English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 110411/141324 (78%)
Visitors : 46982037      Online Users : 973
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 企業管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/34944
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34944


    Title: 以聯合分析法探討消費者對忠誠方案屬性之偏好
    Authors: 沈佳穎
    Contributors: 張愛華
    沈佳穎
    Keywords: 忠誠方案
    品牌忠誠
    品牌信任
    品牌承諾
    Date: 2003
    Issue Date: 2009-09-18 13:23:26 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 由於今日顧客的忠誠度極易發生動搖,加上失去顧客的代價遠大於獲得顧客的代價,因此,企業如何與顧客建立與維持良好的關係,獲得顧客的信任、承諾,最終獲得顧客的品牌忠誠,則成為企業刻不容緩的重要課題。本研究的重點將放在能夠獲得消費者「行為忠誠」的忠誠方案上,以行動電話系統商續約方案的型式呈現,透過聯合分析法來找出消費者在選擇忠誠方案時所考量因素的優先順序。本研究主要在探討不同的顧客特徵如關係導向、人口統計變數、使用頻率對忠誠方案的選擇如何造成影響。不同的顧客在選擇忠誠方案時,各要素的偏好順序有何差異,並進而影響到最終的方案選擇。本研究之忠誠方案乃根據O’Brien and Jones所提出的忠誠方案要素加以設計;除了現金價值(Cash value)、選擇的空間(Choice of redemption options)情感價值(Aspirational value)、相關性(Relevance)之外,本研究另外加入「會員資格」作為欲探討的要素之一。本研究所獲得的實證結果如下:
    1. 顧客關係導向區隔之實證結果:交易型:金錢價值>年約>選擇空間>享樂價值>會員資格
    B. 關係型:年約>金錢價值>會員資格>選擇空間>享樂價值
    2.人口統計變數與使用頻率區隔之實證結果
    A. 女性、30-40歲、從事商業/服務業、重度使用者、高收入的消費者均重視「年約」勝過於「金錢價值」。
    B. 除了關係型以及從事商業/服務業的消費者以外,其他區隔方式中的消費者,都將「會員資格」視為最不重要的屬性。
    3.以重視之屬性為區隔之實證結果
    A. 學生、低收入、輕度使用以及交易導向的消費者重視「金錢價值」勝於「年約」,而非學生、高收入、重度使用以及關係導向則較重視「年約」。
    B. 在「享樂價值」以及「選擇空間」兩群中,人口特徵相類似,只是在「享樂價值」群中的男性較多,而在「選擇空間」群中的多為女性。

    關鍵字:忠誠方案、品牌忠誠、品牌信任、品牌承諾
    The unsteadiness of customer loyalty and the huge expense of losing a existing customer have made it an important issue to build up and maintain the good relationship with customers, to earn the trust, commitment, and brand loyalty ultimately. Therefore, this research will focus on the loyalty program which can improve the customers’ “behavioral loyalty”. First, this research will use the extending program provided by mobile phone system company as the loyalty program. Second, use the conjoint analysis to figure out customers’ preference toward the factor of loyalty program.
    This research confer the effect of different customer trait (relationship oriented, demographic statistics, the frequency of using the mobile phone) makes toward the preference of loyalty program, since different customers will have different preference for factors while choosing the loyalty program. The loyalty programs in this research are designed according to the research of O’Brien and Jones. In addition to the four composing factors from O’Brien and Jones: cash value, choice of redemption options, aspirational value, relevance, this research will add the” membership” into the factors to design the loyalty program.

    The practical results of this research are as following.
    1. Relationship-oriented as the segmentation:
    A. Low relationship-oriented customers:
    cash value> relevance>choice of redemption options> aspirational value> membership
    B. High relationship-oriented customers:
    relevance> cash value> membership> choice of redemption options> aspiration value

    2. Demographic statistics and frequency of using the mobile phone as the segmentation:
    A. Female, age30-40, working in business/ service industry, heavy user, high salary customers prefer relevance to cash value.
    B. Except for the customers who are high relationship-oriented and working in the business/ service industry, other segment of customers consider the membership as least important factors.

    3. Preference for factors as the segmentation:
    A. Student, low salary, light user and low relationship-oriented customers prefer cash value to relevance. Non-student, high salary, heavy user and high relationship-oriented prefer relevance.
    B. In the segment of “aspirational value” and “choice of redemption options”, the customer traits are similar, the only difference is that there are more men in the “aspirational value” then in the other, and the majority is women in the segment of “choice of redemption options.”

    Key word: loyalty program, brand loyalty, brand trust, brand commitment
    Reference: 中文部分
    1. 王又鵬、吳佳純(民90年),購物網站之隱私權政策、聲譽與信任對消費者購物意圖之研究,交大管理學報,p.169
    2. 田芝穎(民87年),行動電話門號產品屬性最佳化設計--以聯合分析法為例,政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    3. 吳兆益(民71年),聯合分析法在果汁消費者知覺與偏好上之應用研究,政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    4. 邱瓊慧(民91年),顧客利益與顧客行為關聯性之研究—以航空業為例,東吳大學企業管理研究所碩士論文
    5. 徐士雯(民89年),關係行銷結合方式與顧客行為意向關聯性之研究—關係型與交易型傾向之分析,銘傳大學國際企業管理研究所碩士論文
    6. 黃俊英(民89年),多變量分析,第七版,台北:中國經濟企業研究所。
    7. 鍾惠萍(民91年),品牌情感、品牌信任對品牌忠誠度影響之研究—以信用卡產業為例,實踐大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    英文部分
    1. Aaker, D. A. (1991), Managing brand equity, New York : The Free Press.
    2. Anderson, James C. & James A. Narus (1991), “Partnering as A Focused Market Strategy,” California Management Review, 33 (Spring), 95-114.
    3. Bennett, Rebekah & Rundle-Thiele , Sharyn(2002), “A comparison of attitudinal loyalty measurement approaches”, Brand Management,9 (3), 193-209.
    4. Berry, L. L. (1995), “Relationship Marketing of Services- Growing Interest,
    5. Bhote, Keki R. (1996), Beyond Customer Satisfaction to Customer Loyalty-The Key to Greater Profitibility. American Management Association(pp.31). New York
    6. Cattin, Philippe, & Wittink , Dick R(1982), "Commercial Use of Conjoint Analysis: A Survey," Journal of Marketing, 46 (Summer)
    7. Chaudhuri,Arjun & Holbrook , Morris B(2001),” The chain of effects from brand trust and brand affect to brand performance: The role of brand loyalty”, Journal of Marketing,v65 (2),81-93
    8. Delgado-Ballester ,Elena & Munuera- Aleman, J. L., “Brand trust in the context of consumer loyalty,” European journal of marketing, Vol. 35, 1238-1258.
    9. Dick, Alan S & Basu, Kunal (1994),“Customer loyalty : Toward an integrated conceptual framework” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,v22(2), 99-113
    10. Doney, Patricia M. & Cannon, Joseph P. (1997),“An Examination of the Nature of Trust in Buyer-Seller Relationships,”Journal of Marketing, 61(2), 35-51.
    11. Dwyer, F. R., Schurr ,P. H. & Oh,S.(1987), “Developing Buyer-Seller Relationships,” Journal of Marketing, 51(2), 11-27.
    12. Garbarino, Ellen & Johnson,Mark S.(1999),“The Different Roles of Satisfaction, Trust, And Commitment in Customer Relationships,” Journal of Marketing , 70-87.
    13. Green, P.E., & Srinivasan, V. (1978),”Conjoint analysis in consumer research: Issues and outlook,” Journal of Consumer Research,5(2),103-123.
    14. Green, Paul E. & Wind, Yoram (1973), Multiattribute decisions in marketing: a measurement approach, Hinsdale, Ill.: Dryden Press.
    15. Gronroos, Christian (1990),“Relationship Approach to Marketing in Service Contexts: The Marketing and Organizational Behavior Interface,” Journal of Business Research , 20 (Jan), 3-12.
    16. Gronroos, Christian (1991), “The Marketing Strategy Continuum: Towards a Marketing Concept for the 1990s,” Management Decision, 29, 7-13.
    17. Gronroos, Christian (1994), “From Marketing Mix to Relationship Marketing: Towards a Paradigm Shift in Marketing,” Management Decision, 32 (2), 4-20.
    18. Hagerty, M.R.(1985), "Improving the Predictive Power of Conjoint Analysis: The Use of Factor Analysis and Cluster Analysis," Journal of Marketing Research, 22 (May), 168-184.
    19. Hair, Joseph F., Anderson, Rolph E., Tatham, Ronald L.& Black, William C., Multivariate data analysis, 5th Ed.Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, Inc.
    20. Heskett, J. L., W. Earl Sasser, Jr., & C.W. Hart (1989), Service Breakthrough. New York: The Free Press.
    21. Holbrook, M.B.(1981), "Integrating Compositional and Decompositional Analyses to Represent the Intervening Role of Perceptions in Evaluative Judgements," Journal of Marketing Research, 18,(February),13-28.
    22. Jackson,Bund, Barbara (1985), Winning and Keeping Industrial Customers:The Dynamics of Customer Relationships. Lexington, MA:D.C. Heath and Company.
    23. Jacoby, Jacob, R. W.Chestnut(1978), Brand loyalty : measurement and management, New York : John Wiley
    24. James H McAlexander, John W Schouten, Harold F Koening, “Building brand community,” Journal of Marketing, 66(1), 38-54.
    25. Kotler, P. (1992), Marketing’s New Paradigm : What’s really happening out there, (pp.51-52) ,Planning Review
    26. .Kotler, P.(1997), Marketing Management: Analysis Planning Implementation and Control,9 th ed., Upper Saddle River, N. J: Prentice-Hall.
    27. Malhotra, N. K. (1982),"Structural Reliability and Stability of Nonparametric Conjoint Analysis," Journal of Marketing Research, 19 (May), 199-207.
    28. Mayer, R.C., Davis, J.H. & Schoorman, F.D.(1995),"An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust, "Academy of Mnangement Review, 20 (3)
    29. Mayer, R.C., Davis, J.H. & Schoorman, F.D.(1995), "An Integrative Mode of Organizational Trust." Academy of Mnangement Review, 20 (3)
    30. Money, Arthur, David Tromp, & Trevor Wegner (1988), "The Quantification of Decision Support Benefits Within the Context of Value Analysis", MIS Quarterly, June
    31. Montgomery, D. B. & Wittink, D. R. (1980),“The Predictive Validity of Conjoint Analysis for Alternative Aggregation Schemes,” Market Measurement and Analysis, pp.298-309. Cambridge. MA:Marketing Science Institute.
    32. Moore, W.L. (1980), "Levels of aggregation in conjoint analysis: An empirical comparison," Journal of Marketing Research,177, 516-523.
    33. Moorman, C., Deshpand ,R. & Zaltman, G.(1992),"Relationships Between Providers and Users of Marketing Research: The Dynamics of Trust Within and Between Organizations," Journal of Marketing Research, Vol 29, 314-329.
    34. Nunally, J. C. (1978), Psychometric Theory, NY: McGraw-Hill.
    35. O’Brien, Louise & Jones, Charles (1995),”Do rewards really create loyalty?” Harvard Business Review, 73(3),75-82
    36. Oliver, Richard L (1997), Satisfaction: A Behavioral Perspective on the Consumer. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
    37. Pierre, Chandon, Brian, Wansin & Gilles, Laurent (1998),” Hedonic and Utilitarian Benefits of Sales Promotions,” Centre for Marketing Working Paper, 98-203 (December)
    38. Raphel, Murray (1995),“The art of direct marketing: Upgrading prospects to advocates,” Direct Marketing, 58(2), 34-38.
    39. Reichheld, F. F. & W. Earl Sasser, Jr. (1990), “Zero Defections: Quality Comes to Services,” Harvard Business Review, 68 (5), 105-111.
    40. Reinartz, Werner J& Kumar, V.(2000),”On the profitability of long-life customers in a noncontractual setting: An empirical investigation and implications for marketing,”Journal of Marketing,64 (4),17-35
    41. Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998),”Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust,” Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393-404.
    42. Shoemaker, Stowe & Lewis Robert C.(1999),“Customer loyalty: the future of hospitality marketing.” International Journal of Hospital Management, 345-370.
    43. Singh, Jagdip & Sirdeshmukh, Deepak(2000),”Agency and Trust Mechanisms in Consumer Satisfaction and Loyalty Judgements,”, Journal of Academy of Marketing Science ,150-167.
    44. Sitkin, S. B. & Roth, N. L (1993),”Explaining the Limited Effectiveness of Legalistic “Remedies” for Trust/Distrust,” Organizational Science, 4(3), 367-392.
    45. Stum, David L & Alain Thiry (1991), “Building Customer Loyalty,” Training and Development Journal,Vol. 45, 34-36.
    46. Zucker, L.G.(1986), "Production of Trust: Institutional Sources of Economic Structure, " Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol.8, 53-111.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    企業管理研究所
    90355020
    92
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0090355020
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[企業管理學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    35502001.pdf142KbAdobe PDF21675View/Open
    35502002.pdf160KbAdobe PDF210582View/Open
    35502003.pdf313KbAdobe PDF23583View/Open
    35502004.pdf919KbAdobe PDF21416View/Open
    35502005.pdf163KbAdobe PDF21082View/Open
    35502006.pdf28KbAdobe PDF2931View/Open
    35502007.pdf93KbAdobe PDF2976View/Open
    35502008.pdf35KbAdobe PDF2965View/Open
    35502009.pdf81KbAdobe PDF2894View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback