English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 88295/117812 (75%)
Visitors : 23403682      Online Users : 197
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/114477

    Title: 政策認同下的投票效用與選擇:空間投票理論在不同選舉制度間的比較
    Voting Utility and Choice Decision in 2001 Election: The Application of Spatial Voting Theory in Different Electoral Systems
    Authors: 王鼎銘
    Wang, Ding-Ming
    Keywords: 空間投票;方向理論;條件式勝算對數分析;不相關選項的獨立性
    Spatial Theory;Directional Theory;Conditional Logit;Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives(ⅡA)
    Date: 2003-05
    Issue Date: 2017-11-08 11:28:13 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 為探索選民對各種政策認同的程度,以及政策對政黨偏好與投票選擇的影響,本文利用空間投票理論來解釋2001年台灣選舉的一些情況。有別於國内多數的實證研究,本文推論出條件式勝算對數分析(Conditional Logit)是所有不連續選擇模型中,較正確地分析空間投票理論的一項工具。此外,本文也針對不相關選項的獨立性假設(Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives,IIA)作一討論。雖然IIA假設對許多選擇理論與模型是相當嚴格的條件,但經由Hausman檢定,也佐証條件式勝算對數分析結果的適當性。
    This paper is to explore how the policy issues affected the voting behavior in the 2001 election based on the spatial theory of voting. It applies Conditional Logit methodology, which is more appropriate and correct than Multinomial Logit in analyzing the impact of policy on voting behavior. This paper also points out a restriction that many discrete choice models have overlooked - the property of Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives (IIA) and as a matter, introduces the Hausman Test to exam the coefficient stability.
    The results show that the voting behavior is significantly different under different electoral systems. Essentially, the policy issues, including the unification-independence issue, economic policy, welfare policy, influence the voting decision more profoundly in county magistrate election, than in the legislative election. In addition, those who prefer unification with China, economic development, more social welfare, and political stability are pro KMT, PSP or NP. On the other hand, the voters who favor independent from China, environment protection, fewer social welfare, and political revolution, are pro DDP and TSU.
    Relation: 選舉研究 , 10(1) , 171-206
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: http://dx.doi.org/10.6612%2ftjes.2003.10.01.171-206
    DOI: 10.6612/tjes.2003.10.01.171-206
    Appears in Collections:[選舉研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    10(1)(171-206).pdf2452KbAdobe PDF77View/Open

    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    社群 sharing

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback