English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 112721/143689 (78%)
Visitors : 49597834      Online Users : 438
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/132562


    Title: 聯邦體制與選舉制度對不同層級選舉間選民政黨偏好轉移之影響:德國2013年至2017年聯邦衆議院及巴登-符騰堡邦議會選舉之實證研究
    The Impact of the Federal System and the Electoral System on the Political Party Inclination of Voters at Different Levels of Election: An Empirical Study on the Bundestag and Baden-Württemberg Landtag Elections in Germany from 2013 to 2017
    Authors: 彭睿仁
    Peng, Jui-Jen
    Contributors: 問題與研究
    Keywords: 選民投票穩定程度 ; Gary King區位推論模型 ; 階層貝式模型 ; 跨層次推論 
    Electoral Stability ; Gary King`s EI Model ; Hierarchical Bayesian Model ; Cross-level Inference
    Date: 2019-06
    Issue Date: 2020-11-16 13:40:24 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 在德國多層級聯邦體制和單一選區兩票聯立制(Mixed-member proportional representation,MMP)作用下,聯邦眾議院(Bundestag)與邦議會(Landtag)選舉,常因不同層級間之政治連結(Politikverflechtung),形成相互影響的關係。故選民常將聯邦政府的執政效能,在邦議會選舉中直接歸責於執政黨在邦層級對應的參選政黨,而邦議會選舉因此也被視為「測試性選舉」(Testwahl)。依「次級選舉」(The Second-order Election)理論之假設推斷,聯邦眾議院與邦議會選舉屬第一級和次級選舉間之關係,故選民在選舉週期及不同層級選舉重要性考量下,於各黨間顯示出高度變遷性。然僅從選舉結果觀察,無法得知選民的政黨偏好在前後兩次選舉間如何轉移,以及其選票之變遷程度。因此,若要測量選民真實意向,須利用集體層次之選舉資料進行分析。惟集體資料係由個體資料集結而成,特性就如同厚資料,無法於其中區分個體行為資訊,因此需以「區位推論方法」(ecological inference,EI),進行「跨層次推論」(cross-level inference),以集體資料回推個體層次投票行為及建構厚資料知識。為此,本文運用「Gary King的區位推論模型」(Gary King`s EI model)及「階層貝式模型」(hierarchical Bayesian model),估計巴登-符騰堡邦(Baden-Württemberg)2013至2017年聯邦眾議院與邦議會選舉間之選民投票穩定及變遷程度,以檢驗各項依「次級選舉」理論建構之假設,同時並從厚資料研究之觀點,解釋選民投票行為之轉變趨勢和對政治勢力消長之影響。
    Under the influence of the German multi-level federal system and mixed-member proportional representation (MMP), the Bundestag (the Federal Parliament) and the Landtag (the Representative Assembly) elections often form interrelated and interactive relations due to the political connections (Politikverflechtung) characteristic of different government levels. Therefore, in an ongoing Landtag election, voters often directly attribute the federal government`s ruling efficiency to the ruling party`s standing counterpart in Landtag. Hence, Landtag is often regarded as a "Testwahl." According to the hypothesis constructed based on a second-order election, Bundestag and Landtag elections fall under the first-order and second-order election relations. Therefore, with the election cycle and different levels of election taken into account, voters show a high degree of political party inclination change. However, how the voters` political inclination changes in the two elections and the extent of vote transfer cannot be determined when based solely on the observations of the election results. In order to measure the true intentions of voters, it is necessary to adopt collective-election data to carry out the analyses. However, since collective data is made up of individual data sets, its "thick" data" nature makes it impossible to distinguish individual behavior information; thus, the need for ecological inference (EI) to implement "cross-level inference," is needed to infer the implications of the voting behavior behind the thick data, to interpret factors contributing to voting choices, and to construct the trend of individual voting stability and change. In order to achieve the purpose of constructing voting behavior knowledge through collective data, the ecological inference methods used in this study for cross-level inference include Gary King`s EI model and the hierarchical Bayesian model, through which the voters` voting stability and degree of change during the Bundestag and Landtag elections spanning 2013 to 2017 were estimated. At the same time, the model estimation results were used to examine the hypotheses established based on the second-order election theory, explaining the change in voter`s voting behavior and the influence of the political power growth and decline.
    Relation: 問題與研究季刊, 58卷2期, 115-189
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.30390/ISC.201906_58(2).0004
    DOI: 10.30390/ISC.201906_58(2).0004
    Appears in Collections:[問題與研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    9.pdf1791KbAdobe PDF2179View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback