English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 112721/143689 (78%)
Visitors : 49544522      Online Users : 934
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/131421


    Title: 論「通過/不通過制」在大學教育中的誤用與重塑
    On the Misuse and Reestablishement of the Pass/Fail Grading System in University Education
    Authors: 何萬順
    Her, One-Soon
    林俊儒
    林昆翰
    Contributors: 語言所
    Keywords: 通過/不通過制;學習評量;零學分課程;成績平均積點;學習規劃
    Pass/fail;Grading system;Zero-credit course;Grade point average;Learning planning
    Date: 2019-09
    Issue Date: 2020-09-02 09:17:54 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文首先釐清「通過/不通過」（Pass/Fail，簡稱 P/F）的學習評量方式與 「百分制」和「等第制」之異同，以及 P/F 制與成績平均積點（GPA）的關 係，並且呈現 P/F 制在我國高等教育發展上與零學分課程之間的緊密連結。 接著從學分與授課的對應關係，說明「服務學習」、「教學實務與實習」與 「外語能力檢定」此三種零學分課程如何誤用 P/F 制，並指出其中的可能弊 端以及背後的政策思維。從教育政策的角度觀察，P/F 制與其他評量方式都 各有利弊得失。在提示 P/F 制的適用課程、對象與階段的理論基礎上，本文 主張多元的學習規劃設計，建議大學可從多元的學習評量方式著手，重塑教 學管理的方向，期能更加符合適才適所的教育精神。
    In this paper, we first clarify the similarities and differences between the pass/fail grading system (P/F) and other grading systems and explain the relationship between P/F and the grade point average (GPA). We then reveal the close connection between P/F and the development of zero-credit courses in Taiwan’s university education. Based on the correspondence between credits and credit hours, we further demonstrate how the zero-credit courses of “service-learning”, “internship and practice of teaching”, and “graduation requirement of foreign language proficiency” seriously misuse P/F and point out their likely drawbacks and the thinking behind such policies. From the perspective of education policies, P/F, like other grading systems, has its advantages and disadvantages. Built on a discussion of the theoretical foundation of P/F’s suitability and applicability in terms of courses, participants, and learning phases, we propose a diversified approach towards designing learning planning. We thus further suggest that by considering a diversified range of grading possibilities, universities can reshape the direction of course management to better facilitate students’ individual educational goals.
    Relation: 教育研究集刊, Vol.65, No.3, pp.67-89
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.3966/102887082019096503003
    DOI: 10.3966/102887082019096503003
    Appears in Collections:[語言學研究所] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    93.pdf758KbAdobe PDF2264View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback