English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 110944/141864 (78%)
Visitors : 48018270      Online Users : 694
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/123952


    Title: 重返公共領域：哈伯瑪斯、女性主義、羅逖、文化研究
    The Public Sphere Revisited : Habermas, Feminism, Rorty, Cultural Studies
    Authors: 戴育賢
    Tai, Yu-Hsien
    Contributors: 新聞學研究
    Keywords: 公共領域;私人領域;共識;偏差;溝通理性;實踐論說
    the public sphere;the private sphere;consensus;differences;communicative rationality;practical discourse
    Date: 2000-01
    Issue Date: 2019-06-25 09:04:43 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 近十年來，有關哈伯瑪斯公共領域理論的討論方興未艾。 同時政治社會實踐的發展也使得這個理論面臨考驗。本文 辨視了三種相關的挑戰與創見，它們分別是來自女性主 義、羅逖的實用主義、以及文化研究。女性主義集中批判 了哈伯瑪斯對參與公共領域的男性道德預設；羅逖描繪了 公/私領域的分割如何在不需要共識之餘、仍能透過知識 份子對社群團結作出貢獻；文化研究借助於它擅長的閱聽 人分析，論証公共領域概念必須容納更多私人領域的視 野。這三種論述雖然千差萬別，但卻共同地指出公共領域 概念修正的必要方向：即更謹慎地反省公/私二分，並且 加重私領域這一端的平衡力量。
    Following the publishing of Habermas`s classical Public Sphere book, the past decade has witnessed a rising discussion about this concept. Academic discourses, compounded by `real` socio-politico practices, have burdened this discussion with fatal challenges. Three of them are critically reviewed in this article. They are from some authors of feminism, neo-pragmatism of Rorty, and cultural studies. Feminist`s criticism has centered on the `gender blindness` of Habermas`s account of the public sphere. Rorty casts a light on the contribution of intellectuals to societal solidarity in the public sphere without pursuing the `Consensus`. Media and Cultural studies argues for an emphasis on private domains which impinge on the mapping of the public sphere for ordinary people. While differing with each other in many respects, these three camps point to a significant direction of revisiting the public sphere concept, namely, to recast the dichotomy of public/private spheres and balance the `impracticability` of Habermas original account against the private sphere.
    Relation: 新聞學研究, 62, 119-142
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[新聞學研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    847.pdf1761KbAdobe PDF2185View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback