政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/132468
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 109952/140887 (78%)
造访人次 : 46351368      在线人数 : 27
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/132468


    题名: 論非都市土地編定種類及其變更與更正問題
    A Study on the Changing and Correcting of Non-Urban Land`s Classification
    作者: 戴秀雄
    Tai, Hsiu-Hsiung
    贡献者: 臺灣土地研究
    关键词: 非都市土地 ; 編定使用地別 ; 變更編定 ; 更正編定 ; 行政處分 ; non-urban land ; classify lands of various purposes ; changing the classification of lands ; correcting the classification of lands ; administrative disposition
    日期: 2020-05
    上传时间: 2020-11-11 11:18:44 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 台灣全境非都市土地在民國65到74年間完成編定作業，並自此全面實施非都市土地使用管制。對於土地編定結果不敷使用需求者，民眾依法可循申請變更編定或是開發許可途徑改變土地編定種類。惟近年因配合辦理國土計畫相關作業，卻出現不少在土地初次編定完成30-40年後提出申請更正編定案件，而達到與申請變更編定相同之結果。為何非都市土地的編定結果可以在原結果生效數十年後辦理更正，相關法規究竟如何規範，其法理依據為何，甚至是否具有法理上的正當性，皆屬值得探究之處。由於本主題涉及事項欠缺相關法學研究，本研究嘗試由非都市土地初次編定作業的歷史背景開始，就其迄今之發展於空間規劃與法理面向進行分析，釐清變更編定與更正編定二者之差異，並檢視二者在法理上之妥適性。
    In order to implement the land use control of non-urban lands under regional plans. Non-urban lands in Taiwan were between 1976-1985 according to the land use purposes classified. Instead of applying for permission in order to change the results of land`s classification, the results of land`s classification could be changed when it has been done in so-called ＂correcting＂ process. To notice is that, a legal result of land`s classification can be (de facto) changed in such ＂correcting＂ process retroactively. For this reason, such ＂correcting＂ mechanism becomes an unique phenomenon in Taiwan`s spatial plan system and needs to be analyzed. This phenomenon is how ever not yet academically researched, under neither spatial plan system nor juristical aspects. And the question, how can a result of land`s classification in this way legally and legitimately be corrected, becomes juristically even more important, while this ＂correcting＂ process was for the lands in aboriginal areas widely applied. This study reviews the historical background of both changing and correcting processes for the results of land`s classification at first. As result of the systematical analysis in contents and structure of relevant Norms, this study has found out that, the ＂correcting＂ process (or mechanism) of the land`s classification against Administrative Procedure Act and is neither legal nor legitimate. A further application of this process under Spatial Planning Act is also not suggested.
    關聯: 臺灣土地研究, 23(1), 1-45
    数据类型: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.6677/JTLR.202005_23(1).0001
    DOI: 10.6677/JTLR.202005_23(1).0001
    显示于类别:[臺灣土地研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    7.pdf7862KbAdobe PDF2213检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈