English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 112721/143689 (78%)
Visitors : 49600326      Online Users : 503
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/65135


    Title: 美國金融改革著政治分析─管制與革新─
    Other Titles: The Politics of US Financial Reform in the 1990s
    Authors: 蔡增家
    Tsai, Tzeng-Jia
    Contributors: 政大政治系
    Keywords: 美國聯邦準備體系;公開市場委員會;通貨監理官;聯邦存款保險公司;聯邦住宅貸款銀行理事會;全國信用組合管理局
    United States;Financial Reform;Politics;Glass-Steagall Act
    Date: 2000-06
    Issue Date: 2014-04-01 17:20:40 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 當東亞各國歷經一九九七年亞洲金融風暴而正在商議如何對流動性資本進行管制的同時，就在去〈一九九九〉年十一月，美國參、眾兩院正式通過金融業現代化法案，正式廢除長達六十六年的格拉斯─史帝格法案，徹底打破銀行、證券與保險業務的藩籬，可見在面對資本國際化與金融合併蔚為風潮的情況下，連美國都不得不採取綜合銀行政策來提高金融機構的國際競爭力。本文認為，當金融業務越趨於多元化、國家對於金融體系的管制就越困難，因此在金融自由化的浪潮下，國家如何在管制與改革下尋求金融穩定與效率的最適點便成本文探討的焦點。本文主要論點是：一個穩定的金融機構必須擁有健全的金融監督制度，先有健全的監督制度才能夠在進一步提生金融自由化與競爭力，換句話說，當國家在進行金融自由化的同時應該也要對於金融監督體系進行再管制，但是監督體系卻常常會受到政治力量的干預，因而影響到金融體系的穩定。因此，本文將以一九八O年之後美國金融監督體系的管制改革為例證，分析其背後的政治意涵。本文將從政府、企業與銀行三邊關係的角度切入，分析國會與利益團體的互動關係對金融監督體系改革的影響，並舉出一九九O年之後美國國內對格拉斯─史帝格法案存廢的爭辯，來驗證本文的論點。
    In November 1999, when East Asian countries collectively contemplated methods to control international capital movements, the United States Congress abolished the Glass-Steagall Act that had tightly restricted capital movement among the banking, security, and insurance sectors. Under the pressure of financial liberalization and company mergers, the United States adopted such a universal banking policy in order to promote the international competitiveness of her financial institutions. However, tension between financial liberalization and stability is unavoidable. The critical factor in preventing financial liberalization from leading to uncontrollable instability is the establishment of an effective monitoring system over capital flows. Political forces representing different interests and ideologies heavily influence the establishment of such a monitoring system, however. This paper analyzes the interaction of political forces – the government, legislators, banks, and businesses – in the process of abolishing the Glass-Steagall Act.
    Relation: 問題與研究, 39(6), 75-98
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[問題與研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    75-98.pdf1738KbAdobe PDF2793View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback