English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 20 |  Items with full text/Total items : 90058/119991 (75%)
Visitors : 24133110      Online Users : 1846
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 文學院 > 哲學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/53526
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/53526

    Title: 不可說的在言噤聲:藍騰的反色情論證
    Unspeakable Illocutionary Silencing :Langton’s Free Speech Argument Against Pornography
    Authors: 鄭光明
    Cheng, Kuang-Ming
    Contributors: 政大哲學系
    Keywords: 色情權利;說話做行論;麥肯能;藍騰;不可說的在言噤聲
    a right to pornography;speech-act theory;Catharine MacKinnon;Rae Langton;unspeakable illocutionary silencing
    Date: 2009-03
    Issue Date: 2012-09-04 10:42:11 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 色情刊物會使得婦女遭到「噤聲」的命運,因而侵害了婦女的言論自由嗎?對此,女性主義者麥肯能的回答是肯定的,而許多自由主義者的回答則是否定的,甚至認為這個主張非常荒謬。為此,藍騰特別援引英國語言哲學家奧斯丁的說話做行論,並主張:色情刊物之所以侵害了婦女的言論自由,其原因在於色情刊物使得婦女「不能拿話做事」,而這等於使得婦女的言論不能出現在言論自由市場中。本文將主張:藍騰的主張會課以說話者和聽者太多義務;為此,我們必須主張一種對聽者不要求任何「最低限度接收度」的言論自由觀,以避免上述問題。
    Famous anti-pornography feminists, Catharine MacKinnon and Rae Langton believe that pornography harms women in a very spe-cial and serious way: by silencing them or violating their civil right to freedom of speech. Langton believes that an analysis of the con-cept of speech acts shows that pornography silences women’s voices. Therefore, pornography destroys political liberty and should not be allowed. Pornography may thus make potential speech acts un-speakable for women, not by preventing them from producing or distributing sounds and scrawls, but by preventing women from do-ing things with their words. In what follows, I will argue that Lang-ton’s view would impose a burdensome range of duties on individu-als. This suggests that there are some powerful liberal reasons for thinking that the right to free speech should not include any mini-mal receptiveness requirement on the part of audiences.
    Relation: 歐美研究, 39(1), 169-224
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[哲學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    123778970813.pdf590KbAdobe PDF1131View/Open

    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    社群 sharing

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback