English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 88284/117783 (75%)
Visitors : 23396173      Online Users : 84
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 文學院 > 宗教研究所 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/119662
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/119662

    Title: Is “Vijñaptimātra” ontological or epistemological idealism?
    Authors: 楊志常
    Contributors: 宗教博三
    Keywords: Vijñaptimātra;Ontological idealism/Epistemological idealism;Vimśatikāvijñaptimātratāsiddhi;Triṃśikāvijñaptimātratā;Cheng Wei Shi Lun (CWSL);Sandhinirmocanasūtra
    Date: 2016-06
    Issue Date: 2018-08-28 10:38:48 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: There has been no academic agreement on whether “Vijñaptimātra”(Consciousness-only) should be understood to advocate ontological
    idealism or epistemological idealism. What is amusing and confusing is that there are several occasions that both sides of the debate are reading same texts or even referring to the same paragraph but interpreting it in totally different way. This article is intended to draw attention to those texts and paragraphs from Vimśatikāvijñaptimātratāsiddhi, Triṃśikāvijñaptimātratā, Cheng Wei Shi Lun (CWSL), Sandhinirmocanasūtra, Yogācārabhūmi, Mahāyāna-samgraha where both sides of the debate confront each other with their competing arguments. The purpose is to understand better where the possible differences are coming from in the hope to reduce some confusion/bias and to find common denominator if any. Discussion finds the debates might be attributed to several factors: the deep-rooted equivocal relationship between cosmology and psychology in Buddhist tradition; different translations of the key term “vijñānapariṇāma”; how to understand the generalization from meditation practice experience to ordinary experience; and what to expect regarding the coherence among Yogācāra texts and within Yogācāra lineage and whether and where the interoperation should be applied. Last, it is suggested that whether ontological idealist theory is making perfect sense and whether “Vijñaptimātra” be understood as ontological idealism should be decoupled and addressed as different topics.
    Relation: 正觀, No.77, pp.113-166
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[宗教研究所] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    113-166.pdf607KbAdobe PDF97View/Open

    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    社群 sharing

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback