English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109952/140887 (78%)
Visitors : 46323003      Online Users : 875
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 企業管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/34920
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34920


    Title: 影響網路謠言傳播的因素及擴散模式-由電子郵件謠言的散播與企業闢謠作為談起
    The Determinants of Internet Rumor Diffusion - Patterns of E-mail Based Rumor Diffusion and Corporate Clarification Strategies
    Authors: 鍾宏彬
    Chung, Hung Pin
    Contributors: 別蓮蒂
    Bei, Lien-Ti
    鍾宏彬
    Chung, Hung Pin
    Keywords: 網路謠言
    傳播模式
    電子郵件
    企業策略
    危機管理
    Internet Rumor
    Diffusion Model
    E-mail
    Corporate Strategy
    Crisis Management
    Date: 2002
    Issue Date: 2009-09-18 13:18:51 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 網際網路是繼電子計算機發明後,帶給人類最大衝擊的一項革命,它突破了地理的籓籬,資訊的流動可以在極短暫的時間內跨越國界,這是其他媒體所望塵莫及的。而這種傳播特性最為人所詬病的問題之一,就是網路謠言的充斥。透過E-mail、BBS、NEWS、WWW等各種不同的管道散播出來的謠言,不僅可能造成個人的名譽受損、企業的形象破壞,許多的犯罪手法也因而產生。就企業主而言,網路謠言的殺傷力莫過於對公司形象與品牌聲譽的損害,而如何防範與澄清消息的正確性,已成為企業公關與危機管理的重要一環。
    本研究則分析現有的謠言與消息來源理論,探討謠言的結構、傳播過程以及其社會心理成因等,並比較電腦中介傳播 (CMC) 與一般謠言口耳相傳 (FtF) 之下的謠言特性,以及探討傳統大眾媒體與網路媒介傳播謠言效果之差異,歸納出影響謠言傳播的可能因素包括謠言的可相信度、渾沌不安、訊息特性、涉入度、網路訊息惰性、人口統計變數與網路使用行為等。利用這些可能的變數,本研究設計兩組實驗來衡量謠言散播與闢謠效果,實驗一利用可相信度與渾沌不安兩個變數操弄謠言,並以小樣本的散播實驗來衡量謠言操弄的結果,探討謠言散播模式與影響變數,並以計數器追溯謠言散播的情形,來了解謠言散播的真實面貌;實驗二則以類似的實驗方法,選擇一則已發生的網路謠言案例來研究謠言散佈模型,並以發送闢謠信件的方式來探討其謠言防治效果。
    實驗一在經網路謠言散播實驗之後,發現操弄變數的差異並不顯著,故實驗一改採Regression檢定,最後發現可相信度、訊息特性與渾沌不安是影響謠言散播的主要因素,網路訊息惰性則對謠言散播有間接影響效果,而可相信度有部分的中介效果;在電子郵件闢謠實驗方面,實驗二發現可相信度與網路訊息惰性對訊息的散播有顯著影響效果,而可相信度有部分的中介效果。由此可知,兩個實驗的散佈模式並不相同,其原因有可能是因為涉入度的差異。另外,兩個實驗皆發現經由電子郵件散播的訊息符合創新採用理論,其中實驗一的謠言與實驗二的闢謠訊息為Rogers所說的不完全散佈模式,而實驗二的謠言則為所謂的「S」形創新散佈曲線。
    此外,本研究利用謠言的追蹤計數,得到了散播曲線與訊息散播方程式,並估計而求出了謠言的散播速度。由追溯的結果得知,網路謠言傳播的速度十分快速,尤其實驗二的謠言在第2.2日時就達擴散曲線的反曲點,一星期內散佈的人數高達原來樣本數的兩倍;相反的,不被眾人散播的謠言可以在短短幾天之內就趨於平息。而本研究也對網路訊息的「散播者」與「非散播者」作出比較,發現散播者的散佈可能性、對謠言的相信度、渾沌不安等都比非散播者高,但網路訊息惰性則較低。在粗淺的瞭解這群可能的網路「意見領袖」之後,企業界可以專注於這群人作有效的闢謠公關活動,讓網路謠言的管理更有效率。
    最後,本研究彙整謠言的應對策略,並對企業因應謠言的危機管理的模式,提出許多的方案與建議,讓企業界在面對網路謠言時,能有參考的依循,並將損害減至最低。
    Not only has the internet increased the efficiency of communication, it has also brought out severe crises in the real world. Messages can be circulated all over the world in just seconds. As a result, geographical barriers have been virtually broken down. However, while rumors and hoaxes can easily be distributed through e-mail, BBS, news group, and so on, such false information may cause severe damage to individuals and corporations concerned, even trigger criminal offenses. How to prevent potential damage of commercial reputations which may cause by internet rumors and clarify the existing grapevines is one of the most important issues each corporation needs to address in the present information society.
    This thesis is inclined to find out the differences between Computer Mediated Communication (CMC) and Face-to-Face (FtF) Communication in terms of the variables which affect the diffusion of rumors, i.e. Credibility, Anxie-uncertainty, Message Property, Involvement, Internet Inertia, demographical variables, and personal internet behavior. Two experiments are designed in this research. Exp.1 operates Credibility versus Anxie-uncertainty into four rumors and illustrates the correlation between Diffusion Possibility and each of the aforesaid independent variables which can facilitate establishing the diffusion model for Internet Rumors accordingly. Exp.2 is an empirical study based on the diffusion model built up in Exp.1. A pre-selected existing rumor is used as the research sample. It remodels the rumor diffusion and measures the clarification effect through e-mail as well. Moreover, both experiments use Site Meter to trace the mechanism of rumor diffusion. Numbers of the rumor being viewed and its responses and clarifications can be easily counted.
    According to experiments, Credibility and Anxie-uncertainty are originally well operated in pretests. However, the manipulated variables are not fully distinguished in Exp.1. Hence, Regression is employed to test the hypotheses and as a result, Credibility, Anxie-uncertainty, and Message Property are the key variables that directly influence rumor diffusion in Exp.1 while Internet Inertia has indirect effect on the outspread of a rumor. In Exp.2, both Credibility and Internet Inertia play important roles in the diffusion behavior while Credibility acts as a partial mediating variable in this case. Additionally, this research also shows the possibility and degree that Involvement might be the factor which causes discrepancy between these 2 models. However, it needs to be confirmed by further research. Moreover, both models fit the Distribution Theory of Innovations developed by Rogers. Rumors in Exp.1 and clarify message in Exp.2 are both Unsuccessful Diffusion while rumor in Exp. 2 belongs to S-shaped Normal Diffusion.
    Incidentally, diffusion curves and the function of rumor diffusion are obtained to work out through simulation equations and so are the diffusion rates, which surprised us for their rapid distribution. The inverse point was reached in the 2.2 days after the rumor message was distributed in Exp.2, and almost two folds of the original group numbers were reached in just one week. On the other hand, rumors which were not circulated would be quelled in few days. Comparisons between the Distributor and the Non-distributor in the Internet society are also made in this study in facilitating the management of corporate grapevines. The Distributor believes rumors and are more aggressive in rumor distribution and shows higher Anxie-uncertainty, while their Internet Inertia are lower than Non-distributor. Knowing more about the so-called Internet “Opinion Leader” helps corporations focus on crisis management by initiating effective public activities not only because they are cores of grapevines but are also easier to approach than others.
    Finally, various corporate strategies of confining rumors are developed in the thesis. Suggestions and alternatives are provided in conclusion. Corporate administrators can therefore take them for reference when dealing with rumor-caused crises.
    Reference: 中文部份
    方文昌 (1997),“電子佈告欄使用型態與訊息擴散之探索研究”,【第二屆資訊科技與社會轉型研討會】發表論文。南港:中央研究院。
    方念萱、劉駿州 (1997),“網路媒介與性言說:台灣BBS站連線性版之言說分析”,【全國比較文學會議】發表論文。台北:中華民國比較文學學會。
    何建明、葉信源 (1997),“資訊科技與教育的互動─建立「以網路為主的教育情境」”,【第二屆資訊科技與社會轉型研討會】發表論文。南港:中央研究院。
    林幸男 (2000),【大宗扁平郵件收寄與投遞處理之研究】,75卷,3月號。
    林東泰 (1997),【大眾傳播理論】。台北:師大書苑。
    周冠中 (1997),“1000大企業Internet現況調查”,【資訊與電腦】,第197期,頁101-107,1997年10月號。
    周桂田 (1997),“網際網路上的公共領域:在當代風險社會下的建構意義”,【第二屆資訊科技與社會轉型研討會】發表論文。南港:中央研究院。
    吳齊殷 (1995),“電腦架構的社會網路:社會學研究新領域”,【第一屆資訊科技與社會轉型研討會】發表論文。南港:中央研究院。
    吳筱玫 (1999a),“數位時代之「新聞」產製面貌---從兩個案例看網路媒體如何影響新聞形塑”,【中華傳播學會1999年會暨研討會】發表論文。
    吳筱玫 (1999b)。“電子報對傳統新聞媒體的衝擊 (上)(下)”,分別刊載於【網路通訊】,1999年一月號,頁96-101,及二月號,頁122-128。
    柯舜智 (1993),【電子佈告欄使用者的媒介行為與時間分配的關聯性研究】,國立政治大學碩士論文。
    翁秀琪 (1996),【大眾傳播理論與實證】。台北:三民書局。
    孫秀蕙 (1996),“網際網路與公共關係:理論與實務運用模式的思考”,【第五屆中華民國廣告寄公共關係學術與實務研討會】論文。台北:政治大學。
    孫秀蕙 (1997),“網際網路與公共關係:理論與實務運用模式的思考”,【廣告學研究】,第九集,頁159-181,政治大學,1997年7月。
    孫秀蕙 (1999),【網路時代的企業公關─格魯尼模式的理論性重構】。台北:國立政治大學廣告系。
    項靖 (1998),“願景與陷阱:論電子化政府與政府再造”,行政院研考會、中興大學公共行政學系主辦【跨世紀政府再造研討會】發表論文。
    教育部電子計算機中心,(1989a),“BITNET網路負荷問題”,台北:【研究服務簡訊】,41:2。
    教育部電子計算機中心,(1989b),“研討建立大學高速學術網路有關事宜會議記錄”,台北:【研究服務簡訊】,46:25。
    莊克仁譯 (1988),Rogers, E.M. 原著 (1987),【傳播科技學理】。台北市: 正中。
    郭書祺 (2001),【企業網路公關之研究初探—從電腦中介傳播談起】,國立交通大學傳播研究所碩士論文。
    黃厚銘 (1997),“資訊社會中教育的變與常”,【第二屆資訊科技與社會轉型研討會】發表論文。南港:中央研究院。
    黃羨文 (1997),【紙本書與電子書之比較】。台北:漢美圖書。
    彭芸 (1997),“美國國家資訊基磐上的言論自由”,【新聞學研究】,第54期,頁35-51。
    彭漣漪 (1997),“網路錢潮誰抓得住?”,【天下雜誌】,第188期,頁36-42。
    葉恆芬 (2000),【網路媒體可信度及其影響因素初探研究-以台灣地區網路使用者為例】,國立中正大學電訊傳播研究所碩士論文。
    張紹勳 (1995),“資訊科技引進的適切性及對開發中國家衝擊之研究”,【第一屆資訊科技與社會轉型研討會】發表論文。南港:中央研究院。
    張紹勳 (1998),“電子報在網際網路上成功發展之關鍵因素”,【Tanet98論文集】。
    張慧元 (1998),【大眾傳播理論解讀】,台北:五南。
    楊艾俐 (1994),“解放焦慮─作資訊的主人”,【天下雜誌】,第163期,頁28-38。
    楊志弘/莫季雍譯 (1996),McQuail, D., & Windahl, S. 原著,【傳播模式】 (Communication Models)。台北:正中書局。
    楊忠川 (1996),“如何推出成功的電子報紙”,【新聞鏡週刊】,第407期,頁36-42。
    楊忠川 (2000),“網際網路媒體可信度初探性研究”,銘傳大學【展望新世紀國際學術研討會:網路媒體的跨世紀展望】發表論文。
    楊忠川等 (May 2002),“台灣200大企業網際網路公關應用現況調查”,【中華管理評論】,3(2),頁39-49。
    潘明君 (2001),“E-Mail仍為網路應用主流”,【資策會ECRC-FIND─網路脈動】,台北。 <http://www.find.org.tw/0105/news/0105_news_disp.asp?news_id=1657>,瀏覽日期: 2002/5/3。
    鄭若麟╱邊芹譯 (1992),Kapferer, J. N.原著,【謠言】(Rumeurs)。台北:桂冠。
    劉鳳珍 (2000),“企業主-小心,綱路謠言上身!”,【動腦Brain】,第288期,頁70-72。
    劉駿州 (1997),【電子資訊使用與生活品質的關聯性研究】,行政院國科會專題研究計畫成果報告。
    蔡美瑛譯 (1999),Doug Newsom, Judy VanSiyke Turk, Dean Kruckeberg原著,【公共關係:理論與務實】。台北市:亞太圖書。
    蔡靚萱(1999),【網路對謠言傳播的影響】,未發表之網路論文。<http://www-ms.cc.ntu.edu.tw/~r7342018/ethics.htm>,瀏覽日期: 2002/5/3。
    歐柏杉 (1995),【Email與紙張問卷之績效比較研究】。國立交通大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。
    臧國仁 (1999),【新聞媒體與消息來源:媒介框架與真實建構之論述】。台北:三民。
    賴靜儀、張軒豪、謝亨如、陳宏義、蘇曉屏、林育賢、宋繐容、楊曉萍、張家琪 (1995),“電子報的發展與問題”,【新聞鏡週刊】,第346期,頁30-37。
    羅澤生 (1995),【Internet 商用化趨勢及我國軟體業者機會分析】。台北:財團法人資訊工業策進會。
    謝瀛春 (1997),“數位媒介對大眾傳播的革命性挑戰”,【資訊社會對人文、社會的衝擊與影響】,行政院經建會委託研究。台北:中央研究院資訊科學研究所,頁127-145。
    蘇芸 (1996),【網路誹謗之研究:以電子布告欄(BBS)為例】,國立交通大學傳播研究所碩士論文。
    外文部份
    Adams, B. N. & Bristow, M. (1979). “Ugandan Asian expulsion: rumour and reality.” Journal of Asian and African Studies, 14, pp.191-203.
    Allport, G. W. & Postman, L. J. (1947). The Psychology of Rumor, New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
    Al-Makaty, S. S., Boyd, D. A., & Van Tubergen, G. N. (1991). “Source credibility during the Gulf War: A Q-study of rural and urban Saudi Arabian citizens.” Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Montreal.
    Ambrosini, P. J. (1983). “Clinical assessment of group and defensive aspects of rumor.” International Journal of Group Psychology, 89, pp.91-98.
    Anderson, R. E. & Harris, L. (1984). Computing Learning and the Public Need (MCSR Report No.84-3), Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Center for Social Research.
    Anonymous. (1999, Feb.). “Small PR firms go to the net.” Investor Relations Business, p.4.
    Anthony, S. (1973). “Anxiety and rumor.” Journal of Social Psychology, 89, pp.91-98.
    Aronson, E. (1980). The Social Animal, 3rd ed., W. H. Freeman, New York.
    Austin, E. W. & Dong, Q. (1993). “Putting news into context: apparent reality versus source credibility in judgments of news believability.” Unpublished manuscript, Edward R. Murrow School of Communication, Washington State University, Pullman, WA.
    Back, K., Festinger, L., Hymovitch, B., Kelley, H., Schachter, S., & Thibaut, J. (1950). “The methodology of studying rumor transmission.” Human Relations, 3, pp.307-312.
    Ball-Rokeach & Reardon (1988). “Monologue, dialogue, and telelog: comparing an emergent form of communication with traditional forms.” In Hawkins, R. P., Wiemann, J. M., & Pingree, S. (eds.)(1988), Advancing Communication Science: Merging Mass and Interpersonal Process, pp.110-134, Sage.
    Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Baym, N. K. (1996). “The emergence of community in computer-mediated communication.” In Johes, Steven (ed.)(1996), Cybersociety - Computer -Mediated Communication and Community, Sage.
    Beals, D. E. (1992). “Computer networks as a new data base.” Journal of Educational Computing Research, 8, pp.327-345.
    Bell, D. (1973). The Coming of Post-Industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting, New York: Basic Books.
    Berenson, B. (1952). Rumor and Reflection, Simon and Schuster, New York.
    Berlo, D. K., Lemert, J. B., & Mertz, R. J. (1966). Dimensions for Evaluating the Acceptance of Message Sources, Research Monograph, Department of Communication, Michigan State University.
    Berscheid, E. (1966). “Opinion change and communicator-communicate similarity and dis-similarity.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, pp.670-680.
    Bird, G. A., Goss, R. C., & Bird, G. W. (1990). “Effects of home computer use on fathers’ lives.” Family Relations, 39(4), pp.38-42.
    Bloch, P. H. (1981). “An exploration into the scaling of consumers’ involvement with a product class.” Advances in Consumer Research, 8, pp.61-65.
    Bordewijk, J.L. & Kaam, B. (1986). “Towards a classification of new tele-information services.” Intermedia, 14(1), pp.16-21.
    Bordia. P. (1996). “Studying verbal interaction on the Internet: The case of rumor transmission research.” Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28(2), pp.149-151.
    Bordia, P. & Rosnow, R. L. (1998). “Rumor rest stops on the information highway:Transmission patterns in a computer-mediated rumor chain.” Human Ccommunication Research, 25, pp.163-179.
    Braddlee. (1993). Virtual Communities: Computer-Mediated-Communication and Communities of Association, Indiana University, doctorial dissertation.
    Brod, M. (1984). Technostress: The Human Cost of the Commuter Revolution, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
    Caputo, P. (1977). A Rumor of War, Holt, Rinehart, Winston, New York.
    Chaffee, S. (1977). “The diffusion of political information.” In Chaffee S. (ed.), Political Communication Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
    Chaiken, S. (1979). “Communicator physical attractiveness and persuasion.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, pp.1387-1397.
    Chorus, A. (1952). “The basic law of rumor.” The Journal of Abcdrmal and Social Psychology, 48, pp.313-314.
    Chyi, H.I. & Sylvie, G. (1998). “Competing with whom? Where? And how? A structural analysis of the electronic newspaper market.” The Journal of Media Economics, 11(2), pp.1-18.
    Cohen, A. R. (1964). Attitude Change and Social Influence. Basic Books, New York.
    Cohen, S. & Wills, T. A. (1985). “Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis.” Psychological Bulletin, 98, pp.310-357.
    Culnan, M. J. & Markus, M. L. (1987). “Information technologies.” In Jablin, F. M., Putnam, L. L., Roberts, K. H. & Poter, L. W. (eds.), Handbook of Organizational Communication, pp.420-443. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
    Danowski, J. A. (1988). “Media richness: Decontextualizing media and changing semantics of organizational symbols.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, New Orleans, LA.
    Danowski, J. A. (1993). “An emerging macrolevel theory of organizational communication: Organizations as virtual reality management systems.” In Thayer, L. & Barnett, G. (eds.), Emerging Perspectives in Organizational Communication, pp.141-174. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    Davis, K. (1969, April). “Grapevine communication among lower and middle managers.” Personnel Journal, p.272. Also “The care and cultivation of the corporate grapevine.” Management Review, 62, October, 1973.
    Deaux, K. (1985). “Sex and gender.” Annual Review of Psychology, 36, pp.49-81.
    Debevec, K., Madden, T. J., & Kernan, J. B. (1986). “Physical attractiveness, message evaluation, and compliance- a structural evaluation.” Psychological Reports, 58, pp.503-508.
    December, J. (1996). Units of Analysis for Internet Communication, Beverly Hills, CA:Sage.
    Delumeau J. (1978). La Peur en Occident, Paris, Pluriel.
    DeFleur, M. L. (1966). Theories of Mass Communication, New York: David McKay.
    DeFleur, M. L. (1987). “The growth and decline of research on the diffusion of news.” Communication Research, 14, pp.109-130.
    DeFleur, M. L. & Ball-Rokeach, S. (1982). Theories of Mass Communication, 4th ed. New York: McKay.
    Deken, J. (1981). The Electronic Cottage, New York: Bantam Books.
    Dholakia, R. R. & Sternthal, B. (1977). “Highly credible sources: Persuasive facilitators or persuasive liabilities?” Journal of Consumer Research, 3, pp.223-232.
    Difonzo, N., Bordia, P., & Rosnow, R. L., (1994). “Reining in rumors.” Organizational Dynamics, 23(1), pp.47-62.
    Dodd, S. C. (1958). “Formulas for spreading opinions.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 22, pp.537-554.
    Eagly, A. H., Chaiken, S., & Wood, W. (1981). “An attributional analysis of persuasion.” In J. Harvey, W. Ickes, R. Kidd (eds.), New Directions in Attribution Research 3, pp.37-62. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
    Edwards, O. (1989, April). “Leak soup.” In GQ Magazine, p.228.
    Esposito, J. L. (1987). “Subjective factors and rumor transmission: A field investigation of the influence of anxiety, importance, and belief on rumormongering.” (Doctoral dissertation, Temple University, 1986) Dissertation Abstracts International, 48, 596B.
    Esposito, J. L. & Rosnow, R. L. (1983). “Corporate rumors: how they start and how to stop them.” Management Review, 72, pp.44-49.
    Esposito, J. L. & Rosnow, R. L. (1984). “Cognitive set and message processing: implications of prose memory research for rumor theory.” Language & Communication, 4(4), pp.301-315.
    Esrock, S. L. & Leichy, G. B. (2000). “Organization of corporate web pages: publics and functions.” Public Relations Review, 26(3), pp.327-344.
    Feick, L. F., Price, L. L., & Higie, R. A. (1987). “Information sensitive consumers and market information.” The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 21(2), pp.328-341.
    Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of Cognitive Dissonance, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
    Fischer, C. S. (1984). The Urban Experience, New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers.
    Fiske, S. T. & Taylor, S. E. (eds.) (1991). Social Cognition, 2ed edn. McGraw-Hill, New York.
    Folkes, V. S. & Sears, D. O. (1977). “Does everybody like a liker?” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, pp.505-519.
    Galant, D. (1990, March). “Responding to rumors.” In Situational Investor, p.58.
    Gennaro, E. D., Kehrberg, K., & Heller, P. (1983). “Computer literacy is a family affair.” Instructional Innovator, pp.17-18.
    Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age, Ca, Stanford U Press.
    Goffman, E. (1996). Wir Alle Spielen Theater - Die Selbstdarstellung im Alltag, Piper.
    Goleman, D. (1991). “Anatomy of a Rumor: It Flies on Fear.” The New York Times, June 4, p. C5.
    Graham, S. & Folkes, V. S. (eds.) (1990). Attribution Theory: Applications to Achievement, Mental Health, and Interpersonal Conflict, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
    Greenberg, B. S. (1964). “Person-to-person communication in the diffusion of news events.” Journalism Quarterly, 41, pp.489-494.
    Gualtieri, R. (1998). “Impact of the emerging information society on the policy development process and democratic quality.” Commissioned by the OECD, <http://www.oced.org/puma>, visited 1999/6/2.
    Hanson, W. A. (2000). Principles of Internet Marketing, Ohio: South-Western College Publishing.
    Heider, F. (1958). The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations, John Wiley, New York.
    Hill, L. N. & White, C. (2000). “Public relations practitioners’ perception of the World Wide Web as a communications tool.” Public Relations Review, 26(1), pp.31-51.
    Hiltz, S. R., Turoff, M., & Johnson. K. (1989). “Experiments in group decision making, 3: Disinhibition, deindividuation, and group process in pen name and real name computer conferences.” Decision Support Systems, 5, pp.217-232.
    Hoffman, D. L. & Novak, T.P. (1995). “Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: conceptual foundations,” <http://ecommerce.vanderbilt.edu/ cmepaper.revision.july11.1995/cmepaper.html>, visited 2000/1/12.
    Holderness, M. (1998). “Who are the world`s information-poor?” In Brain, D. L. (ed.), Cyberspace Divide: Equality: Agency and Policy in the Information Society, New York: Routledge, pp.35-56.
    Holtz, S. (1998). Public Relations on the Net: Winning Strategies to Inform and Influence the Media, the Investment Community, the Government, the Public, and More, pp.26-143. NY: AMA.
    Homas G. C. (1974). Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms, revised edn. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York.
    Horton, T. (1983, June). “Rumors: a corporate communication crisis,” Security Management, p.21.
    Hovland, C. I. & Weiss, W. (1951). “The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 15, pp.633-650.
    Hovland, C. & Mandell, W. (1952). “An experimental comparison of conclusion-drawing by the communicator and by the audience.” Journal of Abcdrmal and Social Psychology, 47, pp.581-588.
    Iyer, E. S. & Debevec K., (1991). “Origin of rumor and tone of message in rumor quelling strategies.” Psychology & Marketing, 8(3), pp.161-175.
    Jaeger, M. E., Anthony, S., & Rosnow, R. L. (1980). “Who hears what from whom and with what effect: A study of rumor.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6, pp.473-478.
    Jung, C. G. (1922). “A contribution to the psychology of rumor.” In Collected Papers on Analytic Psychology, 2nd ed. London: Barlliere, Tindall & Cox.
    Kamins, M. A., Folkes, V. S., & Perner L. (1997). “Consumer responses to rumors: good news, bad news.” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 6(2), pp.165-187.
    Kapferer, J. N. (1990). “Rumeurs.” Rumors: Uses, Interpretations, and Images. New Brunswick (U.S.A): Transaction Publishers.
    Katz, E. & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1955). Personal Influence, Free Press, Glencoe, IL.
    Katz, E. (1957). “The two-step flow of communication: An up-to-date report of a hypothesis.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 21, pp.61-78. Also in W. Schramm (ed.)(1960), Mass Communications. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
    Kaye, B.K. (1998). “Uses and gratification of the world wide web: From couch potato to web potato.” The New Jersey Journal of Communication, 6(1), pp.21-40.
    Kennedy, G. A. (1991). Aristotle on Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse. Oxford University Press, New York.
    Kent, M. L. & Taylor, M. (1998, Fall). “Building dialogic relationships through the world wide web.” Public Relations Review, pp.321-334.
    Kim, S. (2001/01). “E-mail survey response rates: A review”, JCMC, 6(2), available at: http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol6/issue2/sheehaqn.html.
    Kimmel, A. J. & Keefer, R. (1989). Psychological correlates of the acceptance and transmission of rumors about AIDS, unpublished manuscript, Fitchburg State College, Department of Behavioral Science, Fitchburg, MA.
    Knapp, R. (1944). “A psychology of rumor.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 8(1), pp.22-37.
    Knopf, T. A. (1975). Rumor, Race and Riot, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
    Koenig, F. (1985). Rumor in the Marketplace, Auburn House, Dover, MA.
    Koller, M. (1992). “Rumor rebuttal in the marketplace.” Journal of Economic Psychology, 13, pp.167-186.
    Landberg, T. (1986). Electric Bulletin Boards, WA: U.S. Department of Commerce.
    Lasswell, H.D. (1948). “The structure and function of communication in society.” In Bryson, (ed.), The Communication of Ideas, New York: Haper and Brothers.
    Larson, C. U. (1995). Persuasion: Reception and Responsibility, 7th edn. Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.
    Larson, O. N. (1954). “Rumors in a disaster.” Journal of Communication, 4, pp.111-123.
    Lemos, A. (1996). “The labyrinth of minitel.” In Shields, R (ed.), Cultures of Internet Virtual Spaces, Real Storied, Real History, Living Bodies, Sage Publications, Ltd., UKL London. pp.33-48.
    Lerner, A. (1980). “Orientation to ambiguity.” In Fiddle, S. (eds.), Uncertainty: Behavioral and Social Dimensions, pp.43-58. Praeger, New York.
    Levin, J. & Arluke, A. (1985). “An exploratory analysis of sex differences in gossip.” Sex Roles, 12, pp.281-286.
    Lifton, P. D. (1985). “Individual differences in moral development: the relation of sex, gender, and personality to morality.” In Stewart, A. J. & Lykes, M. B. (eds.), Gender and Personality, pp.218-246. Duke University Press, Durham, NC.
    Lustig, M. W. & Cassotta, L. L. (1992). “Comparing group communication across cultures: leadership, conformity, and discussion processes.” In Cathcart, R. S. & Samovar, L. A. (eds.), Small Group Communication: A Reader, 6th edn, pp.393-404. Wm. C. Brown, Dubuque, IA.
    Maccoby, E. E. & Jacklin, C. N. (1974). The Psychology of Sex Differences, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
    Markus, M. L. (1994). “Electronic mail as the medium of managerial choice.” Organization Science, 5, pp.502-527.
    Marx, W. (1995, April 17). “PR joins the interactive parade.” Interactive section, Advertising Age, p.15.
    Masson, R.O. (1986). “Four ethical issues of the information age.” MISQ, pp.5-12.
    McGregor, D. (1938). “The major determinants of the prediction of social events.” Journal of Abcdrmal and Social Psychology, 33, pp.179-204.
    McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man, New York: Signet Paperback.
    McLuhan, E. & Zingrone, F. (1994). Essential McLuhan, New York: Basic Books.
    McQuail, D. and Windahl S. (1993). Communication Models for the Study of Mass Communications, 2nd ed., Longman.
    McQuail, D. (1994). Mass Communication Theory: An Introduction, 3rd. London: Sage.
    Melody, W. (1985). “The Information Society: Unveiling Some Contradictions.” Media, Culture and Society, 7, p.3.
    Melody, W. (1990). “Communication policy in the global information economy.” In Ferguson, M., (ed.), Public Communication: the New Imperatives, pp.16-39. London: Sage.
    Melody, W. (1994). “Electronic network, social relations and the changing structure of knowledge.” In Crowley & Mitchell (eds.), Communication Theory Today, pp.254-273. Stanford, Cal.: Stanford University Press.
    Merton, R. K. (1957). Social Theory and Social Structure, Free Press, Glencoe, IL.
    Meyer, P. (1995, Oct.-Dec.). “Taking advantage of the web.” Business & Economic Review, pp.25-27.
    Meyer, S. P. (1985). Gossip, New York, Alfred Knopf.
    Meyrowitz, J. (1985). No Sense of Place: The Impact of Electronic Media on Social Behavior, New York: Oxford University Press.
    Mishra, J. M. (1990). “Managing the grapevine.” Public Personnel Management, 19(2), pp.213-228.
    Morris, M. & Organ, C. (1996). “The Internet as mass medium.” Journal of Communication, 46, pp.39-50.
    Newcomb, T. M. (1969). “Impersonal balance.” In Abelson, R. P., Aronson, E., McGuire, W. J., Newcomb, T. M., Rosenberg, M. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (eds.), Theories of Cognitive Consistency: A Source Book, pp.28-51. Rand McNally, Chicago.
    Newhagen, J., & Levy, R. M. (1998). The Future of Journalism in a Distributed Communication Architecture. The Electronic Grapevine, Rumor, Reputation, and Reporting in the New On-Line Environment, edited by Diane L. Borden and Kerric Harvey.
    Newhagen, J., & Nass, C. (1989). “Differential criteria for evaluating credibility of newspapers and TV news.” Journalism Quarterly. 66(2), pp.277-284.
    Newhagen, J. E., & Rafaeli, H. (1996). “Why communication research should study the internet: A dialogue.” Journal of Communication, 46, pp.4-13.
    Nilles, J. M. (1982). Exploring the World of the Personal Computer, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
    Nkpa, N. K. U. (1977). “Rumors of mass poisoning in Biafra.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 41, pp.332-346.
    O’Keffe, D. J. (1992). Persuasion: Theory and Research, Newbury Park: Safe.
    Ogan, C. (1993). “Listserver communication during the Gulf War: What kind of medium is the electronic bulletin board.” Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 37(2), pp.177-196.
    Ogniagova, E. (1997). Audience Processing of News and Advertising in Computer-Mediated Environments: Effects of the Content Provider’s Perceived Credibility and Identity. Doctor Dissertation. The University of Missouri-Columbia.
    Pendleton, S. C. (1998). “Rumor research revisited and expanded.” Language & Communication, 18, pp.69-86.
    Peterson, W. & Gist, N., (1995). “Rumor and public opinion.” American Journal of Sociology, 57, pp.159-167.
    Petty, R. E. & Cacioppo, J. T. (1981). Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches, Wm. C. Brown, Dubuque, IA.
    Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Schumann, D. (1983). “Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: The moderating role of involvement.” Journal of Consumer Research, 10(September), pp.135-146.
    Pool, I. De Sola. (1983). Technologies of Freedom, Harvard. MA: Belknap Press.
    Rammert, W. (1993). Technik aus Soziologischer Perspektive, Westdeutscher Verlag.
    Reck, H. U. (1996). “Inszenierte imagination - zu programmatik und perspektiven einer historischen anthropologie der medien.” In: Mulller-Funk, Wolfgang & Reck, Hans Ulrich (Hg.) (1996), Inszenierte Imagination - Beitrage zu einer Historischen Anthropologie der Medien. Springer.
    Reid, E. M. (1991). Electropolis: Communication and Community on Internet Relay Chat, Electronic document.
    Rice, R. E. (1989). “Issues and concepts in research on computer-mediated communication system.” In Anderson, J.A. (eds.), Communication Yearbook, 12, pp.436-476, Newbury Park, C.A: Sage.
    Rice, R. E. & Bair, J. H. (1984). “New organizational media and productivity.” In Rice, R. E. (ed.), The New Media: Communication, Research, and Technology, pp.185-215, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
    Rich C. (1999). Creating Online Media: A Guide to Research, Writing and Design on the Internet. Dubuque: McGraw-Hill College.
    Rogers, E. M. (1976). “Communication and development: the passing of the dominant paradigm.” Communication Research, 3, pp.213-40.
    Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of Innovations, 3rd. ed. New York: Free Press.
    Rogers, E. M. (1986). Communication Technology: The New Media in Society, NY:Free Press.
    Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations, 4th ed. Free Press, New York.
    Rogers, E. M. & Others. (1982). The Diffusion of Home Computers: An Exploratory Study, CA;Stanford U.
    Rosengren, K. (1971). Diffusion of News. Bereds.kapsnamnden for Psykologiskt Forsvar, Stockholm, Sweden.
    Rosenthal, R. & Rosnow, R. L. (1991). Essentials of Behavioral Research: Methods and Data Analysis, New York: McGraw-Hill.
    Rosnow, R. L. (1974). “On rumor.” Journal of Communication, 24, pp.26-38.
    Rosnow, R. L. (1980). “Psychology of rumor reconsidered.” Psychological Bulletin, 87, pp.578-591.
    Rosnow, R. L. (1981). Paradigms in Transition: The Methodology of Social Inquiry, New York: Oxford University Press.
    Rosnow, R. L. (1988). “Rumor as communication: a contextual approach.” Journal of Communication, 38, pp.1-17.
    Rosnow, R. L. (1991). “Inside rumor: A personal journey.” American Psychologist, 46(5), pp.484-496.
    Rosnow, R. L. & Fine, G. A. (1974, August). “Inside rumors.” Human Behavior, pp.64-68.
    Rosnow, R. L. & Fine, G. A. (1976). Rumor and Gossip: The Social Psychology of Hearsay, New York: Elsevier North-Holland.
    Rosnow, R. L. & Kimmel, A. J. (1979, June). “Lives of a rumor.” Psychology Today, pp.88-92.
    Rosnow, R. L., Esposito, J. L., & Gibney, L., (1988). “Factors influencing rumor spreading: Replication and extension.” Language & Communication, 8(1), pp.29-42.
    Rosnow, R. L., Yost, J. H., & Esposito, J. L. (1986). “Belief in rumor and likelihood of rumor transmission.” Language and Communication, 6, pp.189-194.
    Rothbaum, F., Weisz, J. R., & Syder, S. S. (1982). “Changing the world and changing the self: a two-process model of perceived control.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, pp.5-37.
    Rowan, R. (1979). “Where did that rumor come from?” Fortune, 100, August 13.
    Scanlon, T. J. (1977). “Post-disaster rumor chains: A case study.” Mass Emergencies, 2, pp.121-126.
    Schachter, S. & Burdick, H. (1955). “A field experiment on rumor transmission.” Journal of Abcdrmal and Social Psychology, 50, pp.363-371.
    Schachter, S. and Burdick, H. (1966). “A field experiment on rumor transmission and distortion.” In Alfred G. Smith’s Communication and Culture, pp.294-308. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
    Schiffman, L. G., & Kanuk, L. L. (2000). Consumer Behavior, 7th ed. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
    Seligman, M. E. (1975). Helplessness: On Depression, Development and Death, Freeman, San Francisco.
    Semin, G. R., & Manstead, A. S. R. (1983). The Accountability of Conduct, Academic Press, New York.
    Shannon, C. & Weaver, W. (1949). The Mathematical Theory of Communication, Urbana: University of Illinois press.
    Severin, W. J. (1988). Communication Theories, 2nd edition. New York: Longman, p.41.
    Shibutani T. (1966). Improvised News: A Sociological Study of Rumor, Indianapolis, Bobbs Merril.
    Shiha, D. (1952). “Behaviour in a catastrophic situation: A psychological study of reports and rumours.” British Journal of Psychology, 43, pp.200-209.
    Shimanoff, S. B. & Jenkins, M. M. (1992). “Leadership and gender: challenging assumptions and recognizing resources.” In Cathart, R. S. & Samovar, L. A. (eds.), Small group communication: A Reader, 6th edn, pp.504-522. Wm. C. Brown, Dubuque, IA.
    Simon, H. (1982). The Computer Age, Washington, D.C.: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Educational Research and Improvement.
    Slater, D. M., & Router, D. (1996). “How message evaluation and source attributes may influence credibility assessment and belief change.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 73(4), pp.974-991.
    Smelser, N. (1963). Theory of Collective Behavior, New York: Free Press.
    Spataro, M. (1998, August). “Net relations: A fusion of direct marketing and public relations.” Direct Marketing, 61(4), pp.16-19.
    Spielberger, C. D. (1971). “Anxiety as an emotional state.” In Spielberger, C. D. (ed.), Anxiety: Current Trends in Theory and Research, Vol. 1, Academic Press, New York.
    Sproull, L. & Kiesler, S. (1991). Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization, the MIT Press.
    Stein, H. F. (1980). “Wars and rumors of wars: a psychohistorical study of medical culture.” Journal of Psycho-history, 7, pp.379-401.
    Stern, B. (1902). Zur Psychologie der Aussage, Berlin: J. Guttentag.
    Steuer, J. (1992). "Defining virtual reality: dimensions determining telepresence." Journal of Communication, 42(4), pp.73-93.
    Sundar, S. S. (1998). “Effect of source attribution on perception of online news stories.” Journal of Mass Communication Quarterly, 75(1), pp.55-68.
    Swartz, T. A. (1984). “Relationship between source expertise and source similarity in an advertising context.” Journal of Advertising, 13, pp.49-55.
    Taylor, J. A. (1953). “A personality scale of manifest anxiety.” Journal of Abcdrmal and Social Psychology, 48, pp.285-290.
    Tesser, A. & Rosen, S. (1975). “The reluctance to transmit bad news.” In Berkowitz, L. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, (Vol. 7), pp.193-232. San Diego, CA: Academic.
    TRAP, Inc. (1985). Consumer Complaint Behavior in America: An Update Study, Washington, DC: United States Office of Consumer Affairs.
    Turkle, S. (1995). The Second Self: Identity in the Age of the Internet, New York: Simon & Schuster.
    Tybout, A. M., Calder, B. J., & Stemthal, B. (1981). “Using information processing theory to design marketing strategies.” Journal of Marketing Research, 18, pp.73-79.
    Vitalari, N. P. & Venkatesh, A. (1988). The Social Impact of Computing in the Home, Irvine, CA:University of California-Irvine.
    Vitalari, N. P., Venkatesh, A., & Gronhaug, K. (1985). “Computing in the home: Shifts in the time allocation patterns of household.” Communication of the AC, pp.512-522.
    Walker, C. J. & Beckerle, C. A. (1987). “The effect of anxiety on rumor transmission.” Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 2, pp.353-360.
    Walker, C. J. & Blaine, B. (1991). “The virulence of dread rumors: A field experiment.” Language & Communication, 11(4), pp.291-297.
    Whitehead, J. L. (1968). “Factors of source credibility.” Quarterly Journal of Speech, 54, pp.59-63.
    Winner, L. (1986). “Technology as forms of life.” In Winner, The Whale and the Reactor - A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology, pp.19-39.University of Chicago Press, Chicago, S.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    企業管理研究所
    88355021
    91
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0088355021
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[企業管理學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    35502101.pdf80KbAdobe PDF21165View/Open
    35502102.pdf131KbAdobe PDF21122View/Open
    35502103.pdf83KbAdobe PDF21077View/Open
    35502104.pdf180KbAdobe PDF22998View/Open
    35502105.pdf117KbAdobe PDF21070View/Open
    35502106.pdf122KbAdobe PDF21253View/Open
    35502107.pdf274KbAdobe PDF21667View/Open
    35502108.pdf653KbAdobe PDF27994View/Open
    35502109.pdf450KbAdobe PDF21617View/Open
    35502110.pdf418KbAdobe PDF21248View/Open
    35502111.pdf434KbAdobe PDF21209View/Open
    35502112.pdf392KbAdobe PDF21608View/Open
    35502113.pdf258KbAdobe PDF21747View/Open
    35502114.pdf192KbAdobe PDF21015View/Open
    35502115.pdf176KbAdobe PDF21132View/Open
    35502116.pdf325KbAdobe PDF21010View/Open
    35502117.pdf202KbAdobe PDF2953View/Open
    35502118.pdf174KbAdobe PDF21057View/Open
    35502119.pdf199KbAdobe PDF21153View/Open
    35502120.pdf317KbAdobe PDF21523View/Open
    35502121.pdf191KbAdobe PDF21318View/Open
    35502122.pdf219KbAdobe PDF2938View/Open
    35502123.pdf127KbAdobe PDF21082View/Open
    35502124.pdf219KbAdobe PDF2930View/Open
    35502125.pdf138KbAdobe PDF2901View/Open
    35502126.pdf91KbAdobe PDF2822View/Open
    35502127.pdf86KbAdobe PDF2886View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback