者，移送強制執行。」第三項規定：「第一項必要費用之求償權，優於一切債權及抵押權。」\\r依據上開規定，該等費用均優先於一切債權及抵押權，其他債權人與抵押權人的受償次序劣後，其法理依據何在、如何妥適地解釋適用，亟待研究。本文參考美國全面性環境應變補償及責任法與相關文獻探討之。
    The first paragraph of Article 71 of Waste Disposal Act provides, “Where waste clearance and disposal conducted in noncompliance with the regulation, the RAML or RAML or the Implementing Agencies may order the enterprise, commissioned waste clearance and disposal organization, agent for illegal waste clearance and disposal organization, land owner, manager or user who allows illegal dumping of waste or serious misconduct that leads to illegal dumping of waste on its land to clear and dispose of the waste in specific time period. The RAML or RAML or the Implementing Agencies may clear and dispose of the waste for them when no clearance or disposal is done within the specified time period and request for compensation for the clearance, improvement and necessary fees sustained from this action. Failure to effect the payment before expiration date, compulsory enforcement shall be imposed. The RAML or RAML or the Implementing Agencies may apply to the administrative court for probational lien or probational attachment without providing collateral.” The third paragraph provides, “The RAML or RAML or the Implementing Agencies may authorize a suitable publicly or privately owned waste clearance and disposal organization when clearing and disposing of the waste prescribed in Paragraph 1.” Article 49 of Soil and Groundwater Pollution Remediation Act provides, “The payment of fees pursuant to Paragraphs 43 and 44 shall take precedence over all creditor rights and collateral rights.” The first paragraph of Article 71 of Water Pollution Control Act provides, “The competent authority may order the polluter to perform clearance and disposal within a limited period for the occurrence of a pollution incident on a surface water body; when the clearance and disposal is not performed by the deadline, the competent authority may perform clearance and disposal in place of the polluter and seek compensation from the polluter for necessary clearanceand disposal, improvement and derivative expenses.” The third paragraph provides, “The right to seek compensation for necessary expenses in Paragraph 1 shall take precedence over all creditor rights and collateral rights.”\\r The payment of fees pursuant to the provisions above shall take precedence over all creditor rights and collateral rights. Other creditors and mortgagees are subordinated. It is necessary to study the jurisprudence and the way to explain properly. This study explores the issues by reference to the CERCLA.
    Relation: 臺灣土地研究, 16(1), 1-35
    Journal of Taiwan land research
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[Journal of Taiwan land research] Journal Articles

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    16(1)-1-35.pdf826KbAdobe PDF2448View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback