| Reference: | ◆林建煌、林育聰（1993）：〈比較性廣告之比較方式對廣告效果之影響〉，《廣告學研究》，1：33-65。
◆翁景民（1996）：〈公益廣告效果態度中介模式之研究〉，《台大管理論叢》，7(2):127-146。
◆葉明義、陳志賢（1999）：〈以廣告態度中介模式驗證比較性廣告效果〉，《管理學報》，16(1):1-19。
◆黃聖哲（2002）：〈政治大學學生媒體使用行為之調查〉，排印中。
◆Aaker, D.A. & Bruzzone, D.E. (1985). Causes of irritation in advertising. Journal of Marketing, 49:47-57.
◆Alba, J.W. & Hutchinson, J.W. (1987). Dimensions of consumer expertise. Journal of Consumer Research, 13(2):411-454.
◆Anderson, R.D.，Engledow, J.L. & Becker, H. (1979). Evaluating the relationships among attitude toeard business, product satisfaction, experience and search effort. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(8):394-400.
◆Barry, T.E. (1993). Comparative advertising: What have we learned in two decades? Journal of Advertising Research, 33(2):19-29.
◆Barry, T.E. (1993). Twenty years of comparative advertising in United State. International of Journal of Advertising, 12:325-350.
◆Barry,T.E. & Tremblay, R.L. (1975). Comparative advertising: Perspectives and Issues. Journal of Advertising, 4(4):15-20.
◆Beltramini, R.F. (1982). Advertising perceived believability scale. In D.R. Corrigan, F.B. Kraft & R.H. Ross(ed.), Proceeding of the Southwestern Marketing Association. Wichita State University, KS:1-3.
◆Bettman J.R. & Park W. (1980). Effects of prior knowledge and experience and phase of the choice process on consumer decision process: A protocol analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 7:234-248.
◆Boddewyn, J.J. & Marton, K. (1978). Comparison advertising and consumers. Journal of Contemporary Business, 7(4):135-147.
◆Boush, D.M., Friestad, M. & Rose, G.M. (1994). Adolescent skepticism toward TV advertising and knowledge of advertiser tactics. Journal of Consumer Research. 21:165-175.
◆Brucks, M.(1985). The effect of product class knowledge on information search behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(6):1-16.
◆Burke, M.C. & Edell, J.A. (1989). The impact of feelings on Ad-based affect and cognition. Journal of Marketing Research, 26:69-83.
◆Byer, W.J. & Cooke, E.F. (1985). Comparative advertising’s dilemma: How to attack the competition without alienting his customer. Journal of Consumer Research, 2(3):67-71.
◆Campbell, M.C. (1995). When attention-getting advertising tactics elicit consumer inferences of manipulative intent: The importance of balancing benefits and investments. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 4(3):225-254.
◆Chang, C.C. （2000）. Processing Ads in a competitive context. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Washington DC.
◆Chevins, A. (1975). A case for comparative advertising: An experimental field investigation. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(3):362-364.
◆Cialdini, R.B. (1993). Influence: Science and Practice. Glenview, Ill. : Scott, Foresman.
◆Cox, D.S. & Locander, W.B. (1987). Product novelty: Dose it moderate relationship between Ad attitudes and brand attitudes? Journal of Advertising, 16(3):39-44.
◆Droge,C. (1989). Shaping the route to attitude change: Central versus peripheral processing through comparative versus noncomparative advertising. Journal of Marketing Research, 26:193-204.
◆Eagly, A.H. & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitude, Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
◆Edell, J.A. (1987). The power of feelings in understanding advertising effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 14:421-433.
◆Fishbein, M. (1963). An investigation of relationship between beliefs about an object and the attitude toward the object. Human Relation, 16:233-240.
◆Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research, Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley.
◆Friestad M. & Wright, P. (1994). The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with Persuasion attempts. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(3):1-31.
◆Friestad M. & Wright, P. (1995). Persuasion knowledge: Lay people’s and researchers’beliefs about the psychology of advertising. Journal of Consumer Research. 22(3):62-74.
◆Golden,L. (1979). Consumer reaction to explicit brand comparisons in advertising. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(4):517-532.
◆Graeff, T.R. (1997). Comprehending product attributes and benefits: The role of product knowledge and means-end chain inference. Psychology and Marketing, 14(2):163-183.
◆Greenwald, T. & Leavitt, C. (1984). Audience involvement in advertising: Four levels. Journal of Consumer Research, 11:581-592.
◆Grossbart, S. et al. (1986). Verbal and visual references to competition in comparative advertising. Journal of Advertising, 15(1):10-23.
◆Harris, K. (1967). How Stirling Gestchell chased Walter Chrysler-and hired a mail boy. Advertising Age, July:31.
◆Hempel, D.J. (1969). Search behavior and information utilization in the home buying process. In Marketing Involvement in Society and the Economy, ed. P.R. McDonald, Chicago: American Marketing Association, 461-466.
◆Holbrook, M.B. & Batra, R. (1987). Assessing the role of emotions as mediators of consumer Responses to advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(Dec):404-420.
◆Holmes, C.I. & Holley, B.E. (1986). The relative effectiveness of comparative advertising and product benefit advertising for top ranked brands. In Advance in Consumer Research, (ed). Lutz, R. J., 13 pp.85-90. Provo, Utah: Association for Consumer Research.
◆Homer, P.M. (1990). The mediate role of attitude toward the Ad: Some additional evidence. Journal of Marketing Research, 27:78-86.
◆Jain, S.P. et al. (2000). Comparative versus noncomparative advertising: The moderating impact of prepurchase attribute verifiability. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 9(4):201-211.
◆Johnson, E.J. & Russo, E.J. (1984). Product familiarity and learning new information. Journal of Consumer Research, 11(6):542-550.
◆Katona, G. & Meuller, E. (1955). A study of purchase decisions. In Consumer Behavior: The Dynamic of Consumer Reaction, ed. Lincoln H. Clark, New York: New York University Press, 30-87.
◆Kirmani, A. (1990). The effect of perceived advertising costs on brand beliefs. Journal of Consumer Research, 17:160-171.
◆Kirmani, A. & Wright, P. (1989). Money talks: Perceived advertising expense and expected product quality. Journal of Consumer Research, 16:344-353.
◆Lang, A. (1992). A limited capacity theory of television viewing. Paper presented to the Information Systems Division of the International Communication Association, Miami, FL.
◆Levine, P. (1976). Commercial that name competing brands. Journal of Advertising Research, 16(6):7-14.
◆Lutz, R.J. (1985). Affective and cognitive antecedent of attitude toward the ad: A conceptual framework. In L. Alwitt & A. Mitchell (Eds.), Psychological process and advertising effects. (pp.45-65). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
◆MacKenzie et al. (1983) Testing competing models of advertising effectiveness via structure equation moels. In Proceedings, Winter Educators’Conference, Chicago: American Marketing Association, 70-75.
◆MacKenzie et al. (1986). The role of attitude toward the ad as mediator of advertising effectiveness: A test of competing explanation. Journal of Marketing Research, 23:130-143.
◆Madden,T.J. et al. (1988). Attitude toward the Ad: An assessment of diverse measurement indices under different processing sets. Journal of Marketing Research, 25(Aug):242-252.
◆McDougall, G.H.G. (1978). Comparative advertising: The effectof claim type and brand loyalty. In Current Issue and Research in Advertising, Leigh, J. & Martin, C.R. jr., pp.39-52. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan.
◆Miniard, P.W., Bhatla, S. & Rose, R.L. (1992). On the formation and relationship of Ad and brand attitudes: An experimental and causal analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 27:290-303.
◆Mitchell, A. & Olson, J. (1981). Are product attribute the only mediator of advertising effects on brand attitude? Journal of Marketing Research, 18:318-332.
◆Moore, W.L. & Lehmann, D.R. (1980). Individual differences in search behavior for a nondurable. Journal of Consumer Research, 7(12):296-307.
◆Muehling, D.D. (1987). Comparative advertising: The influence of attitude-toward-the-Ad on brand evaluation. Journal of Advertising, 16(4):43-49.
◆Muehling, D.D. et al. (1990). The impact of comparative advertising on levels of message involvement. Journal of Advertising, 19(4):41-50.
◆Muehling D.D. et al. (1991). The moderating effects of Ad message involvement: A reassessment. Journal of Advertising, 20(2):29-38.
◆Muehling, D.D. & McCann, M. (1993). Attitude toward the Ad: A review. Journal of Current Issue and Research in Advertising, 35(2):26-58.
◆Miniard, P.W., Bhatla, S. & Rose, R.L. (1992). On the formation and relationship of Ad and brand attitudes: An experimental and casual analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 27:290-303.
◆Newman, J.W. & Staelin, R. (1971). Multivariate analysis od differences in buyer decision time. Journal of Marketing Research, 8:192-198.
◆Newman, J.W. & Staelin, R. (1972). Purchase information seeking for new cars and major household appliance. Journal of Marketing Research, 9(8):249-257.
◆O`Keefe, D.J. (1990). Persuasion: Theory and Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
◆Petty, R.E. & Cacioppo, J.T. (1980). Persuasiveness of communications is affected by exposure frequency and message quality: A theoretical and empirical analysis of persisting attitude change. In J. Leigh & C. Martin (Eds.), Current issue and research in advertising. (pp. 97-122) Ann Arbor: University of Michjgan.
◆Petty, R.E. & Cacioppo, J.T. (1986). Attitude and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches, Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown.
◆Petty, R.E. & Cacioppo, J.T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. NY: Springer-Verlag.
◆Petty, R.E., Cacioppo, J.T. & Shumann, D. (1983). Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: The moderating role of involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, 10:135-146.
◆Petty, R.E., Ostrom, T.M. & Brock, T.C.(1981). Historical foundation of the cognitive response approach to attitude and persuasion. Pp.5-29. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Association, Inc.
◆Prasad, V.K. (1976). Communications-effectiveness of comparative advertising: A laboratory analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 13(2): 128-137.
◆Pride, W.M. et al. (1977). Are comparative advertising more information for owners of the mentioned competing brand than for non-owners? In Comtempporary Marketing Thought (ed). Greenberg, B.A. & Bellenger, D.N., 4, pp298-301. Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association.
◆Punj , G.N. & Staeline, R. (1983). A model of consumer information search behavior for new automobile. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(5):366-380.
◆Putrevu, S. & Lord, K.R. (1994). Comparative and noncomparative advertising: Attitudinal effects under cognitive and affective involvement. Journal of Advertising, 23(2):77-90.
◆Scammon , D. (1978). Comparative advertising: Are-examination of issue. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 12(4):381-392.
◆Sheluga, D.A. & Jacoby, J. (1978). Do comparative claim encourage comparison shopping? The impact of comparative claims in consumers’ acquisition of product information. In Current Issues and Research in Advertising (ed.) Leigh, J.H. & Martin, C.R.jr.,pp.23-37. Ann Arbor, MI:The University of Michigan.
◆Sherif, M. & Hovland, C. (1961). Social judgment. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
◆Shimp, T.A. & Dyer, D.C. (1978). The effects of comparative advertising mediated by market position of sponsoring brand. Journal of Advertising, 7(3):13-19.
◆Srull, T.K. & Wyer, R.S. (1980). Category accessibility and social perception: Some implication for the study of person memory and interpersonal judgrments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(6):841-856.
◆Stewart, D.W. & Furse, D.H. (1984). Analysis of impact of executional factors on advertising performance. Journal of Advertising Research, 24:23-26.
◆Swan, J.E. (1969). Experimental analysis of predicision information seeking. Journal of Marketing Research, 6(5):192-197.
◆Swayne, L.E. & Stevenson, T.H. (1987). Comparative advertising in horizontal business publications. Industrial Marketing, 16(1):71-76.
◆Swinyard, W.R. (1981). The interaction between comparative advertising and copy claim variation. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(2):175-186.
◆Yi, Y. (1993). Contextual priming effects in print advertisements: The moderating role of prior knowledge. Journal of Advertising, 22(1):1-10.
◆Yoo, B. & Donthu, N. (2001). Developing and validating a multidimensional consumer-based brand equity scale. Journal of Business Research, 52:1-14.
◆Wilkie, W.L. & Farris, P.W. (1975). Comparison advertising: Problems and potential. Journal of Marketing, 39(4):7-15.
◆Wright, P. (1973). The cognitive process mediating acceptance of advertising. Journal of Marketing Research, 10:53-62.
◆Wright, P. (1974). Analyzing media effect on advertising responses. Public Opinion Quarterly, 38:192-205.
◆Wright, P. (1975). Factors affecting cognitive resistance to advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 2:1-9.
◆Wright, P. (1985). Schemer schema: Consumers’ intuitive theory about marketers’ Influence tactics. In Advances in Consumer Research, 13 (ed.) R.J. Lutz, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 1-3.
◆Wyer, R.S. & Srull, T.K. (1981). Category accessibility: Some theoretical and empirical issue concern the processing of social stimulus information. Social Cognition: The Ontario Symposium, E.T. Higgins, C.P. Herman and M.P. Zanna, eds., Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum, 161-197. |
