English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 110180/141115 (78%)
Visitors : 46603779      Online Users : 1026
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 文學院 > 哲學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/53529


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/53529


    Title: 婦女遭到臣屬誰之過：維塔論色情刊物之責任
    Who Should Be Responsible for the Subordination of Women? Vadas’s Feinbergian Analysis of Pornography
    Authors: 鄭光明
    Cheng, Kuang-Ming
    Contributors: 政大哲學系
    Keywords: 范伯格的責任理論;傷害三條件;維塔;性常規優先性;臣屬
    Date: 2012-08
    Issue Date: 2012-09-04 11:10:13 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 反色情的分析哲學家維塔 (Melinda Vadas) 曾主張「臣屬不可抹滅」(the indelibility of subordination) 如下：在現有常規中製造、散播以「描繪婦女遭到臣屬」為內容的色情刊物會使得婦女遭到臣屬，這是無法抹滅的事實。維塔更援引當代法哲學家范伯格 (Joel Feinberg) 的責任理論，證明製造、散播色情刊物必須為婦女遭到臣屬負責，從而主張有充分理由查禁色情刊物。本文將檢驗上開主張是否能夠成立。本文將指出：如果維塔要由范伯格的責任理論導出「限制色情刊物」此一結論，她就必須假定「性常規優先性」；然則我們可以利用兩個歸謬論證證明「性常規優先性」無法成立，可見維塔的
    主張並不能成立。
    Feminist writer Melinda Vadas attempts an original defense of the view that pornography is itself the subordination based on sex which differentially harms women. In order to argue that women`s being treated as a subordinated class is directly and relevantly related to producing or disseminating pornography, she draws the distinction between that which may and may not be imputed to the agents of faulty actions from Joel Feinberg`s theory of responsibility. In this paper, I will argue that Vadas may not recognize that the causal relevance for pornography and women`s being treated as a subordinated class exists only in our practice of sexuality; in order to go beyond this, she has to utilize the principle of the priority of the practice of sexuality. But we have yet to be given any reason for supposing that the principle of the priority of the practice of sexuality is tenable. Consequently we have as yet no reason to accept Vadas`s account of the wrongness of producing or disseminating pornography.
    Relation: 東吳哲學學報, 26, 1-40
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[哲學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    no.26Kuang-Ming Cheng.pdf735KbAdobe PDF21370View/Open


    View Licence

    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback