English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 110182/141115 (78%)
Visitors : 46717123      Online Users : 775
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/32027


    Title: 我國駐外機構經營績效之探討-以僑務委員會為例
    Authors: 歐陽富
    Contributors: 王國樑
    吳中書
    孫克難




    歐陽富
    Keywords: 華僑文敎服務中心
    產出導向
    資料包絡分析法
    決策單位
    技術效率
    規模效率
    the overseas Chinese culture and education service center
    output-oriented
    data envelopment analysis
    decision making
    technical efficiency
    scale efficiency
    Date: 2005
    Issue Date: 2009-09-14 12:45:47 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 海外華人人口,截至2004年底止,約為3,808萬人(不含香港、澳門),政府為照顧為眾多之海外僑胞,先於1926年於國民政府下設僑務委員會以推進僑務,復為擴大服務僑社並增進僑民福址,於1985年針對海外僑社需求,選擇華僑眾多之地區,設置華僑文教服務中心,自1985年起迄2004年底止,僑委會在海外各地前後共設置了十七個文教服務中心。為維持該等中心之運作,政府每年均編有巨額預算挹注,為瞭解相對於投入之資源,中心之產出是否符合經濟學上『投入』與『產出』之生產效率概念,本文之研究爰以產出導向之資料包絡分析法建立實證模型進行探討,同時以各文教服務中心為一決策單位,將2001年至2004年間各文教中心之投入及產出項目投入實證模型中,以計算各文教中心的經營績效。
    實證結果顯示,海外文教中心整體的技術效率平均值介於2.4662與3.1605之間,同時規模效率平均值大於1,顯示造成各文教中心技術無效率的來源,大部份來自於純技術效率,另一部分則來自於規模無效率。
    同時依實證結果資料可以發現,(一)僑委會截至2004年止之十七個文教中心,在各種不同的組合下,僅有4至9個中心之效率值為1,占全部文教中心的二成至五成,顯示整體經營績效有待加強與提升;(二)以僑委會關閉倫敦及墨爾本文教中心雖與實證分析結果相符,然績效較墨爾本中心為低之雪黎文教中心卻未關閉之情況而言,益顯數據性資料於決策過程中之重要性;(三)以全球華人人口分配來看,北美洲地區文教中心之技術效率值,無論在固定或變動規模下,就各種組合而言,均較其他地區文教中心之效率值為佳,顯示除應提高北美地區以外中心之效率外,似乎也反映了服務海外僑胞之資源分配是否過度集中,及與僑胞互動應予加強之問題。
    最後,由於本研究係首次將DEA運用於駐外機構經營效率之評估,因此本文之相關實證模型將可作為評估我國其他部會所屬駐外機構效率衡量之基礎及參考。
    The overseas Chinese population, up till 2004, approximates 3.8 millions (not counting Hong Kong, Macao). To attend to their needs, the government has first established the Commission of Overseas Chinese Affairs under the Nationalist Government in 1926. To better and further serve this overseas Chinese community, the government has chosen among several populous areas to set up Chinese Culture and education service center later in 1985. Between 1985 and the end of 2004, 17 service centers have been set up. To keep these centers running requires a big budget support from the government each year. To examine if these centers provide values that conform to the economic concept of "the input" and "the output" production efficiency, this article has used the data envelopment analysis method to establish the real diagnosis model. This model has used various culture and education service centers as policy-making units from 2001 to 2004 to evaluate the efficacy of these service centers.
    Test results have shown that the mean value of central whole technical efficiency is between 2.4662 and 3.1605. Also, the mean value of scale efficiency is bigger than 1. This demonstrates the inefficient central technology rate of the service centers results mainly from pure technical inefficiency, and partly from diseconomy of scale.
    On the other hand, test results also show that, (1) up till 2004, among 17 culture and education centers, just only remain 4 to 9 with central efficiency value of 1 under different kinds of combinations. The fact that they account for two tenths to five tenths of the total number of service centers demonstrates the need for improvement in their operating performance (2) the closing of both London and Melbourne culture and education centers does not conform to the findings of the real diagnosis analysis, but Sydney center is not closed, which reveals the importance of data material in the decision-making process; (3) looking at the distribution of global overseas Chinese population, the technology efficiency values for culture and education centers in North America area are far higher than other areas, measured by all sorts of combinations regardless of fixed or variable scale. This has revealed issues of not only efficiency enhancements for local centers excepting this area, but also excessive concentration of service resources allocated within the region and augment the co-activity with compatriots.
    Finally, since this is the first time DEA has been utilized in a research to evaluate the management efficiencies for government agencies abroad, the real diagnosis model presented in this article might be used as a reference for similar studies in the future.
    Reference: 一、 中文部分
    小林伊織 (2000),「中共改革開放後的僑務政策」,國立政治大學東亞研究所碩士論文。
    王國樑、翁志強、張美玲(1998),「台灣綜合證券商技術效率探討」,證券市場發展季刊,第10卷第2期,頁93~116。
    外交部(2004),「外交統計年報,2003」,台北:外交部。
    李博文(2000),「以DEA模型評估縣市政府開闢財源績效作為補助基準之研究」,朝陽大學財務金融系碩士論文。
    林美惠(1990),「攜手走過的歲月-中華民國僑務發展歷程」,台北:華僑通訊社。
    林耀垣(2004),「應用德菲法及資料包絡分析法於我國地方政府施政績效評估之研究」,國立東華大學企業管理學系碩士在職專班碩士論文。
    邱瓊慧(2002),「臺灣林務機關管理經營績效與策略評估之研究」,國立海洋大學河海工程學系碩士在職專班碩士論文。
    姜波英 (2004),「我國國立大學經營效率之探討」,國立政治大學社科院行政管理碩士學程碩士論文。
    胡明輝、陳珠龍、張石柱(2002),「成本分析與作業改善:整合作業基礎成本與資料包絡法於國軍某修(造)船廠之應用」,《國防管理學報》,第32卷第1期,頁37-38。
    高強、楊啟榮、林文亮(1994),「台灣省現行國有林區劃分與其經營效率之評估」研究報告書。
    高強、黃旭男、Toshiyuki Sueyoshi(2003),「管理績效評估-資料包絡分析法」,台北:華泰文化。
    夏誠華 (2005),「民國以來的僑務與僑教研究(1912~2004)」,《玄奬大學海外華人研究中心叢書》,新竹:玄獎大學海外華人研究中心。
    孫遜(2004),「資料包絡分析法:理論與應用」,台北:揚智文化。
    孫遜(2004),「台灣地區地方法院檢察署辦案績效評估」,台北:揚智文化。
    陳昌茂(2001),「台灣地區中南部鄉鎮市組織特性及其效率評估之研究」,國立成功大學都市計畫學系研究所碩士論文。
    陳烈甫(1987),「華僑學與華人學總論」,台北:臺務商務印書館。
    陳叡貞(2003),「官僚行為與政府產出供給效率之實證研究-以警政服務為例」,逢甲大學會計與財稅研究所碩士論文。
    陳懷東、黃海龍(1997),「海外華商貿易現況與展望」,台北:世華經濟出版社。
    張景年(1997),「省立醫院生之分配與技術效率評估」,中國醫藥學院醫務管理研究所碩士論文。
    張曜麟(1997),「台灣地區都市發展效率之研究」,國立成功大學都市計畫學系研究所碩士論文。
    華僑志編纂委員會(1956),「華僑志.總志」,台北:華僑志編纂委員會。
    劉得港(2003),「北高二市地政電腦化對提升地政機關效率之研究-應用DEA之實證分析」,國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所。
    僑務委員會 (2005),「中華民國九十三年僑務統計年報」,台北:僑務委員會。
    監察院(2004),「我國海外華僑文敎服務中心之定位與功能專案調查研究報告」,台北:監察院外交及僑政委員會。
    鄭淑芳(1998),「國立大學校院相對效率之研究-使用資料包絡分析法」,國立台灣大學會計學系碩士論文。
    羅凱文、楊千(2004),「應用資料包絡分析法評估台灣地區消防機關相對效率及探討環境因素之影響」,《中央警察大學警學叢刊》,第35卷第2期,頁241~262。
    蘇永裕,(2001),「醫院長期經營效率評估」,高雄醫學大學公共衛生學研究所碩士論文。
    二、 英文部分
    Banker, R. D. , A. Charnes, and W.W. Cooper(1984), “Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis, ” Management Science, Vol. 30, 1078-1092.
    Borger,B. and Kersens,K.(1996)“Radial and non-radial measures of technical efficiency :An empirical illustration for Belgian local governments using and FDH reference technology,” The journal of Productivity Analysis,7(1),41-62.
    Charnes, A., W.W. Cooper and E. Rhodes (1978), “Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units,” European Journal of Operations Research, Vol. 2, 429-444.
    Clarke,R.L.,(1992)“Evaluating USAF vehicle maintenance productivity over time: An application of data envelopment analysis ,”Decision Science,23(2),376-384.
    Colbert,A.., Levary, R.R., and Shaner, M.C.(2000), “Determining the relative efficiency of MBA programs using DEA,” European Journal of Operational Research ,125(3)656-669.
    Farell,M.J.(1957) “The measurement of productive efficiency”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 120,253-290.
    Farell,M.J. and Fieldhouse,M.(1962) “Estimating Efficient Production Under Increasing Returns to Scale,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A,Vol.125,Part 2,252-267.
    Ferrier,G.D. and Valdmanis, V.G.,(1996)“Rural hospital performance and its correlates,” The Journal of Productivity Analysis, 7(1),63-80.
    Kao,C. (1991)“Measuring the Efficiency of Forest Districts With Multiple Working Circles,” Journal of the Operational Research Society Vol.48,583-590.
    Kittelsen,S.A.C. and Førsund,F.R.,(1992)“Efficiency analysis of Norwegian district courts,” The Journal of Productivity Analysis,3(3),277-306.
    Koopmans,T.C.,(1951)“Analysis of Production as an Efficient Combination of Activities,” Activity Analysis of Production and Allocation ,New York,1951,33-97.
    M.Abbott,C.Doucouliagos (2001) “The efficiency of Australian universities:a data envelopment analysis,” Economics of Education Review 22,89-87.
    Nold Hughes,P.A, & M.E. Edwards,(2000)“ Leviathan vs. Lilliputian: A data envelopment analysis of government efficiency ”, Journal of Regional Science, Heightstown.
    Puig-Junoy, J.,(2000) “Partitioning input cost efficiency into its allocative and technical components : An empirical DEA application to hospitals ,” Socio-Economic Planning Sciences,34(3),199-218.
    Roll,Y. Golany, B. and Seroussy,D.,(1989)“Measuring the efficiency of maintenance units in the Israeli Air Force,” European Journal of Operational Research,43(2),136-142.
    Seaford,L.M.,(1996)“Data Envelopment Analysis: The Evolution of the State of the Art(1978-1995) ,” The Journal of Productivity Analysis,7,99-137.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    行政管理碩士學程
    92921031
    94
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0929210312
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Master for Eminent Public Administrators] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2157View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback