English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 112721/143689 (78%)
Visitors : 49513876      Online Users : 855
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 法學院 > 法律學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/121703


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/121703


    Title: 政府資訊公開法的實務新發展與未來展望
    Recnet Developments and Future Directions of the Freedom of Government Informamtion Law
    Authors: 劉定基
    Liu, Ting-Chi
    Contributors: 法律系
    Keywords: Freedom of Government Information；Archives Act；Proactive Disclosure；Preparatory work；Personal Reverse FOIA Suit
    政府資訊公開；檔案法；主動公開；擬稿；個人隱私；反資訊公開訴訟
    Date: 2016-10
    Issue Date: 2018-12-28 17:18:58 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: The administrative courts have rendered numerous relevant decisions since the promulgation of the Freedom of Government Information Law (FOGIL) in 2005. Starting from the end of 2015, the Ministry of Justice has also begun to draft a bill which will update and amend the FOGIL. This article selects and discusses important recent cases as well as issues which are worth our attention, including the relation between FOGIL and other laws, definition of collegial agencies in the proactive disclosure provision, necessity of specifying the purpose of a request for release of government information, exemption of drafts, preparatory work, and information concerning personal privacy, and reverse FOGIL lawsuits. As the notions of “open government” and “participatory democracy” become more and more important, this article endeavors to bring the FOGIL closer and more integrated to our everyday life.
    政府資訊公開法自 2005 年公布施行至今已累積了許多實務案例，而法務部也在 2015 年底開始進行政資法的全面修正工作。本文依據政資法的章節順序，從中選擇實務上有新近重要見解或本文認為值得未來關注的部分，包括：政資法定位、主動公開規定中合議制機關的定義、申請公開用途記載必要性、擬稿或準備文件與個人隱私兩項限制公開規定究應如何適用，以及反資訊公開訴訟容許性等問題，加以討論。希望在「陽光政府」、「參與民主」理念，越來越受到重視的今日，讓政資法能更融入我們的民主生活中。
    Relation: 法學叢刊, Vol.第42卷, No.第4期, pp.57-81.
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[法律學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2284View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback