English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109952/140887 (78%)
Visitors : 46365390      Online Users : 1407
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 文學院 > 哲學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/139450
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/139450


    Title: 從公民審議到民主倫理性 ——論哈伯馬斯的溝通理論是否需要黑格爾式的奠基
    From Civic Deliberation to Democratic Ethics - On Whether Habermas` Theory of Communication Needs a Hegelian Foundation
    Authors: 林遠澤
    Lin, Yuan-ze
    Contributors: 哲學系
    Keywords: 道德性與倫理性;批判理論;法蘭克福學派;哈伯馬斯;霍耐特
    Morality and Ethical Life;Critical Theory;Frankfurt School;Habermas;Honneth
    Date: 2021-06
    Issue Date: 2022-03-28 14:41:33 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 在德國法蘭克福大學為哈伯馬斯九十壽慶所舉辦的盛大演溝中,哈伯馬斯以「再一次:論道德性與倫理性的關係」這個講題,來回顧他一生的學思發展、並確立他的晚年定論。他宣稱他的溝通理論所代表的康德道德普遍主義,才是解決當前時代問題所需要的哲學理論。據此,本文將從哈伯馬斯三度經歷「從康德走向黑格爾並再度回到康德」的學思發展過程,分析他在這篇演講中所隱涵提出的三項晚年定論。並透過與霍耐特承認理論的對照來說明,哈伯馬斯的溝通理論仍存在道德的抽象性問題,他的理論因而恐仍難免於黑格爾透過倫理性學說對於康德的道德性所展開的批判。透過論證哈伯馬斯的溝通理論為何仍需一種黑格爾倫理性的奠基,本文將試圖指出,當代民主理論的完整圖像,實應從公民審議進一步發展到民主倫理性的形塑。
    In a gala lecture organised by Frankfurt University for Habermas`s 90th birthday celebration, Habermas reviewed the development of his academic thought throughout his life under the title "Once again: on the relationship between morality and ethical life". He claimed that the Kantian moral universalism represented by his theory of communication is the type of philosophical theory needed to solve the problems of our time. This paper will analyse the three late theses of Habermas in this speech through the three stages of his intellectual development, "From Kant to Hegel and back again". By contrast with Honneth, it is shown that Habermas`s theory of communication still inevitably falls into the formality of Kantian morality, and that his interpretation of Hegel`s doctrine of ethical life is very inadequate. In this way, it is clear that Habermas`s theory of communication is still in need of a Hegelian ethical foundation, and that the complete picture of contemporary democratic theory should be further developed from civic deliberation to the shaping of democratic ethics.
    Relation: 《哲學與文化》, Vol.48, No.6, pp.5-28
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[哲學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    38.pdf949KbAdobe PDF2222View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback