English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 110944/141864 (78%)
Visitors : 48037890      Online Users : 592
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/123102


    Title: 日本眾議院議員選舉制度改革之探討：小選舉區比例代表並立制
    The Electoral Reform of Japan`s House of Representatives: The Mixed System of Single - Member and Proportional - Representation Districts
    Authors: 吳明上
    Wu, Ming-Shan
    Contributors: 問題與研究
    Keywords: 選舉制度改革;中選舉區制;政策決定過程;小選舉區比例代表並立制
    the electoral reform;SNTV;policy-making process;Mixed System of Single-Member and Proportional-Representation Districts
    Date: 2003-03
    Issue Date: 2019-04-23 09:01:44 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 日本於一九九四年三月完成了選舉制度改革，將中選與區制改為小選舉區比例代表並立制。本文主要探討兩個主題。第一個是，九○年代以前，自民黨曾兩度嘗試將中選舉區制改為舉區制，但是均失敗。又為何自民黨下臺不到一年，卻完成了以小選舉區制為中心的選舉制度改革?既有的反對勢力，尤其是當時的在野黨為何在成為執政黨之後，反而成立了對自民黨有利的選舉制度呢?第二個主題是，在日本實施四十六年之久的中選舉區制，為何在九○年代被認為有弊端呢?為何直接被替換?新選舉制度是否達成改革的目的? 日本的經驗顯示，期望經由選舉制度的改革來達成政治目的解決，似乎太過樂觀。
    Japan completed the electoral reform of the House of Representatives in 1994 which changed the electoral system, from SNTV (multi-member district with single non-transferable vote system) to the mixed system of single-member and proportional-representation districts. This paper studies two themes. First why did the reform of the electoral system conducted by the LDP (Liberal Democratic Party) twice before the 1990’s, fail while this one within one year after the LDP cabinet had resigned? Succeed. And why did the opposition party, after becoming the ruling power in 1994, approve of the electoral reform which was advantageous to the LDP? Second, why was not SNTV, which had been executed for 46 years, found with flaws till the 1990’s? Why was SNTV directly substituted? Did the new electoral system accomplish the aim of reform? According to this analysis, the attempts to solve Japan’s political problem through electoral reform are not likely to succeed.
    Relation: 問題與研究, 42(2), 79-94
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[問題與研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    376.pdf952KbAdobe PDF2188View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback