政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/114441
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 109951/140892 (78%)
造访人次 : 46201046      在线人数 : 546
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/114441


    题名: 種類之債下債務人之主給付義務
    Debtor`s Principal Performance Obligations under Debts of the Same Kind
    作者: 王千維
    Wang, Chien-Wei
    关键词: 特定之債;種類特徵;尋獲義務;客觀不能;主觀不能;一般交易觀念上應有品質;中等品質;種類之債之特定;指定權;交付其物之必要行為完結;法定可得受領之狀態;給付行為地;給付結果發生地;赴償之債;往取之債;寄送之債;現實提出;言詞提出
    Determinate Obligation;Characteristics of the Kind;Procurement Obligation;Objective Impossibility of Performance;Subjective Impossibility of Performance;Proper Quality at Arm`s Length Principle;Medium Quality;Determination of Debts of the Same Kind;Designating Right;Has Done Whatever is Necessary for the Delivery of Such a Thing;Legal Available Status to Take Delivery;The Place of Prestation Act;The Place of Prestation Outcome Occurred;Bring Obligation;Hold Obligation;Send Obligation;Actual Tender;Notice Tender
    日期: 2016-06
    上传时间: 2017-11-07 14:53:43 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 所謂「種類之債」，乃係對於債之關係下債務人之給付內容僅描述一定之種類特徵而言。種類之債下債務人主給付義務之特色主要有三，亦即尋獲義務、給付應具之品質，以及種類之債之特定等。首先，就尋獲義務而言，因符合債之關係所定種類特徵之任一標的皆得成為債務人給付之內容，所以原則上債務人乃負擔尋獲義務。其次，就債務人給付應具之品質而言，民法第二○○條第一項甚且結合民法第三五四條第一項等規定為保護債權人，提供一以品質為核心之標準，作為債務人選擇其給付標的與確定其給付內容之依據。若債務人選擇之給付標的其品質未達依上開規定所定之標準者，則屬不合債之本旨之給付，債務人原始之主給付義務未履行。最後，就種類之債之特定而言，民法第二○○條亦為保護債權人，針對債務人行使其指定權之情形，除契約另有訂定外，債務人之給付行為原則上須達民法第二○○條第二項前段所定「交付其物之必要行為完結」之要件，雙方當事人間債之關係始侷限於由債務人所指定之特定標的。至於債務人交付其物之必要行為是否完結，則依據受領遲延相關規範以決之。種類之債之特定所衍生之後續效果，主要乃係按特定之債之標準界定嗣後不能是否成立。
    The so-called ＂Debt of the same kind＂ refers to the debtor`s performance content under the obligations only describe certain characteristics of the kind concerned. The debtor`s principal performance obligation under debts of the same kind mainly consists of three characteristics, i.e. procurement obligation, proper quality for performance, and determination of debts of the same kind. Their respective introductions are as follows: Procurement Obligation: Any objects which meet the designated characteristics of the kind under the obligations may become the debtor`s performance content. Therefore, in principle, the debtor bears procurement obligation. Proper quality for performance: Paragraph 1, Article 200 of the Civil Code actually consolidates the provisions of Paragraph 1, Article 354 of the Civil Code to protect creditors by providing a quality- centered criteria as the base to the choose object of the prestation and determine the performance content for the debtor. If the object of the prestation chosen by the debtor fails to meet the criteria in accordance with the above provisions, the performance is not actually tendered according to the tenor of, and debtor`s original principal performance obligations is not performed. Determination of Debts of the Same Kind: In order to protect creditors, Paragraph 1, Article 200 of the Civil Code prescribes the circumstances of the designating right exercised by the debtor Unless otherwise provided by contract, debtor`s prestation act should meet the criteria of ＂has done whatever is necessary for the delivery of such a thing＂ under first sentence, Paragraph 2, Article 200 of Civil Code, the obligation between two parties thus is restrict within the specific objects designated by the debtor. As for whether the debtor has done whatever is necessary for the delivery of such a thing, it should be determined based on the related requirements of delays to take delivery. The derived consequent effects on determination of debts of the same kind should be mainly depend on whether the subsequent impossibility of performance requirements of determination of debts of the same kind to be constituted.
    關聯: 政大法學評論, 145, 257-337
    数据类型: article
    DOI 連結: http://dx.doi.org/10.3966/102398202016060145005
    DOI: 10.3966/102398202016060145005
    显示于类别:[政大法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    145-5.pdf1921KbAdobe PDF2372检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈