English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 110180/141115 (78%)
Visitors : 46598349      Online Users : 481
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/54887


    Title: 臺北捷運公私部門聯合開發制度之研究
    A study on the institution of Taipei MRT public-private joint development
    Authors: 蕭淑君
    Contributors: 成之約
    蕭淑君
    Keywords: 治理
    公私協力
    聯合開發
    資源共用
    權力互賴
    Governance
    Public-Private Partnerships
    Joint Development
    Resource Dependence
    interdependence of power
    Date: 2011
    Issue Date: 2012-10-30 14:17:00 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 隨著社會與環境的快速變遷,政府傳統的單一權力控制模式已經無法有效解決公共問題與滿足民眾需求,因此世界各國政府改造趨勢多以治理取代過去由上而下的統治與管理思維,並且尋求政府體制以外的非政府夥伴加入公共事務管理與公共服務產出的行列,而公私協力治理模式之運作更是廣受學界與實務工作者的關注與重視。
    本研究試以臺北捷運聯合開發制度檢視我國公私協力之運作執行,透過文獻分析與深度訪談,萃取相關學者與實務工作者的參與經驗,探討我國公私部門在捷運聯合開發之協力過程中所產生之限制與問題。
    研究發現我國捷運聯合開發過程中的公私夥伴關係僅建立在制式化的契約基礎上,並無法有效回應開發作業所呈現的複雜動態變化,同時合作雙方也缺乏具體的協商機制與行為共識,因此本研究建議我國政府在政策規劃與設計階段必須將各行動者的參與動機和參與目的納入考量,同時在政策執行過程中,雙方亦須透過協商互動來確保彼此的合作意願,透過資源共用和權力互賴而完善我國捷運聯合開發之公私協力治理模式。
    With the social and environment rapid change, the traditional authority has been not solved the public problem. Hence, every country toward the governance to replace the top-down and seek for non-governments to be public administrators. Therefore, the Public-Private Partnerships is popular for scholar and practice workers.
    This study aims to review the Taipei Mass Rapid Transit(MRT) System with the respect of Public-Private Partnerships. We will discuss the Public-Private Partnerships’ limits and problem in MRT joint developments through the references and deep interview, gaining the experience from the scholars and practices workers.
    This study finds out that the Public-Private Partnerships in MRT joint development process are basic on the contracts. It could not respond efficiency the complex dynamic and both sides lack negotiation systems and arrangement at the same time. Consequence, the study suggests that the country have to consider the motivation and purpose from actors in the process of policy formulation. At the same time, both side have to ensure cooperation willing through the negotiation and to achieve the perfect Public-Private Partnerships through the resource dependence and interdependence of power in the MRT joint development.
    Reference: 一、中文部分
    卜正珉,2003,《公共關係:政府公共議題決策管理》,臺北:揚智出版社。
    王文宇,2007,〈行政判斷與BOT法制—以ETC案及京站案為例〉,《月旦法學雜 誌》,第142期,頁5-36。
    朱正帆,1994,〈都市計畫及建築管理相關法令與聯合開發之互動關係〉,《捷運技術期刊》,第10期,頁60-70。
    朱鎮明、曾冠球,2010,《行政院各部會綜合規劃司處職能與運作之研究》,台灣公共治理研究中心。
    江岷欽,1997,〈企業型政府之理論與實務〉,《人力發展》,第41期,頁4-16。
    江岷欽、劉坤億,1999,《企業型政府》,臺北:智勝。
    江岷欽,2001,〈行政效率的比較觀〉,《新世紀的行政理論與實務-張潤書教授榮退紀念論文集》,頁231-249,臺北:三民。
    杜文苓、陳致中,2007,〈民眾參與公共決策的反思:以竹科宜蘭基地設置為例〉,《臺灣民主季刊》,第4卷第3期,頁33-62。
    李宗勳,2002,《政府業務委外經營的理論與實務》,臺北:智勝。
    李長晏,2009,〈協力治理觀的都會治理能力建構:一個分析架構的提出〉,《府際關係研究通訊》,第6期,頁7-12。
    李述德,2006,《如何推動民間參與公共建設》,臺北市政府財政局。
    林水波,1999,《政府再造》,臺北:智勝。
    林淑馨,2005,〈日本型公私協力之析探:以第三部門與PFI為例〉,《公共行政學報》,第16期,頁1-31。
    林鍾沂,2001,《行政學》,臺北:三民書局。
    林勳杰,2004,〈臺北捷運聯合開發-回顧與創新〉,《捷運技術期刊》,第30期,頁103-110。
    吳英明,1996,《公私部門協力關係之研究:兼論都市發展與公私部門聯合開發》,高雄:復文圖書公司。
    吳瓊恩,2001,《行政學》,臺北:三民書局。
    邱祺龍,2004,〈聯合開發之初探-以政策執行面為中心〉,《臺北市土地開發專題》,頁447-460,臺北:臺北市政府地政處。
    范玫芳,2008,〈科技、民主與公民身份:安坑灰渣掩埋場設置爭議之個案研究〉,《台灣政治學刊》,第12卷第1期,頁185-228。
    許立一,1999,〈後現代主義與公共行政:理論與實務的反思〉,《行政暨政策學報》,第1期,頁219-256。
    常岐德,2007,〈以捷運聯合開發帶動都會新風貌〉,《捷運技術半年刊》,第36 期,頁25-30。
    孫本初,2006,《新公共管理》,臺北:一品文化。
    詹中原,1998,〈國家競爭力與企業精神政府〉,《研考月刊》,第22卷第4期,頁6-18。
    曾冠球,2011,〈協力治理觀點下公共管理者的挑戰與能力建立〉,《文官制度季刊》,第3卷第1期,頁27-52。
    曾冠球、黃偉誠,2011,〈公共管理者對於公私合夥風險的認知:調查與反思〉, 《公共行政學報》,第41期,頁1-36。
    馮正民,1991,〈郊區線捷運系統對都會區發展型態之衝擊〉,《都市交通》,第60期,頁6-9。
    張千帆,2008,〈主權與分權—中央與地方關係的基本理論〉,《中研院法學期刊》,第3期,頁56-112。
    張偉斌、曹奮平,1996,〈捷運聯合開發對土地所有人之投資效益分析〉,《台灣土地金融季刊》,第33卷,第2期,頁41。
    劉坤億,2003,〈英國柴契爾政府改革背景與理念的探索〉,《行政暨政策學報》,第36期,頁81-118。
    劉長功、李宜春,2007,〈擴權強縣與政府層級管理體制創新〉,《中國行政管理》,第4期,頁19-21。
    陳恆鈞,2008,〈協力網絡治理之優點與罩門〉,《研習論壇》,第92期,頁40-54。
    陳敦源、張世傑,2010,〈公私協力夥伴關係的弔詭〉,《文官制度季刊》,第2卷第3期,頁17-71。
    趙永茂,1997,《中央與地方權限劃分的理論與實際》,臺北:翰蘆。
    蕭全政,1998,〈企業家精神與新政府運動〉,《政治科學論叢》,第9期,頁363-384。
    蔡茂寅,2006,《地方自治之理論與地方制度法》,臺北:新學林。
    二、西文部分
    Allison, G. T. 1999, Public and Private Management: Are They Fundamentally Alike inAll Unimportant Respects? In F. S. Lane (Ed.), Current Issues in Public Administration (6th) (pp.14-29), Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s.
    Ansell, C., & A. Gash,. 2008, Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice., Journalof Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4): 543-571.
    Beder, H.,1984, Realizing the Potential of Interorganizational Cooperation., San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
    Borins, S., 2000, New public management, North American style. In: McLaughlin, K., Osborne, S. P. & Ferlie, E. (Eds.), The New Public Management: Current Trends and Future Prospects. UK:Routledge.
    Bovaird, T. 2004, Public-Private Partnerships: From Contested Concepts to Prevalent Practice., International Review of Administrative Sciences, 70(2): 199-215.
    Clinton, W. 1993, Remarks and a Questions-and-Answer Session on the National Performance Review in Houston, Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents, 29(37):17-32.
    Cullen, R.B., 1987, Business, Government and Change:Managing Transition in the Public and Private Sectors, Australian Journal of Public Administration, 6(1):10-19.
    Daley, D. M., 2008, Interdisciplinary Problems and Agency Boundaries: Exploring Effective Cross-Agency Collaboration., Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19: 477-493.
    Denhardt, R. B. & J. S. Denhardt. 2003, The New Public Service: Serving , not Steering, NY: M. E. Sharpe Hood, C. C.
    Downs, Anthony. 1967, Inside Bureaucracy. Boston: Little Brown.
    Goldsmith, Stephen & Eggers, D. William, 2004, Governing by network The new shape of the public sector, Washington, DC: Brookings.
    Grimsey, D., & M. K. Lewis., 2004, Public-private partnerships: The worldwide revolution in infrastructure provision and project finance. Northampton, Mass.: Edward Elgar.
    Hodge, G. A., & C. Greve , 2007, Public- Private Partnerships: An International Performance Review. Public Administration Review, 67(3): 545-558.
    Hood, C. 1991, A public management for all seasons, Public Administration, 69(1): 3-19.
    Jessop, B. 1998, The rise of governance and the risk of failure: the case of economic development, International Social Science Journal, 155:29-45.
    Johnston, J., & S. P. Gudergan, 2007, Governance of Public-Private Partnerships: Lessons Learnt from an Australian Case? International Review of Administrative Sciences, 73 (4): 569-582.
    Kettl, Donald F. 2002, The Transformation of Governance: Public Administration for Twenty-First Century America, The Johns Hopkins University Press.
    Kettl, Donald F. 2005, The Global Public Management Revolution(2rd)., DC: Brookings.
    Klijn, E.-H., & G. R. Teisman , 2003, Institutional and Strategic Barriers to Public- Private Partnerships: An Analysis of Dutch Cases., Public Money & Management, 23(3): 137-147.
    Knott, J. , 1993, Comparing Public and Private Management: Basic Management Functions and External Constraints, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 3:93-119.
    Lane, Jan-Erik. 2000, New Public Management. London: Routledge.
    Lynn, L. Jr., C. Heinrich, and C. Hill. 2000, Studying Governance and Public Management: Why? How?” In Lynn, Laurence, Jr., C. Heinrich, and C. Hill(ed.), Governance and Performance: New Perspective. (pp.1-33) DC: Georgetown University Press.
    Noble, G., & R. Jones, 2006, The Role of Boundary-Spanning Managers in the Establishment of Public-Private Partnerships., Public Administration, 84(4):891-917.
    Osborne, D. and Gaebler, T. 1992, Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. New York: Plume.
    Rainey, H. G. and Bozeman, B., 2000, Comparing Public and Private Organizations: Empirical Research and the Power of the A Priori, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10:447-469.
    Ring, P. S., & A. H. Van De Ven , 1994, Developmental Processes of Cooperative Interorganizational Relationships, Academy of Management Review, 19 (1): 90-118.
    Teisman, G. R., & E. H. Klijn, 2002, Partnerships Arrangement: Governmental Rhetoricor Government Scheme, Public Administration Review, 62 (2): 197-205.
    Weissert, C. S., 2001, Reluctant Partners: The Role of Preferences, Incentives, and Monitoring in Program Compliance, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11(4): 435-453.
    Wettenhall, R., 2003, The Rhetoric and Reality of Public-Private Partnerships, Public Organization Review, 3(1): 77-107.
    Williamson, O., 1999, Public and Private Bureaucracies: A Transaction Cost Economics Perspectives, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 15:306-342.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    行政管理碩士學程
    94921008
    100
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094921008
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[行政管理碩士學程(MEPA)] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2183View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback