Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/65748
|
| Title: | 社會企業的經營模式-以里仁事業股份有限公司為例
The business model of social enterprises- Case study of Lee-Zen company |
| Authors: | 吳宜蓉
Wu, Yi Jung |
| Contributors: | 黃秉德
Huang, Ping Der
吳宜蓉
Wu, Yi Jung |
| Keywords: | 有機農業
社會企業
組織文化
經營模式
關鍵成功因素
社會資本
三重盈餘
organic agriculture
social enterprise
organizational culture
business model
key success factor
social capital
triple bottom lines |
| Date: | 2013 |
| Issue Date: | 2014-05-01 15:17:39 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 商業上的大趨勢（megatrend）一直是學者專家所研究的對象，因為它影響著企業如何競爭與為消費者創造價值。近年來，由於全球化與新興經濟體所帶來的環境衝擊與自然資源的競爭，迫使商業開始出現本質上的改變。本研究以里仁公司為例，深入研究日益蓬勃發展的社會企業如何因運時勢而生，及其如何運用獨特的經營模式來為消費者以及農友創造價值，以達到經濟、社會與環境的三重盈餘。
本研究採用文獻回顧分析結合非結構式的訪談，與里仁公司的總經理、公關部進行數十小時的溝通與意見交流，以分析歸納出里仁公司的經營模式與關鍵成功因素。里仁公司的成立目的是推廣台灣的有機農業與慈心食品 ，讓消費者有健康的飲食，提升台灣農民的競爭力同時保育環境。里仁公司為佛教徒所創立，其研習的經典「菩提道次第廣論」為組織的思想與價值觀，指導著組織上下的行為法則，形塑出強勢的企業文化。因此相較於一般企業，里仁公司的組織成員目標與組織目標整合程度較高，而由此衍生出來的成功關鍵有三，一為宗教背景帶來的組織整合能力，二為慈心事業利用社會資本所創造的綜效帶來供應鏈的緊密關係，三為里仁公司的創新與研發能力。
里仁公司的成功，有賴於高度的組織認同與組織獨特經營模式的相輔相成，對於里仁公司而言，能夠落實佛法才是事業的意義。因此在面臨市場需求大的組織成長壓力，里仁公司仍堅定步伐讓員工慢慢從佛法內化學習起，因其不以利益擴張為考量，即便組織成長趨緩可能會影響獲取規模經濟的優勢。從經營模式來看，社會資本的大量運用與模式中各個環結串連的流暢性是里仁模式成功的關鍵，慈心事業的各組織分別在供應鏈上扮演著資源的媒合者來把上游供應商、消費者與里仁公司緊緊串連，供應商與消費者亦同時成為組織社會資本的一部分，帶入更多的人來認識里仁與新的消費力量。
里仁公司藉由提供有機與慈心食品給消費者，同時幫助台灣的農民在走向外銷之路上更具有競爭力，盈餘則贊助兩個股東基金會的生命成長營隊、校園蔬食及種樹護地球等讓促進社會健康與改善環境的活動。目前台灣有機農業已逐漸發展成熟，里仁公司已開始邁向新的策略—結合環境保育與有機農業，期望能讓台灣重要的環境保育區、集水區上游有乾淨的水質與土壤，並利用環境保育商標來凝聚消費者對這塊土地的重視。
對於此經營模式如何複製與擴充，作者認為整合經營模式中利害關係人需求間的交換機制以及善用經營模式的可複製元素是成功關鍵。在個案公司的例子中是將佛家以人為本的普世價值形成強組織文化，將供應商、消費者的需求與供給能夠透過組織力量的媒合進行更有效率的交換。強組織文化在此種商業模式的應用上不可或缺，其為累積社會資本的一大關鍵。另外則是運用社會資本產生一回饋系統。
Business megatrend has always been an important research target, as it influences on how enterprises compete and create value for their customers. In recnt years, globalization and emerging economies bring environmental impact and competition for natural resources, forcing fundamental and persistant shift in how companies compete. In this research, Leesen Company is used as a case of a social enterprise to illustrate how it creates and utilizes social capital to grow and sustain its business, which provides a reference for social entrepreneurs and researchers to develop new business model that achieves the so called triple bottom lines.
Systematic paper review combined with 26 hours of low-structured interview with CEO and director of public relations in Leezen Company, this study aims to summarize and analyze the business model and key success factors. Leezen Company is built for promoting organic agriculture and non-toxic food, trying to make healthy food available for all consumers in Taiwan.
Founded by a Buddhist, Leezen company is guided by the Buddhist Sutra “Lamrim Chenmo”, which deeply influences employees’ thoughts and core value. This, in tern, results in higher integration of goals between organization and employees compared to other organization. Key success factors are as follows: Highly coordinated and integrated coporate culture formed through buddsim generates great synergy in supply chain of Tzu-Xin conglomerates, where Leezen Company belongs to, and gains great trust from consumers. Also, the innovation and R&D in food technology created by its persistence in doing the right thing strengthens its competitive advantage in in organic argiculture and non-toxic food.
Through providing organic and non-toxic food, Leezen Company creates a healthier environment for consumers and bolsters competitiveness of Taiwanese farmers to sale argicultural product abroad. Revenue goes to sponsor various activities that benefit our mind, health and environment of two shareholder foundations. As the organic industry become more mature these days, Leezen Company starts to adopt a new strategy of combining environmental protection and organic agriculture, expecting to replace traditional agriculture in conseravation aeras and upstream reservoirs. Also, it develops an environmental protection trademark for food grown in those areas, trying to arouse the awareness of more people.
The key to replicate and expand this business model lies in how the organization can integrate and exchange its stakeholders’ needs, also how it can make good use of its replicable factors in the business model. In this case, Buddhism shapes strong organizational culture, which increases the efficiency of mediating the needs between suppliers and customers, accumulating its social capital. Further, social capital creates feedback system which makes the business model self-sufficient. |
| Reference: | 英文部分
1. Afuah, A. & C. L. Tucci (2001). Internet business models and strategies: Text and cases. McGraw-Hill, New York.
2. Andrews, K. R. (1951). Executive training by the case method. Harvard Business Review, 29(5):58-70.
3. Barros, C. P. & F. Nunes (2008). Social capital in non-profit organizations: A multi-disciplinary perspective. Journal of Socio-Economics, 37:1554-1569.
4. Brandenburger, A. M. & H. W. Stuart (1996). Value-based business strategy. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 5(1):5-24.
5. Brehm, V. M. (2001). Promoting effective north-south ngo partnerships: A comparative study of 10 european ngos. Occasional paper series (INTRAC (Great Britain)) , no. 35. Oxford.
6. Brewer, P. C. & T. W. Speh (2001). Adapting the balanced scorecard to supply chain management. Supply chain management review, 2(5):48-56.
7. Casadesus-Masanell, R. & Ricart, J. E. (2010). From strategy to business models and onto tactics. Long Range Planning, 43:195-215.
8. Cattanach, R. E., J. M. Holdreith, D.P. Reinke & L. K. Sibik (1995). The Handbook of Environmentally Conscious Manufacturing: From Design and Production to Labeling and Recycling. Irwin, Chicago, USA.
9. Chell, E. (2007). Social enterprise and entrepreneurship. International Small Business Journal, 25:5-26.
10. Dees, J. G. (1998). Enterprising nonprofit. Harvard business review, 76(1):55-67.
11. Defourny, J. (2001). From third sector to social enterprise. In The Emergence of Social Enterprise, Borzaga, C. and Defourny, J., (eds.), Routledge, London, 1-28.
12. Denison, D. (1990). Corporate culture and organizational effectiveness. Wiley series on organizational assessment and change. Oxford, England: John Wiley & Sons, xvii:267.
13. Emerson, J. (2000). The nature of returns: A social capital markets inquiry into the elements of investment and the blended value proposition.
14. EMES (2004). Work integration social enterprises in the european union: An overview of existing models.
15. Flamholtz, E. G. & R. Yvonne (2011). Corporate culture: The ultimate strategic asset. Stanford university press.
16. Gay,L.R.(1992). Educational research：Competencies for analysis and application. New York:Merrill.
17. Giesen, E., S. J. Berman, R. Bell, & A. Blitz (2007). Three ways to successfully
innovate your business model. Strategy and Leadership, 35:27-33.
18. Green, K., B. Morton, & S. New (1998). Green purchasing and supply policies: Do they improve companies’ environmental performance? An International Journal, 3:89-95.
19. Gordon, G. G., N. Ditomaso (1992). Predicting corporate performance from organizational culture. Journal of Management Studies, 29:783-798.
20. Gunasekaran, A., C. Patel & R.E. McGaughey (2004), A framework for supply
chain performance measurement. International Journal of Production
Economics, 87(3):333-47.
21. Hamel, G., Y. L. Doz & C. K. Prahalad (1989). Collaborate with your competitors--and win. Harvard Business Review, 67(1):133-139.
22. Hervani, A. A., M. M. Helms & J. Sarkis (2005). Performance measurement for green supply chain management. An International Journal, 12(4):330 - 353.
23. Green, K. W., P. J. Zelbst, J. Meacham, & V. S. Bhadauria (2012). Green supply chain management practices: Impact on performance. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17( 3): 290 – 305.
24. Kelley, T. A. (2009). Law and choice of entity on the social enterprise frontier, University of North Carolina. Law and Choice of Entity on the Social Enterprise Frontier, 84 (337):339–45.
25. Kerlin, J. A. (2006). Social enterprise in the United States and Europe: Understanding and learning from the differences. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 17:246-262.
26. Kerr, J., Jr. Slocum, & W. John (1987). Managing Corporate Culture through Reward Systems. Academy of Management, 1:99
27. Kingma, B. R. (1997). Public good theories of the non-profit sector: Weisbrod revisited. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 8:135-148.
28. Kleindorfer, P. R., Y. Wind, & R. E. Gunther (2009). The network challenge: Strategy, profit, and risk in an interlinked world. 288-304.
29. Kotter, J. P. & J. L. Heskett (1992) Corporate culture and performance.
30. Magretta, J. (2002). Why business models matter. Harvard Business Review, 80(5):86-92.
31. Mohiddin, A. (1998). Partnership: A new buzzword or realistic relationship? Journal of the Society for International Development, 41(1):5-12.
32. Mason, C., J. Kirkbride, D. Bryde (2007). From stakeholders to institutions: The changing face of social enterprise governance theory. Management Decision, 45:284-301.
33. Nelson, J. & B. Jenkins. (2006). Investing in social innovation: Harnessing the potential for partnership between corporations and social entrepreneurs. Corporate Social Responsibility Initiative Working Paper No.20. Cambridge MA: John F. Kennedy School of Government. Harvard University.
34. OECD (1999). Social enterprise. OECD.
35. Marguerite Mendell & Rocío Nogales. (2008). Social enterprises in OECD Member Countries: What are the financial streams? Mendell, Marguerite; Nogales, Rocio.
36. Posner B. Z., J. M. Kouzes & W. H. Schmidt (1985). Shared values make a
difference: An empirical test of corporate culture. Human Resource Management, 24:293-309.
37. Poter, M. E., M. R. Kramer (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1-2):62-77.
38. Poter, M. E., M. R. Kramer (2006). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84 (12): 78-92.
39. Pratt, K.M. (1997). Environmental standards could govern trade.
Transportation and Distribution, 38:68-76.
40. Rashid, Md. Z. A., M. Sambasivan, & J. Johari (2003). The influence of
corporate culture and organisational commitment on performance. Journal of Management Development, 22:708-728.
41. Richardson, J. (2008). The business model: An integrative framework for strategy execution. Strategic Change, 17:133-144.
42. Ridley-Duff, R. (2008). Social enterprise as a socially rational business. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 14:291-312.
43. Sagawa S., & E. Seqal (2000). Common interest, common good: Creating value through business and social sector partnerships. Harvard business school press.
44. Sarkis, J. (2003). A strategic decision framework for green supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 11(4):397-409.
45. Scofield, A. M. (1986). Organic farming - the origin of the name. Biological Agriculture and Horticulture, 4:1-5.
46. Seelos, C., J. Mair. (2007). Profitable business models and market creation in the context of deep poverty: A strategic view. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(4):49-63.
47. Seitanidi, M., D. Koufopoulos, & P. Palmer (2010). Partnership formation for change: Indicators for transformative potential in cross sector social partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 94:139-161.
48. Seitanidi, M. M. (2008). Adaptive responsibilities: Non-linear interactions across social sectors. Cases from cross sector partnerships, Brunel University, 51-64.
49. Sorensen, J. B. (2002). The strength of corporate culture and the reliability of firm performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47:70-91.
50. Spear, R. & E. Bidet (2005). Social enterprise for work integration in 12 european countries: A descriptive analysis. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 76:195-231.
51. Thilmany, D. (2006). The us organic industry: Important trends and emerging issues for the usda department of agricultural and resource economics. Department of agricultural and resource economics, Colorado State University.
52. Thomas, A., David, J. Nicholls, S. Forster & A. Westall (2004). Social Return on Investment: Valuing What Matters. Findings and Evaluation from a Pilot Study. New Economics Foundation. [Available Online] www.neweconomics.org/gen/z_sys_publicationdetail.aspx?pid=180.
53. Tuan, M. T. (2008). Measuring and/or Estimating Social Value Creation: Insights Into Eight Integrated Cost Approaches. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
54. Williams, C. A. & J. M. Conley (2005). An emerging third way? The erosion of the anglo-american shareholder value construct. Cornell international law journal, 38(2): 493-551.
55 Young, D. R. (2001). Organizational identity in nonprofit organizations: Strategic and structural implications. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 12(2):139-157.
56. Zappala, G. (2001). From "charity" to "social enterprise": Managing volunteers in public-serving nonprofits. Australian Journal on Volunteering, 6(1):41-49.
57. Zott, C., R. Amit (2007). Business model design and the performance of entrepreneurial. Organization Science, 18:181-199.
58. Zott C., R. Amit, L. Massa (2010). The business model: Theoretical roots, recent developments, and future research. WP-862, IESE.
59. Zott, C. & R. Amit (2008). The fit between product market strategy and business model: Implications for firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29:1-26.
60. Zott, C., & R. Amit (2009). The business model as the engine of network-based strategies. The network challenge, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Wharton School Publishing, 259-275.
61. Zott, C., R. Amit (2001). Value creation in e-business. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6-7):493-520.
中文部分
62. 李蒼郎（2005）。國內有機農產品之生產策略。優質安全農產品生產策略研
討會專刊。
63. 李崇僖（2008）。理念與實踐-有機農業的法政策課題。律師雜誌：11-21。
64. 林銘洲（2005）。台灣有機米消費者行為之研究。國立嘉義大學農學研究所。
65. 林銘洲（2010）。國內有機農業驗證與輔導。行政院農業委員會農糧署。
66. 倪禮豐（2011）。日本自然農法與循環農法簡介。花蓮區農業專訊 60：17-22。
67. 朱梓維（2010）。有機農業經營模式之探討-以里仁有機商店供應鏈為例，經營管理研究所，國立屏東商業技術學院。
68. 張山豐、李素箱（2009）。 有機農產品消費者購物導向之探討，休閒事業管理系，朝陽科技大學。
69. 陳金貴（2002）。非營利組織社會企業經營探討。新世紀智庫論壇19 期：39-51。
70. 吳品賢（2005）。有機，是生機或是商機？三個新竹組織化有機消費場域的分析。社會與文化研究所，國立交通大學。
71. 黃璋如、方正璽（2001）。有機蔬菜之生產者運銷通路與價格研究，農產運銷，123：42-53。
72. 黃璋如（2000）。有機蔬菜直接銷售之利弊與展望，農業經營管理年刊：652-68。
73. 溫惠貞（2007）。風險社會中的有機消費文化：臺灣有機消費的組織研究。社會學研究所，私立南華大學。
74. 張佩蓉（2008）。影響消費者網路購買有機蔬果之因素。公共事務管理研究所，國立中山大學。
75. 張舜翔（2011）。台灣精緻農業的產業發展機會。工業技術與資訊，236期。
76. 陳玠廷、蕭崑杉（2010）。臺灣「有機農業」的發展與未來展望。農業推廣文彙第 55 輯。
77. 陳素玲（2010）。有機商店印象、產品認知、服務態度、顧客滿意度及忠誠度影響因素之研究-以北區里仁商店為例。健康產業管理研究所.經國管理學院。
78. 管倖生、董皇志、阮綠茵（2007）。設計研究方法。台北：全華，129-144。
79. 黃怡靜（2011）。社會創業家如何成功地創造社會交換之價值？里仁公司之個案研究。科技管理研究所.國立台南大學。
80. 黃玉禎（2010）。里仁-賣不掉的好東西，創十億營收。商業週刊1178期。
81. 謝明晃（2010）。從國際導游到有機茶園經營者的觀點轉化歷程。休閒運動
研究所.雲林科技大學。
82. 有機.光復大地見生機（2006）。福智之聲出版社。
83. 健康食品好人生（2007）。福智之聲出版社。
參考網站：
1. Codex Alimentarius Commission，登入時間：2012年 2月1日，登入網址：http://www.codexalimentarius.org/。
2. EnviroWindows, European Environment Agency，登入時間：2012年 2月1日，登入網址：http://ew.eea.europa.eu/Agriculture/organic/Europe/of_in_europe/#eu_conference。
3. National Organic Program，取自USDA (U.S. Department of Agriculture)網站，登入時間：2012年6月29日，登入網址：http://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/ams.fetchTemplateData.do?template=TemplateA&navID=WhoWeAreNOPNationalOrganicProgramHome&rightNav1=WhoWeAreNOPNationalOrganicProgramHome&topNav=&leftNav=NationalOrganicProgram&page=NOPAboutUs&resultType=&acct=nopgeninfo。
4. OECD (2011), Society at a Glance 2011- OECD Social Indicators (www. oecd.org/els/social/indicators/SAG).
5. Supply Chain Council (SCC)，登入時間：2012年 2月1日，登入網址：http://supply-chain.org/。
6. Top 10 Reasons to Support Organic in the 21st Century（2012）登入時間：2012年 6月12日，登入網址：http://www.organic.org/articles/showarticle/article-206。
7. 縣市重要指標查詢系統（2012）中華民國統計資訊網，登入時間：2012年3月5日，登入網址：http://ebas1.ebas.gov.tw/pxweb/Dialog/statfile9.asp 。
8. 公務統計（2012）農糧署全球資訊網，登入時間：2012年 6月12日，登入網址：http://www.afa.gov.tw/GrainStatistics_index.asp?CatID=2。
9. 我國現階段有機農業政策與輔導成果（2012）登入時間：2012年 6月12日，登入網址：http://www.coa.gov.tw/view.php?catid=11924。
10 里仁公司網站，登入時間：2012年 6月5日，登入網址：http://www.leezen.com.tw。
11. 財團法人慈心有機農業發展基金會，登入時間：2012年 7月1日，登入網址：http://toaf.org.tw/9_1_1.asp?idno=18&mpage=1。
12. 農民組織與福利（2012）行政院農業委員會，登入時間：2012年 2月1日，登入網址：http://www.coa.gov.tw/view.php?catid=1041。
13. 有機農業簡介（2007）有機農業全球資訊網，登入時間：2012月6月5日，登入網站：http://info.organic.org.tw/supergood/front/bin/ptlist.phtml?Category=100981
14. 政府採取各項獎勵輔導措施，促進國內有機農業發展（2012）行政院農業委員會農糧署，登入時間：2012年 6月12日，登入網址：http://www.afa.gov.tw/agriculture_news_look.asp?NewsID=1688。
15. 認識佛陀教育（2012）登入時間：2012年 2月5日，登入網址：http://www.amtfweb.org/understand/whatisbuddhism.htm。 |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
企業管理研究所
99355018
102 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0099355018 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [企業管理學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
