English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 112721/143689 (78%)
造訪人次 : 49611922      線上人數 : 771
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/62598


    題名: 批判的主體與主體的批判:知識分子的反抗與共謀
    其他題名: Critical Subjectivity and Critique of Subjectivity: Intellectual Resistance and Compliance
    作者: 楊小濱
    Yang, Xiao-Bin
    貢獻者: 台文所
    關鍵詞: 批判主體性;台灣知識分子;政治權力中心;現代主義;國族主義
    critical subjectivity;Taiwan intellectual;political power center;modernism;nationalism
    日期: 2007-12
    上傳時間: 2013-12-17 14:49:55 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 當代台灣知識分子是一個矛盾而曖昧的群體。本文旨在探討他們如何在對權力中心的抵抗或依附的關係中建立某種主體性幻覺。令人困惑的問題包括:為什麼在台灣無畏反對獨裁的異議知識分子(比如陳映真和李敖)對大陸的另一個強權卻充滿友善甚至諂媚?本文剖析以陳映真為代表的現代知識分子型左派和以李敖為代表的前現代文人式自由主義,如何由於他們的美學保守主義而缺乏批判的全面性和複雜性,並認同了某種同質化的理念模式。本文試圖說明,自足的批判主體只可能是被「大他者」的符號秩序所規定和俘獲的幻覺主體。本文進一步討論了經由美學現代主義訓練的知識分子(比如龍應台和陳芳明)是否,或在多大程度上,有可能將多元、雜糅與反諷帶入文化政治思考,最終將批判的主體與主體的批判結合到一種異質立場的文化政治話語中。
    Contemporary Taiwan intellectuals appear to be full of contradictions and ambiguities. This paper investigates how they establish an illusion of subjectivity in their resistant or compliant relationship with the central power. The puzzling questions include: Why do dissident intellectuals, such as Chen Ying-Zhen and Li Ao, offer friendship or even flattery to another hegemonic power in China? The paper analyzes how modern intellectual leftists, represented by Chen Ying-Zhen, and premodern-style liberal literati, represented by Li Ao, both abhorring literary modernism, lack critical complexities and aspire to homogeneous ideals, due to their aesthetic conservatism. The paper attempts to demonstrate that the presumably self-sufficient critical subject is doomed to be an illusory subject stipulated and captured by the symbolic order of the Lacanian big Other. The paper continues to discuss whether, or to what extent, such intellectuals as Lung Ying-Tai and Chen Fang-Ming, who have been trained in aesthetic modernism, may bring pluralized, hybridized and ironized subjectivity into culturo-political thinking, and combine the critical subject and the subjective (self-) critique into a culturo-political discourse with heterogeneous positions.
    關聯: 台灣文學學報, 11, 1-20
    Bulletin of Taiwanese literature, 11, 1-20
    資料類型: article
    顯示於類別:[臺灣文學學報 THCI Core] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    120.pdf978KbAdobe PDF21729檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋