政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/104809
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109952/140887 (78%)
Visitors : 46324325      Online Users : 708
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大典藏 > Journal of NCCU > Issue 78 > Journal Articles >  Item 140.119/104809
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/104809


    Title: 兩岸談判中「一個中國原則」之探討
    Other Titles: The Factor Of The Principle Of ";One China";in The Process of Cross-Strait Negotiation
    Authors: 邵宗海
    Shaw, Chong-Hai
    Contributors: 人社所
    Keywords: 兩岸;談判;一個中國原則;台灣;中國
    Cross-Strait;Negotiation;OneChina;Taiwan;China
    Date: 1999-06
    Issue Date: 2016-12-12 16:44:59 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 自從兩岸開始接觸談判以來,對於「一個中國」這四個字,基本上,雙方都是一致的;但是探詢到它的意涵時,兩岸的解讀卻是南轅北轍,以致兩岸開始展開交流並進行接觸協高商後,「一個中國」不管是原則,政策或是意涵,都引發雙方彼此之間強烈的爭議。本文主要是從兩岸對於「一個中國」不斷的爭議。看法的差歧,但從兩岸當局重要文件來檢視,「一個中國」仍然被視為兩岸未來整合協商的進程裏一個不可或缺的原則與主要條件。本文從「一個中國」原則是雙方接觸談判的要件到成為折騰角色及未來「一個中國」在兩岸談判過程可能的走向,到最後兩岸間現階段對「一個中國」的解讀與未來可能發展。
    "One China" has been the subject under consensus between the both side of Taiwan Strait since they started to contact and then to talk each other, but TaiPei and Beijing gave different meaning to so called "One China" Owing to the different definition, the cross-strait relations have been full of controversies since then.The article tries to focus the argment of "One China" between the both sides through the historical review, and to find out what are the main factors blocking the recognition of "One China" for both sides, however, through the analysis of governmental documents of the both sides, "One China" is still consideted as a necessary condition to the process of unification.The paper then continues to research how "One China" has become the controversial role in principle at the present time from its argument in definition before, and how the problem "One China" can be settled finally by both TaiPei and Bejiing authorities.
    Relation: 國立政治大學學報,78,505-531
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[Issue 78] Journal Articles

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    78-505-531.pdf2505KbAdobe PDF2664View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback