English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 110097/141043 (78%)
Visitors : 46425578      Online Users : 557
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 學術期刊 > 問題と研究 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/132626


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/132626


    Title: 日本の裁判員裁判制度実施10周年の検証
    檢視日本裁判員審判制度實施10週年
    Evaluating the Implementation of the 10th Anniversary of the Saiban-in System (Lay Judge)
    Authors: 林弘正
    Hiromasa Hayashi
    Contributors: 問題と研究
    Keywords: 司法制度改革 ; 裁判員裁判 ; 評議 ; 心的外傷後ストレス障害（PTSD） 
     司法制度改革 ; 裁判員參審 ; 評議 ; 創傷後壓力症候群（PTSD）
    Justice System Reform ; Saiban-in system ; deliberation ; Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)
    Date: 2020-03
    Issue Date: 2020-11-17 10:51:58 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本稿は、日本の裁判員裁判制度実施10周年を迎え、裁判員裁判制度成立の背景、基本的理念を考察し、裁判員裁判制度の現況と評価及び課題を検討するものである。法律知識を持たない市民が、裁判員．補充裁判員という身分で刑事裁判の合議体を構成することは当初不安視された。職業裁判官の適切なリードは、重罪事案の刑事裁判第1審での裁判員及び補充裁判員の合議体での評決等で一定の効果を挙げている。裁判員裁判を重視する立場からは、控訴審及び上告審で裁判員裁判判決を否定することは許されないとする。然しながら、公平な裁判を第一義とする立場からは、事実判断及び量刑判断における誤認や逸脱に対して控訴審及び上告審が是正することは不可避とする。控訴審及び上告審が、裁判員裁判判決を破棄自判したケースを紹介し、その判断の妥当性を示した。今後の課題は、裁判員及び補充裁判員の辞退率の低減化である。
    因應日本實施裁判員參審制度將屆10週年，本文檢視其成立之背景、基礎理念，並探討裁判員參審制度之現狀、評析及課題。起初，人們對不具備法律知識的市民以裁判員與補充裁判員身份組成刑事審判之合議制感到不安。在專業法官適度的引導下，於重罪案件的刑事第一審審判中，裁判員與補充裁判員的合議制之評決等制度被認為具有發揮一定的功能。從注重裁判員參審的角度來看，不得在控訴審及上告審（第二審、第三審上訴審）時，否定裁判員之判決。然而，從公正審判為首的角度來看，控訴審及上告審不可避免地會糾正其事實判斷和量刑判斷中的任何誤認或偏差。本研究介紹在控訴審及上告審中放棄自判之案例，並顯示其判斷之妥當性。未來課題將是減少裁判員與補充裁判員退出的比率。
    This paper considers the background and basic concept of the Saiban-in (lay judge) system which has been started from 2009, and evaluates the implementation and problems. People, at first, are uneasy towards criminal cases trial by a panel of the Saiban-in and alternate Saiban-in participation; because they are chosen from the general public and lack legal knowledge. However, under the professional guidance of judges, the Saiban-ins participation can play a role in the primary ruling of felony trials in the district court. It is said that the ruling of the Saiban-in cannot be overruled in appeal trials (the court of second instance and the final appellate instance). However, from the perspective of a fair trial, it is unavoidable that appeal trials could correct any misunderstanding or errors that were made in the previous trials. This research introduces cases of abandoning self-ruling during trials and appeals to determine the validity of such judgement. One of the most important problems is the reduction of dropout rate of the Saiban-in and alternate Saiban-in.
    Relation: 問題と研究, 49(1), 1-36
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.30391/ISJ.202003_49(1).0001
    DOI: 10.30391/ISJ.202003_49(1).0001
    Appears in Collections:[問題と研究] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    20.pdf862KbAdobe PDF2141View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback