English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 110944/141864 (78%)
Visitors : 47843859      Online Users : 1195
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/60167


    Title: 漢語親子對話中母親控制行為
    Maternal control acts in mandarin mother-child conversation
    Authors: 蔡雨倫
    Tsai, Yu Lun
    Contributors: 黃瓊之
    Huang, Chiung Chih
    蔡雨倫
    Tsai, Yu Lun
    Keywords: 控制行為
    指令
    禁止
    句法直接性
    語意修飾
    內容
    control acts
    directives
    prohibitions
    syntactic directness
    semantic modification
    content
    Date: 2009
    Issue Date: 2013-09-04 16:33:39 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本篇研究目的在於藉由分析句法直接性(syntactic directness)、語意修飾(semantic modification)以及內容 (content)來探討漢語母親規範語中的控制行為(control acts),也就是指令(directives)和禁止(prohibitions)。語料來自一名以漢語為母語的母親與兒童之間的日常對話。研究結果顯示,指令隨著兒童年紀增長而遞減,而禁止卻隨著兒童年紀增長而遞增。句法直接性分析結果發現,不論指令或是禁止的情況下,漢語母親常使用祈使句(imperative)的句式。語意修飾方面結果發現,漢語母親主要是採用未修飾(bald)以及縮小(minimization)。內容方面顯示,指令常使用在從事能力活動(competent action),而禁止常使用在得體行為(appropriate behavior)和自立(caretaking)。
    The purpose of this study is to investigate Mandarin maternal control acts including the directives and prohibitions in maternal regulatory language by analyzing syntactic directness, semantic modification, and content. The data collected were natural conversations of one Mandarin-speaking mother-child dyad. The data of maternal regulatory language was analyzed when the child’s ages were 2;1, 2;7, 3;1, and 3;7. The results show that the frequency of directives decreases with the child’s age, but the frequency of prohibitions increases. In addition, the preferred sentence type is imperative in both directives and prohibitions. The child’s cognitive development and the culture factors which would determine the style of regulatory language used by the Mandarin mother are discussed. Furthermore, the results of semantic modification reveal that bald and minimization are two dominant modifications. The mother’s adoption of bald and minimization may be influenced by her power status and politeness. Two major kinds of semantic combinations are also discovered in this study. Finally, the results of contents show that competent action often occurs in directives. As for prohibitions, appropriate behavior and caretaking are most related. Our finding would shed some light on the Mandarin maternal regulatory language.
    Reference: Aronsson, K., & Thorell, M. (1999). Family politics in children’s play directives. Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 25-47.
    Barber, B. K. (1996). Parental psychological control: Revisiting a neglected construct. Child Development, 67(6), 3296-3319.
    Baumrind, D. (1971). Current patterns of parental authority. Developmental Psychology Monograph, 4(1), 1-130.
    Baumrind, D. (1991). The influence of parenting style on adolescent competence and substance use. Journal of Early Adolescence, 11(1), 56-95.
    Baumrind, D., & Black, A. E. (1967). Socialization practices associated with dimensions of competence in preschool boys and girls. Child Development, 38, 291-327.
    Bellinger, D. (1979). Changes in the explicitness of mothers’ directives as children age. Journal of Child Language, 6, 443-458.
    Blum-Kulka, S. (1989). Playing it safe: The role of conventionality in indirectness. In S. Blum-Kulka, J. House & G. Kasper (Eds.), Cross-cultural pragmatics: Request and apologies (pp. 37-70). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., & Kasper, G. (1989). Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    Blum-Kulka, S. (1990). You don’t touch lettuce with your fingers: Parental politeness in family discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 14, 259-288.
    Bond, M. H., Wan, K., Leung, K., & Giacalone, R. A. (1985). How are responses to verbal insult related to cultural collectivism and power distance? Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 16 (1), 111-127.
    Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Cheah, C. S. L., & Rubin, K. H. (2003). European American and Mainland Chinese mothers’socialization beliefs regarding preschoolers’ social skills. Parenting:
    Science and Practice, 3, 1-22.
    Chen, G. M., & Chung, J. (1994). The impact of Confucianism on organizational communication. Communication Quarterly, 41, 93-105.
    Culpeper, J. (1996). Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics, 25, 349-367.
    Damon, W. (2006). Socialization and individuation. In G. Handel (Ed.), Childhood socialization (2th ed., pp. 3-10). New Brunswick, NJ; London: Aldine Transaction.
    Darling, N. (1999). Parenting style and its correlates. Eric Digest, EDO-PS-99-3.
    Dorfman, P. W., & Howell, J. P. (1988). Dimensions of national culture and effective leadership patterns: Hofstede revisited, Advances in International Comparative Management, 3, 127-150.
    Dubin, E. R., & Dubin, R. (1963). The authority inception period in socialization. Child Development, 34, 885-898.
    Dunn, J. (1988). The beginnings of social understanding. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Ervin-Tripp, S. M. (1976). Is Sybil there? The structure of some American English directives. Language in Society, 5, 25-66.
    Ervin-Tripp, S. M. (1977). Wait for me, roller skate. In S. Ervin-Tripp, & C. Mitchell-Kernan (Eds.), Child discourse (pp. 165-188). New York: Academic Press.
    Ervin-Tripp, S. M. (1988). Control exchange code. Berkeley: University of California, Institute of Cognitive Studies.
    Ervin-Tripp, S. M., Guo, J., & Lampert, M. (1990). Politeness and persuasion in children’s control acts. Journal of Pragmatics, 14, 195-219.
    Forbes, G., Zhang, X., Doroszewicz, K., & Haas, K. (2009). Relationships between individualism-collectivism, gender, and direct or indirect Aggression: A study in China, Poland, and the U.S. Aggressive Behavior, 35, 24–30.
    Fukushima, S. (2000). Request and culture: Politeness in British English and Japanese. Berlin: Peter Lang.
    Gao, H. (1999). Features of request strategies in Chinese. Lund Universality, Dept. of Linguistics. Working Papers, 47, 73-86.
    Garvey, C. (1975). Requests and responses in children’s speech. Journal of Child Language, 2, 41-63.
    Gleason, J. B. (1988). Language and socialization. In F. S. Kessel (Ed.), The development of language and language researchers: Essays in honor of roger Brown. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Gleason, J. B., Ely, R., Perlmann, R. Y., & Narasimhan, B. (1996). Patterns of prohibition in parent-child discourse. In D. I. Slobin, J. Gerhardt, A. Kyratzis & J. Guo (Eds.), Social interaction, social context, and language: Essays in honor of Susan Ervin-Tripp (pp. 205-217). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Gralinski, J. H., & Kopp, C. B. (1993). Everyday rules for behavior: Mothers’requests to young children.Developmental Psychology, 29, 573-584.
    Halle, T., & Shatz, M. (1994). Mothers’ social regulatory language to young children in family settings. First Language, 14, 83-104.
    Hays, J., Power, T. G., & Olvera, N. (2001). Effects of maternal socialization strategies on children’s nutrition knowledge and behavior. Applied Developmental Psychology, 22, 421-437.
    Hetherington, E. M., & Parke, R. D. (1975). Child psychology: A contemporary viewpoint. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    Hoffman, M. L. (1977). Moral internalization: Current theory and research. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10, pp.85-133). New York: Academic Press.
    Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture`s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
    Hofstede, G., & Bond, M. H. (1988). The Confucius connection: From cultural roots to economic growth. Organizational Dynamics, 16(4), 4–21.
    Hong, W. (1998). Request patterns in Chinese and German: A cross-cultural study. Munich: Lincom Europa.
    Huitt, W., & Hummel, J. (2003). Piaget`s theory of cognitive development. Educational Psychology Interactive. Valdosta, GA: Valdosta State University. Retrieved April 20, 2010 from http://www.edpsycinteractive.org/topics/cogsys/piaget.html
    James, S. L. (1978). Effects of listener age and situation on the politeness of children`s directives. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 7, 307-317.
    Junefelt, K., & Tulviste, T. (1997). Regulation and praise in American, Estonian, and Swedish mother-child interaction. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 4 (1), 24-33.
    Kuczynski, L., Kochanska, G., Radke-Yarrow, M., & Girnius-Brown, O. (1987). A developmental interpretation of young children’s noncompliance. Developmental Psychology, 23(6), 799-806.
    Kuczynski, L., & Kochanska, G. (1990). Development of children’s noncompliance strategies from toddlerhood to age 5. Developmental Psychology, 26 (3), 398-408.
    Kuczynski, L., & Kochanska, G. (1995). Function and content of maternal demands: Developmental significance of early demands for competent action. Child Development, 66, 616- 628.
    Lakoff, R. (1973). The logic of politeness; or, minding your p’s and q’s. Chicago Linguistic Society, 9, 292-305.
    Lampert, M. D., & Ervin-Tripp, S. M. (1993). Structured coding for the study of language and social interaction. In J. A. Edwards, & M. D. Lampert (Eds.), Talking data: Transcription and coding in discourse research (pp. 169-206). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Lytton, H. (1980). Parent-child interaction: The socialization process observed in twin and singleton families. New York: Plenum.
    Maccoby, E. E. (1980). Social development: Psychological growth and the parent-child relationship. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
    Maccoby, E. E., & Martin, J. A. (1983). Socialization in the context of the family: Parent-child interaction. In E. M. Hetherington (Vol. Ed.), & P. H. Mussen (Series Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 4. Socialization, personality, and social development (4th ed., pp. 1-101). New York: Wiley.
    McDonald, L., & Pien, D. (1982). Mother conversational behaviour as a function of interactional intent. Journal of Child Language, 9, 337-358.
    McLaughlin, B., Schutz, C., & White, D. (1980). Parental speech to five-year-old children in a game-playing situation. Child Developmental, 51, 580-582.
    McLaughlin, B. (1983). Child compliance to parental control techniques. Developmental Psychology, 19(5), 667-673.
    Minton, C., Kagan, J., & LeVine, J. A. (1971). Maternal control and obedience in the two-year-old. Child Development, 42, 1873-1894.
    Newport, E.L., Gleitman, H., & Gleitman, L. R. (1977). Mother, I`d rather do it myself: Some effects and non-effects of maternal speech style. In C. E. Snow, & C. A. Ferguson (Eds.), Talking to Children: Language input and acquisition (pp. 109-149). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    Olsen-Fulero, L. (1982). Style and stability in mother conversational behaviour: A study of individual differences. Journal of Child Language, 9, 543-564.
    Perry, D. G., & Perry, L. C. (1983). Social learning, causal attribution, and moral internalization. In J. Bisanz, G. L. Bisanz & R. Kail (Eds.), Learning in
    children: Progress in cognitive development research (pp. 105-136). New York: Springer-Verlag.
    Power, T. G., & Manire, S. H. (1992). Child rearing and internalization: A developmental perspective. In: J. Janssens, & J. Gerris (Eds.), Child rearing: Influence on prosocial and moral development (pp. 101-123). Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.
    Rosen, M. (1989). Piagetian theory and cognitive therapy. In: A. Freeman, K.M. Simon, L.E. Beutler & H. Arkowitz (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of cognitive therapy (pp. 189–212). New York: Plenum Press.
    Rue, Y., & Zhang, G. (2008). Requests strategies: A comparative study in Mandarin Chinese and Korean. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    Sachs , J. (1980). The role of adult-child play in language development. In K. Rubin (Ed.), Children’s play. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Schaffer, H. R. (2006). The mutuality of parental control in early childhood. In G. Handel (Ed.), Childhood socialization (2th ed., pp. 45-64). New Brunswick, NJ; London: Aldine Transaction.
    Schaffer, H. R., & Crook, C. K. (1979). Maternal control techniques in a directed play situation. Child Development, 50, 989-998.
    Schaffer, H. R., & Crook, C. K. (1980). Child compliance and maternal control techniques. Developmental Psychology, 16(1), 54-61.
    Schneiderman, M. H. (1983). “Do what I mean, not what I say!” Changes in mothers’ action-directives to young children. Journal of Child Language, 10, 357-367.
    Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. (1981). Narrative, literacy, and face in interethnic communication. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    Searle, J. R. (1975). Indirect speech acts. In P. Cole, & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Vol. 3. Speech acts (pp. 59-82). New York: Academic Press.
    Searle, J. R. (1976). A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society, 5, 1-23.
    Shatz, M. (1978). Children’s comprehension of their mothers’ question-directives. Journal of Child Language, 5, 39-46.
    Shatz, M. (1994). A toddler’s life: Becoming a person. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Snow, C., Perlmann, R., Gleason, J., & Hooshyar, N. (1990). Developmental perspectives on politeness: Sources of children’s knowledge. Journal of Pragmatics, 14, 289-305.
    Triandis, H. C. (1993). Collectivism and individualism as cultural syndromes. Cross-Cultural Research, 27, 155-180.
    Triandis, H. C. (1994). Culture and Social behaviour. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    Triandis, H. C., McCusker, C., & Hui, C. H. (1990). Multimethod probes of individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(5), 1006-1020.
    Tulviste, T. (1995). Mothers’ regulation of their two-year-olds’ behavior in two settings. In: K. Junefelt (Ed.), Activity theory. Proceedings of the XIVth
    Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics and the VIIIth Conference of Nordic and General Linguistics, August 16-21, 1993. Gothenburg Papers in Theoretic Linguistics 73. Göteborg: Göteborg University Press, 127-137.
    Tulviste, T., & Raudsepp, M. (1997). The conversational style of Estonian mothers. First Language, 17, 151–63.
    Wertsch, J. V. (1979). From social interaction to higher psychological processes: A clarification and application of Vygotsky’s theory. Human Development, 22, 1-22.
    Yu, C. L. (2004). Infixing with a vengeance: Pingding Mandarin infixation. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 13, 39-58.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    語言學研究所
    96555002
    98
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096555002
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Graduate Institute of Linguistics] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    500201.pdf434KbAdobe PDF2451View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback